nach oben

The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

Erschienen in:

01.06.2021 | Critical Review

Screw-assisted 3D printing with granulated materials: a systematic review

verfasst von: Joaquim Manoel Justino Netto, Henrique Takashi Idogava, Luiz Eduardo Frezzatto Santos, Zilda de Castro Silveira, Pedro Romio, Jorge Lino Alves

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology | Ausgabe 9-10/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This paper presents a systematic review on extrusion additive manufacturing (EAM), with focus on the technological development of screw-assisted systems that can be fed directly with granulated materials. Screw-assisted EAM has gained importance as an enabling technology to expand the range of 3D printing materials, reduce costs associated with feedstock fabrication, and increase the material deposition rate compared to traditional fused filament fabrication (FFF). Many experimental printheads and commercial systems that use some screw-processing mechanism can be found in the literature, but the design diversity and lack of standard terminology make it difficult to determine the most suitable solutions for a given material or application field. Besides, the few previous reviews have offered only a glimpse into the topic, without an in-depth analysis about the design of the extruders and associated capabilities. A systematic procedure was devised to identify the screw-assisted EAM systems that can print directly from granulated materials, resulting in 61 articles describing different pieces of equipment that were categorized as experimental printheads and commercial systems, for small- and large-scale applications. After describing their main characteristics, the most significant extruder modifications were discussed with reference to the materials processed and performance requirements. In the end, a general workflow for the development of 3D printers based on screw extrusion was proposed. This review intends to provide information about the state-of-the-art screw-assisted EAM and help the academy to identify further research opportunities in the field.

Vorheriger Artikel A review on deep learning in machining and tool monitoring: methods, opportunities, and challenges

Nächster Artikel Defining acoustic emission-based condition monitoring indicators for monitoring piston rod seal and bearing wear in hydraulic cylinders

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

ISO/ASTM (2017) ISO/ASTM 52900:2017-02 Additive manufacturing - general principles terminology

Crump SS (1992) Apparatus and method for creating three-dimensional objects

Leary M (2020) Design for additive manufacturing. Elsevier, Amsterdam

Nurhudan AI, Supriadi S, Whulanza Y, Saragih AS (2021) Additive manufacturing of metallic based on extrusion process: a review. J Manuf Process 66:228–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.04.018CrossRef

Gonzalez-Gutierrez J, Cano S, Schuschnigg S, Kukla C, Sapkota J, Holzer C (2018) Additive manufacturing of metallic and ceramic components by the material extrusion of highly-filled polymers: a review and future perspectives. Materials 11(5):840. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11050840CrossRef

Zhang P, Wang Z, Li J, Li X, Cheng L (2020) From materials to devices using fused deposition modeling: A state-of-art review. Nanotechnol Rev 9(1):1594–1609. https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2020-0101CrossRef

Rane K, Strano M (2019) A comprehensive review of extrusion-based additive manufacturing processes for rapid production of metallic and ceramic parts. Adv Manuf 7:155–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-019-00253-6CrossRef

Das A, Chatham CA, Fallon JJ, Zawaski CE, Gilmer EL, Williams CB, Bortner MJ (2020) Current understanding and challenges in high temperature additive manufacturing of engineering thermoplastic polymers. Addit Manuf 34:101218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101218CrossRef

Siddaway AP, Wood AM, Hedges LV (2018) How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annu Rev Psychol 70(1):747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803CrossRef

10.

Bellini A (2002) Fused deposition of ceramics: a comprehensive experimental, analytical and omputational study of material behavior, fabrication process and equipment design, PhD thesis. Drexel University, USA

11.

Wang F, Shor L, Darling A, Khalil S, Sun W, Guçeri S, Lau A (2004) Precision extruding deposition and characterization of cellular poly-ε-caprolactone tissue scaffolds. Rapid Prototyp J 10(1):42–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540410512525CrossRef

12.

Bellini A, Shor L, Guçeri SI (2005) New developments in fused deposition modeling of ceramics. Rapid Prototyp J 11(4):214–220. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540510612901CrossRef

13.

Reddy BV, Reddy NV, Ghosh A (2007) Fused deposition modelling using direct extrusion. Virtual Phys Prototyp 2(1):51–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452750701336486CrossRef

14.

Lam CXF, Olkowski R, Swieszkowski W, Tan KC, Gibson I, Hutmacher DW (2008) Mechanical and in vitro evaluations of composite PLDLLA/TCP scaffolds for bone engineering. Virtual Phys Prototyp 3(4):193–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452750802551298CrossRef

15.

Silveira ZC, de Freitas MS, Inforçatti Neto P, Noritomi PY, Silva JVL (2014) Design development and functional validation of an interchangeable head based on mini screw extrusion applied in an experimental desktop 3-D printer. Int J Rapid Manuf 4(1):49–65. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRAPIDM.2014.062037CrossRef

16.

Dávila JL, Freitas MS, Inforçatti Neto P, Silveira ZC, Silva JVL, D’Ávila MA (2016) Fabrication of PCL/β-TCP scaffolds by 3D mini-screw extrusion printing. J Appl Polym Sci 133(15):43031. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.43031CrossRef

17.

Annoni M, Giberti H, Strano M (2016) Feasibility study of an extrusion-based direct metal additive manufacturing technique. Procedia Manuf 5:916–927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2016.08.079CrossRef

18.

Canessa E, Baruzzo M, Fonda C (2017) Study of Moineau-based pumps for the volumetric extrusion of pellets. Addit Manuf 17:143–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.08.015CrossRef

19.

Liu F, Hinduja S, Bartolo P (2017) Design, fabrication and initial evaluation of a novel hybrid system for tissue engineering applications. Proc CIRP 65:213–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.04.030CrossRef

20.

Liu F, Wang W, Mirihanage W, Hinduja S, Bartolo PJ (2018) A plasma-assisted bioextrusion system for tissue engineering. CIRP Ann 67(1):229–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.077CrossRef

21.

Liu F, Vyas C, Poologasundarampillai G, Pape I, Hinduja S, Mirihanage W, Bartolo PJ (2018) Process-driven microstructure control in melt-extrusion-based 3D printing for tailorable mechanical properties in a polycaprolactone filament. Macromol Mater Eng 303(8):1800173. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201800173CrossRef

22.

Liu F, Vyas C, Poologasundarampillai G, Pape I, Hinduja S, Mirihanage W, Bartolo PJ (2018) Structural evolution of PCL during melt extrusion 3D printing. Macromol Mater Eng 303(2):1700494. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201700494CrossRef

23.

Liu F, Hinduja S, Bartolo PJ (2018) User interface tool for a novel plasma-assisted bio-additive extrusion system. Rapid Prototyp J 24(2):368–378. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-07-2016-0115CrossRef

24.

Jackson RJ, Wojcik A, Miodownik M (2018) 3D printing of asphalt and its effect on mechanical properties. Mater Des 160:468–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.09.030CrossRef

25.

Kumar N, Jain PK, Tandon P, Pandey PM (2018) The effect of process parameters on tensile behavior of 3D printed flexible parts of ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA). J Manuf Process 35:317–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.08.013CrossRef

26.

Kumar N, Jain PK, Tandon P, Pandey PM (2018) Investigation on the effects of process parameters in CNC assisted pellet based fused layer modeling process. J Manuf Process 35:428–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.08.029CrossRef

27.

Kumar N, Jain PK, Tandon P, Pandey PM (2018) Extrusion-based additive manufacturing process for producing flexible parts. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 40(3):143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1068-xCrossRef

28.

Kumar N, Jain PK, Tandon P, Pandey PM (2018) Experimental investigations on suitability of polypropylene (PP) and ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) in additive manufacturing. Mater Today Proc 5(2):4118–4127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.672CrossRef

29.

Kumar N, Jain PK, Tandon P, Pandey PM (2018) 3D printing of flexible parts using eva material. Mater Phys Mech 37(2):124–132 https://doi.org/10.18720/MPM.3722018_3

30.

Kumar N, Jain PK, Tandon P, Pandey PM (2019) Investigations on the melt flow behaviour of aluminium filled ABS polymer composite for the extrusion-based additive manufacturing process. Int J Mater Prod Technol 59(3):194–211. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMPT.2019.102931CrossRef

31.

Kumar N, Jain PK (2019) Analysing the influence of raster angle, layer thickness and infill rate on the compressive behaviour of EVA through CNC-assisted fused layer modelling process. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C: J Mech Eng Sci. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0954406219889076

32.

Singamneni S, Smith D, Le Guen MJ, Truong D (2018) Extrusion 3D printing of polybutyrate-adipate-terephthalate-polymer composites in the pellet form. Polymers 10(8):922. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10080922CrossRef

33.

Singamneni S, Warnakula A, Smith DA, Le Guen MJ (2019) Biopolymer alternatives in pellet form for 3D printing by extrusion. 3D. Print Addit Manuf 6(4):217–226. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2018.0152CrossRef

34.

Tseng JW, Liu CY, Yen YK, Belkner J, Bremicker T, Liu BH, Sun TJ, Wang AB (2018) Screw extrusion-based additive manufacturing of PEEK. Mater Des 140:209–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.032CrossRef

35.

Whyman S, Arif KM, Potgieter J (2018) Design and development of an extrusion system for 3D printing biopolymer pellets. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96:3417–3428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1843-yCrossRef

36.

Harris M, Potgieter J, Ray S, Archer R, Arif KM (2019) Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene and polypropylene blend with enhanced thermal and mechanical properties for fused filament fabrication. Materials 12(24):4167. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12244167CrossRef

37.

Zhou Z, Salaoru I, Morris P, Gibbons GJ (2018) Additive manufacturing of heat-sensitive polymer melt using a pellet-fed material extrusion. Addit Manuf 24:552–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.040CrossRef

38.

Boyle BM, Xiong PT, Mensch TE, Werder TJ, Miyake GM (2019) 3D printing using powder melt extrusion. Addit Manuf 29:100811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.100811CrossRef

39.

Leng J, Wu J, Chen N, Xu X, Zhang J (2019) The development of a conical screw-based extrusion deposition system and its application in fused deposition modeling with thermoplastic polyurethane. Rapid Prototyp J 26(2):409–417. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-05-2019-0139CrossRef

40.

Khondoker MAH, Sameoto D (2019) Direct coupling of fixed screw extruders using flexible heated hoses for FDM printing of extremely soft thermoplastic elastomers. Prog Addit Manuf 4(3):197–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-019-00088-4CrossRef

41.

Alexandre A, Cruz Sanchez FA, Boudaoud H, Camargo M, Pearce JM (2020) Mechanical properties of direct waste printing of polylactic acid with universal pellets extruder: comparison to fused filament fabrication on open-source desktop three-dimensional printers. 3D. Print Addit Manuf 7(5):237–247. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2019.0195CrossRef

42.

Kim H, Lee S (2020) Printability and physical properties of iron slag powder composites using material extrusion-based 3D printing. J Iron Steel Res Int 28:111–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42243-020-00475-0CrossRef

43.

Liu T, Tian X, Zhang Y, Cao Y, Li D (2020) High-pressure interfacial impregnation by micro-screw in-situ extrusion for 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced nylon composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 130:105770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105770CrossRef

44.

Wang C, Zhang L, Fang Y, Sun W (2020) Design, characterization, and 3D printing of cardiovascular stents with zero Poisson’s ratio in longitudinal deformation. Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2020.02.013

45.

Wang W, Caetano GF, Chiang WH, Braz AL, Blaker JJ, Frade MAC, Bartolo PJ (2016) Morphological, mechanical and biological assessment of PCL/pristine graphene scaffolds for bone regeneration. Int J Bioprint 2(2):95–104. https://doi.org/10.18063/IJB.2016.02.009CrossRef

46.

Wang W, Caetano G, Ambler WS, Blaker JJ, Frade MA, Mandal P, Diver C, Bartolo P (2016) Enhancing the hydrophilicity and cell attachment of 3D printed PCL/graphene scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Materials 9(12):1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/2Fma9120992CrossRef

47.

Huang B, Caetano G, Vyas C, Blaker JJ, Diver C, Bartolo P (2018) Polymer-ceramic composite scaffolds: the effect of hydroxyapatite and β-tri-calcium phosphate. Materials 11(1):129. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11010129CrossRef

48.

Huang B, Vyas C, Byun JJ, El-Newehy M, Huang Z, Bartolo P (2020) Aligned multi-walled carbon nanotubes with nanohydroxyapatite in a 3D printed polycaprolactone scaffold stimulates osteogenic differentiation. Mater Sci Eng C 108:110374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.110374CrossRef

49.

Wibowo A, Vyas C, Cooper G, Qulub F, Suratman R (2020) 3D Printing of polycaprolactone–polyaniline electroactive scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Materials 13(3):512. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13030512CrossRef

50.

Aniwaa (2021) RegenHU 3DDiscovery review. https://www.aniwaa.com/product/3d-printers/regenhu-3ddiscovery/. Accessed 26 May 2021

51.

Geoffroy L, Samyn F, Jimenez M, Bourbigot S (2019) Additive manufacturing of fire-retardant ethylene-vinyl acetate. Polym Adv Technol 30(7):1878–1890. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.4620CrossRef

52.

Aniwaa (2021) Pollen AM Pam review. https://www.aniwaa.com/product/3d-printers/pollen-pam/. Accessed 26 May 2021

53.

Goyanes A, Allahham N, Trenfield SJ, Stoyanov E, Gaisford S, Basit AW (2019) Direct powder extrusion 3D printing: fabrication of drug products using a novel single-step process. Int J Pharm 567:118471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.118471CrossRef

54.

Lengauer W, Duretek I, Furst M, Schwarz V, Gonzalez-Gutierrez J, Schuschnigg S, Kukla C, Kitzmantel M, Neubauer E, Lieberwirth C, Morrison V (2019) Fabrication and properties of extrusion-based 3D-printed hardmetal and cermet components. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 82:141–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2019.04.011CrossRef

55.

Aniwaa (2021) AIM3D Exam255 review. https://www.aniwaa.com/product/3d-printers/aim3d-exam-255/. Accessed 26 May 2021

56.

Hertle S, Drexler M, Drummer D (2016) Additive manufacturing of poly(propylene) by means of melt extrusion. Macromol Mater Eng 301(12):1482–1493. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201600259CrossRef

57.

Hertle S, Kleffel T, Wörz A, Drummer D (2020) Production of polymer-metal hybrids using extrusion-based additive manufacturing and electrochemically treated aluminum. Addit Manuf 33:101135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101135CrossRef

58.

Brooks BJ, Arif KM, Dirven S, Potgieter J (2017) Robot-assisted 3D printing of biopolymer thin shells. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89:957–968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9134-yCrossRef

59.

Liu X, Chi B, Jiao Z, Tan J, Liu F, Yang W (2017) A large-scale double-stage-screw 3D printer for fused deposition of plastic pellets. J Appl Polym Sci 134(31):45147. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.45147CrossRef

60.

Magnoni P, Rebaioli L, Fassi I, Pedrocchi N, Tosatti LM (2017) Robotic AM System for Plastic Materials: Tuning and On-line Adjustment of Process Parameters. Procedia Manuf 11:346–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.117CrossRef

61.

Rebaioli L, Magnoni P, Fassi I, Pedrocchi N, Tosatti LM (2019) Process parameters tuning and online re-slicing for robotized additive manufacturing of big plastic objects. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 55(A):55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2018.07.012CrossRef

62.

Schmidt L, Schricker K, Bergmann JP, Hussenöder F, Eiber M (2018) Characterization of a granulate-based strand deposition process in the FLM-method for definition of material-dependent process strategies. Rapid Prototyp J 25(1):104–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-09-2017-0186CrossRef

63.

Duty CE, Kunc V, Compton B, Post B, Erdman D, Smith R, Lind R, Lloyd P, Love L (2017) Structure and mechanical behavior of Big Area Additive Manufacturing (BAAM) materials. Rapid Prototyp J 23(1):181–189. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-12-2015-0183CrossRef

64.

Compton B, Post B, Duty CE, Love L, Kunc V (2017) Thermal analysis of additive manufacturing of large-scale thermoplastic polymer composites. Addit Manuf 17:77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.07.006CrossRef

65.

Ajinjeru C, Kishore V, Chen X, Hershey C, Lindahl L, Kunc V, Hassen AA, Duty CE (2019) Rheological survey of carbon fiber-reinforced high-temperature thermoplastics for big area additive manufacturing tooling applications. J Thermoplast Compos Mater. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0892705719873941

66.

Roschli A, Gaul KT, Boulger AM, Post BK, Chesser PC, Love LJ, Blue F, Borish M (2019) Designing for Big Area Additive Manufacturing. Addit Manuf 25:275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.11.006CrossRef

67.

Billah KMM, Lorenzana FAR, Martinez NL, Wicker RB, Espalin D (2020) Thermomechanical characterization of short carbon fiber and short glass fiber-reinforced ABS used in large format additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 35:101299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101299CrossRef

68.

Meraz Trejo E, Jimenez X, Billah KMM, Seppala J, Wicker R, Espalin D (2020) Compressive deformation analysis of large area pellet-fed material extrusion 3D printed parts in relation to in situ thermal imaging. Addit Manuf 33:101099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101099CrossRef

69.

Yeole P, Hassen AA, Kim S, Lindahl J, Kunc V, Franc A, Vaidya U (2020) Mechanical characterization of high-temperature carbon fiber-polyphenylene sulfide composites for large area extrusion deposition additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 34:101255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101255CrossRef

70.

Woern AL, Byard DJ, Oakley RB, Fiedler MJ, Snabes SL, Pearce JM (2018) Fused particle fabrication 3-D printing: recycled materials’ optimization and mechanical properties. Materials 11(8):1413. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11081413CrossRef

71.

Reich MJ, Woern AL, Tanikella NG, Pearce JM (2019) Mechanical properties and applications of recycled polycarbonate particle material extrusion-based additive manufacturing. Materials 12(10):1642. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12101642CrossRef

72.

Dertinger SC, Gallup N, Tanikella NG, Grasso M, Vahid S, Foot PJS, Pearce JM (2020) Technical pathways for distributed recycling of polymer composites for distributed manufacturing: windshield wiper blades. Resour Conserv Recycl 157:104810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104810CrossRef

73.

Little HA, Tanikella NG, Reich MJ, Fiedler MJ, Snabes SL, Pearce JM (2020) Towards distributed recycling with additive manufacturing of PET flake feedstocks. Materials 13(19):4273. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13194273CrossRef

74.

Aniwaa (2021) re3D Gigabot X review. https://www.aniwaa.com/product/3d-printers/re3d-gigabot-x/. Accessed 26 May 2021

75.

Moreno Nieto D, López VC, Molina SI (2018) Large-format polymeric pellet-based additive manufacturing for the naval industry. Addit Manuf 23:79–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.07.012CrossRef

76.

Aniwaa (2021) CNC Barcenas Super Discovery review. https://www.aniwaa.com/product/3d-printers/cnc-barcenas-super-discovery/. Accessed 26 May 2021

77.

Ferrari A, Frank D, Hennen L, Moniz A, Torgersen H, Torgersen J, Van Bodegom L, Duijne F, Geesink I, Boucher P, Van der Meulen B, Mordini E, Riisgaard K, Nielsen RØ, Baumann M, Coenen C (2018) Additive bio-manufacturing: 3D printing for medical recovery and human enhancement. STOA European Parliament PE614.571. https://doi.org/10.2861/923327

78.

Malone E, Lipson H (2007) Fab@Home: the personal desktop fabricator kit. Rapid Prototyp J 13(4):245–255. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540710776197CrossRef

79.

Fabrx (2021) FabRx’s pharmaceutical 3D printer for personalised medicines, M3DIMAKER™, is now available! https://www.fabrx.co.uk/2020/04/06/fabrxs-pharmaceutical-3d-printer-for-personalised-medicines-m3dimaker-is-now-available/. Accessed 26 May 2021

80.

E-ci (2021) BAAM – Big Area Additive Manufacturing. https://www.e-ci.com/baam. Accessed 26 May 2021

Titel: Screw-assisted 3D printing with granulated materials: a systematic review
verfasst von: Joaquim Manoel Justino Netto
Henrique Takashi Idogava
Luiz Eduardo Frezzatto Santos
Zilda de Castro Silveira
Pedro Romio
Jorge Lino Alves
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2021
Verlag: Springer London
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology / Ausgabe 9-10/2021
Print ISSN: 0268-3768
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07365-z

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9-10/2021

Machine tool analyzer: a device for identifying 13 position-independent geometric errors for five-axis machine tools

A comprehensive review on the application of nanofluids in the machining process

Retraction Note: Research on tool change time and the dynamic reliability of the machining process based on sensitivity analysis

Prediction of electrode loss in micro-EDM drilling based on discharge time

Retraction Note: 3D printing of surface characterization and finite element analysis improvement of PEEK-HAP-GO in bone implant

Effect of micro textures on the cutting performance of circular saw blade

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten