Skip to main content
Registrieren
Springer Professional
SUCHE
MENÜ 1 2 3 4
nach oben

Tipp

Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen

Erschienen in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 4/2021

30.03.2021 | Original Empirical Research

Retail service innovations and their impact on retailer shareholder value: evidence from an event study

verfasst von: Lien Lamey, Els Breugelmans, Maya Vuegen, Anne ter Braak

Erschienen in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science | Ausgabe 4/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
share
TEILEN

Abstract

To survive in the competitive retail landscape, retailers launch service innovations designed to grant additional value to consumers. This study investigates whether and in which circumstances retail service innovations create shareholder value, using stock returns to capture investors’ point of view. An event study is used to analyze a broad, varied set of 350 service innovation announcements by publicly listed retailers. The study shows that the customer value benefit(s) aimed for by the retail service innovation (i.e., its level of convenience and engagement) has an impact on shareholder value. Moreover, this impact is contingent upon the stage of the consumer purchase process that the innovation targets, and upon the hedonic or utilitarian nature of the products offered by the retailer that initiates the innovation. The impact on retailer shareholder value is more positive for service innovations high on convenience that speed up and simplify the shopping process, when implemented at the purchase stage or by retailers offering utilitarian products. Service innovations high on engagement that focus more on non-transactional initiatives instead fare well in the post-purchase stage.
Vorheriger Artikel How and when do big data investments pay off? The role of marketing affordances and service innovation

Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 69.000 Bücher
  • über 500 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt 90 Tage mit der neuen Mini-Lizenz testen!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 58.000 Bücher
  • über 300 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko





Jetzt 90 Tage mit der neuen Mini-Lizenz testen!

Jetzt informieren
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
Some service innovations, like personalized advice, can improve products too, through the added service they provide. While this could be the outcome of the service innovations we consider, in this research, we do not focus on product innovations that directly alter the core benefits that the retailer delivers.
 
2
We define customer engagement more broadly than Beckers et al. (2018) or Van Doorn et al. (2010), who limit it to word of mouth and customer voice.
 
3
As we explain in the Data section, each service innovation is assigned to one purchase process stage only (cf. Lemon and Verhoef 2016) and retailers can offer primarily utilitarian, primarily hedonic or both utilitarian and hedonic products (Li et al. 2020).
 
4
The examples we list here (and later) are the service innovations in our sample that were assigned to the pre-purchase stage and had the highest scores on convenience or engagement. See also Appendix and Figure 2.
 
5
As some retailers offer both utilitarian and hedonic products, in our results section, we will also compare service innovations that aim at improving convenience and engagement for these type of retailers.
 
6
Innovations are often introduced at the banner level (e.g., Walmart introduces separate service innovations for Asda and for Sam’s Club), but we estimate our model at the retailer level, because stock returns are not available at the individual banner level. We do control for the share of the banner.
 
7
In contrast to Woodroof et al. (2019), we do not include retailer size (i.e., dollar sales) as a control variable, due to its high correlation with retailer share (both variables log-transformed produce a correlation > .80). But, in a robustness check where we replace retailer share with retailer size, the same substantive results were obtained.
 
8
The leverage effect refers to how a 1% change in operating business translates into a percentage change in shareholder value, taking into account the retailer’s debt and non-operating assets (e.g., Schulze et al. 2012).
 
9
We took a random selection (10%) of the identified events and verified the announcement data in the Lexis-Nexis database, which also includes a broad selection of business and news publications (Beckers et al. 2018; Raassens et al. 2012). These results point out that Edge Retail Insights includes a larger scope of service innovation announcements and is much quicker in picking up news (for 31.43% there was a delay of on average 28 days). When the announcement was earlier in Lexis-Nexis (for 42.86%), the delay at Edge Retail Insights is limited to 3 days on average (median: 1 day). This falls within the event window that we retain (see below).
 
10
A retailer can be active in more than one industry; the primary SIC code indicates its core market. We exclude non-traditional retailers in the building, materials, hardware, garden supply, and mobile home dealer (SIC 52), automotive dealers and gasoline service stations (SIC 55), and restaurant (SIC 58) sectors.
 
11
We also identified events in the period January 2010–December 2010 (83 events in total). We use this information to operationalize the control variables order of entry (to assess whether the events in the estimation period are new announcements of service innovations not previously introduced) and the relative retailer innovativeness (to assess how innovative the retailer is compared to the market, for events that happen in 2011).
 
