Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Learning Environments Research 3/2020

14.05.2020 | Original Paper

Role of technology in the design of learning environments

Erschienen in: Learning Environments Research | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The design of learning environments is being increasingly investigated, largely as a result of higher-education providers being challenged by both societal and technological developments. These providers are becoming more aware that the quality of learning environments affects students’ approaches to learning and satisfaction. This paper presents an alternative to more-traditional methods for designing learning environments that is driven by input of their main stakeholders: students and teachers. By using this method, we were able to explore stakeholders’ insights into learning spaces design and how learning technologies can be integrated in such spaces. Qualitative research was conducted with the aim of guiding the redesign of technology-enhanced learning environments. For this particular research, we used ‘sandpits’, which are creative and design-thinking workshops, in which participants are encouraged to redesign provocative concepts of a large and a small technology-enhanced learning environment. Thirteen ‘sandpits’ were delivered involving 32 teachers and 25 students. Through these design-thinking workshops, students and teachers reflected on and discussed the role of technology in face-to-face learning and teaching and proposed new design solutions for technology-enhanced learning environments.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Aiyegbayo, O. (2015). How and why academics do and do not use iPads for academic teaching? British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 1324–1332.CrossRef Aiyegbayo, O. (2015). How and why academics do and do not use iPads for academic teaching? British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 1324–1332.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It’s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78(3), 227–236.CrossRef Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It’s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78(3), 227–236.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Barrett, P., Zhang, Y., Moffat, J., & Kobbacy, K. (2013). A holistic, multi-level analysis identifying the impact of classroom design on pupils’ learning. Building and Environment, 59, 678–689.CrossRef Barrett, P., Zhang, Y., Moffat, J., & Kobbacy, K. (2013). A holistic, multi-level analysis identifying the impact of classroom design on pupils’ learning. Building and Environment, 59, 678–689.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Beichner, R. J. (2014). History and evolution of active learning spaces. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2014(137), 9–16.CrossRef Beichner, R. J. (2014). History and evolution of active learning spaces. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2014(137), 9–16.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bligh, B. (2014). Examining new processes for learning space design. In P. Temple (Ed.), The physical university: Contours of space and place in higher education (pp. 34–57). Oxon: Routledge. Bligh, B. (2014). Examining new processes for learning space design. In P. Temple (Ed.), The physical university: Contours of space and place in higher education (pp. 34–57). Oxon: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonsignore, E., Ahn, J., Clegg, T., Guha, M. L., Yip, J. C., & Discussant, A. D. (2013). Embedding participatory design into designs for learning: An untapped interdisciplinary resource? In Computer-supported cooperative learning conference (CSCL 2013). University of Wisconsin-Madison. Bonsignore, E., Ahn, J., Clegg, T., Guha, M. L., Yip, J. C., & Discussant, A. D. (2013). Embedding participatory design into designs for learning: An untapped interdisciplinary resource? In Computer-supported cooperative learning conference (CSCL 2013). University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Zurück zum Zitat Boys, J. (2011). Towards creative learning spaces. Oxon, UK: Routledge. Boys, J. (2011). Towards creative learning spaces. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Clinton, V., & Wilson, N. (2019). More than chalkboards: Classroom spaces and collaborative learning attitudes. Learning Environments Research, 22(3), 325–344.CrossRef Clinton, V., & Wilson, N. (2019). More than chalkboards: Classroom spaces and collaborative learning attitudes. Learning Environments Research, 22(3), 325–344.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Craft, B. (2013). Sketch-ins: A method for participatory design in technology-enhanced learning. In R. Luckin, S. Puntambekar, P. Goodyear, B. Grabowski, J. Underwood, & N. Winters (Eds.), Handbook of design in educational technology (pp. 92–101). Oxford: Routledge. Craft, B. (2013). Sketch-ins: A method for participatory design in technology-enhanced learning. In R. Luckin, S. Puntambekar, P. Goodyear, B. Grabowski, J. Underwood, & N. Winters (Eds.), Handbook of design in educational technology (pp. 92–101). Oxford: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Crook, C., & Mitchell, G. (2012). Ambience in social learning: Student engagement with new designs for learning spaces. Cambridge Journal of Education, 42(2), 121–139.CrossRef Crook, C., & Mitchell, G. (2012). Ambience in social learning: Student engagement with new designs for learning spaces. Cambridge Journal of Education, 42(2), 121–139.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Goedhart, N. S., Blignaut-van Westrhenen, N., Moser, C., & Zweekhorst, M. B. M. (2019). The flipped classroom: Supporting a diverse group of students in their learning. Learning Environments Research, 22(2), 297–310.CrossRef Goedhart, N. S., Blignaut-van Westrhenen, N., Moser, C., & Zweekhorst, M. B. M. (2019). The flipped classroom: Supporting a diverse group of students in their learning. Learning Environments Research, 22(2), 297–310.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2017). What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1567–1579.CrossRef Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2017). What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1567–1579.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat James, K. E., Burke, L. A., & Hutchins, H. M. (2006). Powerful or pointless? Faculty versus student perceptions of PowerPoint use in business education. Business Communication Quarterly, 69(4), 374–396.CrossRef James, K. E., Burke, L. A., & Hutchins, H. M. (2006). Powerful or pointless? Faculty versus student perceptions of PowerPoint use in business education. Business Communication Quarterly, 69(4), 374–396.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Janssen, F. J. J. M., Könings, K. D., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2017). Participatory educational design: How to improve mutual learning and the quality and usability of the design? European Journal of Education, 52(3), 268–279.CrossRef Janssen, F. J. J. M., Könings, K. D., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2017). Participatory educational design: How to improve mutual learning and the quality and usability of the design? European Journal of Education, 52(3), 268–279.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mäkelä, T., & Helfenstein, S. (2016). Developing a conceptual framework for participatory design of psychosocial and physical learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 19(3), 411–440.CrossRef Mäkelä, T., & Helfenstein, S. (2016). Developing a conceptual framework for participatory design of psychosocial and physical learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 19(3), 411–440.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mei, B., & May, L. (2018). Reflective renovation: Insights from a collaborative and active learning space project evaluation. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(6), 12–18.CrossRef Mei, B., & May, L. (2018). Reflective renovation: Insights from a collaborative and active learning space project evaluation. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(6), 12–18.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Muller, M. J. (2007). Participatory design: The third space in HCI. In A. Sears, J. A. Jacko, & J. A. Jackov (Eds.), The Human-computer interaction handbook (2nd ed., pp. 1070–1077). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. Muller, M. J. (2007). Participatory design: The third space in HCI. In A. Sears, J. A. Jacko, & J. A. Jackov (Eds.), The Human-computer interaction handbook (2nd ed., pp. 1070–1077). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Raghunath, R., Anker, C., & Nortcliffe, A. (2018). Are academics ready for smart learning? British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 182–197.CrossRef Raghunath, R., Anker, C., & Nortcliffe, A. (2018). Are academics ready for smart learning? British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 182–197.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rossing, J. P., Miller, W. M., Cecil, A. K., & Stamper, S. E. (2012). iLearning: The future of higher education? Student perceptions on learning with mobile tablets. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(2), 1–26. Rossing, J. P., Miller, W. M., Cecil, A. K., & Stamper, S. E. (2012). iLearning: The future of higher education? Student perceptions on learning with mobile tablets. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(2), 1–26.
Zurück zum Zitat Santos, I. M. (2013). Key challenges associated with bringing personal mobile devices to the classroom. In QScience proceedings (12th World conference on mobile and contextual learning [mLearn 2013), 16. Santos, I. M. (2013). Key challenges associated with bringing personal mobile devices to the classroom. In QScience proceedings (12th World conference on mobile and contextual learning [mLearn 2013), 16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheppard, S. D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2008). Educating engineers: Designing for the future of the field (Vol. 2). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Sheppard, S. D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2008). Educating engineers: Designing for the future of the field (Vol. 2). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Zurück zum Zitat Šorgo, A., Bartol, T., Dolničar, D., & Boh Podgornik, B. (2017). Attributes of digital natives as predictors of information literacy in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(3), 749–767.CrossRef Šorgo, A., Bartol, T., Dolničar, D., & Boh Podgornik, B. (2017). Attributes of digital natives as predictors of information literacy in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(3), 749–767.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat van Merriënboer, J. J. G., McKenney, S., Cullinan, D., & Heuer, J. (2017). Aligning pedagogy with physical learning spaces. European Journal of Education, 52(3), 253–267.CrossRef van Merriënboer, J. J. G., McKenney, S., Cullinan, D., & Heuer, J. (2017). Aligning pedagogy with physical learning spaces. European Journal of Education, 52(3), 253–267.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Van Note Chism, N. (2006). Challenging traditional assumptions and rethinking learning spaces. In D. G. Oblinger (Ed.), Learning spaces. Washington DC: Educause. Van Note Chism, N. (2006). Challenging traditional assumptions and rethinking learning spaces. In D. G. Oblinger (Ed.), Learning spaces. Washington DC: Educause.
Zurück zum Zitat Verdonck, M., Greenaway, R., Kennedy-Behr, A., & Askew, E. (2019). Student experiences of learning in a technology-enabled learning space. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(3), 270–281.CrossRef Verdonck, M., Greenaway, R., Kennedy-Behr, A., & Askew, E. (2019). Student experiences of learning in a technology-enabled learning space. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(3), 270–281.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Waycott, J., Bennett, S., Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., & Gray, K. (2010). Digital divides? Student and staff perceptions of information and communication technologies. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1202–1211.CrossRef Waycott, J., Bennett, S., Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., & Gray, K. (2010). Digital divides? Student and staff perceptions of information and communication technologies. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1202–1211.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Role of technology in the design of learning environments
Publikationsdatum
14.05.2020
Erschienen in
Learning Environments Research / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 1387-1579
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1855
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09314-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

Learning Environments Research 3/2020 Zur Ausgabe