nach oben

Erschienen in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

11. Relationship Between Legitimacy and Organizational Success

verfasst von : Serge Miranda, Ana Cruz-Suarez, Miguel Prado-Román

Erschienen in: Organizational Legitimacy

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This article explores the relationship between legitimacy and success in the high education sector. To do so the relationship between legitimacy and organizational results is analysed as well as the relationship between legitimacy and the access to resources. Eight hypotheses related to the legitimacy of the European Higher Education Area in the public universities of Madrid (Spain) are proposed. Hypotheses are tested by using data from students (783 questionnaires), teachers (761 questionnaires) and other publicly available secondary data. Results suggest differences according to the source and the type of legitimacy analysed. There is no appreciable relation between teacher’s legitimacy and their results. However, universities with high teacher’s legitimacy show better access to resources. Regarding student’s legitimacy, we found that universities with high legitimacy obtain a little more better result. Furthermore, high student’s legitimacy leads to better access to resources. This research provides answers to some gaps of the legitimacy literature. Do greatest legitimacy organizations obtain better results? Do they get better access to resources? What type of legitimacy lead to better organizational results?

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Legitimizing and Delegitimizing Factors of Firms in Society: Is It a Problem of Communication or Strategic? An Approach Based on the Distributed Social Value as the Key Factor for the Organizations’ Social Legitimacy

Nächstes Kapitel The Business Legitimacy and Its Relationship with the Corporate Social Responsibility: Analysis of Mexico and Spain Through the Case Method

Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. D. (2001). Learning from successful local private firms in China: Establishing legitimacy. Academy of Management Executive, 15, 72–83.

Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Yeh, K. S. (2008). Private firms in China: Building legitimacy in an emerging economy. Journal of World Business, 43, 385–399.CrossRef

Alcantara, L., Mitsuhashi, H., & Hoshino, Y. (2006). Legitimacy in international joint ventures: It is still needed. Journal of International Management, 12, 389–407.CrossRef

Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in – the institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19, 645–670.CrossRef

Arnold, S. J., Handelman, J., & Tigert, D. J. (1996). Organizational legitimacy and retail store patronage. Journal of Business Research, 35, 229–239.CrossRef

Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1, 177–194.CrossRef

Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. (1985). An empirical-examination of the relationship between corporate social-responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 446–463.

Balabanis, G., Phillips, H. C., & Lyall, J. (1998). Corporate social responsibility and economic performance in the top British companies: Are they linked? European Business Review, 98, 25–44.CrossRef

Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. (2004). Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 93–103.

Barreto, I., & Baden-Fuller, C. (2006). To conform or to perform? Mimetic behaviour, legitimacy-based groups and performance consequences. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1559–1581.CrossRef

Baum, J. A. C., & Oliver, C. (1991). Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 187–218.CrossRef

Bianchi, & Ostale. (2006). Lessons learned from unsuccessful internationalization attempts: Examples of multinational retailers in Chile. Journal of Business Research, 59(2006), 140–147.CrossRef

Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 151–179.CrossRef

Blair, E., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2006). Nonresponse and generalizability in academic research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34, 4–7.CrossRef

Blanco-González, A., Cruz-Suárez, A., & Díez-Martín, F. (2015). The EFQM model as an instrument to legitimise organisations. In M. Peris-Ortiz, J. Álvarez-García, & C. Rueda-Armengot (Eds.), Achieving competitive advantage through quality management (pp. 155–169). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.CrossRef

Blanco-González, A., Prado-Román, C., & Díez-Martín, F. (2017). Building a European legitimacy index. American Behavioral Scientist, 61(5), 509–525.CrossRef

Bozeman, B. (1993). Understanding the roots of publicness. In B. Sutton (Ed.), The legitimate corporation. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

Brown, A. D. (1998). Narrative, politics and legitimacy in an IT implementation. Journal of Management Studies, 35, 35–58.CrossRef

Chen, H. Y., Griffith, D. A., & Hu, M. Y. (2006). The influence of liability of foreignness on market entry strategies. International Marketing Review, 23, 636–649.CrossRef

Cruz-Suárez, A., Prado-Román, A., & Prado-Román, M. (2014). Cognitive legitimacy, resource access, and organizational outcomes. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, 54(5), 575–584.CrossRef

Deephouse, D. L. (1996). Does isomorphism legitimate? Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1024–1039.CrossRef

Deephouse, D., & Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), The sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: Sage.

Déniz Déniz, M., & García Cabrera, A. (2011). El isomorfismo mimético y las ventajas de localización como determinantes de la elección del modo de entrada. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 20, 105–122.

Díez-de-Castro, E., Díez-Martín, F., & Vázquez-Sánchez, A. (2015). Antecedentes de la institucionalización de las organizaciones. Cuadernos de Gestión, 15(1), 15–38.CrossRef

Diez-Martin, F., Blanco-Gonzalez, A., & Prado-Roman, C. (2010a). Legitimidad como factor clave del éxito organizativo. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 16(3), 127–143.CrossRef

Diez-Martin, F., Blanco-Gonzalez, A., & Prado-Roman, C. (2010b). Measuring organizational legitimacy: The case of Mutual Guarantee Societies. Cuadernos de Economia y Direccion de la Empresa, 43(junio), 115–143.CrossRef

Díez-Martín, F., Prado-Roman, C., & Blanco-González, A. (2013). Beyond legitimacy: Legitimacy types and organizational success. Management Decision, 51(10), 1954–1969.CrossRef

Díez-Martín, F., Blanco-González, A., & Prado-Román, C. (2016). Explaining nation-wide differences in entrepreneurial activity: a legitimacy perspective. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal,12(4), 1079–1102.CrossRef

Dimaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited – institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.CrossRef

Dornbush, S. M., & Scott, W. R. (1975). Evaluation and the exercise of authority. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Elsbach, K. D., & Sutton, R. I. (1992). Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions – a marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 699–738.

Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., & Hinings, C. R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 58–80.

Hunt, C. S., & Aldrich, H. E. (1996). Why even Rodney Dangerfield has a home page: Legitimizing the world wide web as a medium for commercial endeavours, Annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Cincinnati, Ohio: Academy of Management.

Kannan-Narasimhan, R. (2014). Organizational ingenuity in nascent innovations: Gaining resources and legitimacy through unconventional actions. Organization Studies, 35(4), 483–509.CrossRef

Lamin, A., & Zaheer, S. (2012). Wall street vs. main street: Firm strategies for defending legitimacy and their impact on different stakeholders. Organization Science, 23(1), 47–66.CrossRef

Li, J. T., Yang, J. Y., & Yue, D. R. (2007). Identity community, and audience: How wholly owned foreign subsidiaries gain legitimacy in China. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 175–190.CrossRef

Low, B., & Johnston, W. (2008). Securing and managing an organizations network legitimacy: The case of Motorola China. Industrial Marketing Management, 37, 873–879.CrossRef

Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations – formal-structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.CrossRef

Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16, 145–179.CrossRef

Ortega Castro, V., Pérez Esparrells, C., & Morales Sequera, S. (2008) La financiación de las Universidades Públicas de la Comunidad de Madrid y su aplicación a la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Madrid, Spain: Consejo Social, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.

Parsons, T. (1960). Structure and process in modern societies. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

Patriotta, G., Gond, J.-P., & Schultz, F. (2011). Maintaining legitimacy: Controversies, orders of worth, and public justifications. Journal of Management Studies, 48(8), 1804–1836.CrossRef

Pollack, J. M., Rutherford, M. W., & Nagy, B. G. (2012). Preparedness and cognitive legitimacy as antecedents of new venture funding in televised business pitches. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(5), 915–939.CrossRef

Ruef, M., & Scott, W. R. (1998). A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: Hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 877–904.CrossRef

Rutherford, M. W., & Buller, P. F. (2007). Searching for the legitimacy threshold. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16, 78–92.CrossRef

Scott, W. R. (1977). Effectiveness of organizational effectiveness studies. In P. S. Goodman & J. M. Pennings (Eds.), New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Scott, W. R. (1994). Institutions and organizations: Toward a theoretical synthesis. In W. R. Scott & J. W. Meyer (Eds.), Institutional environments and organizations: Structural complexity and individualism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Scott, W. R., & Meyer, J. W. (1991). The organization o societal sectors. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.CrossRef

Thomas, T. E. (2005). Are business students buying it? A theoretical framework for measuring attitudes toward the legitimacy of environmental sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14, 186–197.CrossRef

Tornikoski, E. T., & Newbert, S. L. (2007). Exploring the determinants of organizational emergence: A legitimacy perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 311–335.CrossRef

Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375–400.CrossRef

Überbacher, F. (2014). Legitimation of new ventures: A review and research programme. Journal of Management Studies, 51(4), 667–698.CrossRef

Vanhonacker, W. R. (2000). A better way to crack China. Harvard Business Review, 78, 20.

Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Zaheer, S. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 341–363.

Zeitz, G., Mittal, V., & Mcaulay, B. (1999). Distinguishing adoption and entrenchment of management practices: A framework for analysis. Organization Studies, 20, 741–776.CrossRef

Zelditch, M. (2001). Processes of legitimation: Recent developments and new directions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 64, 4–17.CrossRef

Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27, 414–431.CrossRef

Zucker, L. G. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443–464.CrossRef

Titel: Relationship Between Legitimacy and Organizational Success
verfasst von: Serge Miranda
Ana Cruz-Suarez
Miguel Prado-Román
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Organizational Legitimacy
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75989-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-75990-6

Copyright-Jahr: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75990-6_11