12
In line with Beckers et al. (2018) and Raassens et al. (2012), we use the choice of a specific type of service innovation (high/low convenience; high/low engagement; pre-purchase, purchase, or post-purchase stage) instead of the mere announcement of a service innovation. Identifying a sample of non-occurring service innovation announcements would be arbitrary.
 
13
There is also a rather high correlation between purchase and pre-purchase (see Table 3), but this is driven by the fact that we only observe a limited set of post-purchase service innovations (53 out of 350).
 
Literatur
Albrecht, C, M., Hattula, S., & Lehmann, D, R. (2017). The relationship between consumer shopping stress and purchase abandonment in task-oriented and recreation-oriented consumers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45 (5 ), 720–740
Babin, B, J., Darden, W, R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research , 20(4), 644–656
Beckers, S, F, M., Van Doorn, J., & Verhoef, P, C. (2018). Good, better, engaged? The effect of company-initiated customer engagement behavior on shareholder value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(3), 366–383
Berry, L, L., Seiders, K, & Grewal, D. (2002). Understanding service convenience. Journal of Marketing , 66(3), 1–17
Berry, L., Shankar, V., Parish, J, T., Cadwallader, S., & Dotzel, T. (2006). Creating new markets through service innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(1), 56–63
Blut, M., Wang, C., & Schoefer, K. (2016) Factors influencing the acceptance of self-service technologies: A meta-analysis. Journal of Service Research, 19(4) , 396–416
Borah, A., & Tellis, G, J. (2014). Make, buy, or ally? Choice of and payoff from announcements of alternate strategies for innovations. Marketing Science, 33(1), 114–133
Boyd, D, E., Kannan, P, K., & Slotegraaf, R, J. (2019). Branded apps and their impact on firm value: A design perspective. Journal of Marketing Research , 56(2), 76–88
Brown, S, J., & Warner, J, B. (1985). Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies. Journal of Financial Economics , 14(1), 3–31
Day, G. & Fahey, L. (1988). Valuing market strategies. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 45–57
Dekimpe, M, G., Geyskens, I., & Gielens, K. (2020). Using technology to bring online convenience to offline shopping.  Marketing Letters, 31, 25–29.
Dotzel, T., & Shankar, V. (2019). The relative effects of business-to-business (vs. business-to-consumer) service innovations on firm value and firm risk: An empirical analysis. Journal of Marketing , 83(2), 133–152
Dotzel, T., Shankar, V., & Berry, L, L. (2013). Service innovativeness and firm value. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(2), 259–276
Fang, E., Palmatier, R, W., & Grewal, R. (2011). Effects of customer and innovation asset configuration strategies on firm performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 587–602
Gauri, D, K., Jindal, R, P., Ratchford, B., Fox, R., Bhatnagar, A., Pandey, A., Navallo, J, R., Fogarty, J. Carr, S., Howerton, E. (2021). Evolution of retail formats: Past, present, and future, Forthcoming in Journal of Retailing.
Geyskens, I., Gielens, K., & Dekimpe, M. G. (2002). The market valuation of internet channel additions. Journal of Marketing, 66(2), 102–119
Geyskens, I., Gielens, K. & Wuyts S. (2015). United we stand: The impact of buying groups on retailer productivity. Journal of Marketing, 79(4), 16–33
Gielens, K., Van de Gucht, L, M., Steenkamp, J, B, E., & Dekimpe, M, G. (2008). Dancing with a giant: The effect of Wal-Mart's entry into the United Kingdom on the performance of European retailers. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(5), 519–534
Gielens, K., Geyskens, I., Deleersnyder, B., & Nohe, M. (2018). The new regulator in town: The effect of Walmart’s sustainability mandate on supplier shareholder value. Journal of Marketing, 82(2), 124–141
Gill, M., Sridhar, S., & Grewal, R. (2017). Return on engagement initiatives: A study of a business-to-business mobile app. Journal of Marketing, 81(4), 45–66
Greene, W, H. (2003). Econometric analysis. Prentice Hal
Grewal, C. & Roggeveen, A, L. (2020). Understanding retail experiences and customer journey management. Journal of Retailing, 96(1), 3–8
Grewal, D., Levy, M., & Kumar, V. (2009). Customer experience management in retailing: An organizing framework. Journal of Retailing, 85(1), 1–14
Grewal, D., Noble, S, M. Roggeveen, A. L., & Nordfalt, J. (2020). The future of in-store technology, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science , 48(1), 96–113
Hair, J, F., William, C, B., Barry J, B., & Rolph, E, A. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective . Pearson Prentice Hall
Han, S, P., Park, S., & Oh, W. (2016). Mobile app analytics: A multiple discrete-continuous choice framework. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 40(4), 983–1008
Hilken, T., de Ruyter, K., Chylinski, M., Mahr, D., & Keeling, D, I. (2017). Augmenting the eye of the beholder: Exploring the strategic potential of augmented reality to enhance online service experiences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(6), 884–905
Homburg, C., Hoyer, W, D., & Fassnacht, M. (2002). Service orientation of a retailer’s business strategy: Dimensions, antecedents, and performance outcomes. Journal of Marketing, 66(4), 86–101
Homburg, C., Vollmayr, J., & Hahn, A. (2014). Firm value creation through major channel expansions: Evidence from an event study in the United States, Germany, and China. Journal of Marketing, 78(3), 38–61
Inman, J, J., & Nikolova, H. (2017). Shopper-facing retail technology: A retailer adoption decision framework incorporating shopper attitudes and privacy concerns. Journal of Retailing, 93(1), 7–28
Jacoby, J., Szybillo, G, J., & Berning, C, K. (1976). Time and consumer behavior: An interdisciplinary overview. Journal of Consumer Research, 2(4), 320–339
Kumar, V., & Pansari, A. (2016). Competitive advantage through engagement. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(4), 497–514
Lamey, L., Deleersnyder, B., Steenkamp, J, B. E., & Dekimpe, M, G. (2018). New product success in the consumer packaged goods industry: A shopper marketing approach. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 35(3), 432–452
Lee, R, P., & Grewal, R. (2004). Strategic responses to new technologies and their impact on firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 157–171
Lemon, K, N., & Verhoef, P, C. (2016). Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 69–96
Li, J., Abbasi, A., Cheema, A., & Abraham, L, B. (2020). Path to purpose? How online customer journeys differ for hedonic versus utilitarian purchases. Journal of Marketing, 84(4), 127–146
Lim, L, G., Tuli, K, R., & Dekimpe, M. (2018). Investors' evaluations of price-increase preannouncements. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 35(3), 359–377
Mathys, J. , Burmester, A, B., & Clement, M. (2016). What drives the market popularity of celebrities? A longitudinal analysis of consumer interest in film stars. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33(2), 428–448
Papies, D., Ebbes, P., & Van Heerde, H, J. (2017). Addressing endogeneity in marketing models. In P. S. H. Leeflang, J. E. Wieringa, T. H. A. Bijmolt, & K. H. Pauwels (Eds.), Advanced methods for modelling marketing. Springer
Park, S., & Gupta, S. (2012). Handling endogenous regressors by joint estimation using copulas. Marketing Science, 31(4), 567–586
Patell, J, M. (1976). Corporate forecasts of earnings per share and stock price behavior: Empirical test. Journal of Accounting Research, 14(2), 246–276
Puccinelli, N, M., Goodstein, R. C., Grewal, D., Price, R., Raghubir, P., & Stewart, D. (2009). Customer experience management in retailing: Understanding the buying process. Journal of Retailing, 85(1), 15–30
Raassens, N., Wuyts, S., & Geyskens, I. (2012). The market valuation of outsourcing new product development. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(5), 682–695
Reinartz, W., Wiegand, N. & Imschloss, M. (2019). The impact of digital transformation on the retailing value chain. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 36(3), 350–366
Rese, A., Schreiber, S., & Baier, D. (2014). Technology acceptance modeling of augmented reality at the point of sale: Can surveys be replaced by an analysis of online reviews?. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(5), 869–876
Rintamäki, T., Kanto, A., Kuusela, H. & Spence, M, T. (2006). Decomposing the value of department store shopping into utilitarian, hedonic and social dimensions: Evidence from Finland. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 34(1), 6–24
Ruppert, D. (2006). Trimming and winsorization. In S. Kotz, N. Balakrishnan, C. Read, & B. Vidakovic (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences (volume 14, 2nd Ed., pp. 8765–8770). Wiley-Interscience
Schulze, C., Skiera, B., & Wiesel, T. (2012). Linking customer and financial metrics to shareholder value: The leverage effect in customer-based valuation. Journal of Marketing, 76(2), 17–32
Seiders, K., Berry, L. L., & Gresham, L.G. (2000). Attention retailers: How convenient is your convenience strategy? Sloan Management Review, 49(3), 79–90 
Sood, A., & Tellis, G, J. (2009). Do innovations really pay off? Total stock market returns to innovation. Marketing Science, 28(3), 442–456
