Skip to main content

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

16. Risk-Informed Design Verification and Validation Planning Methods for Optimal Product Reliability Improvement

verfasst von : Zhaojun Steven Li, Gongyu Wu

Erschienen in: Handbook of Advanced Performability Engineering

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter proposes four types of mathematical optimization modeling approaches to optimize the product design Verification and Validation (V&V) planning during the New Product Development (NPD) process. These four optimization models provide four risk mitigation strategies from perspectives of cost efficiency to the optimal selection of a set of V&V activities for maximizing the overall system reliability improvement. The proposed approaches not only incorporate the critical product development constraints in V&V planning, such as the cost, time, reliability improvement, and sequencing and effectiveness of V&V activities, but also consider the decay of the improvement effectiveness when tackling the V&V activities’ selecting and sequencing challenges. In addition, the concepts of set covering, set partition, and set packing are applied to assure that different levels of critical failure modes can be covered in different ways according to different risk mitigation requirements by the end of V&V execution. The application of the proposed optimization models and comparisons with existing methods for product V&V planning are illustrated through the product development of a power generation system within a diesel engine.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Li, Z., Mobin, M., & Keyser, T. (2016). Multi-objective and multi-stage reliability growth planning in early product-development stage. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 65(2), 769–781.CrossRef Li, Z., Mobin, M., & Keyser, T. (2016). Multi-objective and multi-stage reliability growth planning in early product-development stage. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 65(2), 769–781.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Murthy, D. N. P., Rausand, M., & Virtanen, S. (2009). Investment in new product reliability. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 94(10), 1593–1600.CrossRef Murthy, D. N. P., Rausand, M., & Virtanen, S. (2009). Investment in new product reliability. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 94(10), 1593–1600.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Maropoulos, P. G., & Ceglarek, D. (2010). Design verifcation and validation in product lifecycle. CIRP Annals, 59(2), 740–759.CrossRef Maropoulos, P. G., & Ceglarek, D. (2010). Design verifcation and validation in product lifecycle. CIRP Annals, 59(2), 740–759.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Babuska, I., & Oden, J. T. (2004). Verification and validation in computational engineering and science: basic concepts. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 193(36–38), 4057–4066.MathSciNetCrossRef Babuska, I., & Oden, J. T. (2004). Verification and validation in computational engineering and science: basic concepts. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 193(36–38), 4057–4066.MathSciNetCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Belt, P., Harkonen, J., Mottonen, M., et al. (2008). Improving the efficiency of verification and validation. International Journal of Services and Standards, 4(2), 150–166.CrossRef Belt, P., Harkonen, J., Mottonen, M., et al. (2008). Improving the efficiency of verification and validation. International Journal of Services and Standards, 4(2), 150–166.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Collopy, P. D., & Hollingsworth, P. M. (2011). Value-driven design. Journal of Aircraft, 48(3), 749–759.CrossRef Collopy, P. D., & Hollingsworth, P. M. (2011). Value-driven design. Journal of Aircraft, 48(3), 749–759.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwenn, R. E., Chitikila, R. C., & Laufer, D. R. et al. (2011). Defense acquisitions: Assessment of selected weapon programs, DC, USA: United States Government Accountability Office, Report No. GAO-11-233SP. Schwenn, R. E., Chitikila, R. C., & Laufer, D. R. et al. (2011). Defense acquisitions: Assessment of selected weapon programs, DC, USA: United States Government Accountability Office, Report No. GAO-11-233SP.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwenn, R. E., Brink, H., & Mebane, C. T., et al. (2009). Defense acquisitions: Assessment of selected weapon programs, DC, USA: United States Government Accountability Office, Report No. GAO-09-326SP. Schwenn, R. E., Brink, H., & Mebane, C. T., et al. (2009). Defense acquisitions: Assessment of selected weapon programs, DC, USA: United States Government Accountability Office, Report No. GAO-09-326SP.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Potty, N. S., Irdus, A. B., & Ramanathan, C. (2011). Case study and survey on time and cost overrun of multiple D&B projects. National Postgraduate Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Sep, 19–20, 1–6. Potty, N. S., Irdus, A. B., & Ramanathan, C. (2011). Case study and survey on time and cost overrun of multiple D&B projects. National Postgraduate Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Sep, 19–20, 1–6.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhattacharjee, A. K., Dhodapkar, S. D., & Shyamasundar, R. K. (2001). PERTS: An environment for specification and verification of reactive systems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 71(3), 299–310.CrossRef Bhattacharjee, A. K., Dhodapkar, S. D., & Shyamasundar, R. K. (2001). PERTS: An environment for specification and verification of reactive systems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 71(3), 299–310.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Han, X., Li, R., Wang, J., et al. (2018). Identification of key design characteristics for complex product adaptive design. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 95(1–4), 1215–1231.CrossRef Han, X., Li, R., Wang, J., et al. (2018). Identification of key design characteristics for complex product adaptive design. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 95(1–4), 1215–1231.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho, H., & Park, J. (2019). Cost-effective concept development using functional modeling guidelines. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 55, 234–149.CrossRef Cho, H., & Park, J. (2019). Cost-effective concept development using functional modeling guidelines. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 55, 234–149.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Estrada, G., Shunk, D. L., & Ju, F. (2018). Systematic continuous improvement model for variation management of key characteristics running with low capability. International Journal of Production Research, 56(6), 2370–2387.CrossRef Estrada, G., Shunk, D. L., & Ju, F. (2018). Systematic continuous improvement model for variation management of key characteristics running with low capability. International Journal of Production Research, 56(6), 2370–2387.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kukulies, J., & Schmitt, R. (2018). Stabilizing production ramp-up by modeling uncertainty for product design verification using Dempster-Shafer theory. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 23, 178–196.CrossRef Kukulies, J., & Schmitt, R. (2018). Stabilizing production ramp-up by modeling uncertainty for product design verification using Dempster-Shafer theory. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 23, 178–196.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Chahin, A. & Paetzold, K. (2018). Planning validation and verification steps according to the dependency of requirements and product architecture, IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), Stuttgart, Germany, Jun.17–20, pp. 1–6. Chahin, A. & Paetzold, K. (2018). Planning validation and verification steps according to the dependency of requirements and product architecture, IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), Stuttgart, Germany, Jun.17–20, pp. 1–6.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Mobin, M., & Li, Z. (2018). An Integrated Approach to Plan the Design Verification and Validation Activities for the New Product Reliability Improvement. Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS) Reno, NV, USA, Jan., 22–25, 1–7. Mobin, M., & Li, Z. (2018). An Integrated Approach to Plan the Design Verification and Validation Activities for the New Product Reliability Improvement. Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS) Reno, NV, USA, Jan., 22–25, 1–7.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmed, H., & Chateauneuf, A. (2014). Optimal number of tests to achieve and validate product reliability. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 131, 242–250.CrossRef Ahmed, H., & Chateauneuf, A. (2014). Optimal number of tests to achieve and validate product reliability. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 131, 242–250.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Mobin, M., Li, Z., & Cheraghi, S.H., et al., (2019) An approach for design verification and validation planning and optimization for new product reliability improvement. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 190. Mobin, M., Li, Z., & Cheraghi, S.H., et al., (2019) An approach for design verification and validation planning and optimization for new product reliability improvement. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 190.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Stamatis, D.H. (2003). Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution, 2nd ed, ASQ Quality Press: Milwaukee, WI, USA. Stamatis, D.H. (2003). Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution, 2nd ed, ASQ Quality Press: Milwaukee, WI, USA.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Barends, D. M., Oldenhof, M. T., Vredenbregt, M. J., & Nauta, M. J. (2012). Risk analysis of analytical validations by probabilistic modifcation of FMEA. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 64, 82–86.CrossRef Barends, D. M., Oldenhof, M. T., Vredenbregt, M. J., & Nauta, M. J. (2012). Risk analysis of analytical validations by probabilistic modifcation of FMEA. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 64, 82–86.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Applegate, D., & Cook, W. (1991). A computational study of the job-shop scheduling problem. ORSA Journal on Computing, 3(2), 149–456.CrossRef Applegate, D., & Cook, W. (1991). A computational study of the job-shop scheduling problem. ORSA Journal on Computing, 3(2), 149–456.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Vazirani, V. V. (2001). Approximation algorithms. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.MATH Vazirani, V. V. (2001). Approximation algorithms. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.MATH
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Farrell, M. J. (1957). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120(3), 253–290.CrossRef Farrell, M. J. (1957). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120(3), 253–290.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Mirdehghan, S. M., & Shirzadi, A. (2012). Ranking decision making units based on the cost efficiency measure. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 81(1), 55–63.MATH Mirdehghan, S. M., & Shirzadi, A. (2012). Ranking decision making units based on the cost efficiency measure. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 81(1), 55–63.MATH
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Mitchell, M. (1998). An introduction to genetic algorithms. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT press.CrossRef Mitchell, M. (1998). An introduction to genetic algorithms. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT press.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu, G., Li, Z.S., & Liu, P. (2020). Risk-informed reliability improvement optimization for verification and validation planning based on set covering modeling, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability. Wu, G., Li, Z.S., & Liu, P. (2020). Risk-informed reliability improvement optimization for verification and validation planning based on set covering modeling, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability.
Metadaten
Titel
Risk-Informed Design Verification and Validation Planning Methods for Optimal Product Reliability Improvement
verfasst von
Zhaojun Steven Li
Gongyu Wu
Copyright-Jahr
2021
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55732-4_16

Neuer Inhalt