Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 5/2019

11.06.2019 | Research Paper

Reliability measure approach for confidence-based design optimization under insufficient input data

verfasst von: Yongsu Jung, Hyunkyoo Cho, Ikjin Lee

Erschienen in: Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization | Ausgabe 5/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In most of the reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) researches, accurate input statistical model has been assumed to concentrate on the variability of random variables; however, only a limited number of data are available to quantify the input statistical model in many practical engineering applications. In other words, irreducible variability and uncertainty due to lack of knowledge exist simultaneously in random design variables, which may result in uncertainty of reliability. Therefore, the uncertainty induced by insufficient data has to be accounted for RBDO to guarantee the confidence of reliability. Using the Bayesian approach, the uncertainty of input distributions is successfully propagated to a cumulative distribution function (CDF) of reliability under reasonable assumptions, but it requires a number of function evaluations in double-loop Monte Carlo simulation (MCS). To tackle this challenge, the reliability measure approach (RMA) in confidence-based design optimization (CBDO) is proposed to handle the uncertainty of reliability following the idea of performance measure approach (PMA) in RBDO. Input distribution parameters are transformed to random variables following the standard normal distribution for the most probable point (MPP) search based on the proposed stochastic sensitivity analysis of reliability. Therefore, the reliability is approximated at MPP with respect to input distribution parameters. The proposed CBDO can treat confidence constraints employing the reliability value at the target confidence level that is approximated by MPP in standard normal space. In conclusion, CBDO can be performed in a probabilistic space of input distribution parameters corresponding to the conventional U-space in RBDO to yield the probability (confidence) that reliability is larger than the target reliability. The proposed method can significantly reduce the number of function evaluations by eliminating outer-loop MCS while maintaining acceptable accuracy. Numerical examples are used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the developed sensitivity analysis and RMA to estimate the confidence of reliability in CBDO.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Bae S, Kim NH, Park C, Kim Z (2017) Confidence interval of Bayesian network and global sensitivity analysis. AIAA J:3916–3924CrossRef Bae S, Kim NH, Park C, Kim Z (2017) Confidence interval of Bayesian network and global sensitivity analysis. AIAA J:3916–3924CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bae S, Kim NH, Jang SG (2018) Reliability-based design optimization under sampling uncertainty: shifting design versus shaping uncertainty. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57(5):1845–1855MathSciNetCrossRef Bae S, Kim NH, Jang SG (2018) Reliability-based design optimization under sampling uncertainty: shifting design versus shaping uncertainty. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57(5):1845–1855MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cho H, Choi KK, Gaul NJ, Lee I, Lamb D, Gorsich D (2016a) Conservative reliability-based design optimization method with insufficient input data. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(6):1609–1630MathSciNetCrossRef Cho H, Choi KK, Gaul NJ, Lee I, Lamb D, Gorsich D (2016a) Conservative reliability-based design optimization method with insufficient input data. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(6):1609–1630MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cho H, Choi KK, Lee I, Lamb D (2016b) Design sensitivity method for sampling-based RBDO with varying standard deviation. J Mech Des 138(1):011405CrossRef Cho H, Choi KK, Lee I, Lamb D (2016b) Design sensitivity method for sampling-based RBDO with varying standard deviation. J Mech Des 138(1):011405CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cho H, Choi KK, Lamb D (2017) Sensitivity developments for RBDO with dependent input variable and varying input standard deviation. J Mech Des 139(7):071402CrossRef Cho H, Choi KK, Lamb D (2017) Sensitivity developments for RBDO with dependent input variable and varying input standard deviation. J Mech Des 139(7):071402CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Choi SH, Lee G, Lee I (2018) Adaptive single-loop reliability-based design optimization and post optimization using constraint boundary sampling. J Mech Sci Technol 32(7):3249–3262CrossRef Choi SH, Lee G, Lee I (2018) Adaptive single-loop reliability-based design optimization and post optimization using constraint boundary sampling. J Mech Sci Technol 32(7):3249–3262CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Der Kiureghian A, Ditlevsen O (2009) Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Struct Saf 31(2):105–112CrossRef Der Kiureghian A, Ditlevsen O (2009) Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Struct Saf 31(2):105–112CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Du L, Choi KK, Youn BD (2006a) Inverse possibility analysis method for possibility-based design optimization. AIAA J 44(11):2682–2690CrossRef Du L, Choi KK, Youn BD (2006a) Inverse possibility analysis method for possibility-based design optimization. AIAA J 44(11):2682–2690CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Du L, Choi KK, Youn BD, Gorsich D (2006b) Possibility-based design optimization method