Sorescu, A., Chandy, R, J., & Prabhu, J, C. (2003). Sources and financial consequences of radical inn ovation: Insights from pharmaceuticals. Journal of Marketing, 67(4), 82–102
Sorescu, A., Shankar, V. & Kushwaha, T. (2007). New product preannouncements and shareholder value: Don’t make promises you can’t keep. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(3), 468–489
Sorescu, A., Frambach, R, T., Singh, J., Rangaswamy, A., & Bridges, C. (2011). Innovations in retail business models. Journal of Retailing, 87(1), S3-S16
Sorescu, A., Warren, N, L., & Ertekin, L. (2017). Event study methodology in the marketing literature: An overview. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(2), 186–207
Sorescu, A., Sorescu, S, M., Armstrong, W, J., & Devoldere, B. (2018). Two centuries of innovations and stock market bubbles. Marketing Science, 37(4), 507–529
Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374
Srinivasan, S., Pauwels, K., Silva-Risso, J., & Hanssens, D, M. (2009). Product innovations, advertising, and stock returns. Journal of Marketing, 73(1), 24–43
Srivastava, R, K., Shervani, T, A., & Fahey, L. (1998). Market-based assets and shareholder value: A framework for analysis. Journal of Marketing, 62(1), 2–18
Van Doorn, J., Lemon, K, N., Mittal, V., Nass, S., Pick, D., Pirner, P., & Verhoef, P. (2010). Customer engagement behavior: Theoretical foundations and research directions. Journal of Service Research, 13 (3 ), 253–266
Verbeek, M., & Nijman, T. (1992). Testing for selectivity bias in panel data models. International Economic Review, 33(3), 681–703
Verhoef, P., Neslin, S, A., & Vroomen, B. (2007). Multichannel customer management: Understand the research-shopper phenomenon. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24 (2 ), 129–148
Verhoef, P, C., Lemon, K, N., Parasuraman, A., Roggeveen, A., Tsiros, M., & Schlesinger, L, A. (2009). Customer experience creation: Determinants, dynamics and management strategies. Journal of Retailing, 85 (1 ), 31–41
Verhoef, P, C., Kannan, P, K., & Inman, J, J. (2015). From multi-channel retailing to omni-channel retailing: Introduction to the special issue on multi-channel retailing. Journal of Retailing, 91 (2 ), 174–181
Wang, R, J, H., Malthouse, E, C., & Krishnamurthi, L. (2015). On the go: How mobile shopping affects customer purchase behavior. Journal of Retailing, 91 (2 ), 217–234
Warren, N, L., & Sorescu, A. (2017). Interpreting the stock returns to new product announcements: How the past shapes investors’ expectations of the future. Journal of Marketing Research, 54 (5 ), 799–815
Woodroof, P., Deitz, G., Howie, K, M., & Evans, R, D. (2019). The effect of cause-related marketing on firm value: A look at Fortune’s most admired all-stars. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47 (3 ), 899–918
Wooldridge, J, M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd Ed). MIT Press.
Yang J., & Klassen, J, Y, K, J. (2008). How financial markets reflect the benefits of self-service technologies. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 21 (5 ), 448–467
Yuldasheva, O., Martsulevich, D., Ahtyamov, M., & Shubaeva, V. (2020). Developing a construct and a scale for measuring the internet-store’s web usability. In E. G. Popkova & B. S. Sergi (Eds.), Artificial intelligence: Anthropogenic nature vs. social origin. Springer
Metadaten
Titel
Retail service innovations and their impact on retailer shareholder value: evidence from an event study
verfasst von
Lien Lamey
Els Breugelmans
Maya Vuegen
Anne ter Braak
Publikationsdatum
30.03.2021
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science / Ausgabe 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0092-0703
Elektronische ISSN: 1552-7824
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-021-00777-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2021

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 4/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Original Empirical Research

How and when do big data investments pay off? The role of marketing affordances and service innovation

Original Empirical Research

Digital business capability: its impact on firm and customer performance

Original Empirical Research

Online reviews generated through product testing: can more favorable reviews be enticed with free products?

Original Empirical Research

Online program engagement and audience size during television ads

Review Paper

Understanding anthropomorphism in service provision: a meta-analysis of physical robots, chatbots, and other AI

Original Empirical Research

Conversational robo advisors as surrogates of trust: onboarding experience, firm perception, and consumer financial decision making