1.
Bar-Ilan, J., Haustein, S., Peters, I., Priem, J., Shema, H., Terliesner, J.: Beyond citations: Scholars’ visibility on the social web. In: Proceedings of 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators. 52900, pp. 98–109 (2012)
2.
Haendel, M.A., Vasilevsky, N.A., Wirz, J.A.: Dealing with data: a case study on information and data management literacy. J. PLoS biol.
10(5), e1001339 (2012)
CrossRef
3.
Alexander, R., Sarah, D.R.: Accounting for Impact? the journal impact factor and the making of biomedical research in the Netherlands. J. Minerva
53(2), 117–139 (2015)
CrossRef
4.
Elliott, D.B.: The impact factor: a useful indicator of journal quality or fatally flawed? J. Ophthalmic Physiol. Optics
34(1), 4–7 (2014)
CrossRef
5.
Kamat, P.V., Schatz, G.C.: Journal impact factor and the real impact of your paper. J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
6(15), 3074–3075 (2015)
CrossRef
6.
Wenli, G.: Beyond journal impact and usage statistics: using citation analysis for collection development. Serials Libr. Printed Page Digital Age
70(1–4), 121–127 (2016)
7.
Hirsch, J.: An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.
102(46), 16569–16572 (2005)
CrossRef
8.
Ball, P.: Index aims for fair ranking of scientists. Nature
436, 900 (2005)
CrossRef
9.
Glanzel, W.: On the opportunities and limitations of the h-index. Sci. Focus
1, 10–11 (2006)
10.
Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F.J., Herrera-Viedma, E., et al.: h-Index: a review focused in its variants.computation and standardization for different scientific fields. J. Informetrics
3(4), 273–289 (2009)
CrossRef
11.
Bar-Ilan, J., Levene, M.: The hw-rank: An h-index variant for ranking web pages. Scientometrics
102(3), 2247–2253 (2015)
CrossRef
12.
Van Eck, N.J., Waltman, L., van Raan, A.F.J., et al.: Citation analysis may severely underestimate the impact of clinical research as compared to basic research. PLoS One
8(4), e62395 (2013)
CrossRef
13.
Das, A.K., Mishra, S.: Genesis of altmetrics or article-level metrics for measuring efficacy of scholarly communications: Current perspectives. Scientometrics
39(2), 1–16 (2014)
14.
Martin, F.: What can article-level metrics do for you? PLoS Biol.
10(11), e1001687 (2013)
15.
Neylon, C.: Article-level metrics and the evolution of scientific impact. PLoS Biol.
7(11), e1000242 (2009)
CrossRef
16.
Shema, H., Bar-Ilan, J., Thelwall, M.: Do blog citations correlate with a higher number of future citations? Research blogs as a potential source for alternative metrics. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.
65(5), 1018–1027 (2014)
CrossRef
17.
Lu, Z.: PubMed and beyond: a survey of web tools for searching biomedical literature. Database
2011(1), 56–65 (2011)
18.
Priem, J., Hemminger, B.H.: Scientometrics 2.0: new metrics of scholarly impact on the social web. First Monday
15(7) (2010)
19.
Liu, Y., Huang, Z., Yan, Y., et al.: Science Navigation Map: an interactive data mining tool for literature analysis. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion, International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, pp. 591–596 (2015)
20.
Adie, E., Roe, W.: Altmetric: enriching scholarly content with article-level discussion and metrics. Learn. Publish.
26(1), 11–17 (2013)
CrossRef
21.
Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., Larivire, V., et al.: Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services (2013)
22.
Haustein, S., Siebenlist, T.: Applying social bookmarking dat to evaluate journal usage. J. Informetrics
5(3), 446–457 (2011)
23.
Gunn, W.: Social signals reflect academic impact: what it means when a scholar adds a paper to Mendeley. Inf. Stand. Q.
25(2), 33–39 (2013)
CrossRef
24.
Liu, Y., Huang, Z., Fang, J., Yan, Y.: An article level metric in the context of research community. In: Proceedings of the companion publication of the 23rd international conference on World Wide Web companion, pp. 1197–1202. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee (2014)
25.
Eysenbach, G.: Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. J. Med. Internet Res.
13(4), e123 (2011)
CrossRef
26.
Weller, K., Puschmann, C.: Twitter for scientific communication: how can citations/ references be identified and measured. In: Proceedings of the ACM WebSci 2011, pp. 1–4 (2011)
27.
Thelwall, M., Tsou, A., Weingart, S., Holmberg, K., Haustein, S.: Tweeting links to academic articles. Cybermetrics: Int. J. Scientometrics Informetrics Bibliometrics
17, 1–8 (2013)
28.
Bollen, J., Van de Sompel, H., Smith, J.A., Luce, R.: Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: a comparison of download and citation data. Inf. Process. Manage.
41(6), 1419–1440 (2005)
CrossRef
29.
Zahedi, Z., Costas, R., Wouters, P.: How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of alternative metrics in scientific publications. Scientometrics
101(2), 1491–1513 (2014)
CrossRef
30.
Zahedi, Z., Fenner, M., Costas, R.: How consistent are altmetrics providers? Study of 1000 PLoS ONE publications using the PLOS ALM, Mendeley and Altmetric.com APIs. In altmetrics 14. Workshop at the Web Science Conference. Bloomington, USA (2014)
31.
Li, X., Thelwall, M., Giustini, D.: Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement. Scientometrics
91(2), 461–471 (2012)
CrossRef
32.
Ling, X., Liu, Y., Huang, Z., Shah, P.K., Li, C.: A graphical article-level metric for intuitive comparison of large-scale literatures. Scientometrics
106(1), 41–50 (2015)
CrossRef
33.
Alhoori, H., Kanan, T., Fox, E.A., Furuta, R., Giles, C.L., Pennsylvania, T.: On the relationship between open access and altmetrics. In: iConference 2015 Proceedings, pp. 1–8 (2015)
34.
Bornmann, L.: What do altmetrics counts mean? A plea for content analyses. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.
67(4), 1016–1017 (2016)
CrossRef
35.
Bornmann, L.: Alternative metrics in scientometrics: a meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics. Scientometrics
103(3), 1123–1144 (2015)
CrossRef