Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
The Journal Impact Factor: A Brief History, Critique, and Discussion of Adverse Effects Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

27. Reviewing, Indicating, and Counting Books for Modern Research Evaluation Systems

verfasst von : Alesia Zuccala, Nicolas Robinson-García

Erschienen in: Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this chapter, we focus on the specialists who have helped to improve the conditions for book assessments in research evaluation exercises, with empirically based data and insights supporting their greater integration. Our review highlights the research carried out by four types of expert communities—the monitors, the subject classifiers, the indexers, and the indicator constructionists. Many challenges lie ahead for scholars affiliated with these communities, particularly the latter three. By acknowledging their unique yet interrelated roles, we show where the greatest potential is for both quantitative and qualitative indicator advancements in book-inclusive evaluation systems.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Social Media Metrics for New Research Evaluation
Nächstes Kapitel Scholarly Twitter Metrics
Literatur
J.B. Thomson: Books in the Digital Age: The Transformation of Academic and Higher Education Publishing in Britain and the United States (Polity, Cambridge 2005)
M. Mann: Introduction to Cataloging and the Classification of Books, 2nd edn. (American Library Association, Chicago 1930)
A. Van der Weel: Changing our Textual Minds, Towards a Digital Order of Knowledge (Manchester Univ. Press, Manchester 2011)
E. Garfield: Is information retrieval in the arts and humanities inherently different from that in science? The effect that ISI®'s Citation Index for the arts and humanities is expected to have on future scholarship, Libr. Q. 50(1), 40–57 (1979)CrossRef
R.A. Day: How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper, 3rd edn. (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 1989)
L.A. Coser: Publishers as gatekeepers of ideas, Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 421(1), 14–22 (1975)CrossRef
G. Williams, A. Basso, I. Galleron, T. Lippiello: More, less or better: The problem of evaluating books in SSH research. In: The Evaluation of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities. Lessons from the Italian Experience, ed. by A. Bonaccorsi (Springer, Cham 2018) pp. 133–158CrossRef
C. Basili, L. Lanzillo: Research quality criteria in the evaluation of books. In: The Evaluation of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities. Lessons from the Italian Experience, ed. by A. Bonaccorsi (Springer, Cham 2018) pp. 159–184CrossRef
S. Fish: Is there a Text in this Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities (Harvard Univ. Press, Harvard 1980)
J. Fry, C. Oppenheim, C. Creaser, W. Johnson, M. Summers, S. White, G. Butters, J. Craven, J. Griffiths, D. Hartley: Communicating knowledge: How and Why Researchers Publish and Disseminate Their Findings (Research Information Network, London 2009)
L. Butler, M.S. Visser: Extending citation analysis to non-source items, Scientometrics 66(2), 327–343 (2007)CrossRef
B. Cronin, K. La Barre: Mickey Mouse and Milton: Book publishing in the humanities, Learn. Publ. 17(2), 85–98 (2004)CrossRef
B. Cronin, H. Snyder, H. Atkins: Comparative citation rankings of authors in monographic and journal literature: A study of sociology, J. Doc. 53(3), 263–273 (1997)CrossRef
J. Gorraiz, P. Purnell, W. Glänzel: Opportunities and limitations of the book citation index, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 64(7), 1388–1398 (2013)CrossRef
H.F. Moed: The future of research evaluation rests with an intelligent combination of advanced metrics and transparent peer review, Sci. Public Policy 34(8), 575–583 (2007)CrossRef
N. Glenn: On the misuse of book reviews, Contemp. Sociol. 7(3), 254–255 (1978)
A. Natowitz, P.C. Wheeler: Evaluating review content for book selection: An analysis of American history reviews in Choice, American Historical Review, and Journal of American History, Coll. Res. Libr. 58(4), 322–335 (1997)CrossRef
