nach oben

Learning & Behavior

Erschienen in:

11.07.2017

Reward devaluation disrupts latent inhibition in fear conditioning

verfasst von: Luís Gonzalo De la Casa, Auxiliadora Mena, Juán Carlos Ruiz-Salas, Esperanza Quintero, Mauricio R. Papini

Erschienen in: Learning & Behavior | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Three experiments explored the link between reward shifts and latent inhibition (LI). Using consummatory procedures, rewards were either downshifted from 32% to 4% sucrose (Experiments 1–2), or upshifted from 4% to 32% sucrose (Experiment 3). In both cases, appropriate unshifted controls were also included. LI was implemented in terms of fear conditioning involving a single tone-shock pairing after extensive tone-only preexposure. Nonpreexposed controls were also included. Experiment 1 demonstrated a typical LI effect (i.e., disruption of fear conditioning after preexposure to the tone) in animals previously exposed only to 4% sucrose. However, the LI effect was eliminated by preexposure to a 32%-to-4% sucrose devaluation. Experiment 2 replicated this effect when the LI protocol was administered immediately after the reward devaluation event. However, LI was restored when preexposure was administered after a 60-min retention interval. Finally, Experiment 3 showed that a reward upshift did not affect LI. These results point to a significant role of negative emotion related to reward devaluation in the enhancement of stimulus processing despite extensive nonreinforced preexposure experience.

Vorheriger Artikel Temporal discounting of aversive consequences in rats

Nächster Artikel Retention period differentially attenuates win–shift/lose–stay relative to win–stay/lose–shift performance in the rat

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Amsel, A. (1992). Frustration theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Amsel, A., & Roussell, J. (1952). Motivational properties of frustration: I. Effect on a running response of the addition of frustration to the motivational complex. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 363–368.CrossRefPubMed

Annicchiarico, I., Glueck, A. C., Cuenya, L., Kawasaki, K., Conrad, S. E., & Papini, M. R. (2016). Complex effects of reward upshift on consummatory behavior. Behavioural Processes, 129, 54–67.CrossRefPubMed

Bouton, M. E. (1993). Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 80–99.CrossRefPubMed

Braunstein-Bercovitz, H., Dimentman-Ashkenazi, I., & Lubow, R. E. (2001). Stress affects the selection of relevant from irrelevant stimuli. Emotion, 1, 182–192.CrossRefPubMed

De la Casa, L. G. (2013). Food and water deprivation disrupts latent inhibition with an auditory fear conditioning procedure. Behavioural Processes, 100, 54–57.CrossRefPubMed

De la Casa, L. G., & Pineño, O. (2010). Inter-stage context and time as determinants of latent inhibition. In R. E. Lubow & I. Weiner (Eds.), Latent inhibition: Cognition, neuroscience and applications to schizophrenia (pp. 40–61). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Derryberry, D., & Tucker, D. M. (1994). Motivating the focus of attention. In P. M. Neidenthal & S. Kitayama (Eds.), The heart’s eye: Emotional influences in perception and attention (pp. 167–196). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRef

Di Chiara, G., Loddo, P., & Tanda, G. (1999). Reciprocal changes in prefrontal and limbic dopamine responsiveness to aversive and rewarding stimuli after chronic mild stress: Implications for the psychobiology of depression. Biological Psychiatry, 46, 1624–1633.CrossRefPubMed

Dudley, R. T., & Papini, M. R. (1995). Pavlovian performance of rats following unexpected reward omissions. Learning & Motivation, 26, 63–82.CrossRef

Flaherty, C. F. (1996). Incentive relativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Flaherty, C. F., Becker, H., & Checke, S. (1983). Repeated contrast in consummatory and open field behaviors with repeated reward shifts. Animal Learning and Behavior, 11, 407–414.

Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition & Emotion, 19, 313–332.CrossRef

Hall, G., & Channell, S. (1986). Context specificity of latent inhibition in taste aversion learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B, 38(2), 121–139.

Hall, G., & Pearce, J. M. (1982). Restoring the associability of a pre-exposed CS by a surprising event. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B, 34(3), 127–140.CrossRef

Hellman, P. A., Crider, A., & Solomon, P. R. (1983). Interaction of tail pressure stress and d-amphetamine in disruption of the rat's ability to ignore an irrelevant stimulus. Behavioral Neuroscience, 97, 1017–1021.CrossRefPubMed

Jiménez-García, A. M., Ruíz-Leyva, L., Cendán, C. M., Torres, C., Papini, M. R., & Morón, I. (2016). Hypoalgesia induced by reward devaluation in rats. PloS One, 11(10), e0164331. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0164331 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Joseph, M. H., Peters, S. L., Moran, P. M., Grigoryan, G. A., Young, A. M. J., & Gray, J. A. (2000). Modulation of latent inhibition in the rat by altered dopamine transmission in the nucleus accumbens at the time of conditioning. Neuroscience, 101, 921–930.CrossRefPubMed

Kawasaki, K., Annicchiarico, I., Glueck, A. C., Morón, I., & Papini, M. R. (2017). Reward loss and the basolateral amygdala: A function in reward comparisons. Behavioural Brain Research, 331, 205–213.

Kawasaki, K., Glueck, A. C., Annicchiarico, I., & Papini, M. R. (2015). Function of the centromedial amygdala in reward devaluation and open-field activity. Neuroscience, 303, 73–81.CrossRefPubMed

Lazar, J., Kaplan, O., Sternberg, T., & Lubow, R. E. (2012). Positive and negative affect produce opposing task-irrelevant stimulus preexposure effects. Emotion, 12, 591–604.CrossRefPubMed

Lehmann, J., Stöhr T. h., & Feldon, J. (2000). Long-term effects of prenatal stress experience and postnatal maternal separation on emotionality and attentional processes. Behavioural Brain Research, 107, 133–144.

Lovibond, P., Preston, G. C., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1984). Contextual control of conditioning and latent inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 360–375.

Lubow, R. E. (1989). Latent inhibition and conditioned attention theory. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Lubow, R. E., & Moore, A. U. (1959). Latent inhibition: The effect of non-reinforced preexposure to the conditional stimulus. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 52, 415–419.CrossRefPubMed

Lubow, R. E., & Weiner, I. (2010). Latent inhibition: Cognition, neuroscience and application to schizophrenia. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Manrique, T., Molero, A., Ballesteros, M. A., Morón, I., Gallo, M., & Fenton, A. A. (2004). Time of day-dependent latent inhibition of conditioned taste aversions in rats. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 82, 77–80.CrossRefPubMed

Manzo, L., Donaire, R., Sabariego, M., Papini, M. R., & Torres, C. (2015). Anti-anxiety self-medication in rats: Oral consumption of chlordiazepoxide and ethanol after reward devaluation. Behavioural Brain Research, 278, 90–97.CrossRefPubMed

McDonald, L. M., Moran, P. M., Vythelingum, G. N., Joseph, M. H., Stephenson, J. D., & Gray, J. A. (2002). Latent inhibition is attenuated by noise and partially restored by a 5-HT2A receptor antagonist. Behavioural Pharmacology, 13, 663–667.CrossRefPubMed

Melo, L., de Moraes, E., Airoldi, N., & Sandner, G. (2003). Enhancement of latent inhibition by chronic mild stress in rats submitted to emotional response conditioning. Neural Plasticity, 10, 327–332.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Mitchell, C., & Flaherty, C. F. (1998). Temporal dynamics of corticosterone elevation in successive negative contrast. Physiology & Behavior, 64, 287–292.CrossRef

Molero-Chamizo, A. (2017). Circadian-temporal context and latent inhibition of conditioned taste aversion: Effect of restriction in the intake of the conditioned taste stimulus. Learning & Behavior, 45, 157–163

Mongeau, R., Marcello, S., Sparre, J., Andersen, J., & Pani, L. (2007). Contrasting effects of diazepam and repeated restraint stress on latent inhibition in mice. Behavioural Brain Research, 183, 147–155.CrossRefPubMed

Mustaca, A. E., & Papini, M. R. (2005). Consummatory successive negative contrast induces hypoalgesia. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 18, 333–339.

Ortega, L. A., Glueck, A. C., Daniel, A. M., Prado-Rivera, M. A., White, M. M., & Papini, M. R. (2014). Memory interfering effects of chlordiazepoxide on consummatory successive negative contrast. Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior, 116, 96–106.CrossRef

Ortega, L. A., Solano, J. L., Torres, C., & Papini, M. R. (2017). Reward loss and addiction: Opportunities for cross-pollination. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, & Behavior, 154, 39–52.CrossRef

Overton, D. A. (1974). Experimental methods for the study of state dependent learning. Federation Proceedings, 33, 1800–1813.PubMed

Papini, M. R. (2009). Role of opioid receptors in incentive contrast. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 22, 170–187.

