Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Kongresse
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Veranstaltungskalender Awards MyNewsletter Firmensuche
Kunden Login
Über Einzelzugang informieren
Über Unternehmenszugang informieren
Referenzkunden
12. Internationaler Motorenkongress 2025 | 25. + 26. Februar 2025

Treffpunkt der Community für Antriebe und nachhaltige Kraftstoffe

Der Kongress beleuchtet die zukünftige Rolle des Verbrennungsmotors und seiner nichtfossilen Kraftstoffe aus globaler Sicht mit führenden Experten. Seien Sie dabei! Weitere Informationen und Buchungsmöglichkeiten finden Sie auf unserer Website.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2025 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

2. Related Work

verfasst von : Tanja Kojić

Erschienen in: User Experience for Serious Games in Virtual Reality

Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The so-called second wave of VR has brought to research and market a lot of new displays, input devices, and content solutions during the last few years. Not only has new hardware entered the consumer market with low-cost price patterns, but whole new technologies are also being designed and developed.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Introduction
Nächstes Kapitel Methods
Literatur
5.
Bastug, E., Bennis, M., Médard, M., Debbah, M.: Toward interconnected virtual reality: opportunities, challenges, and enablers. IEEE Commun. Mag. 55(6), 110–117 (2017)CrossRef
13.
Garrett, J.J.: The Elements of User Experience: User-Centered Design for the Web and Beyond. Pearson Education, London (2010)
14.
Kuniavsky, M.: Observing the User Experience: A Practitioner’s Guide to User Research. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2003)
15.
ITU-T Recommendation G.1035: Influencing Factors on Quality of Experience for Virtual Reality Services. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva (2021)
16.
QUALINET White Paper on Definitions of Immersive Media Experience (IMEx): European Network on Quality of Experience in Multimedia Systems and Services, 14th QUALINET meeting. Perkis, A., Timmerer, C. (Eds.) (2020). arxiv.org/abs/2007.07032
31.
Sutherland, I.: The Ultimate Display (1965)
32.
Lanier, J.: Dawn of the New Everything: Encounters with Reality and Virtual Reality. Henry Holt and Company, New York (2017)
33.
Cummings, J.J., Bailenson, J.N.: How immersive is enough? A meta-analysis of the effect of immersive technology on user presence. Media Psychol. 19(2), 272–309 (2016)
34.
Steuer, J.: Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence. J. Commun. 42(4), 73–93 (1992)CrossRef
35.
Kardong-Edgren, S.S., Farra, S.L., Alinier, G., Young, H.M.: A call to unify definitions of virtual reality. Clin. Simul. Nurs. 31, 28–34 (2019)CrossRef
36.
Deutsch, D., Landsberg, P.T.: The fabric of reality. Nature 388(6638), 136–136 (1997)
37.
Brooks, F.P.: What’s real about virtual reality? IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 19(6), 16–27 (1999)CrossRef
38.
Milgram, P., Colquhoun, H., et al.: A taxonomy of real and virtual world display integration. Mixed Real. Merg. Real Virtual Worlds 1(1999), 1–26 (1999)
39.
Nincarean, D., Alia, M.B., Halim, n.d.A., Rahman, M.H.A.: Mobile augmented reality: the potential for education. Procedia-Soc. Behavior. Sci. 103, 657–664 (2013)
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
Garner, T.A.: Applications of virtual reality. In: Echoes of Other Worlds: Sound in Virtual Reality, pp. 299–362. Springer, Berlin (2018)
45.
McLellan, H.: Virtual realities. In: Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, pp. 457–487. CiteSeer (1996)
46.
Cordeil, M., Dwyer, T., Klein, K., Laha, B., Marriott, K., Thomas, B.H.: Immersive collaborative analysis of network connectivity: cave-style or head-mounted display? IEEE Trans. Visualizat. Comput. Graph. 23(1), 441–450 (2016)CrossRef
47.
48.
DeFanti, T., Acevedo, D., Ainsworth, R., Brown, M., Cutchin, S., Dawe, G., Doerr, K.-U., Johnson, A., Knox, C., Kooima, R., et al.: The future of the cave. Open Eng. 1(1), 16–37 (2011)CrossRef
49.
Shibata, T.: Head mounted display. Displays 23(1–2), 57–64 (2002)CrossRef
50.
51.
Costello, P.J., et al.: Health and Safety Issues Associated with Virtual Reality: A Review of Current Literature. CiteSeer (1997)
52.
Bowman, D.A., Datey, A., Farooq, U., Ryu, Y., Vasnaik, O.: Empirical comparisons of virtual environment displays. Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State, Technical Report, Department of Computer Science (2001)
53.
Elor, A., Powell, M., Mahmoodi, E., Hawthorne, N., Teodorescu, M., Kurniawan, S.: On shooting stars: comparing cave and HMD immersive virtual reality exergaming for adults with mixed ability. ACM Trans. Comput. Healthcare 1(4), 1–22 (2020)CrossRef
54.
Burdea, G., Richard, P., Coiffet, P.: Multimodal virtual reality: input-output devices, system integration, and human factors. Int. J. Human-Comput. Inter. 8(1), 5–24 (1996)
55.
Sherman, W.R., Craig, A.B.: Understanding Virtual Reality: Interface, Application, and Design. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (2018)
56.
Broll, W., Grimm, P., Herold, R., Reiners, D., Cruz-Neira, C.: VR/AR output devices. In: Virtual and Augmented Reality (VR/AR), pp. 149–200. Springer, Berlin (2022)
57.
Kim, T.-B.: Graphical menus for virtual environments. Institute for Graphical Interfaces (2005)
58.
Wenjun, H.: The three-dimensional user interface. In: Advances in Human Computer Interaction. IntechOpen, London (2008)
59.
Stone, D., Jarrett, C., Woodroffe, M., Minocha, S.: User Interface Design and Evaluation. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2005)
60.
Bowman, D.A., Kruijff, E.: 3d User Interfaces: Theory and Practice. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2005)
61.
62.
Steinicke, F., Bruder, G., Hinrichs, K., Ropinski, T., Lopes, M.: 3D user interfaces for collaborative work. In: Human Computer Interaction. IntechOpen, London (2008)
63.
Stellmach, S., Dachselt, R.: Looking at 3D user interfaces. In: CHI 2012 Workshop on The 3rd Dimension of CHI (3DCHI): Touching and Designing 3D User Interfaces, pp. 95–98 (2012)
64.
Marriott, K., Schreiber, F., Dwyer, T., Klein, K., Riche, N.H., Itoh, T., Stuerzlinger, W., Thomas, B.H.: Immersive Analytics, vol. 11190. Springer, Berlin (2018)CrossRef
65.
Zhang, X.: Virtual reality application in data visualization and analysis. M.S. Thesis, TH Köln, Köln (2017)
66.
Bolton, J., Lambert, M., Lirette, D., Unsworth, B.: PaperDude: A virtual reality cycling exergame. In: CHI’14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 475–478. ACM, New York (2014)
67.
Yoo, S., Kay, J.: VRun: Running-in-place virtual reality exergame. In: Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, pp. 562–566. ACM, New York (2016)
68.
Shaw, L.A., Wünsche, B.C., Lutteroth, C., Marks, S., Callies, R.: Challenges in virtual reality exergame design. In: Proceedings of the 16th Australasian User Interface Conference (AUIC 2015), Sydney (2015)
69.
Bogost, I.: The rhetoric of exergaming. In: Proceedings of the Digital Arts and Cultures (DAC) (2005)
70.
Ryan, M.-L.: Immersion vs. interactivity: virtual reality and literary theory. SubStance 28(2), 110–137 (1999)
71.
Zahorik, P., Jenison, R.L.: Presence as being-in-the-world. Presence 7(1), 78–89 (1998)CrossRef
72.
McGloin, R., Farrar, K., Krcmar, M.: Video games, immersion, and cognitive aggression: does the controller matter? Media psychol. 16(1), 65–87 (2013)CrossRef
73.
Monahan, T., McArdle, G., Bertolotto, M.: Virtual reality for collaborative e-learning. Comput. Edu. 50(4), 1339–1353 (2008)CrossRef
74.
McGrath, J.L., Taekman, J.M., Dev, P., Danforth, D.R., Mohan, D., Kman, N., Crichlow, A., Bond, W.F., Riker, S., Lemheney, A., et al.: Using virtual reality simulation environments to assess competence for emergency medicine learners. Acad. Emer. Med. 25(2), 186–195 (2018)CrossRef
75.
Nee, A.Y., Ong, S.-K.: Virtual and augmented reality applications in manufacturing. IFAC Proc. Vol. 46(9), 15–26 (2013)CrossRef
76.
Manresa, C., Varona, J., Mas, R., Perales, F.J.: Hand tracking and gesture recognition for human-computer interaction. ELCVIA Electr. Lett. Comput. Vis. Image Analy. 5(3), 96–104 (2005)CrossRef
77.
Wang, R.Y., Popović, J.: Real-time hand-tracking with a color glove. ACM Trans. Graph. 28(3), 1–8 (2009)
78.
Taylor, J., Bordeaux, L., Cashman, T., Corish, B., Keskin, C., Sharp, T., Soto, E., Sweeney, D., Valentin, J., Luff, B., et al.: Efficient and precise interactive hand tracking through joint, continuous optimization of pose and correspondences. ACM Trans. Graph. 35(4), 1–12 (2016)CrossRef
79.
Cameron, C.R., DiValentin, L.W., Manaktala, R., McElhaney, A.C., Nostrand, C.H., Quinlan, O.J., Sharpe, L.N., Slagle, A.C., Wood, C.D., Zheng, Y.Y., et al.: Hand tracking and visualization in a virtual reality simulation. In: 2011 IEEE Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium, pp. 127–132. IEEE, Piscatway (2011)
80.
McKee, M.: Biofeedback: an overview in the context of heart-brain medicine. Cleveland Clin. J. Med. 75, S31–S34 (2008)CrossRef
81.
Huang, H., Wolf, S.L., He, J.: Recent developments in biofeedback for neuromotor rehabilitation. J. Neuroeng. Rehabilit. 3(1), 11 (2006)CrossRef
82.
Houzangbe, S., Christmann, O., Gorisse, G., Richir, S.: Effects of voluntary heart rate control on user engagement and agency in a virtual reality game. Virtual Real. 24(4), 665–681 (2020)CrossRef
83.
Michael, D.R., Chen, S.L.: Serious Games: Games That Educate, Train, and Inform. Muska & Lipman/Premier-Trade, Frederick (2005)
84.
Dörner, R., Göbel, S., Effelsberg, W., Wiemeyer, J.: Serious Games. Springer, Berlin (2016)CrossRef
85.
Deterding, S., Sicart, M., Nacke, L., O’Hara, K., Dixon, D.: Gamification. using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts. In: CHI’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2425–2428 (2011)
86.
Haoran, G., Bazakidi, E., Zary, N.: Serious games in health professions education: review of trends and learning efficacy. Yearbook Med. Inf. 28(01), 240–248 (2019)CrossRef
87.
Stapleton, A.J.: Serious games: Serious opportunities. In: Australian Game Developers Conference. Academic Summit, Melbourne. CiteSeer (2004)
88.
Checa, D., Bustillo, A.: A review of immersive virtual reality serious games to enhance learning and training. Multimedia Tools Appl. 79(9), 5501–5527 (2020)CrossRef
89.
Oh, Y., Yang, S.: Defining exergames & exergaming. In: Proceedings of Meaningful Play, pp. 1–17 (2010)
90.
Cauberghe, V., De Pelsmacker, P.: Advergames. J. Advert. 39(1), 5–18 (2010)CrossRef
91.
Mueller, F., Gibbs, M.R., Vetere, F.: Design influence on social play in distributed exertion games. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, pp. 1539–1548 (2009)
92.
Murray, E.G., Neumann, D.L., Moffitt, R.L., Thomas, P.R.: The effects of the presence of others during a rowing exercise in a virtual reality environment. Psychol. Sport Exer. 22, 328–336 (2016)CrossRef
93.
Demers, M., Martinie, O., Winstein, C., Robert, M.T.: Active video games and low-cost virtual reality: an ideal therapeutic modality for children with physical disabilities during a global pandemic. Front. Neurol. 11, 1737 (2020)CrossRef
94.
