nach oben

Erschienen in:

2022 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Response of BTC Market to Social Media Sentiment: Application of Cross-Quantilogram with Bootstrap

verfasst von : Kazi Sohag, Mirzat Ullah

Erschienen in: Digitalization and the Future of Financial Services

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The cryptocurrency market is regarded as the world’s first entirely decentralized digital payment system, with no third-party influence. Hence, the advent of Bitcoin symbolizes a revolutionary occurrence in financial markets. This study looks into the relationship between Twitter-based economic uncertainty and changes in Bitcoin returns, which are considered as the dominant cryptocurrency. Using high-frequency historical daily data from March 2017 to March 2022, we used a recently introduced method called cross-quantilogram analysis to investigate Bitcoin’s behavior under various levels of uncertainty. The study created lower, middle, and upper quantiles to investigate the lag impact in time intervals such as daily, weekly, monthly, and quarterly. Twitter-based economic uncertainty appears to be a significant volatility influence, while Bitcoin returns appear to be the net volatility recipient during the daily and weekly time lags. The outcomes of this research study show a substantial causal relationship between Twitter-based economic uncertainty revealed by users of social media and how it effects the returns of Bitcoin. This effect is most noticeable for all cryptocurrencies and especially for Bitcoin at the tails of return distributions. Findings of this study shed some new insight into the significance of Bitcoin to consider as an alternative asset class in the aftermath of global financial instability and provide practical guidance for investors in developing portfolios.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel International Financial Markets in the Digital Era

Nächstes Kapitel The Impact of Digitalization on the Introduction of Innovations into BFSI Activities

Aharon, D. Y., & Qadan, M. (2020). When do retail investors pay attention to their trading platforms? The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 53, 101209.CrossRef

Aharon, D. Y., Demir, E., Lau, C. K. M., & Zaremba, A. (2022). Twitter-based uncertainty and cryptocurrency returns. Research in International Business and Finance, 59(November 2020), 101546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101546CrossRef

Al-Yahyaee, K. H., Rehman, M. U., Mensi, W., & Al-Jarrah, I. M. W. (2019). Can uncertainty indices predict Bitcoin prices? A revisited analysis using partial and multivariate wavelet approaches. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 49, 47–56.CrossRef

Atsalakis, G. S., Atsalaki, I. G., Pasiouras, F., & Zopounidis, C. (2019). Bitcoin price forecasting with neuro-fuzzy techniques. European Journal of Operational Research, 276(2), 770–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.01.040CrossRef

Aysan, A. F., Demir, E., Gozgor, G., & Lau, C. K. M. (2019). Effects of the geopolitical risks on bitcoin returns and volatility. Research in International Business and Finance, 47(September 2018), 511–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2018.09.011CrossRef

Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., Davis, J., & Renault, T. (2021). Twitter-derived measures of economic uncertainty. Policyuncertainty.Com, 1–14. https://www.policyuncertainty.com/media/Twitter_Uncertainty_5_13_2021.pdf

Béjaoui, A., Mgadmi, N., Moussa, W., & Sadraoui, T. (2021). A short-and long-term analysis of the nexus between bitcoin, social media and Covid-19 outbreak. Heliyon, 7, 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07539CrossRef

Bouri, E., Gupta, R., Tiwari, A. K., & Roubaud, D. (2017). Does bitcoin hedge global uncertainty? Evidence from wavelet-based quantile-in-quantile regressions. Finance Research Letters, 23, 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2017.02.009CrossRef

Caferra, R. (2022). Sentiment spillover and price dynamics: Information flow in the cryptocurrency and stock market. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 593, 126983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2022.126983CrossRef

Cary, M. (2021). Down with the #dogefather: Evidence of a cryptocurrency responding in real time to a crypto-tastemaker. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(6), 2230–2240. https://doi.org/10.3390/JTAER16060123CrossRef

Caviggioli, F., Lamberti, L., Landoni, P., & Meola, P. (2020). Technology adoption news and corporate reputation: Sentiment analysis about the introduction of Bitcoin. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 29(7), 877–897. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-03-2018-1774CrossRef

Cheng, H.-P., & Yen, K.-C. (2020). The relationship between the economic policy uncertainty and the cryptocurrency market. Finance Research Letters, 35, 101308.CrossRef

Conlon, T., & McGee, R. (2020). Safe haven or risky hazard? Bitcoin during the COVID-19 bear market. Finance Research Letters, 35, 101607.CrossRef

Demir, E., Gozgor, G., Lau, C. K. M., & Vigne, S. A. (2018). Does economic policy uncertainty predict the Bitcoin returns? An empirical investigation. Finance Research Letters, 26(January), 145–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2018.01.005CrossRef

Fang, L., Bouri, E., Gupta, R., & Roubaud, D. (2019). Does global economic uncertainty matter for the volatility and hedging effectiveness of Bitcoin? International Review of Financial Analysis, 61, 29–36.CrossRef

Gozgor, G., Tiwari, A. K., Demir, E., & Akron, S. (2019). The relationship between Bitcoin returns and trade policy uncertainty. Finance Research Letters, 29(March), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.03.016CrossRef

Grobys, K., Ahmed, S., & Sapkota, N. (2020). Technical trading rules in the cryptocurrency market. Finance Research Letters, 32, 101396.CrossRef

Guégan, D., & Renault, T. (2021). Does investor sentiment on social media provide robust information for Bitcoin returns predictability? Finance Research Letters, 38(December 2019), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101494CrossRef

Han, H., Linton, O., Oka, T., & Whang, Y. J. (2016). The cross-quantilogram: Measuring quantile dependence and testing directional predictability between time series. Journal of Econometrics, 193(1), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2016.03.001CrossRef

Huynh, T. L. D. (2021). Does Bitcoin react to Trump’s tweets? Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 31, 100546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2021.100546CrossRef

Huynh, T. L. D. (2022). When Elon Musk changes his tone, does bitcoin adjust its tune? Computational Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-021-10230-6

Khalfaoui, R., Ben Jabeur, S., & Dogan, B. (2022). The spillover effects and connectedness among green commodities, Bitcoins, and US stock markets: Evidence from the quantile VAR network. Journal of Environmental Management, 306(November 2021), 114493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114493CrossRef

Khan, M. (2021). Predicting cryptocurrency value, based on sentimental analysis of social media post Mohsin Khan.

Lucey, B. M., Vigne, S. A., Yarovaya, L., & Wang, Y. (2022). The cryptocurrency uncertainty index. Finance Research Letters, 45(May 2021), 102147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102147CrossRef

Ma, H., & Hao, D. (2022). Economic policy uncertainty, financial development, and financial constraints: Evidence from China. International Review of Economics and Finance, 79(June 2021), 368–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2022.02.027CrossRef

Mai, F., Shan, Z., Bai, Q., Wang, X. S., & Chiang, R. H. L. (2018). How does social media impact bitcoin value? A test of the silent majority hypothesis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35(1), 19–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2018.1440774CrossRef

Mensi, W., Lee, Y. J., Vo, X. V., & Yoon, S. M. (2021). Quantile connectedness among gold, gold mining, silver, oil and energy sector uncertainty indexes. Resources Policy, 74(November), 102450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102450CrossRef

Mokni, K., Bouteska, A., & Nakhli, M. S. (2022). Investor sentiment and bitcoin relationship: A quantile-based analysis. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 60(January), 101657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2022.101657CrossRef

Naeem, M. A., Mbarki, I., & Shahzad, S. J. H. (2021). Predictive role of online investor sentiment for cryptocurrency market: Evidence from happiness and fears. International Review of Economics and Finance, 73(June 2020), 496–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2021.01.008CrossRef

Ortu, M., Vacca, S., Destefanis, G., & Conversano, C. (2022). Cryptocurrency ecosystems and social media environments: An empirical analysis through Hawkes’ models and natural language processing. Machine Learning with Applications, 7(November 2021), 100229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2021.100229CrossRef

Park, M., & Cha, S. (2019). A study on the information asymmetry among cryptocurrency traders. Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management, 26(3), 29–41.

Philippas, D., Rjiba, H., Guesmi, K., & Goutte, S. (2019). Media attention and bitcoin prices. Finance Research Letters, 30(January), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.03.031CrossRef

Smuts, N. (2019). What drives cryptocurrency prices? An investigation of Google trends and telegram sentiment. Performance Evaluation Review, 46(3), 131–134. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308897.3308955CrossRef

Sohag, K., Shams, S. M. R., Gainetdinova, A., & Nappo, F. (2021). Frequency connectedness and cross-quantile dependence among medicare, medicine prices and health-tech equity. Technovation, 2022, 102483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102483CrossRef

Sohail, H. M., Zatullah, M., & Li, Z. (2021). Effect of foreign direct investment on bilateral trade: Experience from Asian emerging economies. SAGE Open, 11, 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211054487CrossRef

Song, L., Tian, G., & Jiang, Y. (2022). Connectedness of commodity, exchange rate and categorical economic policy uncertainties—Evidence from China. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 60(January), 101656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2022.101656CrossRef

Suardi, S., Rasel, A. R., & Liu, B. (2022). On the predictive power of tweet sentiments and attention on bitcoin. International Review of Economics and Finance, 79(February), 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2022.02.017CrossRef

Symeonidis, S., Effrosynidis, D., & Arampatzis, A. (2018). A comparative evaluation of pre-processing techniques and their interactions for twitter sentiment analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 110, 298–310.CrossRef

Tandon, C., Revankar, S., Palivela, H., & Parihar, S. S. (2021). How can we predict the impact of the social media messages on the value of cryptocurrency? Insights from big data analytics. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 1(2), 100035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2021.100035CrossRef

Urquhart, A. (2018). What causes the attention of Bitcoin? Economics Letters, 166(July 2017), 40–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.02.017CrossRef

Verma, M., & Sharma, P. (2020). Money often costs too much : A study to investigate the effect of twitter sentiment on bitcoin price fluctuation. September. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202009.0216.v1.

Wang, C., Chu, X., & Qin, Y. (2020, July). Measurement and analysis of the bitcoin networks: A view from mining pools. In 2020 6th International Conference on Big Data Computing and Communications (BIGCOM) (pp. 180–188). IEEE.CrossRef

Wook, K. (2020). Advanced social media sentiment analysis for short-term cryptocurrency price prediction. Expert Systems, 37(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12493

Wu, W., Tiwari, A. K., Gozgor, G., & Leping, H. (2021). Does economic policy uncertainty affect cryptocurrency markets? Evidence from Twitter-based uncertainty measures. Research in International Business and Finance, 58, 101478.CrossRef

Yadav, A., Yadav, D., & Jain, A. (2021). An improvised feature-based method for sentiment analysis of product reviews. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Scalable Information Systems, 8(29), e5.

Yarovaya, L., Matkovskyy, R., & Jalan, A. (2020). The effects of a ‘Black Swan’ event (COVID-19) on herding behavior in cryptocurrency markets: Evidence from cryptocurrency USD, EUR, JPY and KRW Markets. EUR, JPY and KRW Markets (April 27, 2020).

Titel: Response of BTC Market to Social Media Sentiment: Application of Cross-Quantilogram with Bootstrap
verfasst von: Kazi Sohag
Mirzat Ullah
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Digitalization and the Future of Financial Services
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-11544-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-11545-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11545-5_6

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"