Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Can We Rebuild the Cell Membrane? Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Rheological Properties of Biological Structures, Scaffolds and Their Biomedical Applications

verfasst von : Sabra Rostami, Bora Garipcan

Erschienen in: Biological, Physical and Technical Basics of Cell Engineering

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Rheology as the science of flow properties of materials is one of the most vital concepts that have greatly attracted the attention of biomedical engineers and bioengineers over the past few decades. It has been less than a century since the science of rheology was formally introduced to the scientific society. Over the past few decades rheological properties of living things including cells and tissues have been investigated and studied thoroughly. As a result various measurement techniques have been developed and used ever since such as Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM), optical measurement techniques, etc. Recent advancements of technology regarding submicron scale measurement enabled scientists to evaluate cellular behavior towards mechanical stimuli with ultra-precision. Data obtained from these studies have revealed vital information regarding effects of mechanical properties of cells on cellular functions such as adhesion, proliferation and migration, and differentiation. Additionally rheological properties of most tissues in human body were measured and some results have been configured into engineered scaffolds along with being used as diagnostic tools. Despite the fact that there are hundreds of studies regarding rheological properties of cells and tissues, there are still so many unsolved problems and unanswered questions concerning fabrication of ideal devices and implants that need to be solved and answered. Hence the hot topic of principles and influence of rheology on living materials has become an appealing and amusing research subject resulting in attainment of fascinating results, which so far have proven to be greatly helpful in unlocking wide range of unknowns of life itself. Of the uncountable number of researches conducted to this day regarding rheological properties of biomaterials a small portion of is discussed in this chapter as an introduction to the concept of rheology in living things and its significance.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel A Collagen-Hyaluronic Acid Matrix for Stem Cell Culture
Nächstes Kapitel Histeresis Loops and Yield Stress in Cell Research
Literatur
1.
Alenghat, F. J., & Ingber, D. E. (2002). Mechanotransduction: All signals point to cytoskeleton, matrix, and integrins. Science’s STKE : Signal Transduction Knowledge Environment, 119, pe6.CrossRef
2.
Amblard, F., Maggs, A. C., Yurke, B., Pargellis, A. N., & Leibler, S. (1996). Subdiffusion and anomalous local viscoelasticity in actin networks. Physical Review Letters, 77(21), 4470–4473. CrossRef
3.
Artmann, G. M. (1995 Sep–Oct). Microscopic stiffness and relaxation time of red blood in a flow chamber of stiffness and relaxation time of red blood cells in a flow chamber. Biorheology, 32(5), 553–570.CrossRef
4.
Artmann, G. M., Sung, K. L., Horn, T., Whittemore, D., Norwich, G., & Chien, S. (1997). Micropipette aspiration of human erythrocytes induces echinocytes via membrane phospholipid translocation. Biophysics Journal, 72, 1434.CrossRef
5.
Ayala, Y. A., Pontes, B., Ether, D. S., Pires, L. B., Araujo, G. R., Frases, S., et al. (2016). Rheological properties of cells measured by optical tweezers. BMC Biophysics, 9, 5.
6.
Badalà, Federico, Nouri-mahdavi, Kouros, & Raoof, Duna A. (2008). NIH public access. Computer, 144(5), 724–732.
7.
Baskurt, Oguz K., & Meiselman, Herbert J. (2003). Blood rheology and hemodynamics. Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, 29(5), 435–450.CrossRef
8.
9.
Boudjema, F., Lounis, M., Khelidj, B., & Bessai, N. (2015). Rheological regional properties of brain tissue studied under cyclic creep/recovery shear stresses. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 602(1), 6.
10.
11.
Chan, C. J., Whyte, G., Boyde, L., Salbreux, G., & Guck, J. (2014). Impact of heating on passive and active biomechanics of suspended cells. Interface Focus, 4(2), 20130069. CrossRef
12.
Cheng, S., Clarke, E. C., & Bilston, L. E. (2008). Rheological properties of the tissues of the central nervous system: A review. Medical Engineering & Physics, 30(10), 1318–1337.CrossRef
13.
Chien, S. (2007). Mechanotransduction and endothelial cell homeostasis: The wisdom of the cell. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 292(3), H1209–H1224. CrossRef
14.
Chien, S., Sung, K. L., Skalak, R., Usami, S., Tözeren, A. (1978, November 24). Theoretical and experimental studies on viscoelastic properties of erythrocyte membrane. Biophysical Journal, 24, 463–487.CrossRef
15.
Chmiel, B., Karkoszka, H., Cierpka, L., & Wiecek, A. (2005). Rheological properties of red blood cells in kidney transplant recipients: The role of lipid profile and type of immunosuppresion. Transplantation Proceedings, 37(4), 1885–1888.CrossRef
16.
Crocker, J. C., & Hoffman, B. D. (2007). Multiple-particle tracking and two-point microrheology in cells. Methods in Cell Biology, 83(7), 141–178.CrossRef
17.
Darling, E. M., Topel, M., Zauscher, S., Vail, T. P., & Guilak, F. (2008). Viscoelastic properties of human mesenchymally-derived stem cells and primary osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and adipocytes. Journal of Biomechanics, 41(2), 454–464.CrossRef
18.
Di Terlizzi, R., & Platt, S. (2006). The function, composition and analysis of cerebrospinal fluid in companion animals: Part I—Function and composition. Veterinary Journal, 172(3), 422–431.
19.
Doherty, G. J., & McMahon, H. T. (2008). Mediation, modulation, and consequences of membrane-cytoskeleton interactions. Annual Review of Biophysics, 37(1), 65–95.CrossRef
20.
Driessen, N. J. B., Mol, A., Bouten, C. V. C., & Baaijens, F. P. T. (2007). Modeling the mechanics of tissue-engineered human heart valve leaflets. Journal of Biomechanics, 40(2), 325–334.CrossRef
21.
Drury, J. L., & Dembo, M. (1999). Hydrodynamics of micropipette aspiration. Biophysical Journal, 76(1 Pt 1), 110–128.CrossRef
22.
Engelking, L. R. (2011). Chemical composition of living cells. Textbook of veterinary physiological chemistry (pp. 2–6). Academic Press. eBook ISBN: 9780123919106.CrossRef
23.
Farrar, D. F., & Rose, J. (2001). Rheological properties of PMMA bone cements during curing. Biomaterials, 22(22), 3005–3013.CrossRef
24.
Franck, C., Maskarinec, S. A., Tirrell, D. A., & Ravichandran, G. (2011). Three-dimensional traction force microscopy: A new tool for quantifying cell-matrix interactions. PLoS ONE, 6(3).CrossRef
25.
Goldmann, W. H. (2012). Mechanotransduction in cells. Cell Biology International, 36(6), 567–570.CrossRef
26.
Guck, J., Ananthakrishnan, R., Mahmood, H., Moon, T. J., Cunningham, C. C., & Käs, J. (2001). The optical stretcher: A novel laser tool to micromanipulate cells. Biophysical Journal, 81(2), 767–784.CrossRef
27.
Guilak, F., Tedrow, J. R., & Burgkart, R. (2000). Viscoelastic properties of the cell nucleus. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 269(3), 781–786.CrossRef
28.
Haase, K., & Pelling, A. E. (2015). Investigating cell mechanics with atomic force microscopy. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface/the Royal Society, 12(104), 20140970.CrossRef
29.
Hale, C. M., Sun, S. X., & Wirtz, D. (2009). Resolving the role of actoymyosin contractility in cell microrheology. PLoS ONE, 4(9).CrossRef
30.
31.
Hasan, A., Memic, A., Annabi, N., Hossain, M., Paul, A., Dokmeci, M. R., et al. (2014). Electrospun scaffolds for tissue engineering of vascular grafts. Acta Biomaterialia, 10(1), 11–25.CrossRef
32.
Hasan, A., Ragaert, K., Swieszkowski, W., Selimović, Š., Paul, A., Camci-Unal, G., et al. (2014). Biomechanical properties of native and tissue engineered heart valve constructs. Journal of Biomechanics, 47(9), 1949–1963.CrossRef
33.
34.
Hoffman, B. D., & Crocker, J. C. (2009). Cell mechanics: Dissecting the physical responses of cells to force. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 11, 259–288.CrossRef
35.
36.
Icard-Arcizet, Delphine, Cardoso, Olivier, Richert, Alain, & Hénon, Sylvie. (2008). Cell stiffening in response to external stress is correlated to actin recruitment. Biophysical Journal, 94(7), 2906–2913.CrossRef
37.
Irace, C., Carallo, C., Scavelli, F., Esposito, T., De Franceschi, M. S., Tripolino, C., & Gnasso, A. (2014). Influence of blood lipids on plasma and blood viscosity. Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation, 57(3), 283–290.
38.
39.
Kalejs, M., Stradins, P., Lacis, R., Ozolanta, I., Pavars, J., & Kasyanov, V. (2009). St Jude Epic Heart Valve bioprostheses versus native human and porcine aortic valves—Comparison of mechanical properties. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 8(5), 553–556.CrossRef
40.
Kofahl, A. L., Theilenberg, S., Bindl, J., Ulucay, D., Wild, J., Napiletzki, S., et al. (2016). Combining rheology and MRI: Imaging healthy and tumorous brains based on mechanical properties. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 0, 1–11.
41.
Kollmannsberger, P., & Fabry, B. (2007). High-force magnetic tweezers with force feedback for biological applications. Review of Scientific Instruments, 78(11), 1–6.CrossRef
42.
Kraning-Rush, C. M., Califano, J. P., & Reinhart-King, C. A. (2012). Cellular traction stresses increase with increasing metastatic potential. PLoS ONE, 7(2).CrossRef
43.
Laperrousaz, B., Drillon, G., Berguiga, L., Nicolini, F., Audit, B., Satta, V. M., et al. (2016). From elasticity to inelasticity in cancer cell mechanics: A loss of scale-invariance. AIP Conference Proceedings (p. 1760).
44.
Last, J. A., Liliensiek, S. J., Nealey, P. F., & Murphy, C. J. (2009). Determining the mechanical properties of human corneal basement membranes with atomic force microscopy. Journal of Structural Biology, 167(1), 19–24.CrossRef
45.
Lomakina, E. B., Spillmann, C. M., King, M. R., & Waugh, R. E. (2004). Rheological analysis and measurement of neutrophil indentation. Biophysical Journal, 87(6), 4246–4258.CrossRef
46.
Lombardo, M., Lombardo, G., Carbone, G., De Santo, M. P., Barberi, R., & Serrao, S. (2012). Biomechanics of the anterior human corneal tissue investigated with atomic force microscopy. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 53(2), 1050–1057.CrossRef
47.
Lu, Y.-B., Franze, K., Seifert, G., Steinhäuser, C., Kirchhoff, F., Wolburg, H., et al. (2006). Viscoelastic properties of individual glial cells and neurons in the CNS. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(47), 17759–17764.CrossRef
48.
Lulevich, V., Zink, T., Chen, H. Y., Liu, F. T., & Liu, G. Y. (2006). Cell mechanics using atomic force microscopy-based single-cell compression. Langmuir, 22(19), 8151–8155.CrossRef
49.
50.
Matthews, B. D., Overby, D. R., Mannix, R., & Ingber, D. E. (2006). Cellular adaptation to mechanical stress: Role of integrins, rho, cytoskeletal tension and mechanosensitive ion channels. Journal of Cell Science, 119(Pt 3), 508–518.CrossRef
51.
Moeendarbary, E., & Harris, A. R. (2014). Cell mechanics: Principles, practices, and prospects. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Systems Biology and Medicine, 6(5), 371–388.
52.
Morra, M., Giavaresi, G., Sartori, M., Ferrari, A., Parrilli, A., Bollati, D., et al. (2015). Surface chemistry and effects on bone regeneration of a novel biomimetic synthetic bone filler. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 26(4). http://​dx.​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10856-015-5483-6.
53.
Munevar, S. (2004). Regulation of mechanical interactions between fibroblasts and the substratum by stretch-activated Ca2+ entry. Journal of Cell Science, 117(1), 85–92.CrossRef
54.
Müller, U. (2004). Integrins and extracellular matrix in animal models. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, 165, 217–241.CrossRef
55.
Nagayama, K., Adachi, A., & Matsumoto, T. (2011). Heterogeneous response of traction force at focal adhesions of vascular smooth muscle cells subjected to macroscopic stretch on a micropillar substrate. Journal of Biomechanics, 44(15), 2699–2705.CrossRef
56.
Nawaz, S., Sánchez, P., Bodensiek, K., Li, S., Simons, M., & Schaap, I. A. (2012). Cell visco-elasticity measured with AFM and optical trapping at sub-micrometer deformations. PLoS ONE, 7(9).CrossRef
57.
Oh, M.-J., Kuhr, F., Byfield, F., & Levitan, I. (2012). Micropipette aspiration of substrate-attached cells to estimate cell stiffness. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 67, e3886.
58.
Pajerowski, J. D., Dahl, K. N., Zhong, F. L., Sammak, P. J., & Discher, D. E. (2007). Physical plasticity of the nucleus in stem cell differentiation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(40), 15619–15624.CrossRef
59.
Park, Y., Best, C. A., Badizadegan, K., Dasari, R. R., Feld, M. S., Kuriabova, T., et al. (2010). Measurement of red blood cell mechanics during morphological changes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(15), 6731–6736.CrossRef
60.
Pierini, F., Zembrzycki, K., Nakielski, P., Pawłowska, S., & Kowalewski, T. A. (2016). Atomic force microscopy combined with optical tweezers (AFM/OT). Measurement Science and Technology, 27(2), 25904.CrossRef
61.
Pryor, L. S., Gage, E., Langevin, C. J., Herrera, F., Breithaupt, A. D., Gordon, C. R., et al. (2009). Review of bone substitutes. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction, 2(3), 151–160.CrossRef
62.
Pullarkat, P. A., Fernández, P. A., & Ott, Albrecht. (2007). Rheological properties of the eukaryotic cell cytoskeleton. Physics Reports, 449(1–3), 29–53.CrossRef
63.
Quinto-Su, P. A., Kuss, C., Preiser, P. R., & Ohl, C.-D. (2011). Red blood cell rheology using single controlled laser-induced cavitation bubbles. Lab on a Chip, 11(4), 672–678.CrossRef
64.
Raucher, D., Stauffer, T., Chen, W., Shen, K., Guo, S., York, J. D., et al. (2000). Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-Bisphosphate functions as a second messenger that regulates cytoskeleton–plasma membrane adhesion. Cell, 100(2), 221–228.CrossRef
65.
Riveline, D., Zamir, E., Balaban, N. Q., Schwarz, U. S., Ishizaki, T., Narumiya, S., et al. (2001). Focal contacts as mechanosensors. The Journal of Cell Biology, 153(6), 1175–1186.CrossRef
66.
Roohani-Esfahani, S.-I., Newman, P., & Zreiqat, H. (2016). Design and fabrication of 3D printed scaffolds with a mechanical strength comparable to cortical bone to repair large bone defects. Scientific Reports, 6(February 2015), 19468.
67.
Rother, J., Nöding, H., Mey, I., & Janshoff, A. (2014). Atomic force microscopy-based microrheology reveals significant differences in the viscoelastic response between malign and benign cell lines. Open Biology, 4(5), 140046.CrossRef
68.
69.
Schulze, C., Wetzel, F., Kueper, T., Malsen, A., Muhr, G., Jaspers, S., et al. (2012). Stiffening of human skin fibroblasts with age. Clinics in Plastic Surgery, 39(1), 9–20.CrossRef
70.
Shuck, L. Z., & Advani, S. H. (1972). Rheological response of human brain tissue in shear. Journal of Basic Engineering Trans ASME, 94 Ser D(4), 905–911.CrossRef
71.
Sleep, J., Wilson, D., Simmons, R., & Gratzer, W. (1999). Elasticity of the red cell membrane and its relation to hemolytic disorders: An optical tweezers study. Biophysical Journal, 77(6), 3085–3095.CrossRef
72.
Stamenović, D. (2008). Rheological behavior of mammalian cells. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 65(22), 3592–3605.CrossRef
73.
Supriya, B., Jun, D., Paul, B. C., & Dahms, T. E. S. (2012). Viscoelasticity in biological systems: A special focus on microbes. ISBN 978-953-51-0841-2, Publisher: InTech.
74.
Thoumine, O., & Ott, A. (1997). Time scale dependent viscoelastic and contractile regimes in fibroblasts probed by microplate manipulation. Journal of Cell Science, 110(Pt 1), 2109–2116.
75.
Tozeren, A., Skalak, R., Sung, K. P., & Chien, S. H. U. (1982). Viscoelastic behavior of erythrocyte membrane. Biophysical Society, 39(1), 23–32.CrossRef
76.
Trepat, X., Grabulosa, M., Puig, F., Maksym, G. N., Navajas, D., & Farré, R. (2004). Viscoelasticity of human alveolar epithelial cells subjected to stretch. American Journal of Physiology, 287(5), L1025–L1034.CrossRef
77.
Tseng, Y., Kole, T. P., & Wirtz, D. (2002). Micromechanical mapping of live cells by multiple-particle-tracking microrheology. Biophysical Journal, 83(6), 3162–3176.CrossRef
78.
Van Citters, K. M., Hoffman, B. D., Massiera, G., & Crocker, J. C. (2006). The role of F-actin and myosin in epithelial cell rheology. Biophysical Journal, 91(10), 3946–3956.CrossRef
79.
80.
81.
Vonna, Laurent, Wiedemann, Agnès, Aepfelbacher, Martin, & Sackmann, Erich. (2003). Local Force Induced Conical Protrusions of Phagocytic Cells. Journal of Cell Science, 116(Pt 5), 785–790.CrossRef
82.
83.
Wang, N., Tolic-Nørrelykke, I. M., Chen, J., Mijailovich, S. M., Butler, J. P., Fredberg, J. J., & Stamenovic, D. (2002). Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells. American Journal of Physiology. Cell Physiology, 282(3), C606–C616.CrossRef
84.
Metadaten
Titel
Rheological Properties of Biological Structures, Scaffolds and Their Biomedical Applications
verfasst von
Sabra Rostami
Bora Garipcan
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Buch
Biological, Physical and Technical Basics of Cell Engineering

Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7903-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-10-7904-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7904-7_5

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise