Skip to main content

Exploring the Relationship Between Technology Education and Educational Sloyd

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Technology Education

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE))

  • 276 Accesses

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to investigate the relationship between Technology education and Educational sloyd (slöjd) in Sweden from the early 1960s until today. It is concluded that the technology subject domain during this period has modernized and become broader and broader, including a systems component. Educational sloyd, on the other hand, partly contains modern, technology-related components but also partly remains a subject emphasizing knowledge and skills rooted in a rural society including elements such as manual handicraft, tool management, aesthetic skills, as well as personal development. The most notable difference between the two subjects lies in their philosophical foundations. Technology education is about various aspects of the human-made world. Its main interest is technology itself; what it is, how it evolves, and how we as humans conceive, design, use, and manage technology. Educational sloyd, on the other hand, is mainly about human development, human capabilities of creating, crafting, working, and developing. However, the curriculum overlap between the two subjects is strikingly similar, and a major part of sloyd can therefore also be seen as a part of the field of Technology education today.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andersson, Y. (1988). Teknikämnet på grundskolans mellanstadium. Linköping: Linköping University, Department of Education and Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, F., & McCormick, R. (2006). A case study of the inter-relationship between science and technology: England 1984–2004. In M. J. de Vries & I. Mottier (Eds.), International handbook of technology education: Reviewing the past twenty years. Rotterdam/Taipei: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlex, D., & Stevens, M. (2012). Making by printing – Disruption inside and outside school? In T. Ginner, J. Hallström, & M. Hultén (Eds.), The PATT 26 conference Stockholm, Sweden 26–30 June 2012, technology education in the 21st century. Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjurulf, V. (2008). Teknikämnets gestaltningar. En studie av lärares arbete med skolämnet teknik. Karlstad: Karlstad University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, K. (1995). Slöjdämnet i förändring 1962–1994. Linköping: Linköping University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, K. (2001). Slöjdämnet. Intryck – uttryck- avtryck. Linköping: Linköping University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bungum, B. (2006a). Teknologi og design i nye læreplaner i Norge: Hvilken vinkling har fagområdet fått i naturfagplanen? NorDiNa, 4, 28–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bungum, B. (2006b). Transferring and transforming technology education: A study of Norwegian teachers’ perceptions of ideas from design & technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 16, 31–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlgren, I. (2013). Hurusom teknik kom att skiljas från naturvetenskap i ‘Skola för bildning’. In J. Hallström & C. Klasander (Eds.), The Ginner handbook of technology education: Some theses about technology, school and society. Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compulsory School Syllabuses 2000. (2009). (Rev. Version 2008. ed.). Stockholm: Swedish National Agency for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and the recreation centre 2011. (2011). Stockholm: Swedish National Agency for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dakers, J. R. (Ed.). (2006). Defining technological literacy: Towards an epistemological framework (1st ed.). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, M. J. (1994). Technology education in Western Europe. In D. Layton (Ed.), Innovations in science and technology education (Vol. V). Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, M. J. (2006). Two decades of technology education in retrospect. In M. J. de Vries & I. Mottier (Eds.), International handbook of technology education: Reviewing the past twenty years (pp. 3–10). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, M. J., & Mottier, I. (Eds.). (2006). International handbook of technology education: Reviewing the past twenty years. Rotterdam/Taipei: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgström, O., & Riis, U. (1990). Läroplansprocesser och förhandlingsdynamik. Exemplet obligatorisk teknik i grundskolan. Linköping: Tema teknik och social förändring.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundskolan. Kursplaner, betygskriterier. (1996). Stockholm: Skolverket.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsson, B. (1996). Bildning i vår tid. Om bildningens möjligheter och villkor i det moderna samhället. Stockholm: Wahlström & Widstrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallström, J. (2009). Technical knowledge in a technical society: Elementary school technology education in Sweden, 1919–1928. History of Education, 38(4), 455–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallström, J. (2011). Looking back in order to move forward: The position of technology education in past Swedish curricula. In M. J. De Vries (Ed.), Positioning technology education in the curriculum (pp. 21–38). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hallström, J. (2013). Samhällslivet, tekniken och skolan. Teknik i fortsättningsskolans medborgarkunskap, 1918–1936. In J. Hallström, M. Hultén, & D. Lövheim (Eds.), Teknik som kunskapsinnehåll i svensk skola 1842–2010 (pp. 147–165). Möklinta: Gidlunds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallström, J., Hultén, M., & Lövheim, D. (2014). The study of technology as a field of knowledge in general education: Historical insights and methodological considerations from a Swedish case study, 1842–2010. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(2), 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallström, J., Klasander, C., & Svensson, M. (2015). The black box and beyond: Introducing a conceptual model as a learning tool for developing knowledge about technological systems. In M. Chatoney (Ed.), PATT 29 plurality and complementarity of approaches in design & technology education, Marseille, France, April 2015. Marseille: Presses Universitaires de Provence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, S. G., Thorbjörnsson, H., & Trotzig, E. (1995). Handens pedagogik. Kulturarv och utveckling i skolslöjden. Linköping: Linköpings universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasselskog, P. (2010). Slöjdlärares förhållningssätt i undervisningen. Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herschbach, D. R. (1996). ‘What is past is prologue’: Industrial arts and technology education. Journal of Technology Studies, 22(1), 28–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, T. P. (2004). Human-built world: How to think about technology and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hultén, M. (2013). Technology as the language of schooling: Utopian visions of technology in Swedish general education in the 1960s. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(3), 581–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, E. W. (1997). Technological literacy: Concepts and constructs. Journal of Technology Studies, 23(1), 2–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, M. (2002). Slöjdpraktik i skolan – hand, tanke, kommunikation och andra medierande redskap. Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A., & Moreland, J. (2002). Technology education in New Zealand. Journal of Technology Studies, 28(1/2), 130–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A., Buntting, C., & de Vries, M. J. (2013). The developing field of technology education: A review to look forward. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(2), 191–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaijser, A. (2004). The dynamics of infrasystems: Lessons from history. Paper presented at the summer academy 2004 “Urban infrastructure in transition: What can we learn from history”, Inter-University Research Centre for Technology, Work and Culture, Graz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kananoja, T. (1994). Technology education in the nordic countries. In D. Layton (Ed.), Innovations in science and technology education (Vol. V, pp. 45–58). Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klasander, C. (2010). Talet om tekniska system. Förväntningar, traditioner och skolverkligheter. Norrköping: Linköpings universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Läroplan för grundskolan, Lgr 80, Allmän del. (1980). Stockholm: Skolöverstyrelsen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layton, D. (1994). A school subject in the making? The search for fundamentals. In D. Layton (Ed.), Innovations in science and technology education (Vol. V). Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leponiemi, T., Virtanen, S., & Rasinen, A. (2012). Design and assessment in technology education – Case: The “birdhouse band” project. In T. Ginner, J. Hallström, & M. Hultén (Eds.), Technology education in the 21st century: The PATT 26 conference Stockholm, Sweden 26–30 June 2012 (pp. 460–467). Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, T., & Zuga, K. F. (2005). A conceptual framework of ideas and issues in technology education. Arlington: Technology Teacher In-service Education & National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liedman, S.-E. (2001). Ett oändligt äventyr. Om människans kunskaper. Stockholm: Bonnier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lövheim, D. (2010). An epistemology of one’s own: Curricular (re-)construction of school technology and non-technology in Sweden, 1975–1995. History of Education, 39(4), 525–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niiranen, S. (2016). Female technical craft teachers in a key role in developing Finnish technology education. In M. J. de Vries, A. Bekker-Holtland, & G. van Dijk (Eds.), PATT-32 proceedings: Technology education for 21st century skills. Utrecht: University of Applied Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ödman, P.-J. (2007). Tolkning, förståelse, vetande. Hermeneutik i teori och praktik. Stockholm: Norstedts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, G., & Young, A. T. (Eds.). (2002). Technically speaking: Why all Americans need to know more about technology. Washington: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postholm, M.-B. (2006). Assessment during project work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 150–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasinen, A., Virtanen, S., Endepohls-Ulpe, M., Ikonen, P., Ebach, J., & Stahl von Zabern, J. (2009). Technology education for children in primary schools in Finland and Germany: Different school systems, similar problems and how to overcome them. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(4), 367–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riis, U. (2013). Teknik – mellan slöjd och naturvetenskap. In J. Hallström & C. Klasander (Eds.), The Ginner handbook of technology education: Some theses about technology, school and society. Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelsson, M., Samuelsson, J., & Autio, O. (2015). Tracing patterns of sloyd teachers’ efficacy beliefs at different stages of their professional careers. Techne Series: Research in Sloyd Education and Craft Science, 22(1), 30–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzberg, E. (2006). Technik comes to America: Changing meanings of technology before 1930. Technology and Culture, 47(3), 486–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjögren, J. (1997). Teknik – genomskinlig eller svart låda? Att bruka, se och förstå teknik – en fråga om kunskap. Linköping: Linköping University, Department of Technology and Social Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stables, K., & Keirl, S. (Eds.). (2015). Environment, ethics and cultures: Design and technology education’s contribution to sustainable global futures. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subjects & Curriculum. (2015). Retrieved 9 Oct 2015, from eng.uvm.dk

  • Swedish Sloyd Curriculum, Lpo 94. (2000). Retrieved from: www.skolverket.se

  • Swedish Technology Curriculum, Lpo 94. (2000). Retrieved from: www.skolverket.se

  • Teknikämnet i träda. Teknikföretagens och CETIS rapport om teknikundervisningen i grundskolan. (2012). Stockholm: Teknikföretagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virtanen, S., Räikkönen, E., & Ikonen, P. (2015). Gender-based motivational differences in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25(2), 197–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, D. J. (2014). The impact and legacy of educational sloyd: Head and hands in harness. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. J. (2013). Research in technology education: Looking back to move forward. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuga, K. F. (1997). An analysis of technology education in the United States based upon an historical overview and review of contemporary curriculum research. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7(3), 203–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonas Hallström .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Hallström, J. (2017). Exploring the Relationship Between Technology Education and Educational Sloyd. In: de Vries, M. (eds) Handbook of Technology Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38889-2_13-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38889-2_13-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-38889-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-38889-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics