Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction to Fluid Mechanics Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

83. Risk-Informed Industrial Fire Protection Engineering

verfasst von : Thomas F. Barry

Erschienen in: SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering

Verlag: Springer New York

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Risk-informed fire protection evaluation is a risk-based decision support tool that evaluates fire and explosion consequence likelihood and includes an analysis of fire protection system(s) performance reliability [1].

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Fire Risk Indexing
Nächstes Kapitel Product Fire Risk Analysis
Glossar
AHJ
Authority having jurisdiction
ETA
Event tree analysis
F
Frequency
FHA
Fire hazard analysis
FMEA
Failure modes and effects analysis
FPS
Fire protection system
FPS-LOPA
Fire protection system-layer of protection analysis
FPS-QRA
Fire protection system-quantitative risk assessment
FRE
Fire risk evaluation
FTA
Fault tree analysis
HAZOP
Hazard and operability analysis
HRA
Human reliability analysis
IFPL
Independent fire protection layer
IMT
Inspection, maintenance, testing
IPL
Independent protection layer
LOPA
Layer of protection analysis
MOC
Management of change
NFPA
National fire protection analysis
P
Probability
P de
Probability of design effectiveness
P fod
Probability of failure on demand
PHA
Process hazard analysis
PIL
Performance integrity level
PIMs
Performance integrity measures
PML
Probable maximum loss
P or
Probability of operational reliability
Literatur
1.
T.F. Barry, Risk-Informed, Performance-Based Industrial Fire Protection, An Alternative to Prescriptive Codes, TFBarry Publications and Tennessee Valley Publishing, Knoxville, TN (2002). Available from http://​www.​fireriskforum.​com.
2.
Marine Risk Assessment, prepared by Det Norske Veritas for the Health and Safety Executive, London Technical Consultancy, London, UK (2002).
3.
UKOOA, A Framework for Risk Related Decision Support, UK Offshore Operators Association, London (1999).
4.
Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS), Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures with Examples, 2nd ed., American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), New York (1992).
5.
F.P. Lees, Lee’s Loss Prevention in the Process Industry, Hazard Identification, Assessment, and Control, 2nd ed., Butterworth-Heineman, Oxford, UK (1996).
6.
I.S. Sutton, Process Hazards Analysis, SW Books, Houston, TX (2001).
7.
NFPA, Fire Protection Handbook, 20th ed., National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA (2008).
8.
C.R. Schroll, Industrial Fire Protection Handbook, 2nd ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2002).CrossRef
9.
R.G. Zalosh, Industrial Fire Protection Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ (2003).CrossRef
10.
Center for Chemical Process Safety, Guidance for Consequence Analysis of Chemical Releases, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York (1999).
11.
Center for Chemical Process Safety, Guidelines for Evaluating the Characteristics of Vapor Cloud Explosions, Flash Fires, and BLEVEs, American Institute of Chemical Engineering, New York (1994).CrossRef
12.
Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS), Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis, American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), New York (1999).
13.
A.M. Dowell III and T. Williams, “Layer of Protection Analysis: Generating Scenarios Automatically from HAZOP Data,” Process Safety Progress, 24, 1 (Mar. 2005).
14.
Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS), Layers of Protection Analysis: Simplified Process Risk Assessment, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York (2001).
15.
A.M. Dowell, Layer of Protection Analysis, A New PHA Tool After Hazop, Before Fault Tree Analysis, CCPS/AIChE International Conference and Workshop on Risk Analysis in Process Safety, Center for Chemical Process Safety, American Institute for Chemical Engineers, New York (1997).
16.
P. Baybutt, “Cyber Security Risk Analysis for Process Control Systems Using Rings of Protection Analysis, ROPA,” Process Safety Progress, 23, 4 (Dec. 2004).
17.
Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Engineering Guide: Fire Risk Assessment, Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Bethesda, MD (2006).
18.
Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS), Guidelines for Process Equipment Reliability Data, with Data Tables, American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), New York (1989).CrossRef
19.
IEEE Std 500–1991, Guide to the Collection and Presentation of Electrical, Electronic, Sensing Component, and Mechanical Equipment Reliability Data for Nuclear Power Generating Stations, Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, New York (1991).
20.
OREDA, Offshore Reliability Data Handbook, 4th ed., OREDA, Stavanger, Norway (2002).
21.
V. Babrauskas, Ignition Handbook, Fire Science Publishers, Issaquah, WA (2003).
22.
ISA-S84.01, Application of Safety Instrumented Systems to the Process Industries, Instrument Society of America (ISA), Research Triangle Park, NC (1996).
23.
R.W. Bukowski, E.K. Budnick, and C.F. Schemel, Estimates of the Operational Reliability of Fire Protection Systems, NIST, Gaithersburg, MD (2002).
24.
British Standard 7974, Application of Fire Safety Engineering Principles to the Design of Buildings, British Standards Institute, London, UK (2001). (supersedes DD 240-1-1997)
25.
S.G. Vick, Degrees of Belief, Subjective Probability and Engineering Judgment, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA (2002).
26.
Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS), Guidelines for Evaluating Process Plant Buildings for External Explosions and Fire, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York (1996).CrossRef
27.
Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Engineering Guide, Human Behavior in Fire, Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Bethesda, MD (2003).
28.
T. Barry and P. Johnson, “Establishing Quantitative Fire Risk Tolerance Benchmarks,” Paper presented at 5th International SFPE Conference on Performance-Based Codes and Fire Safety Design Methods, Luxembourg (Oct. 2004).
Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS), Guidelines for Preventing Human Error in Process Safety, American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), New York (1994).
Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS), Tools for Making Acute Risk Decisions with Chemical Process Safety Applications, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York (1995).
F. Noonan and R. Fitzgerald, “On the Role of Subjective Probabilities in Fire Risk Management Studies, Fire Safety Science,” Proceedings for the 3rd International Symposium, July 8–12, 1991, Edinburgh, Scotland, pp. 495–504 (1991).
D.J. Rasbash, G. Ramachandran, B. Kandola, J.M. Watts, and M. Law, Evaluation of Fire Safety, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., London (2004).CrossRef
I.S. Sutton, Process Reliability and Risk Management, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York (1992).
D. Vose, Quantitative Risk Analysis: A Guide to Monte Carlo Simulation Modelling. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK (1997).MATH
Metadaten
Titel
Risk-Informed Industrial Fire Protection Engineering
verfasst von
Thomas F. Barry
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Verlag
Springer New York
Buch
SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering

Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2564-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-1-4939-2565-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2565-0_83