Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
NanoEthics
Erschienen in: NanoEthics 3/2018

22.10.2018 | Original Paper

Responsible Research and Innovation and the Governance of Human Enhancement

verfasst von: Guido Gorgoni

Erschienen in: NanoEthics | Ausgabe 3/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This article aims to explore the debate on human enhancement (HE) from the perspective of the evolutions of responsibility paradigms, and in particular from the perspective of the so-called Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) approach. The aim is not to explore the arguments pro or contra the ethical legitimacy and/or technical feasibility of human enhancement, but rather exploring if, and how, the RRI perspective can shape the debate on human enhancement (and vice versa).
In particular, the human enhancement debate will be read through the lenses of four main responsibility paradigms that we sketch by examining both, the historical and conceptual evolution of the responsibility idea and the dynamics of its ascription. In order to provide a useful scheme for interpreting human enhancement, RRI will be characterised as a distinctive responsibility model that can subsequently be used to frame the debate on HE with a particular emphasis on its normative implications, as well as on its social and political significance.
Vorheriger Artikel Responsibility and Human Enhancement
Nächster Artikel The Over-Extended Mind? Pink Noise and the Ethics of Interaction-Dominant Systems

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Cane P (2002) Responsibility in law and morality. Hart Publishing, Portland
6.
7.
Ewald F (1993) Responsabilité. In: Arnaud A-J (ed) Dictionnaire encyclopédique de théorie et de sociologie du droit. L.G.D.J, Paris
8.
Jonas H (1984) The imperative of responsibility. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
9.
United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (1993) Rio declaration on environment and development. United Nations, New York
10.
European Union (2016) Treaty on European Union. Off J Eur Union C202 59:13–45
11.
Vincent NA (2011) A structured taxonomy of responsibility concepts. In: Vincent NA, van de PI, van den HJ (eds) Moral responsibility. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 15–35CrossRef
12.
van de Poel I (2011) The relation between forward-looking and backward-looking responsibility. In: Moral Responsibility. Beyond free will and determinism. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 37–52
13.
Arnaldi S, Gorgoni G, Pariotti E (2016) Responsible research and innovation as a governance paradigm: what is new? In: Navigating towards shared responsibility in research and innovation. Approach, Process and Results of the Res-AGorA Project. Karlsruhe, pp 23–29
14.
15.
Iatridis K, Schroeder D (2016) Responsible research and innovation in industry. Springer, ChamCrossRef
16.
Shaffer GC, Pollack MA (2009) Hard vs. soft law: Alternatives, complements, and antagonists in international governance. Minn L Rev 94:706
17.
Brey P (2009) Human enhancement and personal identity. In: Berg Olsen JK, Selinger E, Riis S (eds) New waves in philosophy of technology. Springer, Cham, pp 169–185CrossRef
18.
Arnaldi S, Bianchi L (2016) Responsibility in science and technology. Elements of a social theory. Springer VS, WiesbadenCrossRef
19.
Wright D, Gutwirth S, Gellert R, Friedewald M (2011) Precaution and privacy impact assessment as modes towards risk governance. In: von Schomberg R (ed) Towards responsible research and innovation in the information and communication technologies and security technologies fields. European Union, Luxembourg, pp 83–97
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
Heirri - Higher Education Institutions & Responsible Research and Innovation (2017) Heirri - Integrating RRI into Higher Education Institutions. http://​heirri.​eu. Accessed 26 Oct 2017
25.
26.
Boisson de Chazournes L (2009) New technologies, the precautionary principle, and public participation. In: Murphy T (ed) New technologies and human rights. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, pp 161–194CrossRef
27.
Jasanoff S (2003) Technologies of humility: citizen participation in governing science. Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning & Policy 41:223–244CrossRef
28.
29.
Gianni R (2016) Responsibility and freedom: the ethical realm of RRI. John Wiley & Sons, HobokenCrossRef
30.
Van den Hoven J (2013) Value sensitive design and responsible innovation. In: Owen R, Bessant J, Heintz, Maggy (eds) Responsible innovation. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, pp 75–83
31.
von Schomberg R (2013) A vision of responsible research and innovation. In: Owen R, Bessant J, Heintz, Maggy (eds) Responsible innovation. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, pp 51–74
32.
Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M (2003) Introduction. ‘Mode 2’ revisited: the new production of knowledge. Minerva 41:179–194CrossRef
33.
34.
Yeung K (2004) Securing compliance: a principled approach. Hart Publishing, Oxford
35.
Vincent NA (2013) Neuroscience and legal responsibility. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRef
36.
Maslen H, Santoni de Sio F, Faber N (2015) With cognitive enhancement comes great responsibility? In: Koops B-J, Oosterlaken I, Romijn H et al (eds) Responsible innovation 2. Springer, Cham, pp 121–138
37.
38.
Osimani B (2013) An epistemic analysis of the precautionary principle. Dilemata: International Journal of Applied Ethics 11:149–167
39.
40.
Pariotti E, Ruggiu D (2012) Governing nanotechnologies in Europe: human rights, soft law, and corporate social responsibility. In: Van Lente H, Coenen C, Fleischer T et al (eds) Little by little. Expansions of nanoscience and emerging technologies. IOS Press/AKA-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 157–168
Metadaten
Titel
Responsible Research and Innovation and the Governance of Human Enhancement
verfasst von
Guido Gorgoni
Publikationsdatum
22.10.2018
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
NanoEthics / Ausgabe 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1871-4757
Elektronische ISSN: 1871-4765
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-018-0326-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2018

NanoEthics 3/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Book Review

Rethinking Human Enhancement: Social Enhancement and Emergent Technologies

Original Paper

Animal Disenhancement in Moral Context

Invited Contribution

Human Enhancement and the Anthropology of the “Entire Human Being”

Original Paper

Giving Voice to Patients: Developing a Discussion Method to Involve Patients in Translational Research

Introduction

Responsibility and Human Enhancement

Editorial

Improving Responsibility, Responsible Improvements