Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Challenges in Neurorehabilitation and Neural Engineering Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Rehabilitation Technologies Application in Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injury Patients

verfasst von : Marco Molinari, Alberto Esquenazi, Andrei Agius Anastasi, Rasmus Kragh Nielsen, Oliver Stoller, Antonio D’Andrea, Manuel Bayon Calatayud

Erschienen in: Emerging Therapies in Neurorehabilitation II

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Neurorehabilitation plays a crucial role in the multidisciplinary management of brain injury patients. Emergent therapies based on rehabilitation technologies such as robots, bci, FES, and virtual reality could facilitate cognitive and sensorimotor recovery by supporting and motivating patients to practice-specific tasks on high repetitive levels during different stages of rehabilitation. Robots have become a promising task-oriented tool intended to restore upper limb function and a more normal gait pattern. Virtual reality environments by providing powerful sensorimotor feedback and increasing user interaction with a virtual scenario could improve gait, balance, and upper limb motor function. This chapter will provide an overview on the rationale of introducing rehabilitation technologies-based therapies into clinical settings and discuss their evidence for effectiveness, safety, and value for stroke and traumatic brain injury patients. In addition, recommendations for goal setting and practice of training based on disease-related symptoms and functional impairment are summarized together with reliable functional assessments.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Challenges in Neurorehabilitation and Neural Engineering
Nächstes Kapitel Rehabilitation Technologies for Spinal Injury
Literatur
1.
Alon, G., Levitt, A.F., McCarthy, P.A.: Functional electrical stimulation enhancement of upper extremity functional recovery during stroke rehabilitation: a pilot study. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 21(3), 207–215 (2007). doi:10.​1177/​1545968306297871​
2.
Alon, G., McBride, K., Ring, H.: Improving selected hand functions using a noninvasive neuroprosthesis in persons with chronic stroke. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis.?: Off. J. Natl. Stroke Assoc. 11(2), 99–106 (2002). doi:10.​1053/​jscd.​2002.​127107
3.
Altman, J., Das, G.D.: Autoradiographic and histological evidence of postnatal hippocampal neurogenesis in rats. J. Comp. Neurol. 124, 319–335 (1965)CrossRef
4.
Ang, K.K., Guan, C., Chua, K.S., Ang, B.T., Kuah, C., Wang, C., Phua, K.S., Chin, Z.Y., Zhang, H.: Clinical study of neurorehabilitation in stroke using EEG-based motor imagery brain-computer interface with robotic feedback. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 1, 5549–5552 (2010)
5.
Aprile, I., Di Stasio, E., Romitelli, F., Lancellotti, S., Caliandro, P., Tonali, P., Alessandro Gilardi, A., Padua, L.: Effects of rehabilitation on quality of life in patients with chronic stroke, Brain Inj. 22(6), 451–456 (2008)
6.
Arya, K.N., Pandian, S., Verma, R., Garg, R.K.: Movement therapy induced neural reorganization and motor recovery in stroke: a review. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 15, 528–537 (2011)CrossRef
7.
Astrup, J., Siesjo, B.K., Symon, L.: Thresholds in cerebral ischemia—the ischemic penumbra. Stroke 12, 723–725 (1981)CrossRef
8.
9.
Beebe, J.A., Lang, C.E.: Active range of motion predicts upper extremity function 3 months after stroke. Stroke 40, 1772–1779 (2009)CrossRef
10.
Beer, R.F., Dewald, J.P., Rymer, W.Z.: Deficits in the coordination of multijoint arm movements in patients with hemiparesis; evidence for disturbed control of limb dynamics. Exp. Brain Res. 131, 305–319 (2000)CrossRef
11.
Biernaskie, J., Corbett, D.: Enriched rehabilitative training promotes improved forelimb motor function and enhanced dendritic growth after focal ischemic injury. J. Neurosci. 21,5272–5280 (2001)
12.
Birbaumer, N., Ghanayim, N., Hinterberger, T., Iversen, I., Kotchoubey, B., Kubler, A., Perelmouter, J., Taub, E., Flor, H.: A spelling device for the paralysed. Nature 398, 297–298 (1999)CrossRef
13.
Birbaumer, N., Murguialday, A.R., Cohen, L.: Brain-computer interface in paralysis. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 21, 634–638 (2008)CrossRef
14.
15.
Buccino, G., Solodkin, A., Small, S.L.: Functions of the mirror neuron system: implications for neurorehabilitation. Cogn. Behav. Neurol. 19, 55–63 (2006)CrossRef
16.
Buch, E., Weber, C., Cohen, L.G., Braun, C., Dimyan, M.A., Ard, T., Mellinger, J., Caria, A., Soekadar, S., Fourkas, A., Birbaumer, N.: Think to move: a neuromagnetic brain-computer interface (BCI) system for chronic stroke. Stroke 39, 910–917 (2008)CrossRef
17.
Burdea, G.C.: Virtual rehabilitation. Benefits and challenges. Methods Inf. Med. 42, 519–523 (2003)
18.
Burgar, C.G., Lum, P.S., Shor, P.C., Van der loos, H. M.: Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: the Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 37(6), 663–674 (2000)
19.
Cameirao, M.S., Bermudez-Badia, S., Duarte, E., Frisoli, A., Verschure, P.: The combined impact of virtual reality neurorehabilitation and its interfaces on upper extremity functional recovery in patients with chronic stroke. Stroke 43, 2720–2728 (2012)CrossRef
20.
Carmichael, S.T.: Cellular and molecular mechanisms of neural repair after stroke: making waves. Ann. Neurol. 59, 735–742 (2006)CrossRef
21.
Casadio, M., Giannoni, P., Masia, L., Morasso, P., Sandini, G., Sanguineti, V., Vergaro, E.: Robot therapy of the upper limb in stroke patients: preliminary experiences for the principle-based use of this technology. Funct. Neurol. 24(4), 195 (2009)
22.
Casadio, M., Giannoni, P., Morasso, P., Sanguineti, V.: A proof of concept study for the integration of robot therapy with physiotherapy in the treatment of stroke patients. Clini. Rehabil. 23(3), 217–228 (2009)CrossRef
23.
Chae, J., Sheffler, L., Knutson, J.: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for motor restoration in hemiplegia. Top. Stroke Rehabil. 15(5), 412–426 (2008). doi:10.​1310/​tsr1505-412 CrossRef
24.
Cho, K.H., Lee, W.H.: Virtual walking training program using a real- world video recording for patients with chronic stroke: a pilot study. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 92, 371–380 (2013)CrossRef
25.
Colombo, G., Joerg, M., Schreier, R., Dietz, V.: Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 37, 693–700 (2000)
26.
Coote, S., Stokes, E., Murphy, B., Harwin, W.: The Effect of GENTLE/s robot-mediated Therapy on Upper Extremity Dysfunction Post Stroke, pp. 59–61 (2003)
27.
da Cunha, I.T.J., Lim, P.A., Qureshy, H., Henson, H., Monga, T., Protas, E.J.: Gait outcomes after acute stroke rehabilitation with supported treadmill ambulation training: a randomized controlled pilot study. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 83, 1258–1265 (2002)CrossRef
28.
Cherng, R.J., Liu, C.F., Lau, T.W., Hong, R.B.: Effect of treadmill training with body weight support on gait and gross motor function in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Am. J. Phys. Med. 86, 548–555 (2007)CrossRef
29.
Daly, J.J., Cheng, R., Rogers, J., Litinas, K., Hrovat, K., Dohring, M.: Feasibility of a new application of noninvasive brain computer interface (BCI): a case study of training for recovery of volitional motor control after stroke. J. Neurol. Phys. Ther. 33, 203–211 (2009)CrossRef
30.
DeJong, G., Horn, S.D., Conroy, B., Nichols, D., Healton, E.B.: Opening the black box of post-stroke rehabilitation: stroke rehabilitation patients, processes, and outcomes. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 86(12 suppl 2), S1–S7 (2005)CrossRef
31.
Dobkin, B., Apple, D., Barbeau, H., et al.: Weight-supported treadmill vs over-ground training for walking after acute incomplete SCI. Neurology 66, 484–493 (2006)CrossRef
32.
Donnan, G.A., Fisher, M., Macleod, M., Davis, S.M.: Stroke. Lancet 371, 1612–1623 (2008)CrossRef
33.
Dromerick, A.W., Lum, P.S., Hidler, J.: Activity-based therapies. NeuroRx 3, 428–438 (2006)CrossRef
34.
Duncan, P.W., Goldstein, L.B., Matchar, D., Divine, G.W., Feussner, J.: Measurement of motor recovery after stroke. Outcome assessment and sample size requirements. Stroke 23, 1084–1089 (1992)CrossRef
35.
Duncan, P.W., Zorowitz, R., Bates, B., Choi, J.Y., Glasberg, J.J., Graham, G.D., Katz, R.C., Lamberty, K., Reker, D.: Management of adult stroke rehabilitation care—A clinical practice guideline. Stroke 36, E100–E143 (2005)CrossRef
36.
