Skip to main content

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Risk Assessment on Construction Cost of Green Buildings Based on Structural Equation Model

verfasst von : Zhilin He, Jiayuan Wang, Jie Li

Erschienen in: Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In the construction stage, green buildings have increased cost input compared with traditional buildings, and their cost is threatened by numerous risk factors. Various stakeholders have an influence on construction cost that cannot be ignored. However, the existing research rarely analyzed the construction cost risk of green buildings from the perspective of stakeholders. In order to close such research gap, this study used structural equation modeling to explore key stakeholders and key risk factors that affect the construction cost of green buildings, and to conduct risk assessment on it. Initially, literature bibliometrics and semi-structured interviews were conducted to identify 31 cost risk factors related to various stakeholders and 3 components of green building construction cost. Questionnaire survey was used to collect data and structural equation modeling was then used for verifying the model hypothesis to identify key stakeholders and key risk factors. The identified key stakeholders and key risk factors were evaluated according to the impact coefficient, and finally divided into three levels. Results show that the design unit has the greatest impact on the construction cost of green buildings, followed by the construction unit, while the government sector seems to have the least impact. In addition, in the classification of risk levels, the key risk factors are mainly related to the owner, the design unit, the construction unit, and the material supplier. Findings of this study provide a theoretical basis for effective management on key risk factors for green building construction cost, which will further promotes the practical development of green buildings in China.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Mao, P., Li, J., Tan, Y., Qi, J., & Xiong, L. (2018). Regional suitability of climate-responsive technologies for buildings based on expert knowledge: A China study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 204, 158–168.CrossRef Mao, P., Li, J., Tan, Y., Qi, J., & Xiong, L. (2018). Regional suitability of climate-responsive technologies for buildings based on expert knowledge: A China study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 204, 158–168.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsinghua University Building Energy Conservation Research Center. China Building Energy Efficiency Annual Development Research Report. China Building Industry Press. (2017). (in Chinese). Tsinghua University Building Energy Conservation Research Center. China Building Energy Efficiency Annual Development Research Report. China Building Industry Press. (2017). (in Chinese).
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Forward Industry Research Institute. Report Of Development Mode And Investment Forecast On China Green Building Industry (2019–2024). Forward Industry Research Institute. (2019). (in Chinese). Forward Industry Research Institute. Report Of Development Mode And Investment Forecast On China Green Building Industry (2019–2024). Forward Industry Research Institute. (2019). (in Chinese).
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Vamosi, S. J. (2011). The true cost of leed-certified green buildings columnist examines what contributes to the higher price tags of green designs. Heating/piping/air Conditioning Engineering, 1, 10–11. Vamosi, S. J. (2011). The true cost of leed-certified green buildings columnist examines what contributes to the higher price tags of green designs. Heating/piping/air Conditioning Engineering, 1, 10–11.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Zou, P. X., & Couani, P. (2012). Managing risks in green building supply chain. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 8(2), 143–158.CrossRef Zou, P. X., & Couani, P. (2012). Managing risks in green building supply chain. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 8(2), 143–158.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang, R. J., Zou, P. X. W., & Wang, J. (2016). Modelling stakeholder-associated risk networks in green building projects. International Journal of Project Management, 34(1), 66–81.CrossRef Yang, R. J., Zou, P. X. W., & Wang, J. (2016). Modelling stakeholder-associated risk networks in green building projects. International Journal of Project Management, 34(1), 66–81.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhao, X., Hwang, B. G., & Gao, Y. (2016). A fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach for risk assessment: A case of Singapore’s green projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 115, 203–213.CrossRef Zhao, X., Hwang, B. G., & Gao, Y. (2016). A fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach for risk assessment: A case of Singapore’s green projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 115, 203–213.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hwang, B. G., Shan, M., Phua, H., & Chi, S. (2017). An exploratory analysis of risks in green residential building construction projects: The case of Singapore. Sustainability, 9(7), 1116.CrossRef Hwang, B. G., Shan, M., Phua, H., & Chi, S. (2017). An exploratory analysis of risks in green residential building construction projects: The case of Singapore. Sustainability, 9(7), 1116.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan, A. P. C., Darko, A., Olanipekun, A. O., & Ameyaw, E. E. (2018). Critical barriers to green building technologies adoption in developing countries: The case of Ghana. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 1067–1079.CrossRef Chan, A. P. C., Darko, A., Olanipekun, A. O., & Ameyaw, E. E. (2018). Critical barriers to green building technologies adoption in developing countries: The case of Ghana. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 1067–1079.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Li, Y., Song, H., Sang, P., Chen, P. H., & Liu, X. (2019). Review of Critical Success Factors (CSFs) for green building projects. Building and Environment, 158, 182–191.CrossRef Li, Y., Song, H., Sang, P., Chen, P. H., & Liu, X. (2019). Review of Critical Success Factors (CSFs) for green building projects. Building and Environment, 158, 182–191.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Deng, W., Yang, T., Tang, L., & Tang, Y. T. (2018). Barriers and policy recommendations for developing green buildings from local government perspective: A case study of Ningbo China. Intelligent Buildings International, 10(2), 61–77.CrossRef Deng, W., Yang, T., Tang, L., & Tang, Y. T. (2018). Barriers and policy recommendations for developing green buildings from local government perspective: A case study of Ningbo China. Intelligent Buildings International, 10(2), 61–77.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Shi, Q., Yan, Y., Zuo, J., & Yu, T. (2016). Objective conflicts in green buildings projects: A critical analysis. Building and Environment, 96, 107–117.CrossRef Shi, Q., Yan, Y., Zuo, J., & Yu, T. (2016). Objective conflicts in green buildings projects: A critical analysis. Building and Environment, 96, 107–117.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Qin, X., Mo, Y., & Jing, L. (2016). Risk perceptions of the life-cycle of green buildings in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 126, 148–158.CrossRef Qin, X., Mo, Y., & Jing, L. (2016). Risk perceptions of the life-cycle of green buildings in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 126, 148–158.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Polat, G., Turkoglu, H., & Gurgun, A. P. (2017). Identification of material-related risks in green buildings. Procedia Engineering, 196, 956–963.CrossRef Polat, G., Turkoglu, H., & Gurgun, A. P. (2017). Identification of material-related risks in green buildings. Procedia Engineering, 196, 956–963.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat National Cost Engineer Professional Qualification Examination Training Textbook Review Committee. Cost and Control. China Planning Press. (2009). (in Chinese). National Cost Engineer Professional Qualification Examination Training Textbook Review Committee. Cost and Control. China Planning Press. (2009). (in Chinese).
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohn, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Technometrics, 31(4), 499–500. Cohn, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Technometrics, 31(4), 499–500.
Metadaten
Titel
Risk Assessment on Construction Cost of Green Buildings Based on Structural Equation Model
verfasst von
Zhilin He
Jiayuan Wang
Jie Li
Copyright-Jahr
2021
Verlag
Springer Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8892-1_123