for design problems with both statistical and fuzzy input data. J Mech Des 128(4):928–935CrossRef Du L, Choi KK, Youn BD, Gorsich D (2006b) Possibility-based design optimization method for design problems with both statistical and fuzzy input data. J Mech Des 128(4):928–935CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dubourg V, Sudret B, Bourinet JM (2011) Reliability-based design optimization using kriging surrogates and subset simulation. Struct Multidiscip Optim 44(5):673–690CrossRef Dubourg V, Sudret B, Bourinet JM (2011) Reliability-based design optimization using kriging surrogates and subset simulation. Struct Multidiscip Optim 44(5):673–690CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gelman A, Stern HS, Carlin JB, Dunson DB, Vehtari A, Rubin DB (2013) Bayesian data analysis, 3rd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC Gelman A, Stern HS, Carlin JB, Dunson DB, Vehtari A, Rubin DB (2013) Bayesian data analysis, 3rd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC
Zurück zum Zitat Gunawan S, Papalambros PY (2006) A Bayesian approach to reliability-based optimization with incomplete information. J Mech Des 128(4):909–918CrossRef Gunawan S, Papalambros PY (2006) A Bayesian approach to reliability-based optimization with incomplete information. J Mech Des 128(4):909–918CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hansen BE (2009) Lecture notes on nonparametrics. Lecture notes Hansen BE (2009) Lecture notes on nonparametrics. Lecture notes
Zurück zum Zitat Hao P, Wang Y, Liu C, Wang B, Wu H (2017) A novel non-probabilistic reliability-based design optimization algorithm using enhanced chaos control method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 318:572–593MathSciNetCrossRef Hao P, Wang Y, Liu C, Wang B, Wu H (2017) A novel non-probabilistic reliability-based design optimization algorithm using enhanced chaos control method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 318:572–593MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ito M, Kim NH, Kogiso N (2018) Conservative reliability index for epistemic uncertainty in reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57(5):1919–1935MathSciNetCrossRef Ito M, Kim NH, Kogiso N (2018) Conservative reliability index for epistemic uncertainty in reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57(5):1919–1935MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jung Y, Cho H, Lee I (2019) MPP-based approximated DRM (ADRM) using simplified bivariate approximation with linear regression. Struct Multidiscip Optim 59(5):1761–1773MathSciNetCrossRef Jung Y, Cho H, Lee I (2019) MPP-based approximated DRM (ADRM) using simplified bivariate approximation with linear regression. Struct Multidiscip Optim 59(5):1761–1773MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kang YJ, Lim OK, Noh Y (2016) Sequential statistical modeling method for distribution type identification. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(6):1587–1607CrossRef Kang YJ, Lim OK, Noh Y (2016) Sequential statistical modeling method for distribution type identification. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(6):1587–1607CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Keshtegar B, Lee I (2016) Relaxed performance measure approach for reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(6):1439–1454MathSciNetCrossRef Keshtegar B, Lee I (2016) Relaxed performance measure approach for reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(6):1439–1454MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lee I, Choi KK, Gorsich D (2010) Sensitivity analyses of FORM-based and DRM-based performance measure approach (PMA) for reliability-based design optimization (RBDO). Int J Numer Methods Eng 82(1):26–46MATH Lee I, Choi KK, Gorsich D (2010) Sensitivity analyses of FORM-based and DRM-based performance measure approach (PMA) for reliability-based design optimization (RBDO). Int J Numer Methods Eng 82(1):26–46MATH
Zurück zum Zitat Lee I, Choi KK, Zhao L (2011a) Sampling-based RBDO using the stochastic sensitivity analysis and dynamic Kriging method. Struct Multidiscip Optim 44(3):299–317MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Lee I, Choi KK, Zhao L (2011a) Sampling-based RBDO using the stochastic sensitivity analysis and dynamic Kriging method. Struct Multidiscip Optim 44(3):299–317MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lee I, Choi KK, Noh Y, Zhao L, Gorsich D (2011b) Sampling-based stochastic sensitivity analysis using score functions for RBDO problems with correlated random variables. J Mech Des 133(2):021003CrossRef Lee I, Choi KK, Noh Y, Zhao L, Gorsich D (2011b) Sampling-based stochastic sensitivity analysis using score functions for RBDO problems with correlated random variables. J Mech Des 133(2):021003CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lee I, Noh Y, Yoo D (2012) A novel second-order reliability method (SORM) using noncentral or generalized chi-squared distributions. J Mech Des 134(10):100912CrossRef Lee I, Noh Y, Yoo D (2012) A novel second-order reliability method (SORM) using noncentral or generalized chi-squared distributions. J Mech Des 134(10):100912CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lee I, Choi KK, Noh Y, Lamb D (2013) Comparison study between probabilistic and possibilistic methods for problems under a lack of correlated input statistical information. Struct Multidiscip Optim 47(2):175–189MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Lee I, Choi KK, Noh Y, Lamb D (2013) Comparison study between probabilistic and possibilistic methods for problems under a lack of correlated input statistical information. Struct Multidiscip Optim 47(2):175–189MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Li G, Meng Z, Hu H (2015) An adaptive hybrid approach for reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 51(5):1051–1065MathSciNetCrossRef Li G, Meng Z, Hu H (2015) An adaptive hybrid approach for reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 51(5):1051–1065MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Liang B, Mahadevan S (2011) Error and uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis in mechanics computational models. Int J Uncertain Quantif 1(2) Liang B, Mahadevan S (2011) Error and uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis in mechanics computational models. Int J Uncertain Quantif 1(2)
Zurück zum Zitat Meng Z, Li G, Wang BP, Hao P (2015a) A hybrid chaos control approach of the performance measure functions for reliability-based design optimization. Comput Struct 146:32–43CrossRef Meng Z, Li G, Wang BP, Hao P (2015a) A hybrid chaos control approach of the performance measure functions for reliability-based design optimization. Comput Struct 146:32–43CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Meng Z, Hao P, Li G, Wang B, Zhang K (2015b) Non-probabilistic reliability-based design optimization of stiffened shells under buckling constraint. Thin-Walled Struct 94:325–333CrossRef Meng Z, Hao P, Li G, Wang B, Zhang K (2015b) Non-probabilistic reliability-based design optimization of stiffened shells under buckling constraint. Thin-Walled Struct 94:325–333CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Moon MY, Choi KK, Cho H, Gaul N, Lamb D, Gorsich D (2017) Reliability-based design optimization using confidence-based model validation for insufficient experimental data. J Mech Des 139(3):031404CrossRef Moon MY, Choi KK, Cho H, Gaul N, Lamb D, Gorsich D (2017) Reliability-based design optimization using confidence-based model validation for insufficient experimental data. J Mech Des 139(3):031404CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Moon MY, Cho H, Choi KK, Gaul N, Lamb D, Gorsich D (2018) Confidence-based reliability assessment considering limited numbers of both input and output test data. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57(5):2027–2043MathSciNetCrossRef Moon MY, Cho H, Choi KK, Gaul N, Lamb D, Gorsich D (2018) Confidence-based reliability assessment considering limited numbers of both input and output test data. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57(5):2027–2043MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Muscolino G, Santoro R, Sofi A (2016) Reliability analysis of structures with interval uncertainties under stationary stochastic excitations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 300:47–69MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Muscolino G, Santoro R, Sofi A (2016) Reliability analysis of structures with interval uncertainties under stationary stochastic excitations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 300:47–69MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nannapaneni S, Mahadevan S (2016) Reliability analysis under epistemic uncertainty. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 155:9–20CrossRef Nannapaneni S, Mahadevan S (2016) Reliability analysis under epistemic uncertainty. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 155:9–20CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Noh Y, Choi KK, Lee I, Gorsich D, Lamb D (2011a) Reliability-based design optimization with confidence level under input model uncertainty due to limited test data. Struct Multidiscip Optim 43(4):443–458MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Noh Y, Choi KK, Lee I, Gorsich D, Lamb D (2011a) Reliability-based design optimization with confidence level under input model uncertainty due to limited test data. Struct Multidiscip Optim 43(4):443–458MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Noh Y, Choi KK, Lee I, Gorsich D, Lamb D (2011b) Reliability-based design optimization with confidence level for non-Gaussian distributions using bootstrap method. J Mech Des 133(9):091001CrossRef Noh Y, Choi KK, Lee I, Gorsich D, Lamb D (2011b) Reliability-based design optimization with confidence level for non-Gaussian distributions using bootstrap method. J Mech Des 133(9):091001CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Park JW, Lee I (2018) A study on computational efficiency improvement of novel SORM using the convolution integration. J Mech Des 140(2):024501CrossRef Park JW, Lee I (2018) A study on computational efficiency improvement of novel SORM using the convolution integration. J Mech Des 140(2):024501CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Peng X, Li J, Jiang S (2017) Unified uncertainty representation and quantification based on insufficient input data. Struct Multidiscip Optim 56(6):1305–1317CrossRef Peng X, Li J, Jiang S (2017) Unified uncertainty representation and quantification based on insufficient input data. Struct Multidiscip Optim 56(6):1305–1317CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Picheny V, Kim NH, Haftka RT (2010) Application of bootstrap method in conservative estimation of reliability with limited samples. Struct Multidiscip Optim 41(2):205–217MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Picheny V, Kim NH, Haftka RT (2010) Application of bootstrap method in conservative estimation of reliability with limited samples. Struct Multidiscip Optim 41(2):205–217MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rahman S, Xu H (2004) A univariate dimension-reduction method for multi-dimensional integration in stochastic mechanics. Probab Eng Mech 19(4):393–408CrossRef Rahman S, Xu H (2004) A univariate dimension-reduction method for multi-dimensional integration in stochastic mechanics. Probab Eng Mech 19(4):393–408CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rao SS, Cao L (2002) Optimum design of mechanical systems involving interval parameters. J Mech Des 124(3):465–472CrossRef Rao SS, Cao L (2002) Optimum design of mechanical systems involving interval parameters. J Mech Des 124(3):465–472CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rubinstein RY, Kroese DP (2016) Simulation and the Monte Carlo method (Vol. 10). John Wiley & Sons Rubinstein RY, Kroese DP (2016) Simulation and the Monte Carlo method (Vol. 10). John Wiley & Sons
Zurück zum Zitat Sankararaman S, Mahadevan S (2011) Likelihood-based representation of epistemic uncertainty due to sparse point data and/or interval data. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96(7):814–824CrossRef Sankararaman S, Mahadevan S (2011) Likelihood-based representation of epistemic uncertainty due to sparse point data and/or interval data. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96(7):814–824CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sankararaman S, Mahadevan S (2013a) Distribution type uncertainty due to sparse and imprecise data. Mech Syst Signal Process 37(1–2):182–198CrossRef Sankararaman S, Mahadevan S (2013a) Distribution type uncertainty due to sparse and imprecise data. Mech Syst Signal Process 37(1–2):182–198CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sankararaman S, Mahadevan S (2013b) Separating the contributions of variability and parameter uncertainty in probability distributions. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 112:187–199CrossRef Sankararaman S, Mahadevan S (2013b) Separating the contributions of variability and parameter uncertainty in probability distributions. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 112:187–199CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Silverman BW (2018) Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Routledge Silverman BW (2018) Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Routledge
Zurück zum Zitat Tu J, Choi KK, Park YH (1999) A new study on reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Des 121(4):557–564CrossRef Tu J, Choi KK, Park YH (1999) A new study on reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Des 121(4):557–564CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Z, Wang P (2014) A maximum confidence enhancement based sequential sampling scheme for simulation-based design. J Mech Des 136(2):021006CrossRef Wang Z, Wang P (2014) A maximum confidence enhancement based sequential sampling scheme for simulation-based design. J Mech Des 136(2):021006CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yang D, Yi P (2009) Chaos control of performance measure approach for evaluation of probabilistic constraints. Struct Multidiscip Optim 38(1):83CrossRef Yang D, Yi P (2009) Chaos control of performance measure approach for evaluation of probabilistic constraints. Struct Multidiscip Optim 38(1):83CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yoo D, Lee I (2014) Sampling-based approach for design optimization in the presence of interval variables. Struct Multidiscip Optim 49(2):253–266MathSciNetCrossRef Yoo D, Lee I (2014) Sampling-based approach for design optimization in the presence of interval variables. Struct Multidiscip Optim 49(2):253–266MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Youn BD, Wang P (2008) Bayesian reliability-based design optimization using eigenvector dimension reduction (EDR) method. Struct Multidiscip Optim 36(2):107–123CrossRef Youn BD, Wang P (2008) Bayesian reliability-based design optimization using eigenvector dimension reduction (EDR) method. Struct Multidiscip Optim 36(2):107–123CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Youn BD, Choi KK, Park YH (2003) Hybrid analysis method for reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Des 125(2):221–232CrossRef Youn BD, Choi KK, Park YH (2003) Hybrid analysis method for reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Des 125(2):221–232CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Youn BD, Choi KK, Yang RJ, Gu L (2004) Reliability-based design optimization for crashworthiness of vehicle side impact. Struct Multidiscip Optim 26(3–4):272–283CrossRef Youn BD, Choi KK, Yang RJ, Gu L (2004) Reliability-based design optimization for crashworthiness of vehicle side impact. Struct Multidiscip Optim 26(3–4):272–283CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Youn BD, Choi KK, Du L (2005) Enriched performance measure approach for reliability-based design optimization. AIAA J 43(4):874–884CrossRef Youn BD, Choi KK, Du L (2005) Enriched performance measure approach for reliability-based design optimization. AIAA J 43(4):874–884CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhao L, Choi KK, Lee I, Gorsich D (2013) Conservative surrogate model using weighted Kriging variance for sampling-based RBDO. J Mech Des 135(9):091003CrossRef Zhao L, Choi KK, Lee I, Gorsich D (2013) Conservative surrogate model using weighted Kriging variance for sampling-based RBDO. J Mech Des 135(9):091003CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Reliability measure approach for confidence-based design optimization under insufficient input data
verfasst von
Yongsu Jung
Hyunkyoo Cho
Ikjin Lee
Publikationsdatum
11.06.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization / Ausgabe 5/2019
Print ISSN: 1615-147X
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-1488
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02299-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2019

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 5/2019 Zur Ausgabe

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.