Papini, M. R., & Dudley, R. T. (1997). Consequences of surprising reward omissions. Review of General Psychology, 1, 175–197.CrossRef

Papini, M. R., Fuchs, P. N., & Torres, C. (2015). Behavioral neuroscience of psychological pain. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 48, 53–69.CrossRef

Papini, M. R., & White, N. (1994). Performance during signals for reward omission. Learning & Motivation, 25, 45–64.CrossRef

Papini, M. R., Wood, M., Daniel, A. M., & Norris, J. N. (2006). Reward loss as psychological pain. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 6, 189–213.

Park, C. R., Zoladz, P. R., Conrad, C. D., Fleshner, M., & Diamond, D. M. (2008). Acute predator stress impairs the consolidation and retrieval of hippocampus-dependent memory in male and female rats. Learning & Memory, 15, 271–280.CrossRef

Pascucci, T., Ventura, R., Latagliata, E. C., Cabib, S., & Puglisi-Allegra, S. (2007). The medial prefrontal cortex determines the accumbens dopamine response to stress through the opposing influences of norepinephrine and dopamine. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 2796–2804.CrossRefPubMed

Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 332–352.CrossRef

Pecoraro, N., de Jong, H., & Dallman, M. F. (2009). An unexpected reduction in sucrose concentration activates the HPA axis on successive post shift days without attenuation by discriminative contextual stimuli. Physiology & Behavior, 96, 651–661.CrossRef

Pellegrini, S., Wood, M., Daniel, A. M., & Papini, M. R. (2005). Opioid receptors modulate recovery from consummatory successive negative contrast. Behavioural Brain Research, 164, 239–249.CrossRefPubMed

Rashidy-Pour, A., Sadeghi, H., Taherain, A. A., Vafaei, A. A., & Fathollahi, Y. (2004). The effects of acute restraint stress and dexamethasone on retrieval of long-term memory in rats: An interaction with opiate system. Behavioural Brain Research, 154, 193–198.CrossRefPubMed

Rau, V., & Fanselow, M. S. (2009). Exposure to a stressor produces a long lasting enhancement of fear learning in rats. Stress, 12, 125–133.CrossRefPubMed

Shalev, U., Feldon, J., & Weiner, I. (1998). Latent inhibition is disrupted by acute and repeated administration of corticosterone. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 1, 103–113.CrossRefPubMed

Smith, S., Fieser, S., Jones, J., & Schachtman, T. (2008). Effects of swim stress on latent inhibition using a conditioned taste aversion procedure. Physiology & Behavior, 95, 539–541.CrossRef

Stout, S., Boughner, R. L., & Papini, M. R. (2003). Reexamining the frustration effect in rats: Aftereffects of surprising reinforcement and nonreinforcement. Learning & Motivation, 34, 437–456.CrossRef

Torres, C., & Papini, M. R. (2016). Emotional self-medication and addiction. In V. R. Preedy (Ed.), Neuropathology of drug addiction and substance misuse (Vol. 1, pp. 71–81). New York, NY: Elsevier.CrossRef

Westbrook, R. F., Jones, M. L., Bailey, G. K., & Harris, J. A. (2000). Contextual control over conditioned responding in a latent inhibition paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 26, 157–173.PubMed

Wynne, B., & Delius, J. D. (1995). Sensitization to apomorphine in pigeons: Unaffected by latent inhibition but still due to classical conditioning. Psychopharmacology, 119, 414–420.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Reward devaluation disrupts latent inhibition in fear conditioning
verfasst von: Luís Gonzalo De la Casa
Auxiliadora Mena
Juán Carlos Ruiz-Salas
Esperanza Quintero
Mauricio R. Papini
Publikationsdatum: 11.07.2017
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Learning & Behavior / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1543-4494
Elektronische ISSN: 1543-4508
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-017-0282-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

The processing of positional information in a two-item sequence limits the emergence of symmetry in baboons (Papio papio), but not in humans (Homo sapiens)

Retention period differentially attenuates win–shift/lose–stay relative to win–stay/lose–shift performance in the rat

Context modulation of learned attention deployment

Raising the bar on studying cultural evolution

How lost “passenger” ants find their way home

Temporal discounting of aversive consequences in rats