Skip to main content
main-content

Review of Accounting Studies OnlineFirst articles

12.05.2021

Are corruption and corporate tax avoidance in the United States related?

We examine whether state-level corruption and corporate tax avoidance in the United States (U.S) are related. Using a sample of 36,078 U.S. firm-year observations from 1998 to 2014, we find that corruption is significantly positively related to …

07.05.2021 Open Access

Does litigation change managers’ beliefs about the value of voluntarily disclosing bad news?

Research suggests that earnings-disclosure-related litigation causes managers to reduce subsequent disclosure, perhaps stemming from a belief that even their good faith disclosures will cause them trouble. This paper considers unexplored …

05.05.2021

IAS 7 and value relevance: the direct method versus the indirect method

We identify and predict circumstances where the direct method statement of cash flows is expected to provide more value relevant information to financial statement users. We predict the direct method is more informative when earnings are of lower …

01.05.2021

The value of board commitment

Boards can learn about the environment of their firms through information gathering and communicating with the CEO. In the post-Sarbanes-Oxley environment, some boards have taken steps to shape the communication more proactively by committing to …

01.05.2021

Earnings announcement return extrapolation

We propose that extrapolative beliefs about earnings announcement (EA) returns may contribute to the understanding of EA return patterns. We construct a theoretically motivated measure of extrapolative investors’ expectations based on a stock’s …

Aktuelle Ausgaben

Über diese Zeitschrift

... Compelling international reading for those who take an active interest in theoretical, empirical and experimental accounting research ...
Review of Accounting Studies provides an outlet for significant academic research in accounting including theoretical, empirical, and experimental work. The journal is committed to the principle that distinctive scholarship is rigorous. While the editors encourage all forms of research, it must contribute to the discipline of accounting. The Review of Accounting Studies is committed to prompt turnaround on the manuscripts it receives. For the majority of manuscripts the journal will make an accept-reject decision on the first round. Authors will be provided the opportunity to revise accepted manuscripts in response to reviewer and editor comments; however, discretion over such manuscripts resides principally with the authors. An editorial revise and resubmit decision is reserved for new submissions which are not acceptable in their current version, but for which the editor sees a clear path of changes which would make the manuscript publishable.


Officially cited as: Rev Account Stud

Weitere Informationen

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise