Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Kongresse
Themenseiten
Künstliche Intelligenz Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Veranstaltungskalender Awards MyNewsletter Firmensuche
Kunden Login
Über Einzelzugang informieren
Über Unternehmenszugang informieren
Referenzkunden
Zukunftswerkstatt Sales Excellence 2025 | 08. Mai 2025

KI als Booster im Vertrieb

Lernen Sie von Digital-Experten, wie der gezielte Einsatz von KI-Unterstützung Ihrem Unternehmen in vielen Bereichen hilft, im Vertrieb einen Schritt voraus zu sein. Jetzt wieder live vor Ort teilnehmen in Frankfurt am Main!
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Social Choice and Welfare
Erschienen in:

04.07.2021 | Original Paper

Revisiting comparisons of income inequality when Lorenz curves intersect

verfasst von: James Davies, Michael Hoy, Lin Zhao

Erschienen in: Social Choice and Welfare | Ausgabe 1/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The main contribution of Davies and Hoy (Am Econ Rev 85:980–986, 1995) was a “necessary and sufficient” condition for comparing inequality between income distributions according to the principle of transfer sensitivity (PTS). Chiu (Soc Choice Welf 28:375–399, 2007) showed that although the condition is sufficient, it is not necessary. In this paper, we provide the correct necessary and sufficient condition, and demonstrate with a simple example how the corrected condition allows for more pairs of distributions to be ranked by PTS. The correction clarifies the connection between Lorenz curve comparisons and inequality rankings when the curves intersect.
Vorheriger Artikel Proxy selection in transitive proxy voting
Nächster Artikel Does the approval mechanism induce the efficient extraction in common pool resource games?

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
In the favourable composite transfer defined by Shorrocks and Foster (1987), the progressive transfer occurs in a lower range of incomes than does the regressive transfer, although the two transfers may occur over intersecting income ranges. See Davies and Hoy (1995) for a discussion of the normative appeal of placing greater emphasis on inequality that occurs for relatively lower incomes within the distribution.
 
2
In the literature, Proposition 2 of Davies and Hoy (1995) is usually cited as an equivalence between PTS and the comparison of variances for appropriately truncated subpopulations of a pair of income distributions. See, for example, Davies and Shorrocks (2000) and Cowell (2011) for citations in monographs, and Aaberge (2009), Gajdos and Weymark (2012) and Ibragimov et al. (2018) for citations in other publications.
 
3
This is clear upon comparing his Lemma 2 and Footnote 11 with our Proposition 1 here.
 
4
Theorem 5.2.3 in Athreya and Lahiri (2006, p.155) states integration by parts under mild conditions. Since cumulative distribution functions are always nondecreasing right-continuous and the quadratic function in our derivations never has any point of discontinuity, it follows as a corollary of Theorem 5.2.3 that in our situation, integration by parts is workable for general distributions including discontinuities.
 
5
It can be shown that \(z_i^*\) is also the unique zero root of S(y) on \([G^{-1}(P_i),F^{-1}(P_i)]\). Indeed, applying integration by parts to (2) yields \(P_iG^{-1}(P_i)+\int _{(G^{-1}(P_i),z_i^*]}G(y)dy=P_iF^{-1}(P_i)-\int _{(z_i^*,F^{-1}(P_i)]}F(y)dy\), and to \(\int _{[\underline{y},G^{-1}(P_i)]}ydG(y)=\int _{[\underline{y},F^{-1}(P_i)]}ydF(y)\) yields \(\int _{[\underline{y},G^{-1}(P_i)]}G(y)dy-P_iG^{-1}(P_i)=\int _{[\underline{y},F^{-1}(P_i)]}F(y)dy-P_iF^{-1}(P_i)\). Summing up the two equations results in \(S(z_i^*)=0\).
 
Literatur
Aaberge R (2009) Ranking intersecting Lorenz curves. Soc Choice Welf 33:235–259CrossRef
Atkinson AB (1970) On the measurement of inequality. J Econ Theory 2:244–263CrossRef
Atkinson AB (2008) More on the measurement of inequality. J Econ Inequal 6:277–283CrossRef
Blackorby C, Donaldson D (1978) Measures of relative equality and their meaning in terms of social welfare. J Econ Theory 18:59–80CrossRef
Chiu WH (2007) Intersecting Lorenz curves, the degree of downside inequality aversion, and tax reforms. Soc Choice Welf 28:375–399CrossRef
Cowell F (2011) Measuring inequality. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRef
Davies J, Hoy M (1995) Making inequality comparisons when Lorenz curves intersect. Am Econ Rev 85:980–986
Davies J, Shorrocks AF (2000) The distribution of wealth. In: Atkinson A, Bourguignon F (eds) Handbook of income distribution, vol 1. North-Holland, Amsterdam
Gajdos T, Weymark JA (2012) Introduction to inequality and risk. J Econ Theory 147:1313–1330CrossRef
Ibragimov M, Ibragimov R, Kattuman P, Ma J (2018) Income inequality and price elasticity of market demand: the case of crossing Lorenz curves. Econ Theor 65:729–750CrossRef
Menezes C, Geiss C, Tressler J (1980) Increasing downside risk. Am Econ Rev 70:921–932
Shorrocks AF, Foster JE (1987) Transfer sensitive inequality measures. Rev Econ Stud 54:485–497CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Revisiting comparisons of income inequality when Lorenz curves intersect
verfasst von
James Davies
Michael Hoy
Lin Zhao
Publikationsdatum
04.07.2021
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Social Choice and Welfare / Ausgabe 1/2022
Print ISSN: 0176-1714
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-217X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-021-01343-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2022

Group formation in a dominance-seeking contest

  • Original Paper

Anthony Downs (1930–2021)

  • Obituary

Does the approval mechanism induce the efficient extraction in common pool resource games?

  • Original Paper

John Stuart Mill, soft paternalist

  • Original Paper

The broken Borda rule and other refinements of approval ranking

  • Original Paper

Proxy selection in transitive proxy voting

  • Original Paper

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise