Skip to main content

2015 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Representing and Reasoning About Arguments Mined from Texts and Dialogues

verfasst von : Leila Amgoud, Philippe Besnard, Anthony Hunter

Erschienen in: Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper presents a target language for representing arguments mined from natural language. The key features are the connection between possible reasons and possible claims and recursive embedding of such connections. Given a base of these arguments and counterarguments mined from texts or dialogues, we want be able combine them, deconstruct them, and to analyse them (for instance to check whether the set is inconsistent). To address these needs, we propose a formal language for representing reasons and claims, and a framework for inferencing with the arguments and counterarguments in this formal language.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
\(-^{(1)}\) denotes a single occurrence of the hyphen and \(-^{(0)}\) the absence of it.
 
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Cabrio, E., Villata, S.: Generating abstract arguments: a natural language approach. In: Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA’12), pp. 454–461. IOS Press (2012) Cabrio, E., Villata, S.: Generating abstract arguments: a natural language approach. In: Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA’12), pp. 454–461. IOS Press (2012)
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Florou, E., Konstantopoulos, S., Koukourikos, A., Karampiperis, P.: Argument extraction for supporting public policy formulation. In: Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Language Technology for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, and Humanities, pp. 49–54. ACL (2013) Florou, E., Konstantopoulos, S., Koukourikos, A., Karampiperis, P.: Argument extraction for supporting public policy formulation. In: Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Language Technology for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, and Humanities, pp. 49–54. ACL (2013)
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Peldszus, A., Stede, M.: From argument diagrams to argumentation mining in texts: a survey. Int. J. Cogn. Inf. Nat. Intell. 7(1), 1–31 (2013)CrossRef Peldszus, A., Stede, M.: From argument diagrams to argumentation mining in texts: a survey. Int. J. Cogn. Inf. Nat. Intell. 7(1), 1–31 (2013)CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Green, N., Ashley, K., Litman, D., Reed, C., Walker, V. (eds.).: Proceedings of the First ACL Workshop on Argumentation Mining (2014) Green, N., Ashley, K., Litman, D., Reed, C., Walker, V. (eds.).: Proceedings of the First ACL Workshop on Argumentation Mining (2014)
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Aharoni, E., Polnarov, A., Lavee, T., Hershcovich, D., Levy, R., Rinott, R., Gutfreund, D., Slonim, N.: A benchmark dataset for automatic detection of claims and evidence in the context of controversial topics. In: Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Argumentation Mining (2014) Aharoni, E., Polnarov, A., Lavee, T., Hershcovich, D., Levy, R., Rinott, R., Gutfreund, D., Slonim, N.: A benchmark dataset for automatic detection of claims and evidence in the context of controversial topics. In: Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Argumentation Mining (2014)
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Levy, R., Bilu, Y., Hershcovich, D., Aharoni, E., Slonim, N.: Context dependent claim detection. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Computational Linguistics (COLING) (2014) Levy, R., Bilu, Y., Hershcovich, D., Aharoni, E., Slonim, N.: Context dependent claim detection. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Computational Linguistics (COLING) (2014)
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games. Artific. Intelligence 77, 321–357 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games. Artific. Intelligence 77, 321–357 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Besnard, P., Hunter, A.: Elements of Argumentation. MIT Press, Cambridge (2008)CrossRef Besnard, P., Hunter, A.: Elements of Argumentation. MIT Press, Cambridge (2008)CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bondarenko, A., Dung, P., Kowalski, R., Toni, F.: An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning. Artif. Intell. 93, 63–101 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Bondarenko, A., Dung, P., Kowalski, R., Toni, F.: An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning. Artif. Intell. 93, 63–101 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
10.
Zurück zum Zitat García, A., Simari, G.: Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach. Theory Pract. Logic Program. 4(1–2), 95–138 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH García, A., Simari, G.: Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach. Theory Pract. Logic Program. 4(1–2), 95–138 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Prakken, H.: An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments. Argument Comput. 5(1), 1–31 (2010) Prakken, H.: An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments. Argument Comput. 5(1), 1–31 (2010)
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Black, E., Hunter, A.: A relevance-theoretic framework for constructing and deconstructing enthymemes. J. Logic Comput. 22(1), 55–78 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Black, E., Hunter, A.: A relevance-theoretic framework for constructing and deconstructing enthymemes. J. Logic Comput. 22(1), 55–78 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Apothéloz, D.: The function of negation in argumentation. J. Pragmatics 19, 23–38 (1993)CrossRef Apothéloz, D.: The function of negation in argumentation. J. Pragmatics 19, 23–38 (1993)CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, L., Cardie, C.: Improving agreement and disagreement identification in online discussions with a socially-tuned sentiment lexicon. In: Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social Media Analysis (2014) Wang, L., Cardie, C.: Improving agreement and disagreement identification in online discussions with a socially-tuned sentiment lexicon. In: Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social Media Analysis (2014)
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kraus, S., Lehmann, S., Magidor, D.: Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics. Artif. Intell. 44, 167–207 (1990)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Kraus, S., Lehmann, S., Magidor, D.: Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics. Artif. Intell. 44, 167–207 (1990)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Tarski, A.: Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1956). Traslated by (Woodger., J. H) Tarski, A.: Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1956). Traslated by (Woodger., J. H)
Metadaten
Titel
Representing and Reasoning About Arguments Mined from Texts and Dialogues
verfasst von
Leila Amgoud
Philippe Besnard
Anthony Hunter
Copyright-Jahr
2015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20807-7_6