Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2008 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

53. Rehabilitation and Health Care Robotics

verfasst von : H.F. Machiel Van der Loos, Prof, David J. Reinkensmeyer, Prof

Erschienen in: Springer Handbook of Robotics

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The field of rehabilitation robotics develops robotic systems that assist persons who have a disability with necessary activities, or that provide therapy for persons seeking to improve physical or cognitive function. This chapter will discuss both of these domains and provide descriptions of the major achievements of the field over its short history. Specifically, after providing background information on world demographics (Sect. 53.1.2) and the history (Sect. 53.1.3) of the field, Sect. 53.2 describes physical therapy and training robots, and Sect. 53.3 describes robotic aids for people with disabilities. Section 53.4 then briefly discusses recent advances in smart prostheses and orthoses that are related to rehabilitation robotics. Finally, Sect. 53.5 provides an overview of recent work in diagnosis and monitoring for rehabilitation as well as other health-care issues. At the conclusion of this chapter, the reader will be familiar with the history of rehabilitation robotics and its primary accomplishments, and will understand the challenges the field faces in the future as it seeks to improve health care and the well-being of persons with disabilities. In this chapter, we will describe an application of robotics that may in the future touch many of us in an acutely personal way.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Medical Robotics and Computer-Integrated Surgery
Nächstes Kapitel Domestic Robotics
Literatur
53.1.
L. Leifer: Rehabilitative robots. In: Robotics Age: In the Beginning selected from Robotics Age Magazine, ed. by C. Helmers (Hayden, Hasbrouck 1981) pp. 227–241
53.2.
M. Kassler: Introduction to the special issue on robotics for health care, Robotica 11, 493–494 (1993)
53.3.
H.F.M. Van der Loos: VA/Stanford rehabilitation robotics research and development program: lessons learned in the application of robotics technology to the field of rehabilitation, IEEE Trans. Rehab. Eng. 3, 46–55 (1995)
53.4.
J.L. Patton, M.E. Phillips-Stoykov, M. Stojakovich, F.A. Mussa-Ivaldi: Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors, Exp. Brain Res. 168, 368–383 (2006)
53.5.
J. Emken, D. Reinkensmeyer: Robot-enhanced motor learning: Accelerating internal model formation during locomotion by transient dynamic amplification, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehab. Eng. 99, 1–7 (2005)
53.6.
H.F.M. Van der Loos, R. Mahoney, C. Ammi: Great expectations for rehabilitation mechatronics in the coming decade. In: Advances in Rehabilitation Robotics, Lect. Notes Contr. Inf. Sci. 306, 427–433 (2004)
53.7.
K. Corker, J.H. Lyman, S. Sheredos: A preliminary evaluation of remote medical manipulators, Bull. Prosth. Res. 10, 107–134 (1979)
53.8.
M. Hillman: Rehabilitation robotics from past to present – A historical perspective. In: Advances in Rehabilitation Robotics, Lect. Notes Contr. Inf. Sci. 306, 25–44 (2004)
53.9.
W. Seamone, G. Schmeisser: Early clinical evaluation of a robot arm/work table system for spinal cord injured persons, J. Rehab. Res. Dev. 22, 38–57 (1985)
53.10.
J. Guittet, H.H. Kwee, N. Quetin, J. Yelon: The SPARTACUS telethesis: manipulator control studies, Bull. Prosth. Res. 10, 69–105 (1979)
53.11.
J. Hammel, K. Hall, D.S. Lees, L.J. Leifer, H.F.M. Van der Loos, I. Perkash, R. Crigler: Clinical evaluation of a desktop robotic assistant, J. Rehab. Res. Dev. 26, 1–16 (1989)
53.12.
J.M. Hammel, H.F.M. Van der Loos, I. Perkash: Evaluation of a vocational robot with a quadriplegic employee, Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 73, 683–693 (1992)
53.13.
H.F.M. Van der Loos, S.J. Michalowski, L.J. Leifer: Design of an omnidirectional mobile robot as a manipulation aid for the severely disabled. In: Interactive Robotic Aids, ed. by R. Foulds (World Rehabilitation Fund, New York 1986) pp. 61–63
53.14.
J.J. Wagner, M. Wickizer, H.F.M. Van der Loos, L.J. Leifer: User testing and design iteration of the ProVAR user interface, presented at 8th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interaction: RO-MANʼ99 (1999)
53.15.
M. Busnel, R. Cammoun, F. Coulon-Lauture, J.-M. Detriche, G. Le Claire, B. Lesigne: The robotized workstation MASTER for users with tetraplegia: Description and evaluation, J. Rehab. Res. Dev. 36, 217–229 (1999)
53.16.
R. Gelin, B. Lesigne, M. Busnel, J.P. Michel: The first moves of the AFMASTER workstation, Adv. Robot. 14, 639–649 (2001)
53.17.
M. Topping: The development of Handy 1, a rehabilitation robotic system to assist the severely disabled, Ind. Robot. 25, 316–320 (1998)
53.18.
R.M. Mahoney: The Raptor wheelchair robot system. In: Integration of Assistive Technology in the Information Age (IOS, Amsterdam 2001) pp. 135–141
53.19.
H.H. Kwee: Integrated control of MANUS manipulator and wheelchair enhanced by environmental docking, Robotica 16, 491–498 (2000)
53.20.
Z. Bien, M.J. Chung, P.H. Chang, D.S. Kwon, D.J. Kim, J.S. Han, J.H. Kim, D.H. Kim, H.S. Park, S.H. Kang: Integration of a rehabilitation robotic system (KARES II) with human-friendly man-machine interaction units, Auton. Robot. 16, 165–191 (2004)
53.21.
R.C. Simpson, S.P. Levine, D.A. Bell, L. Jaros, Y. Koren, J. Borenstein: NavChair: An assistive wheelchair navigation system with automatic adaptation. In: Assistive Technology and AI, Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. 1458, 235–255 (1998)
53.22.
R.C. Simpson, D. Poirot, F. Baxter: The Hephaestus smart wheelchair system, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehab. Eng. 10, 118–122 (2002)
53.23.
R. Krukowski: BioDex Muscle exercise and rehabilitation apparatus, US Patent No. 4765315 (Int. A63B 2300) (1986)
53.24.
D. Khalili, M. Zomlefer: An intelligent robotic system for rehabilitation of joints and estimation of body segment parameters, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 35, 138–146 (1988)
53.25.
M.P. Dijkers, P.C. deBear, R.F. Erlandson, K.A. Kristy, D.M. Geer, A. Nichols: Patient and staff acceptance of robotic technology in occupational therapy: a pilot study, J. Rehab. Res. 28, 33–44 (1991)
53.26.
K. Dautenhahn, I. Werry: Towards interaction robots in autism therapy: background, motivation, and challenges, Pragmact. Cognit. 12, 1–35 (2004)
53.27.
T. Shibata, T. Mitsui, K. Wada, K. Tanie: Psychophysiological effects by interaction with mental commit robot, J. Robot. Mechatron. 14, 13–19 (2002)
53.28.
L. Sawaki: Use-dependent plasticity of the human motor cortex in health and disease, IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 24, 36–39 (2005)
53.29.
J.R. Wolpaw, A.M. Tennissen: Activity-dependent spinal cord plasticity in health and disease, Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 807–843 (2001)
53.30.
K.M. Baldwin, F. Haddad: Skeletal muscle plasticity: cellular and molecular responses to altered physical activity paradigms, Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 81, S40–S51 (2002)
53.31.
J.L. Emken, R. Benitez, D.J. Reinkensmeyer: Human-robot cooperative movement training: learning a novel sensory motor transformation during walking with robotic assistance-as-needed, J. Neuroeng. Rehab. 4, 8 (2007)
53.32.
B.H. Dobkin: Neurologic Rehabilitation (F. A. Davis, Philadelphia 1996)
53.33.
H.I. Krebs, N. Hogan, M.L. Aisen, B.T. Volpe: Robot-aided neurorehabilitation, IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng. 6, 75–87 (1998)
53.34.
S.P. Buerger, H.I. Krebs, N. Hogan: Characterization and control of a screw-driven robot for neurorehabilitation, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications pp. 388–394 (2001)
53.35.
D.J. Williams, H.I. Krebs, N. Hogan: A robot for wrist rehabilitation, Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2, (2001) pp. 1336–1339
53.36.
L. Masia, H.I. Krebs, P. Cappa, N. Hogan: Whole-arm rehabilitation following stroke: Hand module, BioRob 2006. The First IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics: February 20-22 (2006) pp. 1085–1089
53.37.
J. Stein, H.I. Krebs, W.R. Frontera, S. Fasoli, R. Hughes, N. Hogan: Comparison of two techniques of robot-aided upper limb exercise training after stroke, Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 83, 720–728 (2004)
53.38.
H. Krebs, J. Palazzolo, L. Dipietro, M. Ferraro, J. Krol, K. Rannekleiv, B. Volpe, N. Hogan: Rehabilitation robotics: performance-based progressive robot-assisted therapy, Auton. Robot. 15, 7–20 (2003)
53.39.
M.L. Aisen, H.I. Krebs, N. Hogan, F. McDowell, B. Volpe: The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke, Arch. Neurol. 54, 443–446 (1997)
53.40.
S. Fasoli, H. Krebs, J. Stein, W. Frontera, N. Hogan: Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke, Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 84, 477–482 (2003)
53.41.
J.J. Daly, N. Hogan, E.M. Perepezko, H.I. Krebs, J.M. Rogers, K.S. Goyal, M.E. Dohring, E. Fredrickson, J. Nethery, R.L. Ruff: Response to upper-limb robotics and functional neuromuscular stimulation following stroke, J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 42, 723–736 (2005)
53.42.
P.S. Lum, C.G. Burgar, P.C. Shor, M. Majmundar, H.F.M. Van der Loos: Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper limb motor function following stroke, Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 83, 952–959 (2002)
53.43.
P.S. Lum, C.G. Burgar, H.F.M. Van der Loos, P.C. Shor, M. Majmundar, R. Yap: MIME robotic device for upper-limb neurorehabilitation in subacute stroke subjects: A follow-up study, J. Rehab. Res. Dev. 43, 631–642 (2006)
53.44.
L.E. Kahn, M.L. Zygman, W.Z. Rymer, D.J. Reinkensmeyer: Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: A randomized controlled pilot study, J. Neuroeng. Neurorehab. 3, 12 (2006)
53.45.
P.S. Lum, D.J. Reinkensmeyer, S.L. Lehman: Robotic assist devices for bimanual physical therapy: preliminary experiments, IEEE Trans. Rehab. Eng. 1, 185–191 (1993)
53.46.
S. Hesse, C. Werner, M. Pohl, S. Rueckriem, J. Mehrholz, M.L. Lingnau: Computerized arm training improves the motor control of the severely affected arm after stroke: a single-blinded randomized trial in two centers, Stroke 36, 1960–1966 (2005)
53.47.
D. Reinkensmeyer, J. Emken, S. Cramer: Robotics, motor learning, and neurologic recovery, Ann. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 6, 497–525 (2004)
53.48.
F. Amirabdollahian, E. Gradwell, R. Loureiro, W. Harwin: Effects of the GENTLE/S robot mediated therapy on the outcome of upper limb rehabilitation post-stroke: Analysis of the Battle Hospital data, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Daejeon, Korea (2003) pp. 55–58
53.49.
F. Amirabdollahian, R. Loureiro, E. Gradwell, C. Collin, W. Harwin, G. Johnson: Multivariate analysis of the Fugl-Meyer outcome measures assessing the effectiveness of GENTLE/S robot-mediated stroke therapy, J. Neuroeng. Rehab. 19, 4 (2007)
53.50.
A.S. Merians, H. Poizner, R. Boian, G. Burdea, S. Adamovich, M. Kuttuva, A. Merians, M. Bouzit, J. Lewis, D. Fensterheim: Sensorimotor training in a virtual reality environment: does it improve functional recovery poststroke? The Rutgers Arm, a rehabilitation system in virtual reality: a pilot study, Neurorehab. Neural Repair 20, 252–267 (2006)
53.51.
R. Colombo, F. Pisano, S. Micera, A. Mazzone, C. Delconte, M. Carrozza, P. Dario, G. Minuco: Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 13, 311–324 (2005)
53.52.
R.J. Sanchez, J. Liu, S. Rao, P. Shah, R. Smith, S.C. Cramer, J.E. Bobrow, D.J. Reinkensmeyer: Automating arm movement training following severe stroke: functional exercises with quantitative feedback in a gravity-reduced environment, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehab. Eng. 14, 378–389 (2006)
53.53.
S. Masiero, A. Celia, G. Rosati, M. Armani: Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the the upper limb after acute stroke, Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 88, 142–149 (2007)
53.54.
G. Fazekas, M. Horvath, A. Toth: A novel robot training system designed to supplement upper limb physiotherapy of patients with spastic hemiparesis, Int. J. Rehabil. Res. 29, 251–254 (2006)
53.55.
T. Nef, R. Riener: ARMin – Design of a novel arm rehabilitation robot, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, June 28-July 1, Chicago, Illinois (2005) pp. 57–60
53.56.
E. Wolbrecht, J. Leavitt, D. Reinkensmeyer, J. Bobrow: Control of a pneumatic orthosis for upper extremity stroke rehabilitation, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Conference, New York (2006) pp. 2687 - 2693
53.57.
