Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Methods for Improving the Microstructure of Recycled Concrete Aggregate: A Review Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Review on Building Energy Performance Labeling: Whole Life-Cycle Perspective

verfasst von : Fenglian Yi, Jiayuan Wang

Erschienen in: Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Building energy performance labeling is an important tool for countries around the world to carry out building energy conservation work. More attention should be paid to the development of building energy performance labeling for China, which has huge energy-saving potential. However, there is currently a lack of reflectiveness and summery on the research and development of building energy performance labeling. Therefore, a systematic literature review method and bibliometric statistical tool are used to analyze the current status, trends, and gaps. Through a review of 162 articles from 2007 to 2020, the focuses of the research on building energy performance labeling have been summarized from four perspectives: design, decision-making, evaluation, control and feedback. Future research directions and feasible improvement directions are also provided. Considering the environment, people, technology, and process management aspects, this paper generalized the reasons why the development of energy performance labeling in China is slow and proposed targeted solutions as references for further theoretical and practical research.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Influencing Factors of Farmers’ Risk Perception on Returning Their Lands: Evidence from Chongqing, China
Nächstes Kapitel Research on Green Evaluation of Mountainous Highway Construction
Literatur
1.
Building Energy Efficiency Research Center, Tsinghua University, 2020 Annual Report on China Building Energy Efficiency (2020). China Building Industry Press.
2.
BP China. BP World Energy Outlook (2020 edition) [EB/OL]. (2020-04-09) [12].
3.
Student, J., Papyrakis, E., & van Beukering, P. (2017). Buildings behaving badly: A behavioral experiment on how different motivational frames influence residential energy label adoption in the Netherlands. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 32(1), 107–132.CrossRef
4.
Ren, S., Guo, H., & Xu, Z. (2009). Research on information asymmetry in my country’s energy-saving building market. Construction Economy (02):92–95.
5.
Pengcheng, S., Yingzong, L., & Bo, Y. (2008). Analysis and countermeasures of information asymmetry in the energy-saving building market. Journal of Xidian University (Social Science Edition), 02, 89–93.
6.
Liu, Y., Dong, J., & Shen, L. (2020). A conceptual development framework for prefabricated construction supply chain management: An integrated overview. Sustainability, 12(5), 1878.CrossRef
7.
Park, J. Y. (2017). Is there a price premium for energy efficiency labels? Evidence from the introduction of a label in Korea. Energy Economics, 62, 240–247.CrossRef
8.
Fedorczak-Cisak, M., & Furtak, M. (2017). ldquoIn siturdquo measurements in energy saving building certificate. 11, 50–63.
9.
Vinagre Diaz, J.J., Richard Wilby, M., & Rodriguez Gonzalez, A. B. (2013). Setting up GHG-based energy efficiency targets in buildings: The Ecolabel. 59, 633–642.
10.
Zhang, H., & Leimer, H. (2011). Low energy certificate—An exploration on optimization and evaluation of energy-efficient building envelope. 54 (6), 1639–1644.
11.
Madrazo, L., Sicilia, A., & Massetti, M., et al. (2018). Enhancing energy performance certificates with energy related data to support decision making for building retrofitting. 22, S957–S969.
12.
Talajic, J., & Pasagic, V. (2008). Energy certificates for buildings as a means to reduce energy consumption. 60 (10), 877–883.
13.
Taranu, V., Verbeeck, G., & Nuyts, E. (2020). Upgrading the energy label for dwellings in Flanders: An example of a behaviourally informed policy tool. 48 (1), 18–33.
14.
Lopez-Gonzalez, L. M., Lopez-Ochoa, L. M., & Las-Heras-Casas, J., et al. (2016). Update of energy performance certificates in the residential sector and scenarios that consider the impact of automation, control and management systems: A case study of La Rioja. 178, 308–322.
15.
Taranu, V., & Verbeeck, G. (2018). A closer look into the European energy performance certificates under the lenses of behavioural insights a comparative analysis. 11 (7), 1745–1761.
16.
Fujisawa, M., Takemura, K., & Funaki, Y., et al. (2020). An experimental study of the effect of energy label design on the correct evaluation of buildings’ energy performance and promotion of energy saving. 23 (1), 733–762.
17.
Organ, S. (2020). Minimum energy efficiency—Is the energy performance certificate a suitable foundation?.
18.
Qiu, Y., Su, X., & Wang, Y. D. (1937). Factors influencing commercial buildings to obtain green certificates. 49 (20), 1937–1949.
19.
Hjortling, C., Bjork, F., & Berg, M., et al. (2017). Energy mapping of existing building stock in Sweden—Analysis of data from energy performance certificates. 153, 341–355.
20.
Reis, J. A., & Escorcio, P. (2012). Energy certification in St. Antonio (Funchal)—Statistical analysis. 49, 126–131.
21.
Qinying, F., & Jie, Y. (2012). Research on the operating mechanism of building energy efficiency evaluation and marking system. Value Engineering, 31(08), 53–54.
22.
Bo, Y. (2006). Study on administration of energy efficiency labeling of building. Tianjin University.
23.
Kang, Y., Zhang, Y., & Han, F. (2009). Recommendations on fiscal and taxation policies for encouraging energy-saving buildings. China Energy, 31 (11), 34–37, 15.
24.
Kelly, S., Crawford-Brown, D., & Pollitt, M. G. (2012). Building performance evaluation and certification in the UK: Is SAP fit for purpose? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(9), 6861–6878.CrossRef
25.
Kok, N., & Jennen, M. (2012). The impact of energy labels and accessibility on office rents. 46, 489–497.
26.
Leskinen, N., Vimpari, J., & Junnila, S. (2020). A review of the impact of green building certification on the cash flows and values of commercial properties. 12 (7).
27.
McCord, M., Davis, P., & McCord, J., et al. (2020). An exploratory investigation into the relationship between energy performance certificates and sales price: A polytomous universal model approach. 25 (2), 247–271.
28.
Porumb, V., Maier. G., & Anghel. I. (2020). The impact of building location on green certification price premiums: Evidence from three European countries. 272.
29.
Reichardt, A., Fuerst, F., & Rottke, N. B., et al. (2012). Sustainable building certification and the rent premium: A panel data approach. 34 (1), 99–126.
30.
Zhang, L., Liu, H., & Wu, J. (2017). The price premium for green-labelled housing: Evidence from China. 54 (15), 3524–3541.
31.
Zhang, L., Li, Y., Stephenson, R., et al. (2018). Valuation of energy efficient certificates in buildings. Energy and Buildings, 158, 1226–1240.CrossRef
32.
Olaussen, J. O., Oust, A., & Solstad, J. T. (2017). Energy performance certificates—Informing the informed or the indifferent? 111, 246–254.
33.
Wilhelmsson, M. (2019). Energy performance certificates and its capitalization in housing values in Sweden. 11 (21).
34.
Holtermans, R., & Kok, N. (2019). On the value of environmental certification in the commercial real estate market. 47 (3), 685–722.
35.
Fan, C., Xiao, F., Li, Z., et al. (2018). Unsupervised data analytics in mining big building operational data for energy efficiency enhancement: A review. Energy and Buildings, 159, 296–308.CrossRef
36.
Jin, Z, Kang, X., & Wu, P., et al. (2018). Research on the incentive mechanism of public building energy consumption and energy efficiency information disclosure. Journal of Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 34 (04), 74–79.
37.
Jose Garcia-Nieto, P., Garcia-Gonzalo, E., & Pablo Paredes-Sanchez, J., et al. (2020). A new hybrid model to foretell thermal power efficiency from energy performance certificates at residential dwellings applying a Gaussian process regression.
38.
Hoerner, M., Cischinsky, H., & Lichtmess, M. (2016). Analysis of energy demand and energy consumption of residential buildings with energy certificate in Luxemburg. 38 (3), 166–175.
39.
Khayatian, F., Sarto, L., & Dall’O, G. (2016). Application of neural networks for evaluating energy performance certificates of residential buildings. 125, 45–54.
40.
Gangolells, M., Casals, M., & Ferre-Bigorra, J., et al. (2020). Office representatives for cost-optimal energy retrofitting analysis: A novel approach using cluster analysis of energy performance certificate databases. 206.
41.
Hardy, A., & Glew, D. (2019). An analysis of errors in the energy performance certificate database. 129, 1168–1178.
42.
Fan, C., Sun, Y., Zhao, Y., et al. (2019). Deep learning-based feature engineering methods for improved building energy prediction. Applied Energy, 240, 35–45.CrossRef
43.
Naji, S., Shamshirband, S., Basser, H., et al. (2016). Application of adaptive neuro-fuzzy methodology for estimating building energy consumption. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53, 1520–1528.CrossRef
44.
Koo, C., & Hong, T. (2015). Development of a dynamic operational rating system in energy performance certificates for existing buildings: Geostatistical approach and data-mining technique. 154, 254–270.
45.
Las-Heras-Casas, J., Lopez-Ochoa, L. M., & Lopez-Gonzalez, L. M., et al. (2018). A tool for verifying energy performance certificates and improving the knowledge of the residential sector: A case study of the Autonomous Community of Aragon (Spain). 41, 62–72.
46.
Wei, Y., Xia, L., Pan, S., et al. (2019). Prediction of occupancy level and energy consumption in office building using blind system identification and neural networks. Applied Energy, 240, 276–294.CrossRef
47.
Melo, A. P., Versage, R. S., & Sawaya, G., et al. (2016). A novel surrogate model to support building energy labelling system: A new approach to assess cooling energy demand in commercial buildings. 131, 233–247.
48.
Jia, M., Srinivasan, R. S., & Raheem, A. A. (2017). From occupancy to occupant behavior: An analytical survey of data acquisition technologies, modeling methodologies and simulation coupling mechanisms for building energy efficiency. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68, 525–540.CrossRef
49.
Hong, T., D’Oca, S., Taylor-Lange. S. C., et al. (2015). An ontology to represent energy-related occupant behavior in buildings. Part II: Implementation of the DNAS framework using an XML schema. Building and Environment, 94, 196–205.
50.
Peng, G., Tao, L., & Yaqing, G. (2019). Energy consumption survey and energy efficiency evaluation of typical green buildings in Beijing. China Housing Facilities, 03, 6–10.
51.
Asensio, O. I., & Delmas, M. A. (2017). The effectiveness of US energy efficiency building labels. 2 (4).
52.
Cheng, J., Luo, J., & Peng, C., et al. (2015). Research and analysis of data based on building energy efficiency labeling. 31 (12), 97–103.
53.
Cozza, S., Chambers, J., & Deb, C., et al. (2020). Do energy performance certificates allow reliable predictions of actual energy consumption and savings? Learning from the Swiss national database. 224.
54.
Cozza, S., Chambers, J., & Patel, M. K. (2020). Measuring the thermal energy performance gap of labelled residential buildings in Switzerland. 137.
55.
Murphy, L. (2014). The influence of the energy performance certificate: The Dutch case. 67, 664–672.
56.
Qiu, Y., & Kahn, M. E. (2019). Impact of voluntary green certification on building energy performance. 80, 461–475.
57.
Bozovic-Stamenovic, R., Kishnani, N., Tan, B. K., et al. (2016). Assessment of awareness of Green Mark (GM) rating tool by occupants of GM buildings and general public. Energy and Buildings, 115, 55–62.CrossRef
58.
Jang, D., Kim, B., & Kim, S. H. (2018). The effect of green building certification on potential tenants’ willingness to rent space in a building. 194, 645–655.
59.
Lee, H., Lee, M., Lim, S. (2018). Do consumers care about the energy efficiency of buildings? Understanding residential choice based on energy performance certificates. 10 (11).
60.
Marmolejo-Duarte, C., & Bravi, M. (2017). Does the energy label (EL) matter in the residential market? A stated preference analysis in Barcelona. 7 (2).
61.
Parkinson, A., De Jong, R., & Cooke, A., et al. (2013). Energy performance certification as a signal of workplace quality. 62, 1493–1505.
62.
Schuitema, G., Aravena, C., & Denny, E. (2020). The psychology of energy efficiency labels: Trust, involvement, and attitudes towards energy performance certificates in Ireland. 59.
Metadaten
Titel
Review on Building Energy Performance Labeling: Whole Life-Cycle Perspective
verfasst von
Fenglian Yi
Jiayuan Wang
Copyright-Jahr
2021
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Buch
Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate

Print ISBN: 978-981-16-3586-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-16-3587-8

Copyright-Jahr: 2021

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3587-8_46