Skip to main content

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Scientometric Analysis and Scientific Trends on Land Trust

verfasst von : Mingfeng Li, Chuan Yang, Lei Zhang

Erschienen in: Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Modern land protection and biodiversity conservation depend greatly on the application of land trust. With the accelerated development of land trust organizations, the land trust has become the most effective land conservation method. To draw and analyze the current status of the research on the field of the land trust, we conduct the cluster analysis of co-citation and keywords co-occupation, and comb the evolution of international land trust research from 1990 to 2019. This article collected 1341 related documents included in the “Web of Science” database as the basic data for analysis, combined with bibliometrics method and visualization software to find out the landmark literature with high burst value, and study literature co-citation clusters in the network map. The results show that the main subject of collected literatures is related to ecology and environment. The hotspots of international land trust mainly cover four aspects: conserving private land by conservation easements, impact and response to climate change, collaborative governance, and community land trust (CLT). It is found that the land trust research has formed a clear co-citation cluster differentiation. By analyzing and sorting out the landmark literatures and hotspots in the field of the land trust, the purpose of this study is to provide researchers with more reference for research implementation.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Brewer, R. (2013).Conservancy: The land trust movement in America. Dartmouth College Press. Brewer, R. (2013).Conservancy: The land trust movement in America. Dartmouth College Press.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Merenlender, A. M., Huntsinger, L., Guthey, G. T., & Fairfax, S. K. (2004). Land trusts and conservation easements: who is conserving what for whom? Conservation Biology, 18(1), 65–76.CrossRef Merenlender, A. M., Huntsinger, L., Guthey, G. T., & Fairfax, S. K. (2004). Land trusts and conservation easements: who is conserving what for whom? Conservation Biology, 18(1), 65–76.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Fairfax, S. K., Gwin, L., King, M. A., Raymond, L., & Watt, L. (2005). Buying nature: The limits of land acquisition as a conservation strategy, 1780–2003. The MIT Press. Fairfax, S. K., Gwin, L., King, M. A., Raymond, L., & Watt, L. (2005). Buying nature: The limits of land acquisition as a conservation strategy, 1780–2003. The MIT Press.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kabii, T., & Horwitz, P. (2006). A review of landholder motivations and determinants for participation in conservation covenanting programmes. Environmental Conservation, 33(1), 11–20.CrossRef Kabii, T., & Horwitz, P. (2006). A review of landholder motivations and determinants for participation in conservation covenanting programmes. Environmental Conservation, 33(1), 11–20.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Rissman, A. R., Lozier, L., Comendant, T., Kareiva, P., Kiesecker, J. M., Shaw, M. R., & Merenlender, A. M. (2007). Conservation easements: Biodiversity protection and private use. Conservation Biology, 21(3), 709–718.CrossRef Rissman, A. R., Lozier, L., Comendant, T., Kareiva, P., Kiesecker, J. M., Shaw, M. R., & Merenlender, A. M. (2007). Conservation easements: Biodiversity protection and private use. Conservation Biology, 21(3), 709–718.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Yuan-Farrell, C., Marvier, M., Press, D., & Kareiva, P. (2005). Conservation easements as a conservation strategy: Is there a sense to the spatial distribution of easements? Natural Areas Journal, 25(3), 282–289. Yuan-Farrell, C., Marvier, M., Press, D., & Kareiva, P. (2005). Conservation easements as a conservation strategy: Is there a sense to the spatial distribution of easements? Natural Areas Journal, 25(3), 282–289.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Milder, J. C., & Clark, S. (2011). Conservation development practices, extent, and land-use effects in the United States. Conservation Biology, 25(4), 697–707.CrossRef Milder, J. C., & Clark, S. (2011). Conservation development practices, extent, and land-use effects in the United States. Conservation Biology, 25(4), 697–707.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Knight, A. T., Cowling, R. M., Difford, M., & Campbell, B. M. (2010). Mapping human and social dimensions of conservation opportunity for the scheduling of conservation action on private land. Conservation Biology, 24(5), 1348–1358.CrossRef Knight, A. T., Cowling, R. M., Difford, M., & Campbell, B. M. (2010). Mapping human and social dimensions of conservation opportunity for the scheduling of conservation action on private land. Conservation Biology, 24(5), 1348–1358.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hodge, I., & Adams, W. M. (2012). Neoliberalisation, rural land trusts and institutional blending. Geoforum, 43(3), 472–482.CrossRef Hodge, I., & Adams, W. M. (2012). Neoliberalisation, rural land trusts and institutional blending. Geoforum, 43(3), 472–482.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Rissman, A. R., & Sayre, N. F. (2012). Conservation outcomes and social relations: A comparative study of private ranchland conservation easements. Society and Natural Resources, 25(6), 523–538.CrossRef Rissman, A. R., & Sayre, N. F. (2012). Conservation outcomes and social relations: A comparative study of private ranchland conservation easements. Society and Natural Resources, 25(6), 523–538.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hotte, N., Kozak, R., & Wyatt, S. (2019). How institutions shape trust during collective action: A case study of forest governance on Haida Gwaii. Forest Policy and Economics, 107, 101921.CrossRef Hotte, N., Kozak, R., & Wyatt, S. (2019). How institutions shape trust during collective action: A case study of forest governance on Haida Gwaii. Forest Policy and Economics, 107, 101921.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Stern, M. J., & Coleman, K. J. (2015). The multidimensionality of trust: Applications in collaborative natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources, 28(2), 117–132.CrossRef Stern, M. J., & Coleman, K. J. (2015). The multidimensionality of trust: Applications in collaborative natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources, 28(2), 117–132.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Mase, A. S., Babin, N. L., Prokopy, L. S., & Genskow, K. D. (2015). Trust in sources of soil and water quality information: Implications for environmental outreach and education. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 51(6), 1656–1666.CrossRef Mase, A. S., Babin, N. L., Prokopy, L. S., & Genskow, K. D. (2015). Trust in sources of soil and water quality information: Implications for environmental outreach and education. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 51(6), 1656–1666.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lachapelle, P., & Mccool, S. F. (2012). The role of trust in community wildland fire protection planning. Society and Natural Resources, 25(4), 321–335.CrossRef Lachapelle, P., & Mccool, S. F. (2012). The role of trust in community wildland fire protection planning. Society and Natural Resources, 25(4), 321–335.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Baumgartgetz, A., Prokopy, L. S., & Floress, K. (2012). Why farmers adopt best management practice in the United States: A meta-analysis of the adoption literature. Journal of Environmental Management, 96(1), 17–25.CrossRef Baumgartgetz, A., Prokopy, L. S., & Floress, K. (2012). Why farmers adopt best management practice in the United States: A meta-analysis of the adoption literature. Journal of Environmental Management, 96(1), 17–25.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ranjan, P., Church, S. P., Floress, K., & Prokopy, L. S. (2019). Synthesizing conservation motivations and barriers: What have we learned from qualitative studies of farmers’ behaviors in the united states? Society & Natural Resources, 32(11), 1171–1199.CrossRef Ranjan, P., Church, S. P., Floress, K., & Prokopy, L. S. (2019). Synthesizing conservation motivations and barriers: What have we learned from qualitative studies of farmers’ behaviors in the united states? Society & Natural Resources, 32(11), 1171–1199.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Alixgarcia, J., Sims, K. R., Orozcoolvera, V. H., Costica, L. E., Medina, J. D., & Monroy, S. R. (2018). Payments for environmental services supported social capital while increasing land management. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(27), 7016–7021.CrossRef Alixgarcia, J., Sims, K. R., Orozcoolvera, V. H., Costica, L. E., Medina, J. D., & Monroy, S. R. (2018). Payments for environmental services supported social capital while increasing land management. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(27), 7016–7021.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Muradian, R., Arsel, M., Pellegrini, L., et al. (2013). Payments for ecosystem services and the fatal attraction of win-win solutions. Conservation Letters, 6(4), 274–279.CrossRef Muradian, R., Arsel, M., Pellegrini, L., et al. (2013). Payments for ecosystem services and the fatal attraction of win-win solutions. Conservation Letters, 6(4), 274–279.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamal, S., Grodzinskajurczak, M., & Brown, G. (2015). Conservation on private land: A review of global strategies with a proposed classification system. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(4), 576–597.CrossRef Kamal, S., Grodzinskajurczak, M., & Brown, G. (2015). Conservation on private land: A review of global strategies with a proposed classification system. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(4), 576–597.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Bennett, D. E., Pejchar, L., Romero, B., Knight, R. L., & Berger, J. (2018). Using practitioner knowledge to expand the toolbox for private lands conservation. Biological Conservation, 152–159. Bennett, D. E., Pejchar, L., Romero, B., Knight, R. L., & Berger, J. (2018). Using practitioner knowledge to expand the toolbox for private lands conservation. Biological Conservation, 152–159.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Gray, K. A., & Galande, M. (2011). Keeping “Community” in a Community Land Trust. Social Work Research, 35(4), 241–248.CrossRef Gray, K. A., & Galande, M. (2011). Keeping “Community” in a Community Land Trust. Social Work Research, 35(4), 241–248.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore, T., & Mckee, K. (2012). Empowering local communities? An international review of community land trusts. Housing Studies, 27(2), 280–290.CrossRef Moore, T., & Mckee, K. (2012). Empowering local communities? An international review of community land trusts. Housing Studies, 27(2), 280–290.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Scott, J. M., Davis, F. W., McGhie, R. G., Wright, R. G., Groves, C., & Estes, J. (2001). Nature reserves: Do they capture the full range of America’s biological diversity? Ecological applications, 11(4), 999–1007.CrossRef Scott, J. M., Davis, F. W., McGhie, R. G., Wright, R. G., Groves, C., & Estes, J. (2001). Nature reserves: Do they capture the full range of America’s biological diversity? Ecological applications, 11(4), 999–1007.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Klenosky, D. B., Perryhill, R., Mullendore, N., & Prokopy, L. S. (2015). Distinguishing ambivalence from indifference: A study of attitudes toward land trusts among members and nonmembers. Land Use Policy, 48(48), 250–260.CrossRef Klenosky, D. B., Perryhill, R., Mullendore, N., & Prokopy, L. S. (2015). Distinguishing ambivalence from indifference: A study of attitudes toward land trusts among members and nonmembers. Land Use Policy, 48(48), 250–260.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Epanchin-Niell, R., Kousky, C., Thompson, A., & Walls, M. (2017). Threatened protection: Sea level rise and coastal protected lands of the eastern United States. Ocean and Coastal Management, 137, 118–130.CrossRef Epanchin-Niell, R., Kousky, C., Thompson, A., & Walls, M. (2017). Threatened protection: Sea level rise and coastal protected lands of the eastern United States. Ocean and Coastal Management, 137, 118–130.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Torabi, N., Cooke, B., & Bekessy, S. A. (2016). The role of social networks and trusted peers in promoting biodiverse carbon plantings. Australian Geographer, 47(2), 139–156.CrossRef Torabi, N., Cooke, B., & Bekessy, S. A. (2016). The role of social networks and trusted peers in promoting biodiverse carbon plantings. Australian Geographer, 47(2), 139–156.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Scientometric Analysis and Scientific Trends on Land Trust
verfasst von
Mingfeng Li
Chuan Yang
Lei Zhang
Copyright-Jahr
2021
Verlag
Springer Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3587-8_62