Duncan, P.W., Sullivan, K.J., Behrman, A.L., et al.: Body-weight-supported treadmill rehabilitation after stroke. N. Engl. J. Med. 364, 2026–2036 (2011)CrossRef
37.
El Saddik, A.: Still only in its infancy, haptics promises to be a revolution in how we interact in the virtual world. IEEE Instrum. Measur. Mag. 1094(6969/07) (2007)
38.
El Saddik, A.: Haptics Technologies: Bringing Touch to Multimedia. Springer, Berlin (2011)
39.
Ferrucci, L., Bandinelli, S., Guralnik, J.M., Lamponi, M., Bertini, C., Falchini, M., Baroni, A.: Recovery of functional status after stroke. A postrehabilitation follow-up study. Stroke 24, 200–205 (1993)CrossRef
40.
Esquenazi, A., Lee, S., Packel, A.T., Braitman, L.: A randomized comparative study of manually assisted versus robotic-assisted body weight supported treadmill training in persons with a traumatic brain injury. PMR 5, 280–290 (2013)
41.
Fernando, C.K., Basmajian, J.V.: Biofeedback in physical medicine and rehabilitation. Biofeedback Self. Regul. 3(4), 435–455 (1978)
42.
Fluet, G.G., Deutsch, J.E.: Virtual reality for sensorimotor rehabilitation post- stroke: the promise and current state of the field. Curr. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Rep. 1, 9–20 (2013)CrossRef
43.
Freivogel, S., Mehrholz, J., Husak-Sotomayor, T., Schmalohr, D.: Gait training with the newly developed ‘LokoHelp’-system is feasible for nonambulatory patients after stroke, spinal cord and brain injury. A feasibility study. Brain Inj. 22, 625–632 (2008)CrossRef
44.
Fritz, S.L., Peters, D.M., Merlo, A.M., Donley, J.: Active video-gaming effects on balance and mobility in individuals with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Top Stroke Rehabil. 20, 218–225 (2013)CrossRef
45.
Goodnight, S.J., Harris, W.S., Connor, W.E.: The effects of dietary omega 3 fatty acids on platelet composition and function in man: a prospective, controlled study. Blood 58(5),880–885 (1981)
46.
Guadagnoli, M.A., Lee, T.D.: Challenge point: a framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. J. Mot. Behav. 36, 212–224 (2004)CrossRef
47.
Hafsteinsdóttir, T.B., Algra, A., Kappelle, L.J., Grypdonck, M.H., Group, D.N.S.: Neurodevelopmental treatment after stroke: a comparative study. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 76, 788–792 (2005)CrossRef
48.
Hallett, M.: Plasticity of the human motor cortex and recovery from stroke. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 36, 169–174 (2001)CrossRef
49.
Haugland, M. (1996). A flexible method for fabrication of nerve cuff electrodes. In: 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 359–360, Amsterdam
50.
Henderson, A., Korner-Bitensky, N., Levin, M.: Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review of its effectiveness for upper limb motor recovery. Top Stroke Rehabil. 14, 52–61 (2007)CrossRef
51.
Hesse, S., Schulte-tigges, G., Konrad, M., Bardeleben, A., Werner, C.: Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 84(6), 915–920 (2003)CrossRef
52.
Holden, M.K., Dettwiler, A., Dyar, T., Niemann, G., Bizzi, E.: Retraining movement in patients with acquired brain injury using a virtual environment. In: Westwood, J.D. (ed.) Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, pp. 192–198. IO Press, Amsterdam (2001)
53.
Hornby, T.G., Campbell, D.D., Kahn, J.H., Demott, T., Moore, J.L., Roth, H.R.: Enhanced gait-related improvements after therapist—versus roboticassisted locomotor training in subjects with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study. Stroke 39, 1786–1792 (2008)CrossRef
54.
Houwink, A., Nijland, R.H., Geurts, A.C., Kwakkel, G.: Functional recovery of the paretic upper limb after stroke: who regains capacity? Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 94, 839–844 (2013)CrossRef
55.
Inoue, Y., Takemoto, K., Miyamoto, T., Yoshikawa, N., Taniguchi, S., Saiwai, S., Nishimura, Y., Komatsu, T.: Sequential computed tomography scans in acute cerebral infarction. Radiology 135, 655–662 (1980)CrossRef
56.
