nach oben

Erschienen in:

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Redesigning Resilient Infrastructure Research

verfasst von : Thomas P. Seager, Susan Spierre Clark, Daniel A. Eisenberg, John E. Thomas, Margaret M. Hinrichs, Ryan Kofron, Camilla Nørgaard Jensen, Lauren R. McBurnett, Marcus Snell, David L. Alderson

Erschienen in: Resilience and Risk

Verlag: Springer Netherlands

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Despite federal policy directives to strengthen the resilience of critical infrastructure systems to extreme weather and other adverse events, several knowledge and governance barriers currently frustrate progress towards policy goals, namely: (1) a lack of awareness of what constitutes resilience in diverse infrastructure applications, (2) a lack of judgement about how to create resilience, (3) a lack of incentives that motivate resilience creation, and (4) obstacles that prevent action or reform, even where incentives exist, within existing governance systems. In this chapter, we describe each of these barriers in greater detail and provide a catalog of theories for overcoming them. Regarding awareness, we contrast four different characterizations of resilience as rebound, robustness, graceful extensibility, and sustained adaptability. We apply Integral Theory to demonstrate the necessity of integrating multiple investigative perspectives. Further, we illustrate the importance of recognizing resilience as a set of processes, in addition to resources and outcomes, and the difficulty of measuring quality and quality of resilience actions. Regarding judgement, we position infrastructure as the principal mechanism by which human rights are realized as human capabilities, and propose applying theories of human development such as Maslow’s hierarchy of needs to identify the most critical infrastructure in terms of the services they provide to end users. Regarding a lack of incentives, we examine the modes and tools of financial analysis by which investments in resilience infrastructure may be prioritized and find two failings: the difficulty of estimating the monetary value of optionality, and the problem of exponential discounting of future cash flows. Regarding obstacles to action, we describe a hierarchy of adaptive actions applicable to physical infrastructure and the essential dimensions of organizational maturity that determine how these adaptive actions might be initiated. Additionally, we discuss the difficulty of education and training for resilient infrastructure systems and propose simulation gaming as an integrative research and education approach for capturing lessons learned from historical catastrophes, play-testing scenarios, sharing knowledge, and training a workforce prepared for the challenges of the post-industrial infrastructure age. Finally, we suggest establishing a National Network for Resilient Infrastructure Simulation to coordinate research and practice focused on interactive case studies in resilient infrastructure systems.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Towards a Generic Resilience Management, Quantification and Development Process: General Definitions, Requirements, Methods, Techniques and Measures, and Case Studies

Nächstes Kapitel Designing Resilient Systems

In Thomas Jefferson’s time, the printing press was a technology platform considered so essential to freedom of speech that it was written directly into the 1st amendment. In today’s age, this right might be expressed as freedom to tweet.

Other multidimensional lists and conceptions of human well-being have been generated and vary according to the questions that each author seek to address and the context of operation; see Alkire (2002) and Hall et al. (2010) for a discussion and comparison of different approaches.

Maslow acknowledges that his hierarchy suggests a degree of fixity, even though some people will be motivated by needs in a different order. He discusses how the hierarchy does not usually occur in a step-wise fashion as the pyramid implies. A more realistic description of the hierarchy is decreasing percentages of satisfaction as one moves up the pyramid.

Maslow’s hierarchy has resonated across many disciplines, from psychology, to education, business, engineering, and technology because it organizes a very complex topic into a cognitively appealing and intuitive model. Its popularity stems from the model’s relative simplicity and hierarchical nature which allows for more practical application, yet these characteristics are also heavily criticized. Alkire (2002) argue that dimensions of human development should be nonhierarchical because what seems most important to an individual will change over time, depending on the situation and context. Others contend that people are capable of higher order needs such as love and belonging, even if their basic psychological needs are unmet.

Moral hazard refers to the externalization of risks to third parties, even in the absence of the intent to cause harm (Pauly 1968). Where the benefits of risk taking accrue to those making the decision to take risks, but the downsides accrue to others, the distortion causes decision-makers with “skin in the game” (Taleb 2012) to place irresponsible bets with poor expected social outcomes. The complementary concept is moral luck (Nagel 1993), which refers to the tendency to judge the moral worthiness of actions by their outcome, rather than intent. Because in complex systems, outcomes will never perfectly align with intentions, judging exclusively on the basis of outcome leaves open the possibility that some poor, or irresponsible decisions may nevertheless be judged morally worthy simply out of good fortune. A more complete description of the relationship between these two fascinating philosophical concepts and resilience must be left for some future publication.

Conation is an obscure word that describes volition, or willful action. Conation describes behavior that is purposeful striving, rather than recreational or hedonic.

Abt C (1970) Serious games. Viking Press, New York

Achard S (2006) A resilient, low-frequency, small-world human brain functional network with highly connected association cortical hubs. J Neurosci 26(1):63–72CrossRef

Adibi MM, Fink LH (2006) Restoration from cascading failures. IEEE Power and Energ Mag 4(5):68–77CrossRef

Alberts D, Huber RK, Moffat J (2010) NATO NECe C2 Maturity Model, Available at: http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA555717. Accessed 15 Feb 2017

Alderson DL, Doyle JC (2010) Contrasting views of complexity and their implications for network-centric infrastructures. IEEE Trans Syst ManCybernPart A Syst Hum 40(4):839–852CrossRef

Alderson DL, Brown GG, Carlyle WM (2014) Assessing and improving operational resilience of critical infrastructures and other systems. In: Bridging Data and Decisions, INFORMS pp 180–215

Alderson DL, Brown GG, Carlyle WM (2015) Operational models of infrastructure resilience. Risk Anal 35(4):562–586CrossRef

Alexander DE (2013) Resilience and disaster risk reduction: an etymological journey. NatHazards Earth Syst Sci 13(11):2707–2716. Available at: http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/13/2707/2013/. Accessed 30 Jan 2014

Alkire S (2002) Dimensions of human development. World Dev 30(2):181–205CrossRef

Andersson G et al (2005) Causes of the 2003 major grid blackouts in North America and Europe, and recommended means to improve system dynamic performance. IEEE Trans Power Syst 20(4):1922–1928CrossRef

Ayres RU, Axtell R (1996) Foresight as a survival characteristic: when (if ever) does the long view pay? Technol Forecast Soc Chang 51(3):209–235CrossRef

Barry J (1997) Rising tide: the great Mississippi flood of 1927 and how it changed America. Simon & Schuster, New York

Berkes F, Ross H (2012) Community resilience: toward an integrated approach. Soc Nat Resour 26(1):5–20CrossRef

Bonanno GA (2004) Loss, truama, and human resilience: have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely adverse events? Am Psychol 59(1):20–28CrossRef

Bowser M (2016) Last night the district failed to deploy the necessary resources in response to the snow – for that I am sorry. Twitter 21 January 2016. Available at: https://twitter.com/mayorbowser/status/690196235593080832. Accessed 13 Feb 2017

Brewer G, Shubik M (1979) The war game: a critique of military problem solving. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

Chen Y-Z, Huang Z-G, Zhang H-F, Eisenberg DA, Seager TP, Lai Y-C (2014) Extreme events in multilayer, interdependent complex networks and control. Sci Rep 5:17277CrossRef

Cioppa TM, Lucas TW, Sanchez SM (2004) Military applications of agent-based simulations. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation conference. IEEE, pp 165–174

Clark SS, Chester MV (2016) A hybrid approach for assessing the multi-scale impacts of urban resource use: transportation in phoenix, Arizona. J Ind Ecol 21(1):136–150CrossRef

Clark SS, Berardy A, Hannah M, Seager TP, Selinger E, Mikanda JV (2015) The role of tacit knowledge in facilitating globally distributed virtual teams: lessons learned from using games and social media in the classroom. Connexions 3(1):113–151

Clark SS, Chester MV, Seager TP (2017) The vulnerability of interdependent urban infrastructure systems to climate change: could phoenix experience a Katrina of extreme heat? Climactic Change. Under review. Prepublication draft. Available at https://awsum.box.com/v/2017Clark-KatrinaExtremeHeat. Accessed 15 Feb 2017

Connor K (2006) Assessment of resilience in the aftermath of trauma. J Clin Psychiatry 67(2):46–49MathSciNet

Department of Defense (DoD) (2016) DoD directive 3020.40: mission assurance, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, Washington, DC, Effective: November 29, 2016

Department of Homeland Security (DHS) (2013) National Infrastructure Protection Plan (NIPP): partnering for critical infrastructure security and resilience. Available at: https://www.dhs.gov/national-infrastructure-protection-plan. Accessed 15 Feb 2017

Dörner D (1996) The logic of failure: recognizing and avoiding error in complex situations. Basic Books, New York

Eisenberg, D.A., Park, J., Kim, D., Seager, T.P. (2014). Resilience analysis of critical infrastructure systems requires integration of multiple analytical techniques. Figshare. Available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3085810.v1. Accessed 15 Feb 2017

Esbjörn-hargens S (2010) An overview of integral theory. In: Esbjörn-hargens S (ed) Integral theory in action: applied, theoretical, and constructive perspectives on the AQAL model. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp 33–61

Esbjörn-hargens S, Zimmerman MA (2009) Integral ecology, uniting multiple perspectives on the natural world. Integral Books, Boston

Flynn SE (2016) Five impediments to building societal resilience. In IRGC Resource Guide on Resilience pp 1–4. Available at https://www.irgc.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Flynn-Five-Impediments-to-Building-Societal-Resilience.pdf. Accessed 14 Feb 2017

Fox-Lent C, Bates M, Linkov I (2015) A matrix approach to community resilience assessment: an illustrative case at Rockaway Peninsula. EnvironSyst Decis 35:209–218

Ganin AA, Massaro E, Gutfraind A, Steen N, Keisler JM, Kott A, Mangoubi R, Linkov I (2016) Operational resilience: concepts, design and analysis. Sci Rep 6:19540CrossRef

GAO (2013) Critical infrastructure protection: DHS list of priority assests needs to be validated and reported to congress. United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters. Available at: http://www.gao.gov/assets/660/653300.pdf

GAO (2014) Critical infrastructure protection: DHS action needed to enhance integration and coordination of vulnerability assessment efforts. United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters. Available at: http://www.gao.gov/assets/670/665788.pdf

Gim C, Kennedy EB, Spierre Clark S, Millar CA, Ruddell B (2017) Institutions in critical infrastructure resilience. J Infrastruct Syst Under review. Prepublication draft available at https://awsum.box.com/v/2017Gim-InstitutionalLayering. Accessed 15 Feb 2017

Google Ngram (2017a) https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=resilience&year_start=1800&year_end=2015&corpus=15&smoothing=3&share=&direct&direct_url=t1%3B%2Cresilience%3B%2Cc0. Accessed 14 Feb 2017

Google Ngram (2017b) https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=risk_NOUN%2Crisk_VERB%2Cresilience&year_start=1800&year_end=2015&corpus=15&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2Crisk_NOUN%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Crisk_VERB%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cresilience%3B%2Cc0. Accessed 15 Feb 2017

Grant R (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strateg Manag J 17:109–122CrossRef

Grant GB, Seager TP, Massard G, Nies L (2010) Information and communication technology for industrial symbiosis. J Ind Ecol 14(5):40–753CrossRef

Hall J et al (2010) A framework to measure the progress of societies, OECD statistics working papers, 2010/05. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5km4k7mnrkzw-en

Hamilton C, Adolphs S, Nerlich B (2007) The meanings of “risk”: a view from corpus linguistics. Discourse Soc 18(2):163–181CrossRef

Hammond J (2004) Simulation in critical care and trauma education and training. Curr Opin Crit Care 10(5):325–329CrossRef

Hannah ST, Avolio BJ, May DR (2011) Moral maturation and moral conation: a capacity approach to explaining moral thought and action. Acad Manag Rev 36:663–685

Hayden BY (2016) Time discounting and time preference in animals: a critical review. Psychon Bull Rev 23:39–53CrossRef

Hays RT et al (1992) Flight simulator training effectiveness: a meta-analysis. Mil Psychol 4(2):63–74CrossRef

Hinrichs MM, Seager TP, Tracy SJ, Hannah MA (2017) Innovation in the knowledge age: implications for collaborative science. Environ Syst Decis In press. doi:10.1007/s10669-016-9610-9

Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23CrossRef

Hollnagel E (2014) Resilience engineering and the built environment. Build Res Inf 42(2):221–228CrossRef

Hollnagel E, Woods DD, Leveson N (2007) Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts. Ashgate Publishing Ltd., Aldershot

Homeland Security Council (HSC) (2007) National strategy for homeland security. The White House, Washington, DC

Hubbard DW (2009) The failure of risk management: why it’s broken and how to fix it. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken

Irwin AR (2000) Historical case studies: teaching the nature of science in context. Sci Educ 84(1):5–26CrossRef

Kapucu N, Garayev V (2014) Structure and network performance: horizontal and vertical networks in emergency management. Adm Soc 48(8):931–961CrossRef

Kapucu N, Garayev V, Wang X (2013) Sustaining networks in emergency management. Public Perform Manag Rev 37(1):104–133CrossRef

Kirschen D, Bouffard F (2009) Keeping the lights on and the information flowing. IEEE Power and Energ Mag 7(1):50–60CrossRef

Kneebone R (2003) Simulation in surgical training: educational issues and practical implications. Med Educ 37(3):267–277CrossRef

Kolb DA (2014) Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. FT press

Larkin S, Fox-Lent C, Eisenberg DA, Trump BD, Wallace S, Chadderton C, Linkov I (2015) Benchmarking agency and organizational practices in resilience decision making. Environment Systems and Decisions 35(2):185–195CrossRef

Linkov I, Bridges T, Creutzig F, Decker J, Fox-Lent C, Kröger W, Lambert JH, Levermann A, Montreuil B, Nathwani J, Nyer R (2014) Changing the resilience paradigm. Nat Clim Chang 4(6):407–409CrossRef

Madni AM, Jackson S (2009) Towards a conceptual framework for resilience engineering. IEEE Syst J 3(2):181–191CrossRef

March JG, Sproull LS, Tamuz M (1991) Learning from samples of one or fewer. Organ Sci 2(1):1–13CrossRef

Maslow AH (1943) A theory of human motivation. Psychol Rev 50(4):370CrossRef

Masten AS (2014) Ordinary magic: resilience in development. The Guilford Press, Upper Saddle River

Munoz G (2015) Capistrano Taxpayers Association, Inc. v. City of San Juan Capistrano, Court of Appeal of the State of California Fourth Appellate District Division Three, Super. Ct. No. 30-2012-00594579. Available at http://wilcoxbenumof.blazonco.com/files/articles/G048969.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2017

Nagel T (1993) Moral luck. In: Russell P, Deery O (eds) Essential readings from the contemporary debates. Oxford University Press, Oxford

National Security Council (NSC) (2007) National Continuity Policy Implementation Plan. The White House, Washington, DC

Navvaro P (2004) On the political economy of electricity deregulation—California style. Electr J 17(2):47–54CrossRef

Noltemeyer AL, Bush KR (2013) Adversity and resilience: a synthesis of international research. Sch Psychol Int 34(5):474–487CrossRef

Norris FH, Stevens SP, Pfefferbaum B, Wyche KF, Pfefferbaum RL (2008) Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. Am J Community Psychol 41(1–2):127–150CrossRef

Nussbaum M (2000) Women and human development: the capabilities approach. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef

Nussbaum M (2003) Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Fem Econ 9(2–3):33–59CrossRef

Nussbaum M (2006) Frontiers of justice: disability, nationality, species membership. Harvard University Press, London

Nussbaum M, Sen A (1992) The quality of life. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Olson K, Morton L (2012) The impacts of 2011 induced levee breaches on agricultural lands of Mississippi River valley. J Soil Water Conserv 67(1):5A–10ACrossRef

Ouyang M (2014) Review on modeling and simulation of interdependent critical infrastructure systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 121:43–60CrossRef

Park J, Seager TP, Rao PSC, Convertino M, Linkov I (2013) Integrating risk and resilience approaches to catastrophe management in engineering systems. Risk Anal 33(3):356–367CrossRef

Pauly MV (1968) The economics of moral hazard: comment. Am Econ Rev 58(3, Part 1):531–537

Perrow C (1984) Normal accidents: living with high-risk technologies. Basic Books, New York

Petit F et al (2015) Analysis of critical infrastructure dependencies and interdependencies. Argonne National Lab Report ANL/GSS-15/4. Available at: http://www.ipd.anl.gov/anlpubs/2015/06/111906.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2017

Petrenj B, Lettieri E, Trucco P (2012) Towards enhanced collaboration and information sharing for critical infrastructure resilience: current barriers and emerging capabilities. Int J Crit Infrastruct 8:107CrossRef

Petrenj B, Lettieri E, Trucco P (2013) Information sharing and collaboration for critical infrastructure resilience – a comprehensive review on barriers and emerging capabilities. Int J Crit Infrastruct 9(4):304–329CrossRef

Pourbeik P, Kundur PS, Taylor CW (2006) The anatomy of a power grid blackout. IEEE Power Energ Mag 4(5):22–29CrossRef

Rinaldi SM, Peerenboom JP, Kelly TK (2001) Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies. IEEE Control Syst Mag 21(6):11–25CrossRef

Sadowski J, Seager TP, Selinger E, Spierre SG, Whyte KP (2013) An experiential, game-theoretic pedagogy for sustainability ethics. Sci Eng Ethics 19(3):1323–1339CrossRef

Sadowski J, Spierre SG, Selinger E, Seager TP, Adams EA, Berardy A (2015) Intergroup cooperation in common pool resource dilemmas. Sci Eng Ethics 21(5):1197–1215CrossRef

Sage D, Zebrowski C (2016) Resilience and critical infrastructure: origins, theories and critiques. In: Dover R, Huw D, Goodman MS (eds) The Palgrave handbook of security, risk and intelligence. Palgrave MacMillan, London

Seager TP (2008) The sustainability spectrum and the sciences of sustainability. Bus Strateg Environ 17(7):444–453CrossRef

Seager TP, Hinrichs MM (2017) Technology and science: innovation at the international symposium on sustainable systems and technology. Environ Syst Decis In press. doi:10.1007/s10669-017-9630-0

Seager TP et al (2007) Typological review of environmental performance metrics (with illustrative examples for oil spill response). Integr Environ Assess Manag 3(3):310–321CrossRef

Seager TP, Selinger E, Whiddon D, Schwartz D, Spierre S, Berardy A (2010) Debunking the fallacy of the individual decision-maker: an experiential pedagogy for sustainability ethics. In: Sustainable Systems and Technology (ISSST), 2010 IEEE international symposium on IEEE, pp 1–5

Seager TP, Gisladottirb V, Mancillas J, Roege P, Linkov I (2017) Inspiration to operation: securing net benefits vs. zero outcome. J Clean Prod 148:422–426CrossRef

Selinger E, Sadowski J, Seager TP (2015) Gamification and morality. In: Waltz SP, Deterding S (eds) The gameful world: approaches, issues, applications. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 371–392

Selinger E, Seager TP, Spierre, S, Schwartz D (2016) Using sustainability games to elicit moral hypotheses from scientists and engineers. Rethinking climate change research: clean technology, culture and communication, Routledge, pp 117–128

Sen A (1999a) Commodities and capabilities. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Sen A (1999b) Development as freedom. Anchor Books, New York

Sterman J (1994) Learning in and about complex systems. Syst Dyn Rev 10(2–3):291–330CrossRef

Stranger W (2013) California wastewater rates: life after Bighorn v Verjil. California Water Law J. Available at: http://waterlawjournal.com/california-wastewater-rates-life-after-bighorn-v-verjil

Taleb NN (2005) Fooled by randomness: the hidden role of chance in life and in the markets. Random House, New York

Taleb NN (2012) Antifragile: things that gain from disorder. Random House, New York

Tennyson RD, Jorczak RL (2008) A conceptual framework for the empirical study of instructional games. In: O’Neil HF, Perez RS (eds) Computer games and team and individual learning. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 39–54

Thomas JB, Watts Sussman S, Henderson JC (2001) Understanding “Strategic Learning”: linking organizational learning, knowledge management, and sensemaking. Organ Sci 12(3):331–335CrossRef

Toft B, Reynolds S (2016) Learning from disasters. Springer, New York

Wilber K (2001) A theory of everything: an integral vision for business, politics, science, and spirituality. Shambhala Publications, Boston

Winkler R (2006) Does ‘better’ discounting lead to ‘worse’ outcomes in long-run decisions? The dilemma of hyperbolic discounting. Ecol Econ 57(4):573–582CrossRef

Woods DD (2015) Four concepts for resilience and the implications for the future of resilience engineering. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 141:5–9CrossRef

Yadav A et al (2007) Teaching science with case studies: a national survey of faculty perceptions of the benefits and challenges of using cases. J Coll Sci Teach 37(1):34MathSciNet

Zautra A, Hall J, Murray K (2008) Community development and community resilience: an integrative approach. Community Dev 39(3):130–147CrossRef

Zhang S-P, Huang Z-G, Dong J-Q, Eisenberg DA, Seager TP, Lai Y-C (2015) Optimization and resilience of complex supply-demand networks. New J Phys 17(6):063029CrossRef

Zimmerman R, Restrepo CE (2006) The next step: quantifying infrastructure interdependencies to improve security. Int J Crit Infrastruct 2:215–230CrossRef

Ziv A, Small SD, Wolpe PR (2000) Patient safety and simulation-based medical education. Med Teach 22(5):489–495CrossRef

Titel: Redesigning Resilient Infrastructure Research
verfasst von: Thomas P. Seager
Susan Spierre Clark
Daniel A. Eisenberg
John E. Thomas
Margaret M. Hinrichs
Ryan Kofron
Camilla Nørgaard Jensen
Lauren R. McBurnett
Marcus Snell
David L. Alderson
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Buch: Resilience and Risk
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1122-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-94-024-1123-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1123-2_3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"