J.M. Parker: Scholarly book reviews in literature journals as collection development sources for librarians, Collect. Manag. 11(12), 41–57 (1989)CrossRef
J. Serebnick: Selection and holdings of small publishers' books in OCLC libraries: A study of the influence of reviews, publishers and vendors, Libr. Q. 62(3), 259–294 (1992)CrossRef
J.W. Cortada: Five ways to be a terrible book reviewer, J. Sch. Publ. 30(1), 34–37 (1998)
V.E. Hargrave: A comparison of reviews of books in the social sciences in general and scholarly periodicals, Libr. Q. 18, 206–217 (1948)CrossRef
D. Motta-Roth: Discourse analysis and academic book reviews: A study of text and disciplinary cultures. In: Genre Studies in English for Academic Purposes, ed. by I. Fortanet (Universitat Jaume, Castelló de la Plana 1998) pp. 29–58
H. Regnery: Bias in book reviewing and book selection, Am. Libr. Assoc. Bull. 60, 57–62 (1966)
J. Hartley: Reading and writing book reviews across disciplines, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 57(9), 1194–1207 (2006)CrossRef
A. Spink, D. Robbins, L. Schamber: Use of scholarly book reviews: implications for electronic publishing and scholarly communication, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 49(4), 364–374 (1998)CrossRef
Y. Lindholm-Romantschuk: Scholarly Book Reviewing in the Social Sciences and Humanities. The Flow of Ideas Within and Among Disciplines (Greenwood, Westport 1998)
T.D. Bilhartz: In 500 words or less: Academic book reviewing in American history, Hist. Teach. 17(4), 525–536 (1984)CrossRef
D.T. Champion, M.F. Morris: A content analysis of book reviews in the AJS, ASR, and social forces, Am. J. Sociol. 78(5), 1256–1265 (1973)CrossRef
L.E. Riley, E.A. Spreitzer: Book reviewing in the social sciences, Am. Sociol. 5(4), 358–363 (1970)
W.E. Snizek, E.R. Fuhrman: The evaluative content of book reviews in the American Journal of Sociology, Contemporary Sociology, and Social Forces, Contemp. Sociol. 8(3), 339–340 (1979)CrossRef
W.E. Snizek, E.R. Fuhrman: Some factors affecting the evaluative content of book reviews in sociology, Am. Sociol. 14(2), 108–114 (1979)
V. Diodato: Impact and scholarliness in arts and humanities book reviews: A citation analysis. In: Proc. 47th Annu. Meet. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., Vol. 21 (1984) pp. 217–221
A.J. Nederhof: Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: A review, Scientometrics 66(1), 81–100 (2006)CrossRef
J. Nicolaisen: The scholarliness of published peer reviews: A bibliometric study of book reviews in selected social science fields, Res. Eval. 11(3), 129–140 (2002)CrossRef
A. Schubert, S. Zsindely, A. Telcs, T. Braun: Quantitative analysis of a visible tip of the iceberg: Book reviews in chemistry, Scientometrics 6(6), 433–443 (1984)CrossRef
J.W. Thompson: The death of the scholarly monograph in the humanities? Citation patterns in literary scholarship, Libri 52, 121–136 (2002)CrossRef
G. Lewison: Evaluation of books as research output in the history of medicine, Res. Eval. 10(2), 89–95 (2001)CrossRef
B. Hammarfelt: Interdisciplinarity and the intellectual base of literature studies: Citation analysis of highly cited monographs, Scientometrics 86(3), 705–725 (2011)CrossRef
D. Hicks: The four literatures of social science. In: Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, ed. by H.F. Moed, W. Glänzel, U. Schmoch (Springer, Dordrecht 2004) pp. 473–496
A.V. Rubio: Scientific production of Spanish universities in the fields of social sciences and language, Scientometrics 24(1), 3–19 (1992)CrossRef
P. Williams, I. Stevenson, D. Nicholas, A. Watkinson, I. Rowlands: The role and future of the monograph in arts and humanities research, ASLIB Proc. New Inf. Perspect. 61(1), 67–82 (2009)CrossRef
J. Guillory: Evaluating scholarship in the humanities: Principles and procedures, ADE Bulletin 137, 18–33 (2005)CrossRef
E. Archambault, E. Vignola Gagné: The use of Bibliometrics in the Social Sciences and Humanities, Science-Metrix, Final Report (Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRCC), Montreal 2004)
M. Huang, Y. Chang: Characteristics of research output in the social sciences and humanities: from a research evaluation perspective, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 59(11), 1819–1828 (2008)CrossRef
K. Kousha, M. Thelwall: Google book citation for assessing invisible impact?, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 60(8), 1537–1549 (2009)CrossRef
V. Larivière, B. Macaluso: Improving the coverage of social science and humanities researchers' output: The case of the Érudit journal platform, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 62(12), 2437–2442 (2011)CrossRef
H.F. Moed, J. Linmans, A. Nederhof, A. Zuccala, C. Lopez Illescas, F. de Moya Anegon: Options for a Comprehensive Database of Research Outputs in the Social Sciences and Humanities, Research Report to the Project Board of the Scoping Study “Towards a Bibliometric Database for the Social Sciences and Humanities” (Standing Committees for the Social Sciences and the Humanities of the European Science Foundation (ESF), Strasbourg 2009)
G. Sivertsen, B. Larsen: Comprehensive bibliographic coverage of the social sciences and humanities in a citation index: An empirical analysis of the potential, Scientometrics 91(2), 567–575 (2012)CrossRef
E. Garfield: Citation indexes for science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas, Science 122(3159), 108–111 (1955)CrossRef
W. Glänzel, A. Schubert: A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes, Scientometrics 56(3), 357–367 (2003)CrossRef
C. Beghtol: Semantic validity: Concepts of warrant in bibliographic classification systems, Libr. Resour. Tech. Serv. 30(2), 109–125 (1986)
L.M. Chan: A Guide to the Library of Congress Classification, 5th edn. (CO: Libraries Unlimited, Englewood 1999)
A.C. Kors: Epicureans and Atheists in France (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 2016) pp. 1650–1729
K.W. Boyack, R. Klavans, K. Börner: Mapping the backbone of science, Scientometrics 64(3), 351–374 (2005)CrossRef
L. Leydesdorff, I. Rafols: A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 60(2), 348–362 (2009)CrossRef
P. Dorta González, M.I. Dorta González: Comparing journals from different fields of science and social science through a JCR subject categories normalized impact factor, Scientometrics 95(2), 645–672 (2013)CrossRef
M.I. Dorta González, P. Dorta González: Do fixed citation windows affect the impact maturation rates of scientific journals?, Invest. Bib. 30(68), 73–89 (2015)
W. Glänzel, H. Moed: Journal impact measures in bibliometric research, Scientometrics 53(2), 171–193 (2002)CrossRef
P.-S. Chi, W. Jueris, B. Thijs, W. Glanzel: Book bibliometrics – A new perspective and challenge in indicator building based on the Book Citation Index. In: Proc. ISSI 2015 Istanbul: 15th Int. Soc. Sci. Informetr. Conf, ed. by A.A. Salah, Y. Tonta, A.A. Akdag Salah, C.R. Sugimoto, U. Al (Bogaziçi Univ. Printhouse, Istanbul 2015) pp. 1161–1169
W. Glänzel, B. Thijs, P.-S. Chi: The challenges to expand bibliometric studies from periodical literature to monographic literature with a new data source: The Book Citation Index, Scientometrics 109(21), 65–2179 (2016)
A. Zuccala, H.D. White: Correlating libcitations and citations in the humanities with WorldCat.org and scopus data. In: Proc. 15th Int. Soc. Sci. Informetr. (ISSI), ed. by A.A. Salah, Y. Tonta, A.A. Akdag Salah, C. Sugimoto, U. Al (Bogazici Univ., Istanbul 2015) pp. 305–316
A. Zuccala, R. Cornacchia: Data matching, integration, and interoperability for a metric assessment of monographs, Scientometrics 108(1), 465–484 (2016)CrossRef
L. Leydesdorff, U. Felt: “Books” and “book chapters” in the book citation index (BKCI) and science citation index (SCI, SoSCI, AHCI), Proc. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 49(1), 1–7 (2012)CrossRef
B. Tillet: Bibliographic relationships. In: Relationships in the Organization of Knowledge, ed. by C.A. Bean, R. Green (Kluwer, Dordrecht 2001) pp. 19–35CrossRef
B. Tillet: What is FRBR? A conceptual model for the bibliographic universe, Aust. Libr. J. 54(1), 24–30 (2005)CrossRef
R.P. Smiraglia: The Nature of a Work: Implications for the Organization of Knowledge (Scarecrow, London 2001)
K. Kousha, M. Thelwall, S. Abdoli: Goodreads reviews to assess the wider impacts of books, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 68(8), 2004–2016 (2017)CrossRef
A. Zuccala, M. Breum, K. Bruun, B.T. Wunsch: Metric assessments of books as families of works, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 69(1), 146–157 (2018)CrossRef
E. Giménez-Toledo, J. Mañana-Rodríguez, T.C.E. Engels, P. Ingwersen, J. Polonen, G. Sivertsen, F.T. Verleysen, A.A. Zuccala: Taking scholarly books into account. Current developments in five European countries, Scientometrics 107(2), 685–699 (2016)CrossRef
K. Kousha, M. Thelwall: Can Amazon.com reviews help to assess the wider impacts of books?, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 67(3), 566–581 (2016)CrossRef
K. Kousha, M. Thelwall: An automatic method for assessing the teaching impact of books from online academic syllabi, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 67(12), 2993–3007 (2016)CrossRef
Y. Gingras: Criteria for evaluating indicators. In: Beyond Bibliometrics: Harnessing Multidimensional Indicators of Scholarly Impact, ed. by B. Cronin, C.R. Sugimoto (MIT Press, Cambridge 2014) pp. 109–125
A. Zuccala: Inciting the metric oriented humanist: Teaching bibliometrics in a faculty of humanities, Educ. Inf. 32(2), 149–164 (2016)
L. Butler, M.S. Visser: Extending citation analysis to non-source items, Scientometrics 66(2), 327–343 (2012)CrossRef
A.J.M. Linmans: Why with bibliometrics the Humanities does not need to be the weakest link. Indicators for research evaluation based on citations, library holdings, and productivity measures, Scientometrics 83(2), 337–354 (2010)CrossRef
A. Zuccala, T. van Leeuwen: Book reviews in humanities research evaluations, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 62(10), 1979–1991 (2011)CrossRef
D. Torres-Salinas, N. Robinson-Garcia, J.M. Campanario, E.D. López-Cózar: Coverage, field specialisation and the impact of scientific publishers indexed in the Book Citation Index, Online Inf. Rev. 38(1), 24–42 (2014)CrossRef
A. Zuccala, R. Guns, R. Cornacchia, R. Bod: Can we rank scholarly book publishers? A bibliometric experiment with the field of history, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 66(7), 1333–1347 (2014)CrossRef
D. Torres-Salinas, H.F. Moed: Library catalog analysis as a tool in studies of social sciences and humanities: An exploratory study of published book titles in economics, J. Informetr. 3(1), 9–26 (2009)CrossRef
H.D. White, S.K. Boell, H. Yu, M. Davis, C.S. Wilson, F.T.H. Cole: Libcitations: A measure for comparative assessment of book publications in the humanities and social sciences, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 60(6), 1083–1096 (2009)CrossRef
D. Torres-Salinas, N. Robinson-García, A. Cabezas-Clavijo, E. Jiménez-Contreras: Analyzing the citation characteristics of books: Edited books, book series and publisher types in the book citation index, Scientometrics 98(3), 2113–2127 (2014)CrossRef
S. Milojević, C.R. Sugimoto, V. Larivière, M. Thelwall, Y. Ding: The role of handbooks in knowledge creation and diffusion: A case of science and technology studies, J. Informetr. 8(3), 693–709 (2014)CrossRef
M. Thelwall, P. Sud: No citation advantage for monograph-based collaborations?, J. Informetr. 8(1), 276–283 (2014)CrossRef
T.C.E. Engels, T.L.B. Ossenblok, E.H.J. Spruyt: Changing publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities, Scientometrics 93(2), 373–390 (2012)CrossRef
T.L.B. Ossenblok, F.T. Verleysen, T.C.E. Engels: Coauthorship of journal articles and book chapters in the social sciences and humanities, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 65(5), 882–897 (2014)CrossRef
P.-S. Chi: Differing disciplinary citation concentration patterns of book and journal literature?, J. Informetr. 10(3), 814–829 (2016)CrossRef