Jauch, E.C., Cucchiara, B., Adeoye, O., Meurer, W., Brice, J., Chan, Y., Gentile, N., Hazinski, M.F.: Part 11: adult stroke 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 122, S818–S828 (2010)CrossRef
57.
Jezernik, S., Schärer, R., Colombo, G., Morari, M.: Adaptive robotic rehabilitation of locomotion: a clinical study in spinally injured individuals. Spinal Cord 41, 657–666 (2003)CrossRef
58.
Jorgensen, H.S., Nakayama, H., Raaschou, H.O., Vivelarsen, J., Stoier, M., Olsen, T.S.: Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen stroke study. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabili. 76, 406–412 (1995)CrossRef
59.
Jueptner, M., Stephan, K.M., Frith, C.D., Brooks, D.J., Frackowiak, R.S., Passingham, R.E.: Anatomy of motor learning. I. Frontal cortex and attention to action. J. Neurophysiol. 77, 1313–1324 (1997)
60.
Karni, A., Meyer, G., Jezzard, P., Adams, M.M., Turner, R., Ungerleider, L.G.: Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning. Nature 377, 155–158 (1995)CrossRef
61.
62.
Keller, T., Lawrence, M., Kuhn, A., Morari, M.: Technology for rehabilitation. In: Proceedings of the 28th IEEE EMBS Annual International Conference, New York City, USA, Aug 30–Sept 3, 2006, pp. 194–197 (2006)
63.
Kim, J.H., Jang, S.H., Kim, C.S., Jung, J.H., You, J.H.: Use of virtual reality to enhance balance and ambulation in chronic stroke: a double-blind randomized controlled study. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 88, 693–701 (2009)CrossRef
64.
Kiper, P., Agostini, M., Luque-Moreno, C., Tonin, P., Turolla, A.: Reinforced feedback in virtual environment for rehabilitation of upper extremity dysfunction after stroke: preliminary data from a randomized controlled trial. Biomed. Res. Int. 752128. doi:10.​1155/​2014/​752128 (2014)
65.
Kitago, T., Krakauer, J.W.: Motor learning principles for neurorehabilitation. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 110, 93–103 (2013)CrossRef
66.
Knutson, J.S., Harley, M.Y., Hisel, T.Z., Hogan, S.D., Maloney, M.M., Chae, J.: Contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation for upper extremity hemiplegia: an early-phase randomized clinical trial in subacute stroke patients. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 26(3),239–246 (2012). doi:10.​1177/​1545968311419301​
67.
Kollen, B.J., Lennon, S., Lyons, B., et al.: The effectiveness of the Bobath concept in stroke rehabilitation: what is the evidence? Stroke 40, e89–e97 (2009)CrossRef
68.
Krebs, H.I., Volpe, B.T.: Rehabilitation robotics. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 110, 283–294 (2013)CrossRef
69.
Krebs, H.I., Ferraro, M., Buerger, S.P., Newbery, M.J., Makiyama, A., Sandmann, M., Hogan, N.: Rehabilitation robotics: pilot trial of a spatial extension for MIT-Manus. J. NeuroEng. Rehabil. 1(1), 5 (2004)CrossRef
70.
71.
Kunesch, E., Binkofsky, F., Steinmetz, H., Freund, H.J.: The pattern of motor deficits in relation to the site of stroke lesions. Eur. Neurol. 35, 20–26 (1995)CrossRef
72.
Lambercy, O., Dovat, L., Gassert, R., Burdet, E., Teo, C.L., Milner, T.: A haptic knob for rehabilitation of hand function. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 15(3), 356–366 (2007)CrossRef
73.
Lange, B., Chang, C.Y., Suma, E., Newman, B., Rizzo, A.S., Bolas, M.: Development and evaluation of low cost game-based balance rehabilitation tool using the Microsoft Kinect sensor. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2011, 1831–1834 (2011). doi:10.​1109/​iembs.​2011.​6090521
74.
Langhorne, P., Bernhardt, J., Kwakkel, G.: Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet 377, 1693–1702 (2011)CrossRef
75.
Langhorne, P., Coupar, F., Pollock, A.: Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 8, 741–754 (2009)CrossRef
76.
Langlois, J.A., Rutland-Brown, W., Wald, M.M.: The epidemiology and impact of traumatic brain injury: a brief overview. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 21, 375–378 (2006)CrossRef
77.
Laufer, Y., Dickstein, R., Chefez, Y., Marcovitz, E.: The effect of treadmill training on the ambulation of stroke survivors in the early stages of rehabilitation: a randomized study. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 38, 69–78 (2001)
78.