J.L. Patton, G. Dawe, C. Scharver, F.A. Mussa-Ivaldi, R. Kenyon: Robotics and virtual reality: the development of a life-sized 3-D system for the rehabilitation of motor function, 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (2004) pp. 4840–4843
53.58.
H. Huang, J. He: Utilization of biomechanical modeling in design of robotic arm for rehabilitation of stroke patients, 26th Ann. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 4, 2718–2721 (2004)
53.59.
D. Reinkensmeyer, C. Pang, J. Nessler, C. Painter: Web-based telerehabilitation for the upper-extremity after stroke, IEEE Trans. Neural Sci. Rehab. Eng. 10, 1–7 (2002)
53.60.
M.J. Johnson, H.F.M. Van der Loos, C.G. Burgar, P. Shor, L.J. Leifer: Experimental results using force-feedback cueing in robot-assisted stroke therapy, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 13, 335–348 (2005)
53.61.
X. Feng, J. Winters: UniTherapy: a computer-assisted motivating neurorehabilitation platform for teleassessment and remote therapy, 2005 IEEE 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (2005) pp. 349–352
53.62.
H. Sugarman, E. Dayan, A. Weisel-Eichler, J. Tiran: The Jerusalem TeleRehabilitation System, a new low-cost, haptic rehabilitation approach, Cyberpsychol. Behav. 9, 178–182 (2006)
53.63.
M. Mulas, M. Folgheraiter, G. Gini: An EMG-controlled exoskeleton for hand rehabilitation, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, June 28-July 1, Chicago, Illinois (2005) pp. 371–374
53.64.
C. Takahashi, L. Der-Yeghiaian, V.H. Le, S.C. Cramer: A robotic device for hand motor therapy after stroke, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, June 28-July 1, Chicago, Illinois (2005) pp. 17–20
53.65.
T. Kline, D.G. Kamper, B.D. Schmit: Control system for pneumatically controlled glove to assist in grasp activities, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, June 28-July 1, Chicago, Illinois (2005) pp. 78–81
53.66.
B.R. Brewer, M. Fagan, R.L. Klatzky, Y. Matsuoka: Perceptual limits for a robotic rehabilitation environment using visual feedback distortion, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 13, 1–11 (2005)
53.67.
J.L. Patton, M. Kovic, F.A. Mussa-Ivaldi: Custom-designed haptic training for restoring reaching ability to individuals with poststroke hemiparesis, J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 43, 643–656 (2006)
53.68.
R.G. Lovely, R.J. Gregor, R.R. Roy, V.R. Edgerton: Effects of training on the recovery of full weight-bearing stepping in the adult spinal cat, Exp. Neurol. 92, 421–435 (1986)
53.69.
H. Barbeau, S. Rossignol: Recovery of locomotion after chronic spinalization in the adult cat, Brain Res. 412, 84–95 (1987)
53.70.
M. Visintin, H. Barbeau, N. Korner-Bitensky, N. Mayo: A new approach to retrain gait in stroke patients through body weight support and treadmill stimulation, Stroke 29, 1122–1128 (1998)
53.71.
S. Hesse, C. Bertelt, M. Jahnke, A. Schaffrin, P. Baake, M. Malezic, K. Mauritz: Treadmill training with partial body weight support compared with physiotherapy in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients, Stroke 26, 976–981 (1995)
53.72.
A. Wernig, A. Nanassy, S. Muller: Maintenance of locomotor abilities following Laufband (treadmill) therapy in para- and tetraplegic persons: follow-up studies, Spinal Cord 36, 744–749 (1998)
53.73.
A.L. Behrman, S.J. Harkema: Locomotor training after human spinal cord injury: a series of case studies, Phys. Therapy 80, 688–700 (2000)
53.74.
H. Barbeau: Locomotor training in neurorehabilitation: emerging rehabilitation concepts, Neurorehab. Neural Repair 17, 3–11 (2003)
53.75.
B. Dobkin, D. Apple, H. Barbeau, M. Basso, A. Behrman, D. Deforge, J. Ditunno, G. Dudley, R. Elashoff, L. Fugate: Weight-supported treadmill vs over-ground training for walking after acute incomplete SCI, Neurology 66, 484–493 (2006)
53.76.
T.G. Hornby: Clinical and quantitative evaluation of robotic-assisted treadmill walking to retrain ambulation after spinal cord injury, Topics Spinal Cord Injury Rehab. 11, 1–17 (2005)
53.77.
L. Nilsson, K. Fugl-Meyer, L. Kristensen, B. Sjölund, K. Sunnerhagen: Walking training of patients with hemiparesis at an early stage after stroke: a comparison of walking training on a treadmill with body weight support and walking training on the ground, Clin. Rehab. 15, 515–527 (2001)
53.78.
C. Werner, A. Bardeleben, K. Mauritz, S. Kirker, S. Hesse: Treadmill training with partial body weight support and physiotherapy in stroke patients: a preliminary comparison, Eur. J. Neurol. 9, 639–644 (2002)
53.79.
S. Hesse, C. Werner, H. Seibel, S. von Frankenberg, E. Kappel, S. Kirker, M. Kading: Treadmill training with partial body-weight support after total hip arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial, Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 84, 1767–1773 (2003)
53.80.
T. Brown, J. Mount, B. Rouland, K. Kautz, R. Barnes, J. Kim: Body weight-supported treadmill training versus conventional gait training for people with chronic traumatic brain injury, J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 20, 402–415 (2005)
53.81.
S. Hesse, D. Uhlenbrock: A mechanized gait trainer for restoration of gait, J. Rehab. Res. Dev. 37, 701–708 (2000)
53.82.
G. Colombo, M. Joerg, R. Schreier, V. Dietz: Treadmill training of paraplegic patients with a robotic orthosis, J. Rehab. Res. Dev. 37, 693–700 (2000)
53.83.
HealthSouth: http://​www.​autoambulator.​com (2007)
53.84.
C. Werner, S. Von Frankenberg, T. Treig, M. Konrad, S. Hesse: Treadmill training with partial body weight support and an electromechanical gait trainer for restoration of gait in subacute stroke patients: a randomized crossover study, Stroke 33, 2895–2901 (2002)
53.85.
M. Pohl, C. Werner, M. Holzgraefe, G. Kroczek, J. Mehrholz, I. Wingendorf, G. Hoolig, R. Koch, S. Hesse: Repetitive locomotor training and physiotherapy improve walking and basic activities of daily living after stroke: a single-blind, randomized multicentre trial (DEutsche GAngtrainerStudie, DEGAS), Clin. Rehabil. 21, 17–27 (2007)
53.86.
M. Wirz, D.H. Zemon, R. Rupp, A. Scheel, G. Colombo, V. Dietz, T.G. Hornby: Effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: A multicenter trial, Arch. Phys. Med. Rehab. 86, 672–680 (2005)
53.87.
H. Schmidt, S. Hesse, R. Bernhardt, J. Krüger: HapticWalker – a novel haptic foot device, ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. (TAP) 2, 166–180 (2005)
53.88.
S. Jezernik, G. Colombo, M. Morari: Automatic gait-pattern adaptation algorithms for rehabilitation with a 4-DOF robotic orthosis, IEEE Trans. Robot. Automat. 20, 574–582 (2004)
53.89.
D. Reinkensmeyer, D. Aoyagi, J. Emken, J. Galvez, W. Ichinose, G. Kerdanyan, S. Maneekobkunwong, K. Minakata, J. Nessler, W. Timoszyk, K. Vallance, R. Weber, J. Wynne, R. Roy, R. d. Leon, J. Bobrow, S. Harkema, V. Edgerton: Tools for understanding and optimizing robotic gait training, J. Rehab. Res. Dev. 43, 657–670 (2006)
53.90.
D. Surdilovic, R. Bernhardt: STRING-MAN: A new wire robot for gait rehabilitation, presented at ICRA ʼ04. 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (2004)
53.91.
J.F. Veneman, R. Ekkelenkamp, R. Kruidhof, F.C.T. van der Helm, H. van der Kooij: A series elastic- and bowden-cable-based actuation system for use as torque actuator in exoskeleton-type robots, Int. J. Robot. Res. 25, 261–282 (2006)
53.92.
J.A. Galvez, D.J. Reinkensmeyer: Robotics for gait training after spinal cord injury, Topics Spinal Cord Injury Rehab. 11, 18–33 (2005)
53.93.
D. Aoyagi, W.E. Ichinose, S.J. Harkema, D.J. Reinkensmeyer, J.E. Bobrow: An assistive robotic device that can synchronize to the pelvic motion during human gait training, Proc. 2005 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Chicago, Illinois (2005) pp. 565–568
53.94.
S. Jezernik, R. Scharer, G. Colombo, M. Morari: Adaptive robotic rehabilitation of locomotion: A clinical study in spinally injured individuals, Spinal Cord 41, 657–666 (2003)
53.95.
D. Aoyagi, Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California at Irvine (2006)
53.96.
G. Pratt, M. Williamson, P. Dillworth, J. Pratt, K. Ulland, A. Wright: Stiffness isnʼt everything, Fourth International Symposium on Experimental Robotics (1995)
53.97.
D. Robinson: Design and Analysis of Series Elasticity in Closed-loop Actuator Force Control (Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2000)
53.98.
D.W. Robinson, J.E. Pratt, D.J. Paluska, G.A. Pratt: Series elastic actuator development for a biomimetic walking robot, 1999 IEEE/ASME Int. Conf. Adv. Intell. Mechatron. (1999) pp. 561–568
53.99.
M. Peshkin, D.A. Brown, J.J. Santos-Munne, A. Makhlin, E. Lewis, J.E. Colgate, J. Patton, D. Schwandt: KineAssist: A robotic overground gait and balance training device, ICORR: 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (2005) pp. 241–246
53.100.
D. Ferris: Powered lower limb orthoses for gait rehabilitation, Topics Spinal Cord Injury Rehab. 11, 34–49 (2005)
53.101.
J. Deutsch, J. Latonio, G. Burdea, R. Boian: Post-stroke rehabilitation with the Rutgers Ankle system – a case study, Presence 10, 416–430 (2001)
53.102.
S. Agrawal, A. Fattah: Theory and design of an orthotic device for full or partial gravity-balancing of a human leg during motion, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehab. Eng. 12, 157–165 (2004)
53.103.
S.K. Banala, S.K. Agrawal: Gait rehabilitation with an active leg orthosis, Proceedings of ASME 2005 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Long Beach, CA, USA (2005)
53.104.
J. Kawamura, T. Ide, S. Hayashi, H. Ono, T. Honda: Automatic suspension device for gait training, Prosthet. Orthot. Int. 17, 120–125 (1993)
53.105.
R.F. Erlandson, P. deBear, K. Kristy, M. Dijkers, S. Wu: A robotic system to provide movement therapy, Proc. 5th Int. Service Robot Conf., Detroit, MI (1990) pp. 7–15
53.106.
M.J. Rosen: Telerehabilitation, NeuroRehabilitation 12, 11–26 (1999)
53.107.
C. Carignan, H. Krebs: Telerehabilitation robotics: Bright lights, big future?, J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 43, 695–710 (2006)
53.108.
C. Stanger, M. Cawley: Demographics of rehabilitation robotics users, Technol. Disability 5, 125–138 (1996)
53.109.
J. Hammel: The role of assessment and evaluation in rehabilitation robotics research and development: Moving from concept to clinic to context, IEEE Trans. Rehab. Eng. 3, 56–61 (1995)
53.110.
J.J. Wagner, H.F.M. Van der Loos, L.J. Leifer: Dual-character based user interface design for an assistive robot, ROMAN-98 Conference (1998) pp. 101–106
53.111.
H.F.M. Van der Loos, J. Hammel, D.S. Lees, D. Chang, I. Perkash: Field evaluation of a robot workstation for quadriplegic office workers, Eur. Rev. Biomed. Tech. 5, 317–319 (1990)
53.112.
J.J. Wagner, H.F.M. Van der Loos, L.J. Leifer: Construction of social relationships between user and robot, Robot. Autonom. Syst. 31, 185–191 (2000)
53.113.
M.J. Johnson, E. Guglielmelli, G.A. Di Lauro, C. Laschi, M.C. Carrozza, P. Dario: GIVING-A-HAND System: The development of a task-specific robot appliance. In: Advances in Rehabilitation Robotics, Vol. 306, ed. by Z.Z. Bien, D. Stefanov (Springer, Berlin 2004) pp. 127–141
53.114.
H.F.M. Van der Loos, N. Ullrich, H. Kobayashi: Development of Sensate and Robotic Bed Technologies for Vital Signs Monitoring and Sleep Quality Improvement, Auton. Robot. 15, 67–79 (2003)
53.115.
T. Sato, T. Harada, T. Mori: Environment-type robot system Robotic Room featured by behavior media, behavior contents, and behavior adaptation, IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 9, 529–534 (2004)
53.116.
G. Romer, H.J.A. Stuyt, A. Peters: Cost-savings and economic benefits due to the Assistive Robotic Manipulator (ARM), 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics: ICORR (2005) pp. 201–204
53.117.
J.F. Engelberger: Health-care robotics goes commercial: The HelpMate experience, Robotica 11, 517–524 (1993)
53.118.
P. Dario, C. Laschi, E. Guglielmelli: Design and experiments on a personal robotic assistant, Adv. Robot. 13, 153–169 (1999)
53.119.
B. Graf, M. Hans, R.D. Schraft: Care-O-bot II – Development of a next generation robotic home assistant, Auton. Robot. 16, 193–205 (2004)
53.120.
S.P. Levine, D.A. Bell, L.A. Jaros, R.C. Simpson, Y. Koren, J. Borenstein: The NavChair assistive wheelchair navigation system, Rehabilitation Engineering, IEEE Trans. 7, 443–451 (1999), [see also IEEE Trans. on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation]
53.121.
H. Yanco: Wheelesley: A robotic wheelchair system: Indoor navigation and user interface, Assist. Technol. Artific. Intell. (1998) pp. 256–268
53.122.
G. Lacey, S. MacNamara: User involvement in the design and evaluation of a smart mobility aid, J. Rehab. Res. Dev. 37, 6 (2000)
53.123.
K. Wada, T. Shibata, T. Saito, K. Tanie: Effects of three months robot assisted activity to depresssion of elderly people who stay at a health service facility for the aged., SICE Annual Conference, Sappario, Japan (2004) pp. 2004–2714
53.124.
A.J. Brisben, A.D. Lockerd, C. Lathan: Design evolution of an interactive robot for therapy, Telemed. J. E-Health 10, 252–259 (2004)
53.125.
Y. Kusuda: How Japan sees the robotics for the future: observation at the World Expo 2005, Ind. Robot. 33, 11–18 (2006)
53.126.
J. Eriksson, M. Mataric, C. Winstein: Hands-off assistive robotics for post-stroke arm rehabilitation, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, June 28-July 1, Chicago, Illinois (2005) pp. 21–24
53.127.
M.K. Holden: Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: review, Cyberpsychol. Behav. 8, 187–211 (2005), discussion 212–219
53.128.
B. Robins, K. Dautenhahn, R. Te Boekhorst, A. Billard: Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: can a small humanoid robt help encourage social interaction skills, Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 4, 105–120 (2005)
53.129.
G. Engelberger: HelpMate, a service robot with experience, Ind. Robot. 25, 101–104 (1998)
53.130.
M.H. Industries: Life with a Robot: Wakamaru (2003)
53.131.
R.F. f. Weir: Design of artificial arms and hands for prosthetic applications. In: Standard handbook of biomedical engineering and design, ed. by M. Kutz (McGraw-Hill, New York 2003) pp. 32.1–32.61
53.132.
T.A. Kuiken, G.A. Dumanian, R.D. Lipschutz, L.A. Miller, K.A. Stubblefield: The use of targeted muscle reinnervation for improved myoelectric prosthesis control in a bilateral shoulder disarticulation amputee, Prosthet. Orthotics Int. 28(3), 245–253 (2004)
53.133.
T.A. Kuiken, L.A. Miller, R.D. Lipschutz, B.A. Lock, K. Stubblefield, P.D. Marasco, P. Zhou, G.A. Dumanian: Targeted reinnervation for enhanced prosthetic arm function in a woman with a proximal amputation: a case study, Lancet 369, 371–380 (2007)
53.134.
G.S. Dhillon, K.W. Horch: Direct neural sensory feedback and control of a prosthetic arm, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 13, 468–472 (2005)
53.135.
L.R. Hochberg, M.D. Serruya, G.M. Friehs, J.A. Mukand, M. Saleh, A.H. Caplan, A. Branner, D. Chen, R.D. Penn, J.P. Donoghue: Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia, Nature 442, 164–171 (2006)
53.136.
J.R. Wolpaw, G.M. Friehs, V.A. Zerris, C.L. Ojakangas, M.R. Fellows, J.P. Donoghue: Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) for communication and control: A mini-review, Suppl. Clin. Neurophysiol. 57, 607–613 (2004)
53.137.
P.R. Kennedy, R.A. Bakay: Restoration of neural output from a paralyzed patient by a direct brain connection, Neuroreport 9, 1707–1711 (1998)
53.138.
A.B. Schwartz: Cortical neural prosthetics, Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 27, 487–507 (2004)
53.139.
B. Pesaran, S. Musallam, R.A. Andersen: Cognitive neural prosthetics, Curr. Biol. 16, R77–R80 (2006)
53.140.
G.E. Loeb, F.J. Richmond, L.L. Baker: The BION devices: injectable interfaces with peripheral nerves and muscles, Neurosurg. Focus 20, E2 (2006)
53.141.
R.B. Stein, V. Mushahwar: Reanimating limbs after injury or disease, Trends Neurosci. 28, 518–524 (2005)
53.142.
P.F. Pasquina, P.R. Bryant, M.E. Huang, T.L. Roberts, V.S. Nelson, K.M. Flood: Advances in amputee care, Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 87, S34–S43 (2006), quiz S44-S45
53.143.
I. Austen: Computerized control is next for artificial limbs (New York Times, January 3, 2002)
53.144.
A. Basmajian, E.E. Blanco, H.H. Asada: The marionette bed: Automated rolling and repositioning of bedridden patients, presented at IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation: ICRAʼ02 (2002)
53.145.
F. Kasagami, H. Wang, I. Sakuma, M. Araya, T. Dohi: Development of a robot to assist patient transfer, IEEE Int. Conf. Syst. Man Cybernet. 5, 4383–4388 (2004)
53.146.
G.D. Abowd, M. Ebling, G. Hung, L. Hui, H.W. Gellersen: Context-aware computing, Pervasive Comput. IEEE 1, 22 (2002)
53.147.
M.J. Covington, W. Long, S. Srinivasan, A.K. Dev, M. Ahamad, G.D. Abowd: Securing context-aware applications using environment roles (ACM, New York 2001)
53.148.
F.H. Wilhelm, W.T. Roth: Ambulatory assessment of clinical anxiety. In: Ambulatory assessment: Computer-assisted psychological and psychophysiological methods in monitoring and field studies, (Hogrefe & Huber, Göttingen 1996) pp. 317–345
53.149.
E. Dishman: Inventing wellness systems for aging in place, Computer 37, 34 (2004)
53.150.
M. Zinn, B. Roth, O. Khatib, J. Salisbury: A new actuation approach for human friendly robot design, Int. J. Robot. Res. 23, 379–398 (2004)
53.151.
M. Nokata, K. Ikuta, H. Ishii: Safety evaluation method for rehabilitation robotics. In: Advances in Rehabilitation Robotics, ed. by Z. Bien, D. Stefanov (Springer-Verlag, Berlin 2004) pp. 187–198
53.152.
N. Tejima: Risk reduction mechanisms for safe rehabilitation robots. In: Advances in Rehabilitation Robotics, ed. by Z. Bien, D. Stefanov (Springer-Verlag, Berlin 2004) pp. 199–207
53.153.
H.F.M. Van der Loos: Design and engineering ethics considerations for neurotechnologies, Cambridge Quart. Healthc. Eth. 16, 305–309 (2007)
53.154.
G. Veruggio: The Roboethics Roadmap: http://​www.​roboethics.​org/​site/​modules/​mydownloads/​visit.​php?​cid=​1&​lid=​37, (2006)
53.155.
J.F. Engelberger: Robotics in Service (MIT Press, Cambridge 1989)
53.156.
Z. Bien, D. Stefanov: Advances in Rehabilitation Robotics (Springer, Berlin 2004)MATH
53.157.
E. Prassler, G. Lawitzky, A. Stopp, G. Grunwald: Advances In Human-Robot Interaction (Springer, Berlin 2004)
53.158.
D. Reinkensmeyer, P. Lum, J. Winters: Emerging technologies for improving access to movement therapy following neurologic injury. In: Emerging and Accessible Telecommunications, Information and Healthcare Technologies: Engineering Challenges in Enabling Universal Access, ed. by J. Winters, C. Robinson, R. Simpson, G. Vanderheiden (RESNA, Arlington 2002) pp. 136–150
53.159.
P. Dario, M.C. Carozza, E. Guglielmelli: Auton. Robot. 15, 1 (2003)
53.160.
J.E. Speich, J. Rosen: Medical Robotics http://​brl.​ee.​washington.​edu/​publications/​Rep178.​pdf.​ In: Encyclopedia of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering (Marcel Dekker, 2004)
53.161.
D.J. Reinkensmeyer, J.L. Emken, S.C. Cramer: Robotics, motor learning, and neurologic recovery, Ann. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 6, 497–525 (2004)
Metadaten
Titel
Rehabilitation and Health Care Robotics
verfasst von
H.F. Machiel Van der Loos, Prof
David J. Reinkensmeyer, Prof
Copyright-Jahr
2008
Buch
Springer Handbook of Robotics

Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23957-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-540-30301-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2008

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30301-5_54

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise