Skip to main content

Classification of UAVs

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

Abstract

Different UAV classification schemes have been proposed to help differentiate existing systems based on their operational characteristics and their capabilities. Several of these schemes are also of regulatory importance since the metrics used directly correlate with risk from ground impact or midair collision accidents. This chapter provides characteristic UAV classifications from a variety of sources, both civilian and military.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,399.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Civil Aviation Authority of New Zealand, Unmanned aerial vehicles. Wellington, New Zealand, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Clough, Metrics, schmetrics! How do you track a UAV’s autonomy? in Proceedings of the AIAA 1st Technical Conference and Workshop on Unmanned Aerospace Vehicles, Portsmouth, 2002a

    Google Scholar 

  • B.T. Clough, Unmanned aerial vehicles: autonomous control challenges, a researcher’s perspective, in Cooperative Control and Optimization, chap. 3, ed. by R. Murphey, P.M. Pardalos (Kluwer, Dordrecht/Boston, 2002b), pp. 35–53

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Dalamagkidis, K. Valavanis, L. Piegl, On Integrating Unmanned Aircraft Systems into the National Airspace System: Issues, Challenges, Operational Restrictions, Certification, and Recommendations, Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering, vol. 36, 2nd edn. (Springer, Dordrecht/New York, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), A-NPA, No. 16/2005, policy for unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) certification, Köln, Germany, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Agencies Ad Hoc Autonomy Levels for Unmanned Systems (ALFUS) Working Group (WG), Autonomy Levels for Unmanned Systems (ALFUS) Framework – Version 1.1. NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • D.R. Haddon, C.J. Whittaker, Aircraft airworthiness certification standards for civil UAVs. UK Civil Aviation Authority, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Hempe, Unmanned aircraft systems in the United States. Presented to the US/Europe international safety conference, Vienna, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • H.M. Huang, Autonomy levels for unmanned systems (ALFUS) framework: safety and application issues, in: Proceedings of the Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems (PerMIS) Workshop, Gaithersburg, 2007, pp. 48–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Industrieanlagen-Betriebsgesellschaft mbH, CARE innovative action – preliminary study on integration of unmanned aerial vehicles into future air traffic management. Final report, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint JAA/Eurocontrol Initiative on UAVs, A concept for European regulations for civil unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV). Final report, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Protti, R. Barzan, UAV autonomy – which level is desirable? – which level is acceptable? Alenia aeronautica viewpoint, in Platform Innovations and System Integration for Unmanned Air, Land and Sea Vehicles (AVT-SCI Joint Symposium), Florence, 2007, pp. 12–1–12–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Range Safety Group, Range Commanders Council, Range safety criteria for unmanned air vehicles – rationale and methodology supplement. Supplement to document 323–99, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  • Range Safety Group, Range Commanders Council, Common risk criteria standards for national test ranges: supplement. Supplement to document 321–07, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • The Joint Air force Competence Centre, Strategic concept of employment for unmanned aircraft systems in NATO, Kalkar, Germany, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Defense, Office of the Secretary of Defense, Unmanned systems roadmap 2007–2032. Report, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • P. van Blyenburgh, UAV systems: global review. Presented at the Avionics’06 conference, Amsterdam, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • R.E. Weibel, R.J. Hansman, Safety considerations for operation of different classes of UAVs in the NAS, in Proceedings of the AIAA 4th Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations Forum and AIAA 3rd Unmanned Unlimited Technical Conference, Workshop and Exhibit, Chicago, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Zeitlin, UAS S&A standards: challenges and progress, in UAS Yearbook 2009/2010 (UVS International, Paris, France, 2009), pp. 134–136

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Konstantinos Dalamagkidis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Dalamagkidis, K. (2015). Classification of UAVs. In: Valavanis, K., Vachtsevanos, G. (eds) Handbook of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9707-1_94

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics