Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
This paper compares outcomes of student teachers’ use of oral classroom and written online forum discussions of course literature, with the aim of examining how each mode facilitates reflective practice. Data were collected from a class of 11 participating student teachers. Oral discussions were video-recorded and written online discussions were saved as Word files. Clinchy’s levels of knowing were used to determine the depth of the reflections and qualitative analyses inspired by Harasim were carried out as a complement. Findings indicate that on a group level the performance according to the levels of reflective thinking was the same. Both modes have advantages and drawbacks, but it is clear that there should be a variety of modes to provide individual student teachers with better possibilities of developing their reflections. Further explorations of the interaction between modal preference and modal performance, as well as the implications for online peer collaboration, are discussed.
Akyol, Z., Garrison, R., & Ozden, Y. (2009). Online and blended communities of inquiry: Exploring the developmental and perceptional differences. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(6). doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v10i6.765.
Clinchy, B. M. V. (1990). Issues of gender in teaching and learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 1, 52–67.
Clinchy, B. M. V. (1996). Connected and separate knowing. In N. R. Goldberger, J. M. Tarule, B. M. Clinchy, & M. F. Belenky (Eds.), Knowledge, difference and power: Essays inspired by Women's ways of knowing (pp. 205–247). New York: Basic Books.
Dysthe, O. (2001). The asynchronous webmediated discussion as a learning genre. Conference proceeding, Genres and discourses in education - Work and Life, Oslo, May 13–16.
Ehn, B., & Löfgren, O. (1982). Kulturanalys. Lund: Liber.
Enochsson, A. (2001a). Children choosing web pages. The New Review of Information Behaviour Research: Studies of Information Seeking in Context, 2(2), 151–165.
Enochsson, A. (2001b). Meningen med webben: En studie om Internetsökning utifrån erfarenheter i en fjärdeklass [The Use of the Web: Fourth Grader’s Experiences of Doing Internet Searches] (Karlstad University Studies 2001:7). Doctoral dissertation in Pedagogy, Karlstad: Karlstad University.
Enochsson, A. (2007a). Gendered interviewing?: A comparison of online and face-to-face interviews. Paper presented at ECER 2007, Ghent 19-21.
Enochsson, A. (2007b). Sant eller falskt på nätet: Tonåringar resonerar om kritisk granskning [True or false on the net]. In U. Palmenfelt (Ed.), Børn og Kultur - I samfunn? (Vol. 2). Bergen: BIN-Norden.
Enochsson, A., & Buskqvist, U. (2011). ICT, teacher education and assessment: What is assessed and how is it done? Paper presented as part of a symposium at the 39th NERA Congress in Jyväskylä, Mar 10–12.
Enochsson, A. (2011). Who benefits from synchronous online interviews?: A comparison of face-to-face and synchronous online interviews with children. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28(2011), 15–22.
Findahl, O., & Davidsson, P. (2016). Svenskarna och Internet [the swedes and the Internet]. Stockholm: Internetstiftelsen.
Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133–148. CrossRef
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 1–19.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23. CrossRef
Gorsky, P., Caspi, A., Antonovsky, A., Blau, I., & Mansur, A. (2010). The relationship between academic discipline and dialogic behavior in open university course forums. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 11(2).
Harasim, L. (2012). Learning theory and online technologies. New York: Routledge.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Malmberg, C., & Svingby, G. (2004). Students' dialogues and contributions in education for sustainable development. In P. Wickenberg, H. Axelsson, L. Fritzén, G. Helldén, & J. Öhman (Eds.), Learning to change our world?: Swedish research on education & sustainable development. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Nilsen, R. & Lundvoll Nilsen, L. (2013). Interprofessional participation and reflection in a digital network. Seminar.net 9(1). http://seminar.net/volume-9-issue-1-2013/205-interprofessional-participation-and-reflection-in-a-digital-network. Accessed 16 Dec 2016.
Pedro, J. (2012). Reflecting on literacy practices. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 29(2), 39–47. CrossRef
Pendry, L. F., & Salvatore, J. (2015). Individual and social benefits of online discussion forums. Computers in Human Behavior, 50(2015), 211–220. CrossRef
Perry Jr., W. G. (1970). Intellectual and ethical development in the college years. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Stodel, E., Thompson, T., & MacDonald, C. (2006). Learners’ perspectives on what is missing from online learning: Interpretations through the community of inquiry framework. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 7(3). doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v7i3.325.
Swan, K., Richardson, J., Ice, P., Garrison, R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Arbaugh, J. (2008). Validating a measurement tool of presence in online communities of inquiry. E-Mentor, 2(24). http://www.e-mentor.edu.pl/artykul/index/numer/24/id/543. Accessed 16 Dec 2016.
Thörne, K., Flognman, J., & Jonsson, G. (2017). En forskningscirkel om blended learning och digital examination: Ett lärarlags process mot ökat samarbete, medvetenhet och utveckling. Karlstad: Karlstad University (in press).
Tsang, A. (2011). Online reflective group discussion: Connecting first year undergraduate students with their third year peers. Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(3), 58–74.
Wise, A., Perera, N., Hsiao, Y.-T., Speer, J., & Marbouti, F. (2012). Microanalytic case studies of individual participation patterns in an asynchronous online discussion in an undergraduate blended course. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(2012), 108–117. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.11.007. CrossRef
Wu, D., & Hiltz, R. (2004). Predicting learning from asynchronous online discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(2), 139–152.
Yang, C. Y. (2008). A catalyst for teaching critical thinking in a large university class in Taiwan: Asynchronous online discussions with the facilitation of teaching assistants. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 241–264. CrossRef
Zieger, L., & Pulichino, J. (2004). Establishing a community of learners: A case study of a university graduate orientation program for online learners. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2(4), 1–13.
- Reflective discussions in teacher training: A comparison between online and offline discussions of course literature in a class of pre-service teachers
- Springer US
Neuer Inhalt/© ITandMEDIA, Best Practices für die Mitarbeiter-Partizipation in der Produktentwicklung/© astrosystem | stock.adobe.com