Skip to main content

Über dieses Buch

This book presents an analysis of the concept of the administrative act and its classification as ‘foreign’, and studies the administrative procedure for adopting administrative acts in a range of countries in and outside Europe. While focusing on the recognition and execution of foreign administrative acts, the book examines the validity, efficacy and enforceability of foreign administrative acts at national level. The book starts with a general analysis of the issue, offering general conclusions about the experiences in different countries. It then analyses the aforementioned themes from the perspective of the domestic law of different European nations and a number of international organisations (European Union, MERCOSUR, and Andean Community). In addition, the book studies the role of the European Union in the progress towards the recognition and execution of foreign administrative acts, where the principle of mutual recognition plays a vital part. Finally, the book analyses the international conventions on the recognition and execution of administrative acts and on the legalisation of public documents.



Chapter 1. Foreign Administrative Acts: General Report

Most countries recognise the notion of “administrative act” as an individual decision taken by a public authority to rule a specific case, submitted to public law and immediately enforceable and, in general, they also identified a foreign administrative act as the one issued by a foreign or international authority and submitted to foreign or international law. However, the existence of a international legal framework does not prevent the existence of broad differences on service, recognition and execution of these foreign administrative acts. It is necessary, to deepen the study of the transnational administrative act, paying special attention to how it affects the conception of the administrative act in different legal cultures and its potential impact on procedural rights and judicial guarantees of the recipients of such acts.
Jaime Rodríguez-Arana Muñoz, Marta García Pérez, Juan José Pernas García, Carlos Aymerich Cano

Chapter 2. The EU’s Role in the Progress Towards the Recognition and Execution of Foreign Administrative Acts: The Principle of Mutual Recognition and the Transnational Nature of Certain Administrative Acts

The EU has promoted the mutual recognition of national administrative acts and therefore helped provide extraterritorial effectiveness to the administrative decisions of the Member States. This phenomenon has been carried out in the EU through secondary legal norms, in areas where the EU has intense competence or powers. These community norms of secondary legislation are an expression of the principle of mutual recognition, which has been the axis around which the EU internal market has been built.
Juan José Pernas García

Chapter 3. The Incorporation of the Acts of the Andean Community of Nations into Internal Legal Systems

This work studies the effects of Andean communitarian law over the domestic administrative laws of the State members of the Andean Community of Nations. Specifically, it deals with the increase of sources of legality applicable to internal decisions. For this purpose, the work analyzes the reception of primary and secondary Andean communitarian law in Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Bolivia; and the status in which that communitarian law is embodied in such countries.
Libardo Rodríguez-Rodríguez, Jorge Enrique Santos-Rodríguez

Chapter 4. Recognition of Foreign Administrative Acts in Australia

This chapter describes the recognition of foreign administrative acts in the Australian context. The models available to determine how administrative acts of one state can be given effect by other states are considered, including mutual recognition, harmonisation and uniformity of requirements. A key issue is whether the enforcement of another state’s administrative acts should require a prior recognition or authorisation. The chapter analyses the recognition and enforcement of specofoc administrative acts within the federation of Australia as well as Australia’s recognition and enforcement arrangements with different countries.
Justice John Griffiths

Chapter 5. Foreign Administrative Acts in Brazil

The present work deals with administrative acts as studied in Brazil, with particular attention to foreign administrative acts, a subject still little known in Brazilian doctrine and practice. An administrative act in the Brazilian legal system arises when the public administrator expresses a Public Administration declaration of intent. It is always linked to a public purpose. The administrative act is foreign when it has the same elements of a national administrative act and also represents the manifestation of the will of the body or agent who is part of a foreign state. Brazil has no regulations about foreign administrative acts, which creates many problems related to recognition and enforcement of foreign administrative acts. The country has not ratified the Apostille Convention, as will be discussed in this work.
Romeu Felipe Bacellar Bacellar Filho, Tatyana Scheila Friedrich

Chapter 6. Foreign Administrative Acts: The Case of Estonia

Problems concerning transnational administrative acts have not yet induced the rise of a subject-related legal-theoretical writings in Estonia. On the practical level, however, Estonia has taken several various steps regarding recognition of foreign administrative acts. This has been done both on the basis of international law as well as within the framework of the EU law. Mutual trust, the principle of reciprocity and respect for the rule-of-law make it possible to move forward towards further actions to be taken in order to develop closer cooperation in this important sphere.
Vallo Olle, Triinu Rauk

Chapter 7. La reconnaissance des actes administratifs étrangers au droit français

According to French Law, administrative acts issued by foreign legal systems as well as the ones issued by international and global organisations can be qualified as administrative foreign acts. However, this is not the case of European secondary law acts wich must be considered like european administrative acts. Taking into account the scarce number of international services and the fact that the international conventions, specially the European ones, use to provide for specific proceedings for administrative assistance and service changes on domestic or European law in this area seems irrelevant.
Au droit français, les actes administratifs émanant de systèmes juridiques nationaux étrangers et les actes de droit dérivé des organisations internationales et globales pourront être qualifiés, du point de vue du droit interne français, comme des actes administratifs étrangers, mais tel ne sera pas le cas des actes de droit dérivé issu de l’Union européenne regardés comme administratifs du point de vue de l’Union. Compte tenu du faible nombre de notifications internationales, du fait que, dans les hypothèses les plus fréquentes –en droit de l’Union notamment-, des textes prévoient les règles et procédure d’assistance administrative et de notification internationale et compte tenu, enfin, de la nécessité de laisser une certaine souplesse dans ce domaine, une évolution du droit interne ou du droit européen en la matière semble peu pertinente.
M. Timothée Paris

Chapter 8. The Recognition of Foreign Administrative Acts: A German Perspective

The chapter examines the legal basis for the recognition of foreign administrative acts in Germany. Starting with a description of the concept of administrative acts in Germany, it gives an insight into the term “Verwaltungsakt” (general German concept of administrative acts) and its different forms, the question of entry into force and binding effect of administrative acts in Germany, the notification and promulgation by service of administrative acts, the enforcement of administrative acts in Germany and the division between German and foreign administrative acts. In the second part, the chapter deals with question of “proof of authenticity”, “translation” and the “execution” of foreign administrative acts in Germany. Doing so, the author distinguish clearly between beneficial and onerous administrative acts. The third part is build up on the context of transborder activities of German administration. Finally, the conclusion sums up the quite complex system of administrative acts in Germany in a transborder context.
Ulrich Stelkens, Michael Mirschberger

Chapter 9. On the Recognition of Foreign Administrative Acts in Greece

A framework for the recognition and enforcement of foreign administrative acts does not yet exist in Greece. National legislation should be adopted, taking into consideration criteria and methods which emerged from the academic and practical development of the concept of the transnational administrative act in the European Union. In order to achieve the aims of the European Union, common recognition and enforcement criteria and procedures should be adopted at European level, in order to have unified solutions which would facilitate the process in question.
Alexandra E. Douga

Chapter 10. La reconnaissance des actes administratifs étrangers en Hongrie

In Hungary there do already exist several mechanisms for the acceptance and execution of foreign acts. These mechanisms function well in the areas regulated especially by international or supranational law. As Hungary has not signed the European Convention on International Service, it would be certainly useful the EU to regulate this foreign notification. The procedure of assistance is very slow and difficult, it is not always possible to remove language barriers. If the authorities could notify the decisions directly abroad, this improved efficiency. The issue of language use should also be carefully managed. These problems are not likely to be solved at Member State level.
En Hongrie, il déjá existent des mécanismes á l’égard de l’acceptance et l’exécution des actes étrangéres. Ces mécanismes fonctionnent au meilleur dans les champs réglés par le droit supranational ou bien international. Il serait certainement très utile que l’UE réglemente la notification à l’étranger d’autant plus que la Hongrie n’a pas signé la Convention européenne sur la notification internationale. La procédure de l’entraide est très lente et difficile, il n’est pas toujours possible de démonter les barrières linguistiques. Si les autorités pouvaient notifier les décisions directement à l’étranger, cela améliorait l’efficacité. La question de l’utilisation de la langue devrait être également réglée avec soin. Ces problèmes ne sont pas susceptibles d’être réglés au niveau des États membres.
István Balázs, Marianna Nagy, Krisztina Rozsnyai

Chapter 11. From the Recognition of Foreign Acts to Trans-national Administrative Procedures

This paper suggests that a public law analysis of the recognition of foreign administrative acts or decision can contribute to the discussion between specialists of different fields of law. We are now in a position to appreciate why this might be the case. The aim is to show that under the traditional label “recognition”, there are two distinct models, each based on distinct underlying assumptions and producing different institutional and operational consequences.
Giacinto della Cananea

Chapter 12. Notion and Recognition of Foreign Administrative Acts in Poland

The subject of enforcement of foreign administrative acts has not been undertaken in Poland. Only some elements have been identified when discussing the problems of global administrative law, international administrative acts or EU administrative law. As it has been repeatedly raised above Polish law has also many gaps in that materia. The increasing importance of application of the international and foreign administrative acts should lead to new solutions in public international law. The European Union has the greatest opportunities and resources for creation of that kind of provisions under condition of the respect of the different forms of administrative activities (e.g. regulatory acts, single-case decisions) and numerous branches of administrative law (e.g. environmental law, construction law or tax law).
Zbigniew Kmieciak, Przemysław Florjanowicz-Błachut, Robert Siuciński

Chapter 13. Recognition of Foreign Administrative Acts in Portugal

The subject of recognition and enforcement of foreign administrative acts is not new, but is undergoing renewal and has recently attracted great interest from part of the Portuguese doctrine, mostly under the dogmatic of transnational acts. However not always greater attention means better regulation. And this is a field were, unlike what should be expected (or desired), plurality and fragmentation are still the rule and the need for clarification of recognition procedures is crucial. Indeed, beyond the recognition demands resulting from international and European Union law and from specific legislative provisions, there is no general framework on recognition and enforcement of foreign administrative acts, nor in what regards their possible effects, neither in what concerns the requirements and procedures from which they can or should be drawn.
Dulce Lopes

Chapter 14. Searching for Foreign Administrative Acts in Spanish Law

Although in Spain there is no explicit reference in the legislation of administrative procedure to the validity, efficacy and enforceability of foreign administrative acts, the international and european framework provides for instruments to fix most of the problems raised by foreign administrative acts, their service and their efficacy.
Carlos Aymerich Cano

Chapter 15. The Recognition of Foreign Administrative Decisions in Sweden

This contribution describes some basic features of the procedure relating to the recognition of foreign administrative decisions under Swedish law. After some comments on the general legal and theoretical framework relating to administrative decisions in Swedish law, the article discusses the preconditions for service of documents, including international aspects. The subsequent section discusses matters of validity, efficacy, and enforcement in relation to foreign administrative decisions. Thereafter, special attention is given the impact of EU law and international conventions. In the subsequent section, the development of doctrinal treatment of matters relating to recognition of foreign administrative decisions is described. Some general comments conclude the article.
Henrik Wenander

Chapter 16. The Recognition of Foreign Administrative Acts in Switzerland

The article focuses on the Recognition of Foreign Administrative Acts according to Swiss law. The Federal Act on Administrative Procedure delineates the concept of administrative act. It does not specifically mention foreign administrative acts. Their treatment is not unified in Switzerland. Much more it depends on the area concerned and blocking statutes may apply. With view to the role of the issue in Switzerland, efforts are underway to reconsider the regulatory situation. Overall, the doctrinal treatment of the subject is not very elaborated.
Myriam Senn

Chapter 17. Les actes administratifs étrangers et le droit turc

In Turkish Administrative Law, although the “administrative act” is a subject matter of a rich and detailed treatment, the same cannnot be said for the “foreign administrative act”. Thus, concerning foreign administrative acts neither positive law nor legal doctrine give precise explanations. This approach requires, therefore, to keep some distance between foreign administrative acts “and” Turkish (Administrative) Law. So, in order to explain the state of the Turkish Administrative law regarding foreign administrative acts, this study will first address the concept of administrative act and its qualification of “foreign” (1) then the legal framework regarding the notification of administrative decisions and foreignness (2) and finally the details of the Turkish Law on recognition, enforcement and legalization for foreign administrative acts (3).
En droit administratif turc, bien que l’« acte administratif » soit un sujet traité d’une manière riche et détaillée, il n’en est pas de même pour l’« acte administratif étranger ». Ainsi, concernant les actes administratifs étrangers, ni le droit positif, ni la doctrine juridique n’avancent d’explications précises. Cette approche oblige, donc, à garder une certaine distance entre les actes administratifs étrangers « et » le droit (administratif) turc. Eu égard à ladite distance et dans le but de faire le point sur l’état du droit administratif turc quant aux actes administratifs étrangers, cette étude abordera en premier lieu la conception d’acte administratif et sa qualification d’« étranger » (1), ensuite, le cadre juridique concernant la notification des actes administratifs et son caractère étranger (2) et, enfin, les précisions du droit turc concernant la reconnaissance, l’exécution et la légalisation des actes administratifs étrangers (3).
Çağla Tansuğ

Chapter 18. Recognition of Foreign Administrative Acts in the United States

The legal rules governing recognition in the United States of foreign administrative acts vary sharply depending on whether the foreign administrative act in question is covered by a mutual recognition agreement (MRA), which seeks to eliminate duplicative assessments in international trade of conformity of goods and services with applicable product and service standards, or similar treaties. Such agreements and their implementing legislation and regulation give a clear legal basis for recognition to the extent that they cover foreign administrative acts though in fact many do not. Otherwise, recognition is based on the common law, which provides for recognition--chiefly enforcement of money judgments or collateral estoppel on common issues, but excluding fines and penalties--in order to avoid duplicative litigation in situations in which there has already been a full and fair opportunity to litigate all relevant issues in connection with the issuance of the foreign administrative act. The common law is subject to exceptions to protect crucial U.S. public policies, but the act of state doctrine extends the scope of administrative acts that may be granted recognition in the United States by eliminating the defense of public policy in certain cases.
John C. Reitz
Weitere Informationen

Premium Partner

BranchenIndex Online

Die B2B-Firmensuche für Industrie und Wirtschaft: Kostenfrei in Firmenprofilen nach Lieferanten, Herstellern, Dienstleistern und Händlern recherchieren.



Wieviel digitale Transformation steckt im Informationsmanagement? Zum Zusammenspiel eines etablierten und eines neuen Managementkonzepts

Das Management des Digitalisierungsprozesses ist eine drängende Herausforderung für fast jedes Unternehmen. Ausgehend von drei aufeinander aufbauenden empirischen Untersuchungen lesen Sie hier, welche generellen Themenfelder und konkreten Aufgaben sich dem Management im Rahmen dieses Prozesses stellen. Erfahren Sie hier, warum das Management der digitalen Transformation als separates Konzept zum Informationsmanagement zu betrachten
und so auch organisatorisch separiert zu implementieren ist. Jetzt gratis downloaden!