Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Lead Editor: C. Milne.
This review essay addresses Germà Garcia-Belmonte’s paper titled: Visualizing time: how linguistic metaphors are incorporated into displaying instruments in the process of interpreting time-varying signals. doi:10.1007/s11422-015-9686-4.
As has been widely discussed, the National Research Council’s (NRC) current policy in United States education advocates supporting students toward acquiring skills to engage in scientific practices. NRC policy also suggests that supporting students in the practices of science may require different approaches than what is required for supporting student engagement with scientific content. Further, acquiring skills in scientific practices is not limited to gaining proficiency in utilizing tools that support scientific inquiry: students must also understand how to interpret information generated from such tools. These tools of scientific practices are embedded within scientific culture, which from Sewell’s perspective, is comprised of both practice and semiotic code (symbols and meanings). To become scientifically literate students must learn to utilize this code in practice. Author Germà Garcia-Belmonte identified one example of learning to utilize the semiotic code in scientific practice and considers challenges faced by undergraduate physics and engineering students within that context. Garcia-Belmonte observes students struggle to interpret symbols and meaning (the visual display generated) while engaging in practice (utilizing an oscilloscope) and posits that two, culturally bound, competing, linguistic metaphors of time may be the cause. Ultimately, however, the author does not explore beyond hypotheses. Although his theory may be correct, the paper serves as a reminder of the responsibility we have to students. As educators, it is useful and beneficial to make observations and develop theories surrounding why our students struggle. However, in addition to theorizing on why, for example, a particular scientific norm might present challenges for our students, we must remain mindful that challenges may not be uniform and may vary considerably according to students’ culture(s). Engaging with students and soliciting specific information regarding the challenges they face allows us, as educators, to both examine whether students’ reported challenges align or conflict with our own perceptions of those challenges, and subsequently devise and test methods toward supporting students in overcoming their challenges.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Everett, D. L. (2012). Language: The cultural tool. New York: Vintage.
Fuhrman, O., McCormick, K., Chen, E., Jiang, H., Shu, D., Mao, S., & Boroditsky, L. (2011). How linguistic and cultural forces shape conceptions of time: English and Mandarin time in 3D. Cognitive science, 35(7), 1305–1328.
Garcia-Belmonte, G. (2016). Visualizing time: how linguistic metaphors are incorporated into displaying instruments in the process of interpreting time-varying signals. Cultural Studies in Science Education. doi: 10.1007/11422-015-9686-4.
Gee, J. P. (2005). Language in the science classroom: Academic social languages as the heart of school based literacy. In E. W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives in theory and practice (pp. 13–32). Newark, DE: International Reading Association/National Science Teachers Association.
Headrick, D. N. (2000). When information come of age: Technologies of knowledge in the age of reason and revolution, 1700–1850. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kirch, S. A., & Stetsenko, A. (2012). What does it mean to know? Third grade students research using claims and evidence in science. Science and Children, Summer, 49(9), 44–49.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lemke, J. L. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. R. Martin (Ed.), Reading Science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science. New York, NY: Longmans.
Lemke, J. L. (2005). The literacies in science. In E. W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives in theory and practice (pp. 33–47). Newark, DE: International Reading Association/National Science Teachers Association.
Merton, R. K. (1973). The normative structure of science. In R. K. Merton (Ed.), The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations (pp. 267–278). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
National Research Council. (2011). A framework for K- 12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Otieno, T., & Milne, C. (2005). Paperclips + Polymers → problems: Learning to use levels of representation in a high school chemistry classroom. In R. Elmesky, G. Seiler, & K. Tobin (Eds.), Improving urban science education: New roles for teachers, students, and researchers (pp. 213–230). Boulder, CO: Rowan & Littlefield.
Sewell, W. H. (1999). The concept(s) of culture. In V. E. Bonnell & L. Hunt (Eds.), Beyond the cultural turn: New directions in the study of society and culture (pp. 35–61). Los Angeles: University of California Press.
- Salt, time, and metaphor: examining norms in scientific culture
Anna G. Brady
- Springer Netherlands
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, digitale Transformation/© Maksym Yemelyanov | Fotolia