nach oben

Social Justice Research

Erschienen in:

01.06.2015

Reality and Perception: Power and Paranoia Within the Political Sphere

Jan-Willem van Prooijen and Paul A. M. van Lange (eds.): Power, Politics and Paranoia: Why People are Suspicious of Their Leaders, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014

verfasst von: Heather J. Smith, Stephanie McKee

Erschienen in: Social Justice Research | Ausgabe 2/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Excerpt

The 16 chapters in the edited volume, Power, Politics and Paranoia (van Prooijen & van Lange, Editors) tie together three different content areas to reveal how research in these different areas can mirror and inform each other. The editors and authors address the validity of two observations often heard around dinner tables, written in newspaper articles and even observed during faculty meetings. On the one hand, does power corrupt (and absolute power corrupt absolutely, Lord Acton, 1972/1897)? On the other hand, are people unjustifiably paranoid about the degree to which the powerful conspire against them? The question is whether either of these observations is a reflection of people’s misperceptions or an indication that true political change is required. …

Vorheriger Artikel Expanding the Horizons of Social Justice Research: Three Essays on Justice Theory

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Bobo, L., & Kluegel, J. R. (1993). Opposition to race-targeting: Self interest, stratification ideology, or racial attitudes? American Sociological Review, 58(4), 443–464.CrossRef

Clark, M. S. (1984). Record keeping in two types of relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(3), 549–557. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.47.3.549.PubMedCrossRef

Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual-process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1861–1894.

Ellemers, N. (2002). Social identity and relative deprivation. In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development and integration (pp. 239–264). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Gurr, T. R. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Haley, H., & Sidanius, J. (2006). The positive and negative framing of affirmative action: A group dominance perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(5), 656–668. doi:10.1177/0146167205283442.PubMedCrossRef

Janis, I. L. (2007). Groupthink. In R. P. Vecchio (Ed.), Leadership: Understanding the dynamics of power and influence in organizations (2nd ed., pp. 157–169). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–920.CrossRef

Kay, A. C., Moscovitch, D. A., & Laurin, K. (2010). Randomness, attributions of arousal, and belief in God. Psychological Science, 21(2), 216–218. doi:10.1177/0956797609357750.PubMedCrossRef

LeBlanc, J., Beaton, A. M., & Walker, I. (submitted). The downside of being up: A new look at relative group privilege and traditional prejudice. Social Justice Research.

Lissak, R., & Sheppard, B. H. (1983). Beyond fairness: The criterion problem in research on dispute interventions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 45–65.CrossRef

Martin, J., Scully, M., & Levitt, B. (1990). Injustice and the legitimation of revolution: Damning the past, excusing the present, and neglecting the future. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 281–290.CrossRef

Mentovich, A. & Tyler, T. R. (2015). The power of fair procedures: The effect of procedural justice on perceptions of power and hierarchy. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University.

Opotow, S. (1994). Predicting protection: Scope of justice and the natural world. Journal of Social Issues, 50(3), 49–63. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02419.x.CrossRef

Platow, M. J., Hoar, S., Reid, S., Harley, K., & Morrison, D. (1997). Endorsement of distributively fair and unfair leaders in interpersonal and intergroup situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27(4), 465–494. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199707)27:4<465:AID-EJSP817>3.0.CO;2-8.CrossRef

Pratto, F., Lee, I., Tan, J. Y., & Pitpitan, E. Y. (2011). Power basis theory: A psychoecological approach to power. In D. Dunning (Ed.), Social motivation (pp. 191–222). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Sears, D. O. (1983). Person positivity bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 344, 233–250.CrossRef

Sheppard, B. H., & Lewicki, R. J. (1987). Toward general principles of managerial fairness. Social Justice Research, 1(2), 161–176.CrossRef

Simon, B., & Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56(4), 319–331.PubMedCrossRef

Smith, H. J., Pettigrew, T. F., Pippin, G. M., & Bialosiewicz, S. (2012). Relative deprivation: A theoretical and meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 203–232. doi:10.1177/1088868311430825.PubMedCrossRef

Sweetman, J., Leach, C. W., Spears, R., Pratto, F., & Saab, R. (2013). “I Have a Dream”: A typology of social change goals. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 1(1), 293–320. doi:10.5964/jspp.v1i1.85.CrossRef

Tajfel, H. (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1994). Theories of intergroup relations: International social psychological perspectives (2nd ed.). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group.

Tyler, T. R., Boeckmann, R. J., Smith, H. J., & Huo, Y. J. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. Denver, CO: Westview Press.

Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 994–1003. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.994.CrossRef

Titel: Reality and Perception: Power and Paranoia Within the Political Sphere
Jan-Willem van Prooijen and Paul A. M. van Lange (eds.): Power, Politics and Paranoia: Why People are Suspicious of Their Leaders, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014
verfasst von: Heather J. Smith
Stephanie McKee
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2015
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Social Justice Research / Ausgabe 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0885-7466
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6725
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-015-0238-6

Springer Professional

Excerpt

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2015

Forging Political Will from a Shared Vision: A Critical Social Justice Agenda Against Neoliberalism and Other Systems of Domination

A Leader’s Procedural Justice, Respect and Extra-role Behaviour: The Roles of Leader In-group Prototypicality and Identification

Expanding the Horizons of Social Justice Research: Three Essays on Justice Theory

Insidious Procedures: Diversity Awards Legitimize Unfair Organizational Practices