Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Social touch is essential for physical and emotional well-being. However, different meanings can be attributed to physical contact during social interactions and may generate bonding or avoidant behaviors. This personal and unique experience is not usually taken into account in health and social care services. The aim of this study is to produce a valid and reliable European Portuguese version of the Social Touch Questionnaire (STQ, Wilhelm et al. in Biol Psychol 58:181–202, 2001. doi:10.1016/S0301-0511(01)00113-2). The STQ is a self-report questionnaire for adolescents and adults measuring behaviors and attitudes towards social touch. The original version was translated into European Portuguese using a forward-back translation process and its feasibility was examined. To evaluate the psychometric properties, a total of 242 Portuguese university students participated in the study (21.3 ± 3.8 years). The STQ was considered feasible, showed adequate internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .734), and the test–retest correlation with the STQ items demonstrated a high concordance between the tests over a two-week interval (ICC = .990; n = 50). Validity tests were performed, comparing the total score of the STQ with that of the anxiety and avoidance subscales of the Social Interaction and Performance Anxiety and Avoidance Scale (SIPAAS). A very significant conceptual convergence was confirmed between the STQ and with the SIPAAS-Anxiety (r = .64; p < .0001) and with the SIPAAS-Avoidance (r = .59; p < .0001). The exploratory factor analysis, with Promax rotation, revealed 3 factors: dislike of physical touch, liking of familiar physical touch and liking of public physical touch (Cronbach’s alphas ranged from .68 to .75). Psychometric properties confirmed the adaptation of the STQ to the Portuguese culture. It is a reliable and valid self-report questionnaire and it appears to be a useful tool to assess behaviors and attitudes towards social touch.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing. CrossRef
Andersen, P. A. (1999). Nonverbal communication: Forms and functions. Mountain-view, CA: Mayfield Publ. Co.
Everett, T., Dennis, M., & Ricketts, E. (1995). Physiotherapy in mental health: A practical approach. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50. CrossRef
Fosshage, J. L. (2000). The meaning of touch in psychoanalysis: A time for reassessment. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 20(1), 21–43. CrossRef
Hair, J. F., Black, W., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle: Prentice Hall.
Jones, S. E., & Brown, B. C. (1996). Touch attitudes and behaviors, recollections of early childhood touch, and social self-confidence. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 20(3), 147–163. CrossRef
Kline, P. (1993). Personality: The psychometric view. London: Routledge.
Matsunaga, M. (2010). How to factor-analyze your data right: Do’s, don’ts and how-to’s. Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 97–110.
McGlone, F., Olausson, H., Boyle, J. A., Jones-Gotman, M., Dancer, C., Guest, S., et al. (2012). Touching and feeling: Differences in pleasant touch processing between glabrous and hairy skin in humans. European Journal of Neuroscience, 35(11), 1782–1788. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08092.x. CrossRefPubMed
McGlone, F., Wessberg, J., & Olausson, H. (2014). Discriminative and affective touch: Sensing and feeling. Neuron, 21(82(4)), 737–755. CrossRef
Ozolins, A., & Sandberg, C. (2009). Development of a multifactor scale measuring the psychological dimensions of touch avoidance. International Journal of Psychology, 3, 33–56.
Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. (Berkshire, Ed.) (3rd ed.). U.K.: Open University Press.
Pinto-Gouveia, J., Cunha, M. I., & Salvador, M. C. (2003). Assessment of social phobia by self-report questionnaires: The social interaction and performance anxiety and avoidance scale and the social phobia safety behaviours scale. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 31(3), 291–311. doi: 10.1017/S1352465803003059. CrossRef
Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcome Trust. (2002). Assessing health status and quality of life instruments: Attributes and review criteria. Quality of Life Research, 11, 193–205. CrossRef
Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (2003). Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tabachnik, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Wilson, L., & Rockstraw, L. (2012). Human simulation for nursing and health professions. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
- Reliability and Validity of the European Portuguese Version of the Social Touch Questionnaire
Ana Isabel Vieira
Ana Vanessa Ramos
Luís Manuel Cavalheiro
Maria Vânia Nunes
- Springer US
Entwicklung einer Supply-Strategie bei der Atotech Deutschland GmbH am Standort Feucht