K. Kousha, M. Thelwall, S. Rezaie: Assessing the citation impact of books: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 62(11), 2147–2164 (2011)CrossRef
K. Kousha, M. Thelwall: Are Wikipedia citations important evidence of the impact of scholarly articles and books?, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 68(3), 762–779 (2017)CrossRef
E. Garfield: The history and meaning of the journal impact factor, JAMA J. Am. Med. Assoc. 295(1), 90–95 (2006)CrossRef
H.F. Moed: Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals, J. Informetr. 4(3), 265–277 (2010)CrossRef
B. González-Pereira, V.P. Guerrero-Boteb, F. Moya-Anegónc: A new approach to the metric of journals' scientific prestige: The SJR indicator, J. Informetr. 4(3), 379–391 (2010)CrossRef
E. Giménez-Toledo, A. Román-Román: Assessment of humanities and social sciences monographs through their publishers: A review and a study towards a model of evaluation, Res. Eval. 18(3), 201–213 (2009)CrossRef
E. Giménez-Toledo, C. Tejada-Artigas, J. Mañana-Rodríguez: Evaluation of scientific books’ publishers in social sciences and humanities: Results of a survey, Res. Eval. 22(1), 64–77 (2012)CrossRef
A. Zuccala: Quality and influence in literary work: evaluating the ‘educated imagination’, Res. Eval. 21(3), 229–241 (2012)CrossRef
A. Nederhof, M. Luwel, H. Moed: Assessing the quality of scholarly journals in linguistics: An alternative to citation-based journal impact factors, Scientometrics 51(1), 241–265 (2001)CrossRef
F.T. Verleysen, T.C.E. Engels: A label for peer-reviewed books, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 64(2), 428–430 (2013)CrossRef
J. Mañana-Rodríguez, E. Giménez-Toledo: Specialization and multidisciplinarity of scholarly book publishers: differences between Spanish University Presses and other scholarly publishers, Scientometrics 114(1), 19–30 (2018)CrossRef
E. Giménez-Toledo, J. Mañana-Rodríguez, C.-M. Tejada-Artigas: Scholarly publishers indicators: Prestige, specialization and peer review of scholarly book publishers, Prof. Inf. 24(6), 855–860 (2015)
D. Torres-Salinas, R. Rodríguez-Sánchez, N. Robinson-García, J. Fdez-Valdivia, J.A. García: Mapping citation patterns of book chapters in the Book Citation Index, J. Informetr. 7(2), 412–424 (2013)CrossRef
A. Zuccala, M. van Someren, M. van Bellen: A machine-learning approach to coding book reviews as quality indicators: Towards a theory of mega-citation, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 65(11), 2248–2260 (2014)CrossRef
A. Zuccala, F. Verleysen, R. Cornacchia, T. Engels: Altmetrics for the humanities: Comparing Goodreads reader ratings with citations to history books, ASLIB Proceedings 67(3), 320–336 (2015)
J. Gorraiz, C. Gumpenberger, P.J. Purnell: The power of book reviews: A simple and transparent enhancement approach for book citation indexes, Scientometrics 98(2), 841–852 (2014)CrossRef
A. Zuccala, R. Guns: Comparing book citations in humanities journals to library holdings: Scholarly use versus “perceived cultural benefit” (RIP). In: Proc. 13th Int. Soc. Sci. (ISSI) Conf. (AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH Vienna, Vienna 2013) pp. 353–360
D. Torres-Salinas, N. Robinson-Garcia, J. Gorraiz: Filling the citation gap: Measuring the multidimentsional impact of the academic book at institutional level with PlumX, Scientometrics 113(3), 1371–1384 (2017)CrossRef
B. Flyvberg: Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and how it can Succeed Again (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 2001)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Reviewing, Indicating, and Counting Books for Modern Research Evaluation Systems
verfasst von
Alesia Zuccala
Nicolas Robinson-García
Copyright-Jahr
2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Buch
Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02510-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-02511-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2019

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_27

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise