Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
During the last 25 years, there have been many calls for new engineering competencies and a corresponding gradual change in both curriculum and pedagogy in engineering education. This has been a global trend, in the US, Europe, Australia and now emerging in the rest of the world. Basically, there have been two main types of societal challenges that many engineering institutions have responded to: the employability skills of graduates and the need for a sustainability approach to engineering. These are two very different challenges and societal needs; however, the ways engineering institutions have responded form a consistent pattern across many of the content aspects. No matter the specific character of change, three very different curriculum strategies seem to have evolved: an add-on strategy, an integration strategy or a re-building strategy; the latter involves substantial curriculum re-design. The add-on strategy and integration strategy are the ones most commonly used, whereas the re-building strategy is at an emerging stage in most engineering education communities. Most engineering schools find it very challenging to re-build an entire curriculum, so smaller changes are generally preferred. The purpose of this article is to conceptualise these institutional response strategies in a wider literature and present examples of curriculum change within both employability and sustainability. We will maintain that all these strategies are based on management decisions as well as academic faculty decisions; however the implications for using the various strategies are very different in terms of system change, role of disciplines, leader interventions and faculty development strategies. Furthermore, institutions might use all types of response strategies in different programs and in different semesters. The conceptual framework presented here can provide analytical anchors, hopefully creating more awareness of the complexity of systemic change.
Baillie, C., Reader, J., & Kabo, J. (2012). Heterotopia: Alternative pathways to social justice. Alresford: John Hunt Publishing.
Barnett, R. (2010). Being a University (1st ed.). New York: Routledge.
Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. Berlin: Springer.
Bologna Working Group. (2005). A framework for qualifications of the European higher education area. Bologna working group report on qualifications frameworks. Copenhagen DK: Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation.
Brulin, G., & Svensson, L. (2012). Managing sustainable development programmes. London: Gower.
Cameron, I., & Hadgraft, R. (2010). Engineering and ICT learning and teaching academic standards statement. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council. http://disciplinestandards.pbworks.com/w/page/52657697/FrontPage
CDIO. (2014a). CDIO history. http://www.cdio.org/cdio-history. Accessed 13 August 2014.
CDIO. (2014b). CDIO vision. http://www.cdio.org/cdio-vision. Accessed 13 August 2014.
Clark, B. R., Pergamon, B. R., & Clark, B. C. (2001). Creating entrepreneurial universities: organizational pathways of transformation. Oxford; New York: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D. R., & Edström, K. (2014). The CDIO approach. In Rethinking engineering education (pp. 11–45). Berlin: Springer. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-05561-9_2. Accessed 28 September 2014.
Crosthwaite, J. L., & Kavanagh, L. (2010). An evaluation of the EWB challenge-implications for future curriculum change. In Proceedings of the 2010 Australasian association for engineering education conference. Sydney.
Dahlgren, M. A. (2002). Portraits of PBL: A cross-faculty comparison of students’ experiences of problem-based learning. Linköping: Linköpings universitet, Department of Behavioural Sciences.
de Graaff, E., & Kolmos, A. (2006). Management of change. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Dowling, D. G., & Hadgraft, R. (2013). The DYD stakeholder consultation process— A user guide.http://www.olt.gov.au/resource-DYD-defining-your-discipline. Accessed 13 August 2014.
Engineers Australia. (2011). Stage 1 competency standard for professional engineer. http://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/sites/default/files/shado/Education/ProgramAccreditation/110318Stage1ProfessionalEngineer.pdf. Accessed 7 January 2012.
Engineers Without Borders. (2014). EWB Challenge. http://www.ewbchallenge.org.
European Commission. (2009). Communiqué of the conference of European ministers responsible for higher education, Leuven and Louvain-la-Neuve, 28–29 April 2009. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-09-675_en.htm. Accessed 6 February 2015.
Felletti, G., & Boud, D. (1997). The challenge of problem based learning. London: Taylor & Francis. http://www.saxo.com/dk/the-challenge-of-problem-based-learning_david-boud_hardback_9780749422912. Accessed 15 October 2014.
Fullan, M. (2007a). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Fullan, M. (2007b). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass (Revised edition).
Goldberg, D. E., & Sommerville, M. (2014). A whole new engineer (1st ed.). Douglas, MI: ThreeJoy Associates Inc.
Graham, R. (2010). UK approaches to engineering project- based learning white paper sponsored by the Bernard M. Gordon‐MIT engineering leadership program. Bernard M. Gordon MIT engineering leadership program.
Graham, R. (2012). Achieving excellence in engineering education: The ingredients of successful change. The Royal Academy of Engineering. www.raeng.org.uk
Hadgraft, R., & Muir, P. (2003). Defining graduate capabilities for chemical engineers at RMIT. In Proceedings of AaeE conference 29 September to 1 October 2003 (pp. 91–102). Austral Asian Association for Engineering Education.
Hadgraft, R., Xie, M., & Angeles, N. (2004). Civil and infrastructure engineering for sustainability. Salt Lake City: Presented at the ASEE annual conference.
Holgaard, J. E., de Graaff, E., & Kolmos, A. (2010). Sustainability in the practice, mindset and heart of engineering. Presented at the ESRSCP-EMSU Conference. http://vbn.aau.dk/da/publications/sustainability-in-the-practise-mindset-and-heart-of-engineering(73d7bba8-f7b5-43ac-948b-49223159267a).html. Accessed 15 October 2014.
International Engineering Alliance. (2013). Graduate attributes and professional competencies. http://www.ieagreements.org/IEA-Grad-Attr-Prof-Competencies.pdf.
International Engineering Alliance. (2015). Washington Accord. http://www.ieagreements.org/washington-accord/.
Johnston, L. F. (2013). Higher education for sustainability: Cases, challenges, and opportunities from across the curriculum. New York: Routledge. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.worc.ac.uk/oala/metadata&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203123041. Accessed 16 October 2014.
Jones, P., Selby, D., & Sterling, S. (2010). Sustainability education— Perspectives and practice across higher education. New York: Earthscan.
King, R. (2008). Addressing the supply and quality of engineering graduates for the new century. http://www.olt.gov.au/resource-addressing-supply-quality-engineering-graduates-uts-2008. Accessed 27 November 2014.
Knoster, T., Villa R, & Thousand J. (2000). A framework for thinking about systems change. In R. Villa & J. Thousand (Eds.), Restructuring for caring and effective education: Piecing the puzzle together. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
Kolmos, A., & Graaff, E. D. (2014). Problem-based and project-based learning in engineering education. In B. M. Olds & A. Johri (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of engineering education research (pp. 141–161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review,73(2), 59–67.
Magnell, M., Geschwind, L. A., Gumaelius, L. B., & Kolmos, A. (2014). Faculty approaches to working life issues in engineering curricula. Presented at the 121st ASEE annual conference and exposition. http://vbn.aau.dk/da/publications/faculty-approaches-to-working-life-issues-in-engineering-curricula(12ebc24b-3994-4387-9dc4-ae7b25dd1abf)/export.html. Accessed 16 October 2014.
Marshall, S. (Ed.). (2007). Strategic leadership of change in higher education: What’s new? New York: Routledge.
National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Accessed 25 November 2014. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10999/the-engineer-of-2020-visions-of-engineering-in-the-new.
Reidsema, C., Hadgraft, R., Cameron, I., & King, R. (2013). Change strategies for educational transformation. http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=810983996591111;res=IELENG. Accessed 16 October 2014.
RMIT. (2014). Engineering, society and sustainability. http://www.rmit.edu.au/courses/035198. Accessed 13 August 2014.
Royal Academy of Engineering. (2007). Educating engineers for the 21st century. The Royal Academy of Engineering. http://www.raeng.org.uk/publications/reports?p=6. Accessed 27 November 2014.
Salminen-Karlsson, M. (2002). Gender-inclusive computer engineering education: Two attempts at curriculum change. International Journal of Engineering Education, 18(4), 430–437. Accessed 25 May 2015.
Savin-Baden, M. (2003). Facilitating problem-based learning (1st ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Schierenbeck, C. (2013). Adaptive change in higher education. In Fixing higher education (pp. 153–162). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-658-00213-8_12. Accessed 15 October 2014.
Seidel, J., Hadgraft, R. G., & Eley, M. (1994). Student contractors bid for soils engineering jobs. Presented at the 6th Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference, Sydney.
Spinks, N., Silburn, N., & Birchall, D. (2006). Educating engineers for the 21st century: The industry view. The Royal Academy of Engineering. http://www.raeng.org.uk/publications/reports?p=7#sthash.0yS6yhdX.dpuf
Sterling, S. (2001). Sustainable education: Re- visioning learning and change. Schumacher Briefings. Schumacher UK, CREATE Environment Centre, Seaton Road, Bristol, BS1 6XN, England (6 pounds). E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org; Web site: http://www.schumacher.org.uk. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED464791. Accessed 21 August 2014.
The Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering. (2015). http://www.olin.edu.
Tryggvason, G., & Apelian, D. (2011). Shaping our world: Engineering education for the 21st century. New York: Wiley. CrossRef
Ulseth, R., & Johnson, B. (2014). PBL curriculum-startup phase complete. In Frontiers in education. Presented at the frontiers in education conference, Madrid 22–26 October.
United Nations. (2014). UN decade of education for sustainable development—Strong sustainability. http://nz.phase2.org/partnerships/unesco/un-decade-of-education-for-sustainable-development. Accessed 27 November 2014.
Wals, A. E. J. (2007). Social learning towards a sustainable world (Vol. 2007). Wageningen: Wagening Academic Publisers.
Wals, A. E. J., & Corcoran, P. B. (2012). Learning for Sustainability—In times for accellerating change. Wageningen: Wagening Academic Publisers. CrossRef
- Response strategies for curriculum change in engineering
Roger G. Hadgraft
Jette Egelund Holgaard
- Springer Netherlands
- International Journal of Technology and Design Education
Print ISSN: 0957-7572
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1804
Neuer Inhalt/© Velodyne Europe, dSpace, FEV, Valeo Logo/© Valeo, TE Connectivity Corporation/© TE Connectivity Corporation, Neuer Inhalt, AVL ADAS Validierung: Vielfalt autonomer Fahrszenarien absichern/© AVL, INNOVATIVE LÖSUNGEN FÜR DIE E-DRIVE VALIDIERUNG/© AVL