Corregidor-Sánchez, A.I., Polonio-López, B., Martin-Conty, J.L., Rodríguez-Hernández, M., Mordillo-Mateos, L., Schez-Sobrino, S., Criado-Álvarez, J.J.: Exergames to prevent the secondary functional deterioration of older adults during hospitalization and isolation periods during the covid-19 pandemic. Sustainability 13(14), 7932 (2021)CrossRef
95.
Brown, C.M.: Human-Computer Interface Design Guidelines. Intellect Books, Bristol (1999)
96.
97.
Hartson, R., Pyla, P.S.: The UX Book: Process and Guidelines for Ensuring a Quality User Experience. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2012)
98.
Kaptelinin, V., Nardi, B., Bødker, S., Carroll, J., Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., Winograd, T.: Post-cognitivist HCI: Second-wave theories. In: CHI’03 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 692–693 (2003)
99.
Calvo, R.A., D’Mello, S., Gratch, J.M., Kappas, A.: The Oxford Handbook of Affective Computing. Oxford Library of Psychology, Oxford (2015)CrossRef
100.
Norman, D., Miller, J., Henderson, A.: What you see, some of what’s in the future, and how we go about doing it: Hi at apple computer. In: Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. 155 (1995)
101.
Roto, V., Law, E., Vermeeren, A., Hoonhout, J.: User experience white paper. Bringing clarity to the concept of user experience. Result from Dagstuhl seminar on demarcating user experience, September 15–18 (2010). Disponible en ligne le 22, 06–15 (2011)
102.
Wechsung, I., Moor, K.D.: Quality of experience versus user experience. In: Quality of Experience, pp. 35–54. Springer, Berlin (2014)
103.
Wilson, G.M., Angela Sasse, M.: From doing to being: getting closer to the user experience. Interact. Comput. 16(4), 697–705 (2004)CrossRef
104.
Qualinet White Paper on Definitions of Quality of Experience. COST Action IC 1003, Le Callet, P., Möller, S., Perkis, A. (Eds.) (2013)
105.
106.
107.
Tcha-Tokey, K., Christmann, O., Loup-Escande, E., Loup, G., Richir, S.: Towards a model of user experience in immersive virtual environments. In: Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 2018 (2018)
108.
Heater, C.: Being there: the subjective experience of presence. Presence Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 1(2), 262–271 (1992)CrossRef
109.
Bulu, S.T.: Place presence, social presence, co-presence, and satisfaction in virtual worlds. Comput. Edu. 58(1), 154–161 (2012)CrossRef
110.
Bowman, D.A., McMahan, R.P.: Virtual reality: How much immersion is enough? Computer 40(7), 36–43 (2007)CrossRef
111.
McCall, R., O’Neil, S., Carroll, F.: Measuring presence in virtual environments. In: CHI’04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 783–784 (2004)
112.
Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Beyond Boredom and Anxiety. Jossey-Bass, Hoboken (2000)
113.
Geslin, E., Bouchard, S., Richir, S.: Gamers’ versus non-gamers’ emotional response in virtual reality. J. CyberTher. Rehabil. 4(4), 489–493 (2011)
114.
Cheng, L.-K., Chieng, M.-H., Chieng, W.-H.: Measuring virtual experience in a three-dimensional virtual reality interactive simulator environment: a structural equation modeling approach. Virtual Real. 18(3), 173–188 (2014)CrossRef
115.
Albert, B., Tullis, T.: Measuring the User Experience: Collecting, Analyzing, and Presenting Usability Metrics. Newness, London (2013)
116.
Card, S.K., Moran, T.P., Newell, A.: The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2018)CrossRef
117.
Lund, A.M.: Measuring usability with the use questionnaire12. Usabil. Inter. 8(2), 3–6 (2001)
118.
Bangor, A., Kortum, P.T., Miller, J.T.: An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Int. J. Human-Comput. Inter. 24(6), 574–594 (2008)
119.
Brooke, J., et al.: SUS-a quick and dirty usability scale. Usabil. Evaluat. Ind. 189(194), 4–7 (1996)
120.
A. S. for Public Affairs: System Usability Scale (SUS). Department of Health and Human Services 2013 (2013).
121.
Bradley, M.M., Lang, P.J.: Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. J. Behav. Therapy Exp. Psych. 25(1), 49–59 (1994)CrossRef
122.
Hassenzahl, M., Trautmann, T.: Analysis of web sites with the repertory grid technique. In: CHI’01 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 167–168 (2001)
123.
Hassenzahl, M., Burmester, M., Koller, F.: Attrakdiff: Ein fragebogen zur messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer qualität. In: Mensch & Computer 2003, pp. 187–196. Springer, Berlin (2003)
124.
Laugwitz, B., Held, T., Schrepp, M.: Construction and evaluation of a user experience questionnaire. In: Symposium of the Austrian HCI and Usability Engineering Group, pp. 63–76. Springer, Berlin (2008)
125.
Schrepp, M., Hinderks, A., Thomaschewski, J.: Design and evaluation of a short version of the user experience questionnaire (UEQ-S). IJIMAI 4(6), 103–108 (2017)CrossRef
126.
Díaz-Oreiro, I., López, G., Quesada, L., Guerrero, L.A.: Standardized questionnaires for user experience evaluation: a systematic literature review. Multidiscipl. Digital Publ. Instit. Proc. 31(1), 14 (2019)
127.
Boyle, E.A., Connolly, T.M., Hainey, T., Boyle, J.M.: Engagement in digital entertainment games: a systematic review. Comput. Human Behav. 28(3), 771–780 (2012)CrossRef
128.
Huang, W., Roscoe, R.D., Johnson-Glenberg, M.C., Craig, S.D.: Motivation, engagement, and performance across multiple virtual reality sessions and levels of immersion. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 37(3), 745–758 (2021)CrossRef
129.
Keller, J.M.: Motivation, learning, and technology: applying the arcs-v motivation model. Participat. Edu. Res. 3(2), 1–15 (2016)CrossRef
130.
Dalgarno, B., Lee, M.J.: What are the learning affordances of 3-d virtual environments? Brit. J. Edu. Technol. 41(1), 10–32 (2010)CrossRef
131.
Chi, M.T., Wylie, R.: The ICAP framework: linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Edu. Psychol. 49(4), 219–243 (2014)CrossRef
132.
Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55(1), 68 (2000)CrossRef
133.
Ryan, R.M., Rigby, C.S., Przybylski, A.: The motivational pull of video games: a self-determination theory approach. Motivat. Emot. 30(4), 344–360 (2006)CrossRef
134.
Pelletier, L.G., Rocchi, M.A., Vallerand, R.J., Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M.: Validation of the revised sport motivation scale (SMS-II). Psychol. Sport Exer. 14(3), 329–341 (2013)CrossRef
135.
Richard, M., Christina, M.F., Deborah, L.S., Rubio, N., Kennon, M.S.: Intrinsic motivation and exercise adherence. Int. J. Sport. Psychol. 28(4), 335–354 (1997)
136.
Kiili, K., Perttula, A., Lindstedt, A., Arnab, S., Suominen, M.: Flow experience as a quality measure in evaluating physically activating collaborative serious games. Int. J. Ser. Games 1(3), 35–49 (2014)
137.
Möller, S., Raake, A.: Quality of Experience: Advanced Concepts, Applications and Methods. Springer, Berlin (2014)
138.
Sweetser, P., Johnson, D., Wyeth, P., Anwar, A., Meng, Y., Ozdowska, A.: GameFlow in different game genres and platforms. Comput. Entertain. 15(3), 1–24 (2017)CrossRef
139.
Jackson, S.A., Eklund, R.C.: Assessing flow in physical activity: the flow state scale-2 and dispositional flow scale-2. J. Sport Exer. Psychol. 24(2), 133–150 (2002)CrossRef
140.
Slater, M.: Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philosoph. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 364(1535), 3549–3557 (2009)CrossRef
141.
Lee, K.M.: Presence, explicated. Commun. Theory 14(1), 27–50 (2004)CrossRef
142.
Aymerich-Franch, L., Karutz, C., Bailenson, J.N., et al.: Effects of facial and voice similarity on presence in a public speaking virtual environment. In: Proceedings of the International Society for Presence Research Annual Conference, pp. 24–26 (2012)
143.
Biocca, F., Harms, C., Burgoon, J.K.: Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleop. Virtual Environ. 12(5), 456–480 (2003)CrossRef
144.
Ratan, R.A., Hasler, B.: Self-presence standardized: Introducing the self-presence questionnaire (SPQ). In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Workshop on Presence, vol. 81 (2009)
145.
Short, J., Williams, E., Christie, B.: The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. Wiley, Toronto (1976)
146.
Lee, K.M., Jung, Y., Kim, J., Kim, S.R.: Are physically embodied social agents better than disembodied social agents?: The effects of physical embodiment, tactile interaction, and people’s loneliness in human-robot interaction. Int. J. Human-Comput. Stud. 64(10), 962–973 (2006)CrossRef
147.
Grassini, S., Laumann, K.: Questionnaire measures and physiological correlates of presence: a systematic review. Front. Psychol. 11, 349 (2020)CrossRef
148.
Witmer, B.G., Singer, M.J.: Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence 7(3), 225–240 (1998)CrossRef
149.
Schubert, T., Friedmann, F., Regenbrecht, H.: The experience of presence: factor analytic insights. Presence 10(3), 266–281 (2001)CrossRef
150.
Kober, S.E., Neuper, C.: Personality and presence in virtual reality: does their relationship depend on the used presence measure? Int. J. Human-Comput. Inter. 29(1), 13–25 (2013)
151.
Szczurowski, K., Smith, M.: Measuring presence: Hypothetical quantitative framework. In: 2017 23rd International Conference on Virtual System & Multimedia (VSMM), pp. 1–8. IEEE, Piscatway (2017)
152.
Oh, C.S., Bailenson, J.N., Welch, G.F.: A systematic review of social presence: definition, antecedents, and implications. Front. Robot. AI 5 , 114 (2018)CrossRef
153.
Biocca, F., Harms, C.: Defining and measuring social presence: contribution to the networked minds theory and measure. Proc. PRESENCE 2002, 1–36 (2002)
154.
155.
Diels, C., Bos, J.E.: Self-driving carsickness. Appl. Ergon. 53, 374–382 (2016)CrossRef
156.
Gavgani, A.M., Hodgson, D.M., Nalivaiko, E.: Effects of visual flow direction on signs and symptoms of cybersickness. PLoS one 12(8), e0182790 (2017)CrossRef
157.
Classen, S., Bewernitz, M., Shechtman, O.: Driving simulator sickness: an evidence-based review of the literature. Am. J. Occupat. Therapy 65(2), 179–188 (2011)CrossRef
158.
Waltemate, T., Senna, I., Hülsmann, F., Rohde, M., Kopp, S., Ernst, M., Botsch, M.: The impact of latency on perceptual judgments and motor performance in closed-loop interaction in virtual reality. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, pp. 27–35. ACM, New York (2016)
159.
Jörg, S., Normoyle, A., Safonova, A.: How responsiveness affects players’ perception in digital games. In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception, pp. 33–38. ACM, New York (2012)
160.
Meehan, M., Razzaque, S., Whitton, M.C., Brooks, F.P.: Effect of latency on presence in stressful virtual environments. In: IEEE Virtual Reality, 2003 Proceedings, pp. 141–148. IEEE, Piscataway (2003)
161.
Roufs, J.A., Boschman, M.C.: Text quality metrics for visual display units: I. methodological aspects. Displays 18(1), 37–43 (1997)
162.
Ardoin, S.P., Suldo, S.M., Witt, J., Aldrich, S., McDonald, E.: Accuracy of readability estimates’ predictions of CBM performance. School Psychol. Quart. 20(1), 1 (2005)CrossRef
163.
Pikulski, J.J.: Readability. Retrieved September, vol. 20, p. 2014 (2002)
164.
Ali, A.Z.M., Wahid, R., Samsudin, K., Idris, M.Z.: Reading on the computer screen: does font type have effects on web text readability? Int. Edu. Stud. 6(3), 26–35 (2013)
165.
Developers, G.: Designing Screen Interfaces for VR (Google i/o’17) (2017)
166.
Grout, C., Rogers, W., Apperley, M., Jones, S.: Reading text in an immersive head-mounted display: An investigation into displaying desktop interfaces in a 3d virtual environment. In: Proceedings of the 15th New Zealand Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 9–16. ACM, New York (2015)
167.
Dingler, T., Kunze, K., Outram, B.: VR reading UIS: Assessing text parameters for reading in VR. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, LBW094. ACM, New York (2018)
168.
Hall, R.H., Hanna, P.: The impact of web page text-background colour combinations on readability, retention, aesthetics and behavioural intention. Behav. Inf. Technol. 23(3), 183–195 (2004)CrossRef
169.
Yates, R.: Web site accessibility and usability: Towards more functional sites for all. Campus-Wide Inf. Syst. 22, 180–188 (2005)CrossRef
170.
171.
Distler, V., Lallemand, C., Bellet, T.: Acceptability and acceptance of autonomous mobility on demand: The impact of an immersive experience. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–10 (2018)
172.
Eghbali, P.: Social acceptability of virtual reality interaction: Experiential factors and design implications (2018)
173.
Schwind, V., Reinhardt, J., Rzayev, R., Henze, N., Wolf, K.: Virtual reality on the go? a study on social acceptance of VR glasses. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct, pp. 111–118 (2018)
174.
Mai, C., Wiltzius, T., Alt, F., Hußmann, H.: Feeling alone in public: Investigating the influence of spatial layout on users’ VR experience. In: Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 286–298 (2018)
175.
Ahsanullah, S.S., Kamil, M., Muzafar, K.: Understanding factors influencing user experience of interactive systems: a literature review. ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 10(18) 175–185 (2006)
176.
Bevan, N.: Classifying and selecting UX and usability measures. In: International Workshop on Meaningful Measures: Valid Useful User Experience Measurement, vol. 11, pp. 13–18 (2008)
177.
Forlizzi, J., Battarbee, K.: Understanding experience in interactive systems. In: Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, pp. 261–268 (2004)
178.
Adikari, S., McDonald, C., Campbell, J.: A design science framework for designing and assessing user experience. In: International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 25–34. Springer, Berlin (2011)
179.
Law, E.L.-C., Sun, X.: Evaluating user experience of adaptive digital educational games with activity theory. Int. J. Human-Comput. Stud. 70(7), 478–497 (2012)CrossRef
180.
Le Callet, P., Möller, S., Perkis, A., et al.: Qualinet white paper on definitions of quality of experience. In: European Network on Quality of Experience in Multimedia Systems and Services (COST Action IC 1003), vol. 3 (2012)
181.
Wienrich, C., Döllinger, N., Kock, S., Schindler, K., Traupe, O.: Assessing user experience in virtual reality–a comparison of different measurements. In: International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability, pp. 573–589. Springer, Berlin (2018)
182.
Zarour, M., Alharbi, M.: User experience framework that combines aspects, dimensions, and measurement methods. Cogent Eng. 4(1), 1421006 (2017)CrossRef
184.
Kim, Y.M., Rhiu, I., Yun, M.H.: A systematic review of a virtual reality system from the perspective of user experience. Int. J. Human-Comput. Interact. 36(10), 893–910 (2020)CrossRef
185.
González Sánchez, J.L., Padilla Zea, N., Gutiérrez, F.L.: From usability to playability: Introduction to player-centred video game development process. In: International Conference on Human Centered Design, pp. 65–74. Springer, Berlin (2009)
186.
187.
Nacke, L.E., Drachen, A., Göbel, S.: Methods for evaluating gameplay experience in a serious gaming context. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Sport 9(2), 1–12 (2010)
188.
Le Marc, C., Mathieu, J.-P., Pallot, M., Richir, S.: Serious gaming: From learning experience towards user experience. In: 2010 IEEE International Technology Management Conference (ICE), pp. 1–12. IEEE, Piscataway (2010)
189.
ITU-T Recommendation G.1032: Influence Factors on Gaming Quality of Experience. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva (2017)
190.
Sutcliffe, A., Gault, B., Fernando, T., Tan, K.: Investigating interaction in CAVE virtual environments. ACM Trans. Comput.-Human Inter. 13(2), 235–267 (2006)CrossRef
191.
Juan, M.C., Pérez, D.: Comparison of the levels of presence and anxiety in an acrophobic environment viewed via HMD or CAVE. Presence Teleop. Virtual Environ. 18(3), 232–248 (2009)CrossRef
192.
Fonseca, D., Kraus, M.: A comparison of head-mounted and hand-held displays for 360°videos with focus on attitude and behavior change. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Academic Mindtrek Conference, pp. 287–296. ACM, New York (2016)
193.
Peng, W., Lin, J.-H., Pfeiffer, K.A., Winn, B.: Need satisfaction supportive game features as motivational determinants: an experimental study of a self-determination theory guided exergame. Media Psychol. 15(2), 175–196 (2012)CrossRef
194.
Mouatt, B., Smith, A.E., Mellow, M.L., Parfitt, G., Smith, R.T., Stanton, T.R.: The use of virtual reality to influence motivation, affect, enjoyment, and engagement during exercise: a scoping review. Front. Virtual Real. 1, 564–664 (2020)CrossRef
195.
Mania, K., Chalmers, A.: The effects of levels of immersion on memory and presence in virtual environments: a reality centered approach. CyberPsychol. Behavior 4(2), 247–264 (2001)CrossRef
196.
Penelle, B., Debeir, O.: Multi-sensor data fusion for hand tracking using Kinect and Leap Motion. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Virtual Reality International Conference, pp. 1–7 (2014)
197.
Zyda, M.: From visual simulation to virtual reality to games. Computer 38(9), 25–32 (2005)CrossRef
198.
Alallah, F., Neshati, A., Sakamoto, Y., Hasan, K., Lank, E., Bunt, A., Irani, P.: Performer vs. observer: Whose comfort level should we consider when examining the social acceptability of input modalities for head-worn display? In: Proceedings of the 24th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, pp. 1–9 (2018)
199.
Eghbali, P., Väänänen, K., Jokela, T.: Social acceptability of virtual reality in public spaces: Experiential factors and design recommendations. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, pp. 1–11 (2019)
200.
Valentini, I., Ballestin, G., Bassano, C., Solari, F., Chessa, M.: Improving obstacle awareness to enhance interaction in virtual reality. In: 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), pp. 44–52. IEEE, Piscataway (2020)
201.
Wehbe, R.R., Nacke, L.E.: Towards understanding the importance of co-located gameplay. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, pp. 733–738. ACM, New York (2015)
202.
Burgoon, J.K., Bonito, J.A., Ramirez, A., Dunbar, N.E., Kam, K., Fischer, J.: Testing the interactivity principle: effects of mediation, propinquity, and verbal and nonverbal modalities in interpersonal interaction. J. Commun. 52(3), 657–677 (2002)CrossRef
203.
Skowronek, J., Raake, A., Berndtsson, G., Rummukainen, O.S., Usai, P., Gunkel, S.N., Johanson, M., Habets, E.A., Malfait, L., Lindero, D., et al.: Quality of experience in telemeetings and videoconferencing: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Access 10, 63885–63931 (2022)CrossRef
204.
Comber, C., Colley, A., Hargreaves, D.J., Dorn, L.: The effects of age, gender and computer experience upon computer attitudes. Edu. Res. 39(2), 123–133 (1997)CrossRef
205.
Roberts, S.C., Mehler, B., Orszulak, J., Reimer, B., Coughlin, J., Glass, J.: An evaluation of age, gender, and technology experience in user performance and impressions of a multimodal human-machine interface. In: IIE Annual Conference. Proceedings, Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE), p. 1 (2011)
206.
Thayer, S.E., Ray, S.: Online communication preferences across age, gender, and duration of internet use. CyberPsychol. Behavior 9(4), 432–440 (2006)CrossRef
207.
Narciso, D., Bessa, M., Melo, M., Coelho, A., Vasconcelos-Raposo, J.: Immersive 360 video user experience: impact of different variables in the sense of presence and cybersickness. Univer. Access Inf. Soc. 18(1), 77–87 (2019)CrossRef
208.
Petri, K., Feuerstein, K., Folster, S., Bariszlovich, F., Witte, K.: Effects of age, gender, familiarity with the content, and exposure time on cybersickness in immersive head-mounted display based virtual reality. Am. J. Biomed. Sci. 12(2), 107–112 (2020)CrossRef
209.
Lacko, J.: Health safety training for industry in virtual reality. In: 2020 Cybernetics & Informatics (K&I), pp. 1–5. IEEE, Piscataway (2020)
Metadaten
Titel
Related Work
verfasst von
Tanja Kojić
Copyright-Jahr
2025
Buch
User Experience for Serious Games in Virtual Reality

Print ISBN: 978-3-031-75529-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-75530-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2025

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-75530-9_2