nach oben

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery

Erschienen in:

01.06.2015 | Original Article

Registration of 3D shapes under anisotropic scaling

Anisotropic-scaled iterative closest point algorithm

verfasst von: Elvis C. S. Chen, A. Jonathan McLeod, John S. H. Baxter, Terry M. Peters

Erschienen in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery | Ausgabe 6/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Purpose

Several medical imaging modalities exhibit inherent scaling among the acquired data: The scale in an ultrasound image varies with the speed of sound and the scale of the range data used to reconstruct organ surfaces is subject to the scanner distance. In the context of surface-based registration, these scaling factors are often assumed to be isotropic, or as a known prior. Accounting for such anisotropies in scale can potentially dramatically improve registration and calibrations procedures that are essential for robust image-guided interventions.

Methods

We introduce an extension to the ordinary iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm, solving for the similarity transformation between point-sets comprising anisotropic scaling followed by rotation and translation. The proposed anisotropic-scaled ICP (ASICP) incorporate a novel use of Mahalanobis distance to establish correspondence and a new solution for the underlying registration problem. The derivation and convergence properties of ASICP are presented, and practical implementation details are discussed. Because the ASICP algorithm is independent of shape representation and feature extraction, it is generalizable for registrations involving scaling.

Results

Experimental results involving the ultrasound calibration, registration of partially overlapping range data, whole surfaces, as well as multi-modality surface data (intraoperative ultrasound to preoperative MR) show dramatic improvement in fiducial registration error.

Conclusion

We present a generalization of the ICP algorithm, solving for a similarity transform between two point-sets by means of anisotropic scales, followed by rotation and translation. Our anisotropic-scaled ICP algorithm shares many traits with the ordinary ICP, including guaranteed convergence, independence of shape representation, and general applicability.

Vorheriger Artikel Towards real-time, tracker-less 3D ultrasound guidance for spine anaesthesia

Nächster Artikel Interactive multi-criteria planning for radiofrequency ablation

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

http://graphics.stanford.edu/data/3Dscanrep.

http://www.vtk.org.

Arun KS, Huang TS, Blostein SD (1987) Least-squares fitting of two 3-d point sets. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 9(5):698–700CrossRefPubMed

Balachandran R, Fitzpatrick JM (2009) Iterative solution for rigid-body point-based registration with anisotropic weighting. In: Proc. SPIE, vol 7261, p 72613D

Bennani Dosse M, Ten Berge J (2010) Anisotropic orthogonal procrustes analysis. J Classif 27:111–128CrossRef

Bentley JL (1975) Multidimensional binary search trees used for associative searching. Commun ACM 18(9):509–517CrossRef

Besl PJ, McKay ND (1992) A method for registration of 3-D shapes. Pattern Anal Mach Intell IEEE Trans 14(2):239–256CrossRef

Burschka D, Li M, Ishii M, Taylor RH, Hager GD (2005) Scale-invariant registration of monocular endoscopic images to CT-scans for sinus surgery. Med Image Anal 9(5):413–426CrossRefPubMed

Cash DM, Sinha TK, Chapman WC, Terawaki H, Dawant BM, Galloway RL, Miga MI (2003) Incorporation of a laser range scanner into image-guided liver surgery: surface acquisition, registration, and tracking. Med Phys 30(7):1671–1682CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Chen ECS, McLeod AJ, Jayarathne UL, Peters TM (2014) Solving for free-hand and real-time 3d ultrasound calibration with anisotropic orthogonal procrustes analysis. In: Proceedings of SPIE, vol 9036, p 90361Z

Chen J, Belaton B, Pan Z (2013) A robust subset-icp method for point set registration. In: Zaman H, Robinson P, Olivier P, Shih T, Velastin S (eds) Advances in visual informatics. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 8237. Springer, Berlin, pp 59–69CrossRef

10.

Du S, Zheng N, Xiong L, Ying S, Xue J (2010) Scaling iterative closest point algorithm for registration of m-D point sets. J Vis Commun Image Represent 21(5–6):442–452CrossRef

11.

Farrell JL, Stuelpnagel JC, Wessner RH, Velman JR, Brook JE (1966) A least squares estimate of satellite attitude (grace wahba). SIAM Rev 8(3):384–386CrossRef

12.

Gower JC, Dijksterhuis GB (2004) Procrustes problems. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRef

13.

Granger S, Pennec X (2002) Multi-scale EM-ICP: a fast and robust approach for surface registration. In: European conference on computer vision (ECCV ), lecture notes in computer science vol 2353, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 418–432

14.

Greenspan M, Yurick M (2003) Approximate k-d tree search for efficient ICP. In: 3-D digital imaging and modeling, 2003. 3DIM 2003. Proceedings of fourth international conference on, pp 442–448

15.

Hansen MF, Blas MR, Larsen R (2007) Mahalanobis distance based iterative closest point. In: Proceedings of SPIE, vol 6512, p 65121Y

16.

Hartov A, Roberts DW, Paulsen KD (2008) A comparative analysis of coregistered ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 62(3):91–101CrossRefPubMed

17.

Horn BK (1987) Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions. J Opt Soc Am 4:629–642CrossRef

18.

Horn BK (1989) Relative orientation. Tech Rep AI Memo No. 994-A, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

19.

Jost T, Hugli H (2003) A multi-resolution ICP with heuristic closest point search for fast and robust 3D registration of range images. In: 3-D digital imaging and modeling, 2003. 3DIM 2003. Proceedings of fourth international conference on, pp 427–433

20.

Leeuw Jd, Michailidis G (2000) Optimization transfer using surrogate objective functions: discussion. J Comput Gr Stat 9(1):26–31

21.

Ma B, Choi J, Huai HM (2014) Target registration error for rigid shape-based registration with heteroscedastic noise. In: Yaniv ZR, Holmes DR (eds), Proceedings of SPIE, vol 9036, p 90360U

22.

Ma B, Ellis RE (2003) Robust registration for computer-integrated orthopedic surgery: laboratory validation and clinical experience. Med Image Anal 7(3):237–250CrossRefPubMed

23.

Ma B, Ellis RE, Fleet DJ (1999) Spotlights: a robust method for surface-based registration in orthopedic surgery. In: Taylor CJ, Colchester AC (eds) Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention—MICCAI’99, lecture notes in computer science, vol 1679. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 936–945

24.

Ma B, Moghari M, Ellis R, Abolmaesumi P (2010) Estimation of optimal fiducial target registration error in the presence of heteroscedastic noise. Med Imaging IEEE Trans 29(3):708–723CrossRef

25.

Mahalanobis PC (1936) On the generalized distance in statistics. Proc Natl Inst Sci 2(1):49–55

26.

Maier-Hein L, Franz AM, dos Santos TR, Schmidt M, Fangerau M, Meinzer HP, Fitzpatrick JM (2012) Convergent Iterative closest-point algorithm to accomodate anisotropic and inhomogeneous localization error. Pattern Anal Mach Intell IEEE Trans 34(8):1520–1532CrossRef

27.

Maier-Hein L, Groch A, Bartoli A, Bodenstedt S, Boissonnat G, Chang PL, Clancy N, Elson D, Haase S, Heim E, Hornegger J, Jannin P, Kenngott H, Kilgus T, Muller-Stich B, Oladokun D, Rohl S, dos Santos T, Schlemmer HP, Seitel A, Speidel S, Wagner M, Stoyanov D (2014) Comparative validation of single-shot optical techniques for laparoscopic 3-d surface reconstruction. Med Imaging IEEE Trans 33(10):1913–1930CrossRef

28.

Maier-Hein L, Mountney P, Bartoli A, Elhawary H, Elson D, Groch A, Kolb A, Rodrigues M, Sorger J, Speidel S, Stoyanov D (2013) Optical techniques for 3D surface reconstruction in computer-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Med Image Anal 17(8):974–996CrossRefPubMed

29.

Masuda T, Sakaue K, Yokoya N (1996) Registration and integration of multiple range images for 3-D model construction. In: Proceedings of 13th international conference on pattern recognition, vol 1. IEEE. pp 879–883

30.

Matei B, Meer P (1999) Optimal rigid motion estimation and performance evaluation with bootstrap. In: Computer vision and pattern recognition, 1999. IEEE computer society conference on, vol 1, pp 339–345

31.

Ohta N, Kanatani K (1998) Optimal estimation of three-dimensional rotation and reliability evaluation. In: Burkhardt H, Neumann B (eds) Computer vision—ECCV’98, lecture notes in computer science, vol 1406. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 175–187

32.

Penney G, Edwards P, King A, Blackall J, Batchelor P, Hawkes D (2001) A stochastic iterative closest point algorithm (stochastICP). In: Niessen WJ, Viergever MA (eds) Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention—MICCAI 2001, lecture notes in computer science, vol 2208. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 762–769

33.

Peters TM, Cleary K (eds) (2008) Image-guided interventions: technology and applications. Springer, Berlin

34.

Renner C, Lindner D, Schneider J, Meixensberger J (2005) Evaluation of intra-operative ultrasound imaging in brain tumor resection: a prospective study. Neurol Res 27(4):351–357CrossRefPubMed

35.

Rusinkiewicz S, Levoy M (2001) Efficient variants of the ICP algorithm. In: Proceedings third international conference on 3-D digital imaging and modeling, pp 145–152. IEEE Comput Soc

36.

Schindler K, Bischof H (2003) On robust regression in photogrammetric point clouds. In: Michaelis B, Krell G (eds) Pattern recognition, lecture notes in computer science, vol 2781. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 172–178

37.

Schönemann P, Carroll R (1970) Fitting one matrix to another under choice of a central dilation and a rigid motion. Psychometrika 35(2):245–255CrossRef

38.

Schönemann PH (1966) A generalized solution of the orthogonal procrustes problem. Psychometrika 31(1):1–10CrossRef

39.

Segal AV, Haehnel D, Thrun S (2009) Generalized-icp. Proceedings of robotics: science and systems

40.

Zha H, Ikuta M, Hasegawa T (2000) Registration of range images with different scanning resolutions. In: Systems, man, and cybernetics, 2000 IEEE international conference on, vol 2, pp 1495–1500

41.

Zhang Z (1994) Iterative point matching for registration of free-form curves and surfaces. Int J Comput Vision 13(2):119–152CrossRef

42.

Zinßer T, Schmidt J, Niemann H (2005) Point set registration with integrated scale estimation. In: International conference on pattern recognition and imaging processing, pp 116–119

Titel: Registration of 3D shapes under anisotropic scaling
Anisotropic-scaled iterative closest point algorithm
verfasst von: Elvis C. S. Chen
A. Jonathan McLeod
John S. H. Baxter
Terry M. Peters
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2015
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery / Ausgabe 6/2015
Print ISSN: 1861-6410
Elektronische ISSN: 1861-6429
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1199-9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2015

PCA-derived respiratory motion surrogates from X-ray angiograms for percutaneous coronary interventions

Automatic bone detection and soft tissue aware ultrasound–CT registration for computer-aided orthopedic surgery

Open-source image registration for MRI–TRUS fusion-guided prostate interventions

Augmenting MRI–transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy with temporal ultrasound data: a clinical feasibility study

Computer-assisted hip resurfacing planning using Lie group shape models

Thermal expansion imaging for monitoring lesion depth using M-mode ultrasound during cardiac RF ablation: in vitro study