Skip to main content

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Robust Ranking of Universities Evaluated by Hierarchical and Interacting Criteria

verfasst von : Salvatore Corrente, Salvatore Greco, Roman Słowiński

Erschienen in: Multiple Criteria Decision Making and Aiding

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this chapter, we present a methodology of decision aiding that helps to build a ranking of a finite set of alternatives evaluated by a family of hierarchically structured criteria. The presentation has a tutorial character, and takes as an example the ranking of universities. Each university is generally evaluated on several aspects, such as quality of faculty and research output. Moreover, their performance on these macro-criteria can be further detailed by evaluation on some subcriteria. To take into account the hierarchical structure of criteria presented as a tree, the multiple criteria hierarchy process will be applied. The aggregation of the university performances will be done by the Choquet integral preference model that is able to take into account the possible negative and positive interactions between the criteria at hand. On the basis of an indirect preference information supplied by the decision maker in terms of pairwise comparisons of some universities, or comparison of some criteria in terms of their importance and their interaction, the robust ordinal regression and the stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis will be used. They will provide the decision maker some robust recommendations presented in the form of necessary and possible preference relations between universities, and in the form of a distribution of possible rank positions got by each of them, taking into account all preference models compatible with the available preference information. The methodology will be presented step by step on a sample of some European universities.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
In the following, with an abuse of notation, we sometimes refer to the criteria with their indices. So we shall say criterion i instead of criterion g i.
 
2
Let us observe that this formulation can be used even in case some of the evaluations are lower than zero. In this case, considering \(k=\displaystyle \min _{\substack {g_j\in G\\ a\in A}}g_j(a)\), it is enough to replace g j(a) with \(g_{j}^{\prime }(a)=g_j(a)-k\), for all j = 1, …, n and a ∈ A, before applying Eq. (3).
 
3
In LP problems strict inequalities have to be converted into weak ones by using an auxiliary variable ε. For this reason, constraints of the type x > y are converted into constraints of the type x ≥ y + ε.
 
4
Let us remember that the power set of a generic set G is denoted by 2G and it is composed of all subsets of G, that is, 2G = {A : A ⊆ G}.
 
5
Let us observe that the same ordering of the alternatives (in that case, solutions) in non-dominated fronts is used in NSGA-II (Deb et al. 2002) in evolutionary multiobjective optimization.
 
6
Let us point out that a similar analysis could also be performed for any subset of universities. For example, all universities belonging to the same country or universities in a certain geographic area, etc., could be taken into account.
 
7
The constraint m(∅) = 0 is implicit.
 
8
Let us observe that in the definition of E DM provided in Sect. 2.1 the set of constraints [AC] is empty since the DM did not provide any preference in terms of comparison between alternatives.
 
9
Let us observe that, to give information on the importance of elementary criteria, we should compute their Shapley value that takes into account also its possible interactions with the other elementary criteria. Here, we are doing some considerations on the Möbius parameters of the elementary criteria alone, without considering the possible interactions.
 
10
As already observed before, since the macro-criteria QE and PCP have only one elementary criterion descending from them, the ranking of the ten universities on these macro-criteria is induced by their evaluations only, independently of the choice of the used aggregation method.
 
11
According to Tervonen et al. (2013), it is sufficient sampling 2 independent normal variables and, therefore, normalizing them.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Abramo, G., Cicero, T., & D’Angelo, C.A. (2011). A field-standardized application of DEA to national-scale research assessment of universities. Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 618–628.CrossRef Abramo, G., Cicero, T., & D’Angelo, C.A. (2011). A field-standardized application of DEA to national-scale research assessment of universities. Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 618–628.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Agasisti, T., Dal Bianco, A., Landoni, P., Sala, A., & Salerno, M. (2011). Evaluating the efficiency of research in academic departments: An empirical analysis in an Italian region. Higher Education Quarterly, 65(3), 267–289.CrossRef Agasisti, T., Dal Bianco, A., Landoni, P., Sala, A., & Salerno, M. (2011). Evaluating the efficiency of research in academic departments: An empirical analysis in an Italian region. Higher Education Quarterly, 65(3), 267–289.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Agasisti, T., Catalano, G., Landoni, P., & Verganti, R. (2012). Evaluating the performance of academic departments: An analysis of research-related output efficiency. Research Evaluation, 21(1), 2–14.CrossRef Agasisti, T., Catalano, G., Landoni, P., & Verganti, R. (2012). Evaluating the performance of academic departments: An analysis of research-related output efficiency. Research Evaluation, 21(1), 2–14.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Aigner, D., Lovell, C. A. K., & Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6(1), 21–37.CrossRef Aigner, D., Lovell, C. A. K., & Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6(1), 21–37.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Angilella, S., Corrente, S., Greco, S., & Słowiński, R. (2016). Robust ordinal regression and stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis in multiple criteria hierarchy process for the Choquet integral preference model. Omega, 63, 154–169.CrossRef Angilella, S., Corrente, S., Greco, S., & Słowiński, R. (2016). Robust ordinal regression and stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis in multiple criteria hierarchy process for the Choquet integral preference model. Omega, 63, 154–169.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Angilella, S., Greco, S., & Matarazzo, B. (2010). Non-additive robust ordinal regression: A multiple criteria decision model based on the Choquet integral. European Journal of Operational Research, 201(1), 277–288.CrossRef Angilella, S., Greco, S., & Matarazzo, B. (2010). Non-additive robust ordinal regression: A multiple criteria decision model based on the Choquet integral. European Journal of Operational Research, 201(1), 277–288.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Aoki, S., Inoue, K., & Gejima, R. (2010). Data envelopment analysis for evaluating Japanese universities. Artificial Life and Robotics, 15(2), 165–170.CrossRef Aoki, S., Inoue, K., & Gejima, R. (2010). Data envelopment analysis for evaluating Japanese universities. Artificial Life and Robotics, 15(2), 165–170.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bayraktar, E., Tatoglu, E., & Zaim, S. (2013). Measuring the relative efficiency of quality management practices in Turkish public and private universities. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 64(12), 1810–1830.CrossRef Bayraktar, E., Tatoglu, E., & Zaim, S. (2013). Measuring the relative efficiency of quality management practices in Turkish public and private universities. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 64(12), 1810–1830.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Behzadian, M., Kazemzadeh, R. B., Albadvi, A., & Aghdasi, M. (2010). PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 200(1), 198–215.CrossRef Behzadian, M., Kazemzadeh, R. B., Albadvi, A., & Aghdasi, M. (2010). PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 200(1), 198–215.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Billaut, J.-C., Bouyssou, D., & Vincke, P. (2010). Should you believe in the Shanghai ranking? Scientometrics, 84(1), 237–263.CrossRef Billaut, J.-C., Bouyssou, D., & Vincke, P. (2010). Should you believe in the Shanghai ranking? Scientometrics, 84(1), 237–263.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Blasi, B., Romagnosi, S., & Bonaccorsi, A. (2017). Playing the ranking game: Media coverage of the evaluation of the quality of research in Italy. Higher Education, 73(5), 741–757.CrossRef Blasi, B., Romagnosi, S., & Bonaccorsi, A. (2017). Playing the ranking game: Media coverage of the evaluation of the quality of research in Italy. Higher Education, 73(5), 741–757.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brans, J. P., Mareschal, B., & Vincke, Ph. (1984). PROMETHEE: A new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis. In J. P. Brans (Ed.), Operational Research, IFORS 84 (pp. 477–490). Amsterdam: North Holland. Brans, J. P., Mareschal, B., & Vincke, Ph. (1984). PROMETHEE: A new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis. In J. P. Brans (Ed.), Operational Research, IFORS 84 (pp. 477–490). Amsterdam: North Holland.
Zurück zum Zitat Brans, J. P., & Vincke, Ph. (1985). A preference ranking organisation method: The PROMETHEE method for MCDM. Management Science, 31(6), 647–656.CrossRef Brans, J. P., & Vincke, Ph. (1985). A preference ranking organisation method: The PROMETHEE method for MCDM. Management Science, 31(6), 647–656.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Buela-Casal, G., Gutiérrez-Martínez, O., Bermúdez-Sánchez, M. P., & Vadillo-Muñoz, O. (2007). Comparative study of international academic rankings of universities. Scientometrics, 71(3), 349–365.CrossRef Buela-Casal, G., Gutiérrez-Martínez, O., Bermúdez-Sánchez, M. P., & Vadillo-Muñoz, O. (2007). Comparative study of international academic rankings of universities. Scientometrics, 71(3), 349–365.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chavas, J.-P., Barham, B., Foltz, J., & Kim, K. (2012). Analysis and decomposition of scope economies: R&D at US research universities. Applied Economics, 44(11), 1387–1404.CrossRef Chavas, J.-P., Barham, B., Foltz, J., & Kim, K. (2012). Analysis and decomposition of scope economies: R&D at US research universities. Applied Economics, 44(11), 1387–1404.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Choquet, G. (1953). Theory of capacities. Annales de l’Institut Fourier, 5(54), 131–295. Choquet, G. (1953). Theory of capacities. Annales de l’Institut Fourier, 5(54), 131–295.
Zurück zum Zitat Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2004). Data envelopment analysis. In Handbook on data envelopment analysis (pp. 1–39). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2004). Data envelopment analysis. In Handbook on data envelopment analysis (pp. 1–39). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Corrente, S., Figueira, J. R., Greco, S., & Słowiński. (2017). A robust ranking method extending ELECTRE III to hierarchy of interacting criteria, imprecise weights and stochastic analysis. Omega, 73, 1–17.CrossRef Corrente, S., Figueira, J. R., Greco, S., & Słowiński. (2017). A robust ranking method extending ELECTRE III to hierarchy of interacting criteria, imprecise weights and stochastic analysis. Omega, 73, 1–17.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Corrente, S., Greco, S., & Ishizaka, A. (2016). Combining analytical hierarchy process and Choquet integral within non additive robust ordinal regression. Omega, 61, 2–18.CrossRef Corrente, S., Greco, S., & Ishizaka, A. (2016). Combining analytical hierarchy process and Choquet integral within non additive robust ordinal regression. Omega, 61, 2–18.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Corrente, S., Greco, S., Kadziński, M., & Słowiński, R. (2013). Robust ordinal regression in preference learning and ranking. Machine Learning, 93, 381–422.CrossRef Corrente, S., Greco, S., Kadziński, M., & Słowiński, R. (2013). Robust ordinal regression in preference learning and ranking. Machine Learning, 93, 381–422.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Corrente, S., Greco, S., & Słowiński, R. (2012). Multiple criteria hierarchy process in robust ordinal regression. Decision Support Systems, 53(3), 660–674.CrossRef Corrente, S., Greco, S., & Słowiński, R. (2012). Multiple criteria hierarchy process in robust ordinal regression. Decision Support Systems, 53(3), 660–674.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Deb, K., Agrawal, S., Pratap, A., & Meyarivan, T. (2002). A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2), 182–197.CrossRef Deb, K., Agrawal, S., Pratap, A., & Meyarivan, T. (2002). A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2), 182–197.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Figueira, J. R., Greco, S., Roy, B., & Słowiński, R. (2013). An overview of ELECTRE methods and their recent extensions. Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis, 20, 61–85.CrossRef Figueira, J. R., Greco, S., Roy, B., & Słowiński, R. (2013). An overview of ELECTRE methods and their recent extensions. Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis, 20, 61–85.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Florian, R. (2007). Irreproducibility of the results of the Shanghai academic ranking of world universities. Scientometrics, 72(1), 25–32.CrossRef Florian, R. (2007). Irreproducibility of the results of the Shanghai academic ranking of world universities. Scientometrics, 72(1), 25–32.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fürnkranz, J., & Hüllermeier, E. (eds.) (2010). Preference Learning. Berlin: Springer. Fürnkranz, J., & Hüllermeier, E. (eds.) (2010). Preference Learning. Berlin: Springer.
Zurück zum Zitat Giannoulis, C., & Ishizaka, A. (2010). A Web-based decision support system with ELECTRE III for a personalised ranking of British universities. Decision Support Systems, 48(3), 488–497.CrossRef Giannoulis, C., & Ishizaka, A. (2010). A Web-based decision support system with ELECTRE III for a personalised ranking of British universities. Decision Support Systems, 48(3), 488–497.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Giarlotta, A., & Greco, S. (2013). Necessary and possible preference structures. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 49(2), 163–172.CrossRef Giarlotta, A., & Greco, S. (2013). Necessary and possible preference structures. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 49(2), 163–172.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Govindan, K., & Jepsen, M. B. (2016). ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 250(1), 1–29.CrossRef Govindan, K., & Jepsen, M. B. (2016). ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 250(1), 1–29.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grabisch, M. (1996). The application of fuzzy integrals in multicriteria decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 89(3), 445–456.CrossRef Grabisch, M. (1996). The application of fuzzy integrals in multicriteria decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 89(3), 445–456.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grabisch, M. (1997). k-order additive discrete fuzzy measures and their representation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 92(2), 167–189.CrossRef Grabisch, M. (1997). k-order additive discrete fuzzy measures and their representation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 92(2), 167–189.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grabisch, M., & Labreuche, C. (2010). A decade of application of the Choquet and Sugeno integrals in multi-criteria decision aid. Annals of Operations Research, 175(1), 247–290.CrossRef Grabisch, M., & Labreuche, C. (2010). A decade of application of the Choquet and Sugeno integrals in multi-criteria decision aid. Annals of Operations Research, 175(1), 247–290.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Greco, S., Figueira, J. R., & Ehrgott, M. (2016). Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys. Berlin: Springer.CrossRef Greco, S., Figueira, J. R., & Ehrgott, M. (2016). Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys. Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., & Słowiński, R. (2001). Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 129(1), 1–47.CrossRef Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., & Słowiński, R. (2001). Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 129(1), 1–47.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Greco, S., Mousseau, V., & Słowiński, R. (2008). Ordinal regression revisited: Multiple criteria ranking using a set of additive value functions. European Journal of Operational Research, 191(2), 416–436.CrossRef Greco, S., Mousseau, V., & Słowiński, R. (2008). Ordinal regression revisited: Multiple criteria ranking using a set of additive value functions. European Journal of Operational Research, 191(2), 416–436.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Greco, S., Mousseau, V., & Słowiński, R. (2014). Robust ordinal regression for value functions handling interacting criteria. European Journal of Operational Research, 239(3), 711–730.CrossRef Greco, S., Mousseau, V., & Słowiński, R. (2014). Robust ordinal regression for value functions handling interacting criteria. European Journal of Operational Research, 239(3), 711–730.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ishizaka, A., Resce, G., & Mareschal, B. (2018). Visual management of performance with PROMETHEE productivity analysis. Soft Computing, 22, 7325–7338.CrossRef Ishizaka, A., Resce, G., & Mareschal, B. (2018). Visual management of performance with PROMETHEE productivity analysis. Soft Computing, 22, 7325–7338.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., & Siskos, Y. (2001). Preference disaggregation: 20 years of MCDA experience. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(2), 233–245.CrossRef Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., & Siskos, Y. (2001). Preference disaggregation: 20 years of MCDA experience. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(2), 233–245.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jeremic, V., Bulajic, M., Martic, M., & Radojicic, Z. (2011). A fresh approach to evaluating the academic ranking of world universities. Scientometrics, 87(3), 587–596.CrossRef Jeremic, V., Bulajic, M., Martic, M., & Radojicic, Z. (2011). A fresh approach to evaluating the academic ranking of world universities. Scientometrics, 87(3), 587–596.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Johnes, G. (2013). Efficiency in English higher education institutions revisited: A network approach. Economics Bulletin, 33(4), 2698–2706. Johnes, G. (2013). Efficiency in English higher education institutions revisited: A network approach. Economics Bulletin, 33(4), 2698–2706.
Zurück zum Zitat Jovanovic, M., Jeremic, V., Savic, G., Bulajic, M., Martic, M. (2012). How does the normalization of data affect the ARWU ranking? Scientometrics, 93(2), 319–327.CrossRef Jovanovic, M., Jeremic, V., Savic, G., Bulajic, M., Martic, M. (2012). How does the normalization of data affect the ARWU ranking? Scientometrics, 93(2), 319–327.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Katharaki, M., & Katharakis, G. (2010). A comparative assessment of Greek universities’ efficiency using quantitative analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 49(4–5), 115–128.CrossRef Katharaki, M., & Katharakis, G. (2010). A comparative assessment of Greek universities’ efficiency using quantitative analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 49(4–5), 115–128.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. New York: Wiley. Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. New York: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Kempkes, G., & Pohl, C. (2010). The efficiency of German universities - some evidence from nonparametric and parametric methods. Applied Economics, 42(16), 2063–2079.CrossRef Kempkes, G., & Pohl, C. (2010). The efficiency of German universities - some evidence from nonparametric and parametric methods. Applied Economics, 42(16), 2063–2079.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kounetas, A., Anastasiou, K., Mitropoulos, P., & Mitropoulos, I. (2011). Departmental efficiency differences within a Greek university: An application of a DEA and Tobit analysis. International Transactions in Operational Research, 18(5), 545–559.CrossRef Kounetas, A., Anastasiou, K., Mitropoulos, P., & Mitropoulos, I. (2011). Departmental efficiency differences within a Greek university: An application of a DEA and Tobit analysis. International Transactions in Operational Research, 18(5), 545–559.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lahdelma, R., Hokkanen, J., & Salminen, P. (1998). SMAA - stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 106(1), 137–143.CrossRef Lahdelma, R., Hokkanen, J., & Salminen, P. (1998). SMAA - stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 106(1), 137–143.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Leskinen, P., Viitanen, J., Kangas, A., & Kangas, J. (2006). Alternatives to incorporate uncertainty and risk attitude in multicriteria evaluation of forest plans. Forest Science, 52(3), 304–312. Leskinen, P., Viitanen, J., Kangas, A., & Kangas, J. (2006). Alternatives to incorporate uncertainty and risk attitude in multicriteria evaluation of forest plans. Forest Science, 52(3), 304–312.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu, N. C., & Cheng, Y. (2005). The academic ranking of world universities. Higher Education in Europe, 30(2), 127–136.CrossRef Liu, N. C., & Cheng, Y. (2005). The academic ranking of world universities. Higher Education in Europe, 30(2), 127–136.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat March, J. G. (1978). Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice. The Bell Journal of Economics, 9, 587–608.CrossRef March, J. G. (1978). Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice. The Bell Journal of Economics, 9, 587–608.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Marginson, S. (2014). University rankings and social science. European Journal of Education, 49(1), 45–59.CrossRef Marginson, S. (2014). University rankings and social science. European Journal of Education, 49(1), 45–59.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Marichal, J. L., & Roubens, M. (2000). Determination of weights of interacting criteria from a reference set. European Journal of Operational Research, 124(3), 641–650.CrossRef Marichal, J. L., & Roubens, M. (2000). Determination of weights of interacting criteria from a reference set. European Journal of Operational Research, 124(3), 641–650.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Meredith, M. (2004). Why do universities compete in the ratings game? An empirical analysis of the effects of the US news and world report college rankings. Research in Higher Education, 45(5), 43–461.CrossRef Meredith, M. (2004). Why do universities compete in the ratings game? An empirical analysis of the effects of the US news and world report college rankings. Research in Higher Education, 45(5), 43–461.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Moed, H. F. (2017). A critical comparative analysis of five world university rankings. Scientometrics, 110(2), 967–990.CrossRef Moed, H. F. (2017). A critical comparative analysis of five world university rankings. Scientometrics, 110(2), 967–990.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mousseau, V., Figueira, J. R., Dias, L., Gomes da Silva, C., & Climaco, J. (2003). Resolving inconsistencies among constraints on the parameters of an MCDA model. European Journal of Operational Research, 147(1), 72–93.CrossRef Mousseau, V., Figueira, J. R., Dias, L., Gomes da Silva, C., & Climaco, J. (2003). Resolving inconsistencies among constraints on the parameters of an MCDA model. European Journal of Operational Research, 147(1), 72–93.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Murofushi, S., & Soneda, T. (1993). Techniques for reading fuzzy measures (III): Interaction index. In: 9th Fuzzy Systems Symposium, Sapporo, Japan (pp. 693–696). Murofushi, S., & Soneda, T. (1993). Techniques for reading fuzzy measures (III): Interaction index. In: 9th Fuzzy Systems Symposium, Sapporo, Japan (pp. 693–696).
Zurück zum Zitat Nazarko, J., & Šaparauskas, J. (2014). Application of DEA method in efficiency evaluation of public higher education institutions. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20(1), 25–44.CrossRef Nazarko, J., & Šaparauskas, J. (2014). Application of DEA method in efficiency evaluation of public higher education institutions. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20(1), 25–44.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Olcay, G. A., & Bulu, M. (2017). Is measuring the knowledge creation of universities possible? A review of university rankings. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 153–160.CrossRef Olcay, G. A., & Bulu, M. (2017). Is measuring the knowledge creation of universities possible? A review of university rankings. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 153–160.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pietrucha, J. (2018). Country-specific determinants of world university rankings. Scientometrics, 114(3), 1129–1139.CrossRef Pietrucha, J. (2018). Country-specific determinants of world university rankings. Scientometrics, 114(3), 1129–1139.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenmayer, T. (2014). Using data envelopment analysis: A case of universities. Review of Economic Perspectives, 14(1), 34–54.CrossRef Rosenmayer, T. (2014). Using data envelopment analysis: A case of universities. Review of Economic Perspectives, 14(1), 34–54.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rota, G. C. (1964). On the foundations of combinatorial theory I. Theory of Möbius functions. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verwandte Gebiete, 2, 340–368.CrossRef Rota, G. C. (1964). On the foundations of combinatorial theory I. Theory of Möbius functions. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verwandte Gebiete, 2, 340–368.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roy, B., & Słowiński, R. (2013). Questions guiding the choice of a multicriteria decision aiding method. EURO Journal on Decision Processes, 1(1), 1–29. Roy, B., & Słowiński, R. (2013). Questions guiding the choice of a multicriteria decision aiding method. EURO Journal on Decision Processes, 1(1), 1–29.
Zurück zum Zitat Saisana, M., d’Hombres, B., & Saltelli, A. (2011). Rickety numbers: Volatility of university rankings and policy implications. Research Policy, 40(1), 165–177.CrossRef Saisana, M., d’Hombres, B., & Saltelli, A. (2011). Rickety numbers: Volatility of university rankings and policy implications. Research Policy, 40(1), 165–177.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Serow, R. C. (2000). Research and teaching at a research university. Higher Education, 40(4), 449–463.CrossRef Serow, R. C. (2000). Research and teaching at a research university. Higher Education, 40(4), 449–463.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sexton, T. R., Comunale, C. L., & Gara, S. C. (2012). Efficiency-based funding for public four-year colleges and universities. Education Finance and Policy, 7(3), 331–359.CrossRef Sexton, T. R., Comunale, C. L., & Gara, S. C. (2012). Efficiency-based funding for public four-year colleges and universities. Education Finance and Policy, 7(3), 331–359.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shafer, G. (1976). A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Shafer, G. (1976). A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Shapley, L. S. (1935). A value for n-person games. In H. W. Kuhn, & A. W. Tucker (Eds.) Contributions to the Theory of Games II (pp. 307–317). Princeton: Princeton University Press. Shapley, L. S. (1935). A value for n-person games. In H. W. Kuhn, & A. W. Tucker (Eds.) Contributions to the Theory of Games II (pp. 307–317). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith, R.L. (1984). Efficient Monte Carlo procedures for generating points uniformly distributed over bounded regions. Operations Research, 32, 1296–1308.CrossRef Smith, R.L. (1984). Efficient Monte Carlo procedures for generating points uniformly distributed over bounded regions. Operations Research, 32, 1296–1308.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Soh, K. (2015). What the overall doesn’t tell about world university rankings: Examples from ARWU, QSWUR, and THEWUR in 2013. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 37(3), 295–307.CrossRef Soh, K. (2015). What the overall doesn’t tell about world university rankings: Examples from ARWU, QSWUR, and THEWUR in 2013. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 37(3), 295–307.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Soh, K. (2017). The seven deadly sins of world university ranking: A summary from several papers. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 39(1), 104–115.CrossRef Soh, K. (2017). The seven deadly sins of world university ranking: A summary from several papers. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 39(1), 104–115.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tervonen, T., & Figueira, J. R. (2008). A survey on stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis methods. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 15(1–2), 1–14.CrossRef Tervonen, T., & Figueira, J. R. (2008). A survey on stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis methods. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 15(1–2), 1–14.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tervonen, T., Van Valkenhoef, G., Bastürk, N., & Postmus, D. (2014). Hit-and-run enables efficient weight generation for simulation-based multiple criteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 224, 552–559.CrossRef Tervonen, T., Van Valkenhoef, G., Bastürk, N., & Postmus, D. (2014). Hit-and-run enables efficient weight generation for simulation-based multiple criteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 224, 552–559.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tochkov, K., Nenovsky, N., & Tochkov, K. (2012). University efficiency and public funding for higher education in Bulgaria. Post-Communist Economies, 24(4), 517–534.CrossRef Tochkov, K., Nenovsky, N., & Tochkov, K. (2012). University efficiency and public funding for higher education in Bulgaria. Post-Communist Economies, 24(4), 517–534.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Usher, A., & Medow, J. (2009). A global survey of university rankings and league tables. In B. M. Kehm & B. Stensaker (Eds.) University rankings, diversity, and the new landscape of higher education (pp. 3–18). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Usher, A., & Medow, J. (2009). A global survey of university rankings and league tables. In B. M. Kehm & B. Stensaker (Eds.) University rankings, diversity, and the new landscape of higher education (pp. 3–18). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Valkenhoef, G., Tervonen, T., & Postmus, D. (2014). Notes on “Hit-And-Run enables efficient weight generation for simulation-based multiple criteria decision analysis”. European Journal of Operational Research, 239, 865–867.CrossRef Van Valkenhoef, G., Tervonen, T., & Postmus, D. (2014). Notes on “Hit-And-Run enables efficient weight generation for simulation-based multiple criteria decision analysis”. European Journal of Operational Research, 239, 865–867.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wakker, P. P. (1989). Additive representations of preferences: A new foundation of decision analysis. Berlin: Springer.CrossRef Wakker, P. P. (1989). Additive representations of preferences: A new foundation of decision analysis. Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Waltman, L., Calero-Medina, C., Kosten, J., Noyons, E., Tijssen, R. J. W., Eck, N. J., Leeuwen, T. N., Raan, A. F. J., Visser, M. S., & Wouters, P. (2012). The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 63(12), 2419–2432. Waltman, L., Calero-Medina, C., Kosten, J., Noyons, E., Tijssen, R. J. W., Eck, N. J., Leeuwen, T. N., Raan, A. F. J., Visser, M. S., & Wouters, P. (2012). The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 63(12), 2419–2432.
Metadaten
Titel
Robust Ranking of Universities Evaluated by Hierarchical and Interacting Criteria
verfasst von
Salvatore Corrente
Salvatore Greco
Roman Słowiński
Copyright-Jahr
2019
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99304-1_5