Laver, K.E., George, S., Thomas, S., Deutsch, J.E., Crotty, M.: Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 9, CD008349 (2011)
79.
Leblanc, S., Paquin, K., Carr, K., Horton, S.: Non-immersive virtual reality for fine motor rehabilitation of functional activities in individuals with chronic stroke: a review. Aging Sci. 1, 105 (2013). doi:10.​4172/​jasc.​1000105
80.
Lennon, S., Ashburn, A., Baxter, D.: Gait outcome following outpatient physiotherapy based on the Bobath concept in people post stroke. Disabil. Rehabil. 28, 873–881 (2006)CrossRef
81.
Lo, R.C.: Recovery and rehabilitation after stroke. Can. Fam. Physician 32, 1851–1853 (1986)
82.
Lohse, K.R., Hilderman, C.G.E., Cheung, K.L., Tatla, S., Van der Loos, H.F.M.: Virtual reality therapy for adults post-stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring virtual environments and commercial games in therapy. PLoS one 9(3), e93318 (2014). doi:10.​1371/​journal.​pone.​0093318 CrossRef
83.
Lucca, L.F.: Virtual reality and motor rehabilitation of the upper limb after stroke: a generation of progress? J. Rehabil. Med. 41, 1003–1006 (2009)CrossRef
84.
Mackay, J., Mensah, G.A.: The atlas of heart disease and stroke. The atlas of heart disease and stroke (2004)
85.
Mayr, A., Kofler, M., Quirbach, E., Matzak, H., Fröhlich, K., Saltuari, L.: Prospective, blinded, randomized crossover study of gait rehabilitation in stroke patients using the Lokomat gait orthosis. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 21, 307–314 (2007)
86.
Manganotti, P., Acler, M., Zanette, G.P., Smania, N., Fiaschi, A.: Motor cortical disinhibition during early and late recovery after stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 22, 396–403 (2008)CrossRef
87.
Martin, S., Nick, H.: Characterisation of the Novint Falcon haptic device for application as a robot manipulator. Australas. Conf. Robot. Autom. (2009)
88.
Massie, T.H., Salisbury, J.K.: The phantom haptic interface: a device for probing virtual objects. In: Proceedings of the ASME Winter Annual Meeting, Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 295–300 (1994, November)
89.
McClanachan, N.J., Gesch, J., Wuthapanich, N., Fleming, J., Kuys, S.S.: Feasibility of gaming console exercise ant its effect on endurance, gait and balance in people with an acquired brain injury. Brain Inj. 27, 1402–1408 (2013)CrossRef
90.
Mattia, D., Molinari, M.: Brain-computer interfaces and therapy. In: Grubler, G., Hildt, E. (eds.) Brain-Computer-Interfaces in their Ethical, Social and Cultural Contexts, pp. 49–59. Springer, Netherlands (2014)
91.
McEwen, D., Taillon-Hobson, A., Bilodeau, M., Sveistrup, H., Finestone, H.: Virtual reality exercise improves mobility after stroke: an inpatient randomized controlled trial. Stroke 45, 1853–1855 (2014)CrossRef
92.
Mehrholz, J., Werner, C., Kugler, J., Pohl, M.: Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke (review). Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (4), CD006185 (2007)
93.
Mirelman, A., Patritti, B.L., Bonato, P., Deutsch, J.E.: Effects of virtual reality training on gait biomechanics of individuals post-stroke. Gait Posture 31, 433–437 (2010)CrossRef
94.
Morone, G., Pisotta, I., Pichiotti, F., Kleih, S., Paolucci, S., Molinari, M., Cincotti, F., Kubler, A., Mattia, D.: Proof of principle of a brain-computer interface approach to support poststroke arm rehabilitation in hospitalized patients: design, acceptability, and usability. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 96(3 supp1), S71–S78 (2015)
95.
Mumford, N., Duckworth, J., Thomas, P.R., et al.: Upper limb virtual rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury: a preliminary within-group evaluation of the elements system. Brain Inj. 26, 166–176 (2012)CrossRef
96.
Nakayama, H., Jorgensen, H.S., Raaschou, H.O., Olsen, T.S.: Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen stroke study. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 75, 394–398 (1994)CrossRef
97.
Nef, T., Riener, R.: ARMin-design of a novel arm rehabilitation robot. In: 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005, pp. 57–60, IEEE (2005, June)
98.
Neumann, N., Kubler, A., Kaiser, J., Hinterberger, T., Birbaumer, N.: Conscious perception of brain states: mental strategies for brain-computer communication. Neuropsychologia 41, 1028–1036 (2003)CrossRef
99.
NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) Stroke rehabilitation: long-term rehabilitation after stroke. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London (2013)
100.
Norouzi-Gheidari, N., Archambault, P.S., Fung, J.: Effects of robot-assisted therapy on stroke rehabilitation in upper limbs: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 49, 479–496 (2012)CrossRef
101.
NUDO, R.J.: Adaptive plasticity in motor cortex: implications for rehabilitation after brain injury. J. Rehabil. Med. 7–10 (2003)
102.
O’ Dwyer, N.J., Ada, L., Nielson, P.D.: Spasticity and muscle contracture following stroke. Brain 119, 1737–1749 (1996)CrossRef
103.
Ochi, F., Esquenazi, A., Hirai, B., et al.: Temporal-spatial feature of gait alter traumatic brain injury. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 14, 105–115 (1999)CrossRef
104.
Paolucci, S., Antonucci, G., Grasso, M.G., et al.: Functional outcome of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke patients after inpatient rehabilitation a matched comparison. Stroke 34,2861–2865 (2003)
105.
Pascual-Leone, A., Grafman, J., Hallett, M.: Modulation of cortical motor output maps during development of implicit and explicit knowledge. Science 263, 1287–1289 (1994)CrossRef
106.
107.
Pfurtscheller, G., Neuper, C.: Motor imagery activates primary sensorimotor area in humans. Neurosci. Lett. 239, 65–68 (1997)CrossRef
108.
Pichiorri, F., Petti, M., Toppi, J., et al.: YIA2: different brain network modulation following motor imagery BCI-assisted training after stroke. Clin. Neurophysiol. 125, S24 (2014)CrossRef
109.
Ploughman, M., Windle, V., MacLellan, C.L., White, N., Dore, J.J., Corbett, D.: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor contributes of recovery of skilled reaching after focal ischemia in rats. Stroke 40, 1490–1495 (2009)CrossRef
110.
Popović, D.B., Sinkjaer, T.: Control of movement for the physically disabled, 2nd edn, p. 488. Center for Sensory Motor Interaction; Aalborg University, Denmark, Aalborg (2003)
111.
112.
Popovic, D.B., Popovic, M.B., Sinkjaer, T., Stefanovic, A., Schwirtlich, L.: Therapy of paretic arm in hemiplegic subjects augmented with a neural prosthesis: a cross-over study. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 82(8–9), 749–756 (2004). doi:10.​1139/​y04-057 CrossRef
113.
Popovic, M., Curt, A., Keller, T., Dietz, V.: Functional electrical stimulation for grasping and walking: indications and limitations. Spinal Cord 39, 403–412 (2001)CrossRef
114.
Prange, G.B., Jannink, M.J., Groothuis-oudshoorn, C.G., Hermens, H.J., Ijzerman, M.J.: Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 43(2), 171 (2006)CrossRef
115.
Prasad, G., Herman, P., Coyle, D., McDonough, S., Crosbie, J.: Applying a brain-computer interface to support motor imagery practice in people with stroke for upper limb recovery: a feasibility study. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 7, 60 (2010)CrossRef
116.
Reinkensmeyer, D.J., Kahn, L.E., Averbuch, M., Mckenna-cole, A., Schmit, B.D., Rymer, W.Z.: Understanding and treating arm movement impairment after chronic brain injury: progress with the ARM guide. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 37(6), 653–662 (2000)
117.
Reinkensmeyer, D.J., Housman, S.J.: ““If I can’t do it once, why do it a hundred times?”: connecting volition to movement success in a virtual environment motivates people to exercise the arm after stroke,” Virtual Rehabil. pp. 44, 48 (2007)
118.
Richards, L.G., Stewart, K.C., Woodbury, M.L., Senesac, C., Cauraugh, J.H.: Movement-dependent stroke recovery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of TMS and fMRI evidence. Neuropsychologia 46, 3–11 (2008)CrossRef
119.
Richards, C.L., Malouin, F., Wood-Dauphinee, S., Williams, J.I., Bouchard, J.P., Brunet, D.: Task-specific physical therapy for optimization of gait recovery in acute stroke patients. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 74, 612–620 (1993)CrossRef
120.
Rosati, G., Gallina, P., Masiero, S., Rossi, A.: Design of a new 5 dof wire-based robot for rehabilitation. In: 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005, pp. 430–433, IEEE (2005, July)
121.
Rossini, P.M., Calautti, C., Pauri, F., Baron, J.C.: Post-stroke plastic reorganisation in the adult brain. Lancet Neurol. 2, 493–502 (2003)CrossRef
122.
Sainburg, R.L., Ghilardi, M.F., Poizner, H., Ghez, C.: The control of limb dynamics in normal subjects and patients without propioception. J. Neurophysiol. 73, 820–835 (1995)
123.
Sanes, J.N.: Skill learning: motor cortex rules for learning and memory. Curr. Biol. 10, R495–R497 (2000)CrossRef
124.
Saposnik, G., Levin, M.: Stroke outcome research Canada working group. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation. A meta-analysis and implications for clinicians. Stroke 42, 1380–1386 (2011)CrossRef
125.
Saposnik, G., Teasell, R., Mamdani, M., Hall, J., McIlroy, W., Cheung, D., Bayley, M.: Effectiveness of virtual reality using Wii gaming technology in stroke rehabilitation: a pilot randomized clinical trial and proof of principle. Stroke 41(7), 1477–1484 (2010) doi:10.​1161/​strokeaha.​110.​584979
126.
Schuhfried, O., Crevenna, R., Fialka-Moser, V., Paternostro-Sluga, T.: Non-invasive neuromuscular electrical stimulation in patients with central nervous system lesions: an educational review. J. Rehabil. Med. 44(2), 99–105 (2012). doi:10.​2340/​16501977-0941 CrossRef
127.
Schwartz, I., Sajin, A., Fisher, M., et al.: The effectiveness of locomotor therapy using robotic-assisted gait training in subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. PM R 1, 516–523 (2009)CrossRef
128.
Sharma, N., Simmons, L.H., Jones, P.S., Day, D.J., Carpenter, T.A., Pomeroy, V.M., Warburton, E.A., Baron, J.C.: Motor imagery after subcortical stroke: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Stroke 40, 1315–1324 (2009)CrossRef
129.
130.
Shelton, F.N., Reding, M.J.: Effect of lesion location on upper limb motor recovery after stroke. Stroke 32, 107–112 (2001)CrossRef
131.
Soekadar, S., Birbaumer, N., Cohen, L.: Brain-computer interfaces in the rehabilitation of stroke and neurotrauma. In: Kansaku, K., Cohen, L. (eds.) Systems Neuroscience and Rehabilitation. Springer, Japan (2011)
132.
Sommerfeld, D.K., Eek, E.U., Svensson, A.K., Holmqvist, L.W., Von Arbin, M.H.: Spasticity after stroke:its occurrence and association with motor impairments and activity limitations. Stroke 35, 134–139 (2004)CrossRef
133.
Sperazza, P.D., CPRP, Lynda Jeanine, Dauenhauer, P.D., MSW, Jason, Banerjee, P. D., Priya.: Tomorrow’s seniors: technology and leisure programming. 8, (2012)
134.
Stroemer, R.P., Kent, T.A., Hulsebosch, C.E.: Neocortical neural sprouting, synaptogenesis, and behavioral recovery after neocortical infarction in rats. Stroke 26, 2135–2144 (1995)CrossRef
135.
Strong, K., Mathers, C., Bonita, R.: Preventing stroke: saving lives around the world. Lancet Neurol. 6, 182–187 (2007)CrossRef
136.
Sukal, T.M., Ellis, M.D., Dewald, J.P.: Shoulder abduction-induced reductions in reaching work area following hemiparetic stroke: neuroscientific implications. Exp. Brain Res. 183(2), 215–223 (2007)CrossRef
137.
Sullivan, K.J., Knowlton, B.J., Dobkin, B.H.: Step training with body weight support: effect of treadmill speed and practice paradigms on poststroke locomotor recovery. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 83, 683–691 (2002)CrossRef
138.
Sveistrup, H., McComas, J., Thornton, M., et al.: Experimental studies of virtual reality- delivered compared to conventional exercise programs for rehabilitation. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 6.245–6.249 (2003)
139.
Swayne, O.B., Rothwell, J.C., Ward, N.S., Greenwood, R.J.: Stages of motor output reorganization after hemispheric stroke suggested by longitudinal studies of cortical physiology. Cereb. Cortex 18, 1909–1922 (2008)CrossRef
140.
Takeuchi, N., Izumi, S.-I.: Rehabilitation with poststroke motor recovery: a review with a focus on neural plasticity. Stroke Res. Treat. 2013, 13 (2013)
141.
Thornton, M., Marshall, S., McComas, J., et al.: Benefits of activity and virtual reality based balance exercise programmes for adults with traumatic brain injury: perceptions of participants and their caregivers. Brain Inj. 19, 989–1000 (2005)CrossRef
142.
Toth, A., Fazekas, G., Arz, G., Jurak, M., Horvath, M.: Passive robotic movement therapy of the spastic hemiparetic arm with REHAROB: report of the first clinical test and the follow-up system improvement. In: 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005, pp. 127–130, IEEE (2005, June)
143.
Ustinova, K.I., Leonard, W.A., Cassavaugh, N.D., Ingersoll, C.D.: Development of a 3D immersive videogame to improve arm- postural coordination in patients with TBI. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 8, 61 (2011)CrossRef
144.
Ustinova, K.I., Perkins, J., Leonard, W.A., Hausbeck, C.J.: Virtual reality game-based therapy for treatment of postural and coordination abnormalities secondary to TBI: a pilot study. Brain Inj. 28, 486–495 (2014)CrossRef
145.
Vachranukunkiet, T., Esquenazi, A.: Pathophysiology of gait disturbance in neurologic disorders and clinical presentations. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. North Am. 24, 233–246 (2013)CrossRef
146.
Van der loos Prof, H.M.: Rehabilitation and health care robotics. In: Springer Handbook of Robotics, pp. 1223–1251. Springer, Berlin (2008)
147.
van Diest, M., Lamoth, C.J., Stegenga, J., Verkerke, G.J., Postema, K.: Exergaming for balance training of elderly: state of the art and future developments. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 10, 101 (2013). doi:10.​1186/​1743-0003-10-101
148.
Van Peppen, R.P., Kwakkel, G., Wood-Dauphinee, S., Hendriks, H.J., Van der Wees, P.J., Dekker, J.: The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what’s the evidence? Clin. Rehabil. 18, 833–862 (2004)CrossRef
149.
Visintin, M., Barbeau, H., Korner-Bitensky, N., Mayo, N.E.: A new approach to retrain gait in stroke patients through body weight support and treadmill stimulation. Stroke 29, 1122–1128 (1998)CrossRef
150.
Ward, N.S., Brown, M.M., Thompson, A.J., Frackowiak, R.S.J.: Neural correlates of motor recovery after stroke: a longitudinal fMRI study. Brain 126, 2476–2496 (2003)CrossRef
151.
Weisman, S.: Computer games for the frail elderly. Gerontologist 23(4), 361–363 (1983)
152.
153.
Wirz, M., Zemon, D.H., Rupp, R., et al.: Effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: a multicenter trial. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 86, 672–680 (2005)CrossRef
154.
Wolbrecht, E.T., Chan, V., Reinkensmeyer, D.J., Bobrow, J.E.: Optimizing compliant, model-based robotic assistance to promote neurorehabilitation. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 16(3), 286–297 (2008)CrossRef
155.
Wolf, S.L.: Electromyographic biofeedback applications to stroke patients. A Crit. Rev. Phys. Ther. 63(9), 1448–1459 (1983)
156.
Wolpaw, J.R., Birbaumer, N., McFarland, D.J., Pfurtscheller, G., Vaughan, T.M.: Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control. Clin. Neurophysiol. 113, 767–791 (2002)CrossRef
157.
Woodford, H., Price, C.: EMG biofeedback for the recovery of motor function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. Cd004585 (2007)
158.
Xu, J.-X., Guo, Z.-Q., Lee, T.H.: Design and implementation of integral sliding-mode control on an underactuated two-wheeled mobile robot ieee transactions on industrial electronics. 61(7), (2014)
159.
You, S.H., Jang, S.H., Kim, Y., Hallett, M., Ahn, S.H., Kwon, Y., et al.: Virtual reality-induced cortical reorganization and associated locomotor recovery in chronic stroke. An experimental-blind randomized study. Stroke 36, 1166–1171 (2005)CrossRef
160.
World Health Organization Library Cataloguing-in Publication Data: International Classification of Functioning. Disability and Health, Geneva (2001)
161.
Zimmermann-Schlatter, A., Schuster, C., Puhan, M.A., Siekierka, E., Steurer, J.: Efficacy of motor imagery in post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 5, 8 (2008)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Rehabilitation Technologies Application in Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injury Patients
verfasst von
Marco Molinari
Alberto Esquenazi
Andrei Agius Anastasi
Rasmus Kragh Nielsen
Oliver Stoller
Antonio D’Andrea
Manuel Bayon Calatayud
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Buch
Emerging Therapies in Neurorehabilitation II

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24899-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-24901-8

Copyright-Jahr: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24901-8_2

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise