Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions
Erschienen in: Innovative Infrastructure Solutions 1/2019

01.12.2019 | Technical Paper

Seismic assessment of the historical third tower in San Marino based on a 3D laser scanner survey (3D-LSS)

verfasst von: Davide Forcellini, Fabrizio Giardi, Marco Tanganelli

Erschienen in: Innovative Infrastructure Solutions | Ausgabe 1/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Italian recent earthquakes demonstrated that historic and monumental buildings are extremely vulnerable to seismic motions. In particular, masonry towers are particularly affected by horizontal loads because of their typological features (slenderness and base shear area). In this regard, San Marino historical center was object of an extended case study to assess the seismic assessment of the monuments. This paper presents a seismic assessment of the historic third tower in San Marino based on several subsequent steps: a preliminary 3D laser scanner survey, a modal frequency identification and a final pushover analysis. The evaluation of the vulnerability of the tower is fundamental for decision makers in order to provide guidelines and establish priority of intervention among historic monuments. In particular, Level 1 and Level 3 were chosen as the approaches under which the structural parameters were calibrated. Following EC8, N2 method was applied in order to assess the vulnerability of the tower.
Vorheriger Artikel Studying the behavior of neural models under hybrid and reinforced foundations
Nächster Artikel Development of full-scale laboratory accelerated pavement testing facility: a step toward performance assessment of geosynthetics reinforced pavement

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Abruzzese D, Miccoli L, Yuan J (2009) Mechanical behavior of leaning masonry Huzhu Pagoda. J Cult Herit 10:480–486CrossRef
2.
Acito M, Bocciarelli M, Chesi C, Milani G (2014) Collapse of the clock tower in Finale Emilia after the May 2012 Emilia Romagna earthquake sequence: numerical insight. Eng Struct 72:70–91CrossRef
3.
Armesto J, Roca-Pardinas J, Lorenzo H, Arias P (2010) Modelling masonry arches shape using terrestrial laser scanning data and nonparametric methods. Eng Struct 32:607–615CrossRef
4.
Barazzetti L, Banfi F, Brumana R, Gusmeroli G, Oreni D, Previtali M, Roncoroni F, Schiantarelli G (2015) BIM from laser clouds and finite element analysis: combining structural analysis and geometric complexity. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci XL-5/W4:345–350CrossRef
5.
6.
Bartoli G, Betti M, Vignoli A (2016) A numerical study on seismic risk assessment of historic masonry towers: a case study in San Gimignano. Bull Earthq Eng 14:1475–1518CrossRef
7.
Bartoli G, Betti M, Galano L, Zini G (2019) Numerical insights on the seismic risk of confined masonry towers. Eng Struct 180:713–727CrossRef
8.
Bernardeschi K, Padovani C, Pasquinelli G (2004) Numerical modelling of the structural behaviour of Buti’s bell tower. J Cult Herit 5:371–378CrossRef
9.
Bayraktar A, Sahin A, Özcan M, Yildirim F (2010) Numerical damage assessment of Haghia Sophia bell tower by nonlinear FE modeling. Appl Math Model 34:92–121CrossRef
10.
Betti M, Galano L, Vignoli A (2016) Finite element modelling for seismic assessment of historic masonry buildings. In: D’amico S (ed) Earthquakes and their impact on society. Springer, Berlin, pp 377–415CrossRef
11.
Boehler W, Heinz G, Marbs A (2002) The potential of non-contact close range laser scanners for cultural heritage recording. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 34:430–436
12.
Carpinteri A, Invernizzi S, Lacidogna G (2005) In situ damage assessment and nonlinear modelling of a historical masonry tower. Eng Struct 27(3):387–395CrossRef
13.
Casolo S, Milani G, Uva G, Alessandri C (2013) Comparative seismic vulnerability analysis on ten masonry towers in the costal Po Valley in Italy. Eng Struct 49:465–490CrossRef
14.
Castellazzi G, D’Altri AM, De Miranda S, Chiozzi A, Tralli A (2015) Numerical insights on the seismic behavior of a nonisolated historical masonry tower. Bull Earthq Eng 16(2):933–961CrossRef
15.
Castellazzi G, D’Altri AM, Bitelli G, Selvaggi I, Lambertini A (2015) From laser scanning to finite element analysis of complex buildings by using a semi-automatic procedure. Sensors 15:18360–18380CrossRef
16.
Curti E, Lagomarsino S, Podestà S (2006) Dynamic models for the seismic analysis of ancient bell towers. In: Lourenço PB, Roca P, Modena C, Agrawal S (eds) Structural analysis of historical constructions SAHC-2006. MacMillan, New Delhi
17.
D’Ayala DF, Paganoni S (2011) Assessment and analysis of damage in L’aquila historic city center after 6th April 2009. Bull Earthq Eng 9(1):81–104CrossRef
18.
DPCM (2011) DIRETTIVA DEL PRESIDENTE DEL CONSIGLIO DEI MINISTRI 9 febbraio 2011. Valutazione e riduzione del rischio sismico del patrimonio culturale con riferimento alle Norme tecniche per le costruzioni di cui al decreto del Ministero delle infrastrutture e dei trasporti del 14 gennaio 2008. (11A02374) (GU Serie Generale n.47 del 26-02-2011 - Suppl)
19.
Drucker D, Prager W (1952) Soil mechanics and plastic analysis or limit design. Q Appl Math 10(2):157–165CrossRef
20.
Fragorara G, Boscato G, Ceravolo R, Russo S, Ientile S, Pecorelli ML, Quattrone A (2017) Dynamic investigation on the Mirandola bell tower in post-earthquake scenarios. Bull Earthq Eng 15(1):313–337CrossRef
21.
22.
Gentile C, Saisi A (2007) Ambient vibration testing of historic masonry towers for structural identification and damage assessment. Constr Build Mater 21(2007):1311–1321CrossRef
23.
Gregori A, Salem H, Harak T, Fassieh K, Khalil A (2017) Collapse analysis of Santo Stefano tower using applied element method. In: Proceedings of 16th world conference on earthquake engineering, 16WCEE 2017, Santiago Chile, January 9–13th 2017, Paper No 2394
24.
Guarnieri A, Milan N, Vettore A (2013) Monitoring of complex structure for structural control using terrestrial laser scanning (Tls) and photogrammetry. Int J Archit Herit 7:54–67CrossRef
25.
Guerra G, Forcellini D, Xhixha E, Peruzzi G, Albarello A, Lo E, Mayer D, Trinh S, Zheng E, Kuester F (2017) 3D numerical simulations of the San Marino third tower (Montale) based on 3D mapping. In: Proceeding of computational method in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering conference (COMPDYN), Rodes Island, 15–17 June 2017
26.
Hinks T, Carr H, Truong-Hong L, Laefer D (2013) Point cloud data conversion into solid models via point-based voxelization. J Surv Eng 139:72–83CrossRef
27.
Korumaz M, Betti M, Conti A, Tucci G, Bratoli G, Bonora V, Korumaz AG, Fiornini L (2017) An integrated terrestrial laser scanner (TLS), deviation analysis (DA) and finite element (FE) approach for health assessment of historical structures. A minaret case study. Eng Struct 153:224–238CrossRef
28.
Lourenço PB (2005) Assessment, diagnosis and strengthening of Outeiro Church, Portugal. Constr Build Mater 19:634–645CrossRef
29.
Lubowiecka I, Armesto J, Arias P, Lorenzo H (2009) Historic bridge modelling using laser scanning, ground penetrating radar and finite element methods in the context of structural dynamics. Eng Struct 31:2667–2676CrossRef
30.
Lunedei E, Peruzzi G, Albarello D (2015) Ambient vibrations in seismic studying the UNESCO cultural heritage site of San Gimignano (Italy). In: Proceedings of the international conference georisks in the mediterrean and their mitigation, Valletta, Malta, 20–21 July 2015, 243–247, ISBN: 978-88-98161-20-1
31.
32.
Meyer D, Guerra G, Lo E, Hess M, Forcellini D, Kuester F (2017) Comparing measured frequency responses of the third tower of San Marino to simulation derived frequency response from a photogrammetry and LIDAR acquired 3D model. In: Computer applications and quantitative methods in archaelogy conference (CCA). Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 14–17 March 2017
33.
Milani G (2010) 3D FE limit analysis model for multi-layer masonry structures reinforced with FRP strips. Int J Mech Sci 52:784–803CrossRef
34.
Milani G, Casolo S, Naliato A, Tralli A (2012) Seismic assessment of a medieval masonry tower in Northern Italy by limit, nonlinear static, and full dynamic analyses. Int J Archit Herit 6(5):489–524CrossRef
35.
Milani G, Russo S, Pizzolato M, Tralli A (2012) Seismic behavior of the San Pietro di Coppito church bell tower in L’Aquila, Italy. Open Civ Eng J 6(Sp. Issue):131–147CrossRef
36.
Milani G, Shehu R, Valente M (2017) Role of inclination in the seismic vulnerability of bell towers: FE models and simplified approaches. Bull Earthq Eng 15(4):1707–1737CrossRef
37.
Modena C, Valluzzi MR, Tongini FR, Binda L (2002) Design choices and intervention techniques for repairing and strengthening of the Monza cathedral bell-tower. Constr Build Mater 16:385–395CrossRef
38.
NTC 2008 (2008) Nuove Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni, G.U. n. 29, 4 Febbraio 2008, S.O. n. 30. D.M. del Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti 14 Gennaio 2008
39.
Núñez MA, Pozuelo FB (2009) Evolution of the architectural and heritage representation. Landsc Urban Plan 91:105–112CrossRef
40.
Oreni D, Brumana R, Della Torre S, Banfi F, Barazzetti L, Previtali M (2014) Survey turned into HBIM: the restoration and the work involved concerning the Basilica di Collemaggio after the earthquake (L’Aquila). ISPRS Ann Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci 2(5):267–273CrossRef
41.
Pieraccini M, Dei D, Betti M, Bartoli G, Tucci G, Guardini N (2014) Dynamic identification of historic masonry towers through an expeditious and no-contact approach: application to the “Torre del Mangia” in Siena (Italy). J Cult Herit 15:1–8CrossRef
42.
Peña F, Lourenço PB, Mendes N, Oliveira DV (2010) Numerical models for the seismic assessment of an old masonry tower. Eng Struct 32(5):1466–1478CrossRef
43.
Peruzzi G, Forcellini D, Venturini K, Albarello D (2016) Seismic characterization of historical buildings in San Marino Republic from ambient vibration monitoring. Int J N Technol Res 2(7):95–102 (ISSN: 2454-4116)
44.
Peruzzi G, Forcellini D, Venturini K, Albarello D (2017) Ambient vibrations applied to San Marino historical building survey. In: Proceedings of the XIV world conference on earthquake engineering, Santiago, Chile. 9–13 January 2017, Paper No 985
45.
Rainieri C, Fabbrocino G (2011) Il periodo elastico delle torri in muratura: correlazioni empiriche per la previsione. In: XIV Congresso Nazionale L’Ingegneria Sismica in Italia, Bari, 18–22 Sept 2011
46.
Riva P, Perotti F, Guidoboni E, Boschi E (1998) Seismic analysis of the Asinelli Tower and earthquakes in Bologna. Soil Dynam Earthq Eng 17:525–550CrossRef
47.
Sarhosis V, Fabbrocino F, Formisano A, Milani G (2017) Seismic vulnerability of different in geometry historic masonry towers. In: 6th International conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering (COMPDYN 2017), Rhodes Island
48.
STRAUS7 (2004) Theoretical manual-theoretical background to the Strand7 finite element analysis system
49.
50.
Valente M, Milani G (2016) Seismic assessment of historical masonry towers by means of simplified approaches and standard FEM. Constr Build Mater 108:74–104CrossRef
51.
Valente M, Milani G (2016) Non-linear dynamic and static analyses on eight historical masonry towers in the North–East of Italy. Eng Struct 114:241–270CrossRef
52.
53.
Zucchini A, Lourenço PB (2002) A micro-mechanical model for the homogenization of masonry. Int J Solids Struct 39:3233–3255CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Seismic assessment of the historical third tower in San Marino based on a 3D laser scanner survey (3D-LSS)
verfasst von
Davide Forcellini
Fabrizio Giardi
Marco Tanganelli
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions / Ausgabe 1/2019
Print ISSN: 2364-4176
Elektronische ISSN: 2364-4184
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-019-0207-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

Innovative Infrastructure Solutions 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Practice-oriented Paper

Ductility considerations in seismic design of reinforced concrete frame buildings according to the Eurocode 8

Technical Note

Comparative performance of different geosynthetics on sandy soil overlying clay subgrades of varying strengths

Technical Note

Evaluation of landslide hazards at Herth, Chitral, Pakistan

Short Communication

Response of micropiles in different seismic conditions

Technical Paper

Reliability assessment of reinforced concrete (RC) bridges due to service loading

Technical Paper

Crack treatment performance on pavement marking, joint and shoulder lanes in Texas