Skip to main content
main-content

Tipp

Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen

Erschienen in: Political Behavior 1/2020

08.09.2018 | Original Paper

Self-Awareness of Political Knowledge

verfasst von: Matthew H. Graham

Erschienen in: Political Behavior | Ausgabe 1/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
share
TEILEN

Abstract

Despite widespread concern over false beliefs about politically-relevant facts, little is known about how strongly Americans believe their answers to poll questions. I propose a conceptual framework for characterizing survey responses about facts: self-awareness, or how well people can assess their own knowledge. I measure self-awareness of political knowledge by eliciting respondent certainty about answers to 24 factual questions about politics. Even on “unfavorable” facts that are inconvenient to the respondent’s political party, more-certain respondents are more likely to answer correctly. Because people are somewhat aware of their ignorance, respondents usually describe their incorrect responses as low-certainty guesses, not high-certainty beliefs. Where misperceptions exist, they tend to be bipartisan: Democrats and Republicans perform poorly on the same questions and explain their answers using similar points of reference.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
Graham (2018) develops this argument in detail.
 
2
The Cambridge English Dictionary defines a belief as “the feeling of being certain that something exists or is true.” Merriam-Webster’s defines a belief as “a state or habit of mind in which trust or confidence is placed in some person or thing.”
 
3
On the efficacy of anti-cheating pledges, see Clifford and Jerit (2016).
 
4
This is true because calibration captures both the slope and the intercept shift away from the perfect use of the scale. Online Appendix B contrives a degenerate case with high calibration and negative slope.
 
5
Online Appendix A presents question-level equivalents of this figure. For simplicity, the figure pools across the partisan cues treatments.
 
6
This difference is statistically significant at the 0.05 level pooling across party cue conditions (\(\beta =0.031\), 95% bootstrapped CI = (0.001, 0.061)) but not separately (without cues: \(\beta = 0.031\)\((-\,0.003, -\,0.069)\), with cues: \(\beta = 0.030\)\((-\,0.022, 0.079)\)). Computing the same estimates with robust standard errors yields nearly identical confidence intervals and the same pattern of statistical significance.
 
7
Note that because these statistics are computed at the question level, within- and between-person slope both reduce to overall slope, and the high/low statistic is undefined because each respondent names only one certainty level.
 
8
On the two stock market questions, 8.4% of respondents used “television”, “watch”, or a variant of “T.V.”, compared with 3.7% of respondents on other questions. In a bivariate OLS regression, this difference of 4.7 percentage points had a robust standard error of 1.2 percentage points.
 
9
About 8.5% of party cues respondents used the word “Obama,” “Trump,” or a male pronoun, compared with 4.7% of respondents who did not see party cues. In a bivariate OLS regression, the 3.8 percentage point difference had a robust standard error of 0.7 percentage points.
 
10
To test this, I ran the following OLS regression using the subset of data in which Democrats and Republicans answered partisan questions: \(\text {correct}_{ik} \sim \beta _0 + \beta _1 \text {stereotype}_{ik} + \beta _2 \text {favorable}_{ik} + \beta _3 \text {stereotype}_{ik} * \text {favorable}_{ik}\). All variables are indicators. The estimated relationship is almost exactly zero for the unfavorable party (\(\beta _1=0.001\), cluster-robust se \(=0.028\)) and a slightly negative but statistically insignificant relationship for the favorable party (\(\beta _3=-\,0.032\), cluster-robust se \(=0.040\)). Because \(\beta _1\) is near-zero, \(\beta _3\) is a close proxy for the favorable party’s main effect.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Ahler, D. J., & Sood, G. (2018). The parties in our heads: Misperceptions about party composition and their consequences. The Journal of Politics, 80(3), 694–981. CrossRef Ahler, D. J., & Sood, G. (2018). The parties in our heads: Misperceptions about party composition and their consequences. The Journal of Politics, 80(3), 694–981. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Alvarez, R. M., & Franklin, C. H. (1994). Uncertainty and political perceptions. The Journal of Politics, 56(3), 671. CrossRef Alvarez, R. M., & Franklin, C. H. (1994). Uncertainty and political perceptions. The Journal of Politics, 56(3), 671. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bartels, L. M. (2002). Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions. Political Behavior, 24(2), 117–150. CrossRef Bartels, L. M. (2002). Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions. Political Behavior, 24(2), 117–150. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Berelson, B., Lazarsfeld, P., & McPhee, W. (1954). Voting. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Berelson, B., Lazarsfeld, P., & McPhee, W. (1954). Voting. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Berinsky, A. J. (2015). Rumors and health care reform: Experiments in political misinformation. British Journal of Political Science, 47(2), 241–262. CrossRef Berinsky, A. J. (2015). Rumors and health care reform: Experiments in political misinformation. British Journal of Political Science, 47(2), 241–262. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Berinsky, A. J. (2018). Telling the truth about believing the lies? Evidence for the limited prevalence of expressive survey responding. The Journal of Politics, 80(1), 211–224. CrossRef Berinsky, A. J. (2018). Telling the truth about believing the lies? Evidence for the limited prevalence of expressive survey responding. The Journal of Politics, 80(1), 211–224. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bullock, J. G., Gerber, A. S., Hill, S. J., & Huber, G. A. (2015). Partisan bias in factual beliefs about politics. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 10, 1–60. CrossRef Bullock, J. G., Gerber, A. S., Hill, S. J., & Huber, G. A. (2015). Partisan bias in factual beliefs about politics. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 10, 1–60. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American Voter. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American Voter. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Caplan, B. (2001). Rational ignorance versus rational irrationality. Kyklos, 54(1), 3–26. CrossRef Caplan, B. (2001). Rational ignorance versus rational irrationality. Kyklos, 54(1), 3–26. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Clifford, S., & Jerit, J. (2016). Cheating on political knowledge questions in online surveys: An assessment of the problem and solutions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(4), 858–887. CrossRef Clifford, S., & Jerit, J. (2016). Cheating on political knowledge questions in online surveys: An assessment of the problem and solutions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(4), 858–887. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent. New York: Free Press. Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent. New York: Free Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Coppock, A., & McClellan, O. A. (2017). Validating the demographic, political, psychological, and experimental results obtained from a new source of online survey respondents. Unpublished Manuscript. Coppock, A., & McClellan, O. A. (2017). Validating the demographic, political, psychological, and experimental results obtained from a new source of online survey respondents. Unpublished Manuscript.
Zurück zum Zitat Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven: Yale University Press. Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
Zurück zum Zitat Evans, G., & Andersen, R. (2006). The political conditioning of economic perceptions. Journal of Politics, 68(1), 194–207. CrossRef Evans, G., & Andersen, R. (2006). The political conditioning of economic perceptions. Journal of Politics, 68(1), 194–207. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Evans, G., & Pickup, M. (2010). Reversing the causal arrow: The political conditioning of economic perceptions in the 2000–2004 U.S. presidential election cycle. The Journal of Politics, 72(04), 1236–1251. CrossRef Evans, G., & Pickup, M. (2010). Reversing the causal arrow: The political conditioning of economic perceptions in the 2000–2004 U.S. presidential election cycle. The Journal of Politics, 72(04), 1236–1251. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Flynn, D. J., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2017). The nature and origins of misperceptions: Understanding false and unsupported beliefs about politics. Political Psychology, 38(682758), 127–150. CrossRef Flynn, D. J., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2017). The nature and origins of misperceptions: Understanding false and unsupported beliefs about politics. Political Psychology, 38(682758), 127–150. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gaines, B. J., Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Peyton, B., & Verkuilen, J. (2007). Same facts, different interpretations: Partisan motivation and opinion on Iraq. The Journal of Politics, 69, 957–974. CrossRef Gaines, B. J., Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Peyton, B., & Verkuilen, J. (2007). Same facts, different interpretations: Partisan motivation and opinion on Iraq. The Journal of Politics, 69, 957–974. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gerber, A. S., & Green, D. (2012). Field experiments. New York: W.W. Norton. Gerber, A. S., & Green, D. (2012). Field experiments. New York: W.W. Norton.
Zurück zum Zitat Gilens, M. (1999). Why Americans hate welfare: Race, media, and the politics of antipoverty policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossRef Gilens, M. (1999). Why Americans hate welfare: Race, media, and the politics of antipoverty policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Graham, M. H. (2018). Defining factual beliefs. Unpublished manuscript. Graham, M. H. (2018). Defining factual beliefs. Unpublished manuscript.
Zurück zum Zitat Guess, A. (2016). Media choice and moderation: Evidence from online tracking data. Unpublished Manuscript. Guess, A. (2016). Media choice and moderation: Evidence from online tracking data. Unpublished Manuscript.
Zurück zum Zitat Guess, A., & Coppock, A. (2018). Does counter-attitudinal information cause backlash? Results from three large survey experiments. British Journal of Political Science, forthcoming. Guess, A., & Coppock, A. (2018). Does counter-attitudinal information cause backlash? Results from three large survey experiments. British Journal of Political Science, forthcoming.
Zurück zum Zitat Hill, S. J. (2017). Learning together slowly: Bayesian learning about political facts. The Journal of Politics, 79(4), 1403–1418. CrossRef Hill, S. J. (2017). Learning together slowly: Bayesian learning about political facts. The Journal of Politics, 79(4), 1403–1418. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hopkins, D. J., Sides, & J. Citrin, J. (2018). The muted consequences of correct information about immigration. The Journal of Politics, forthcoming. Hopkins, D. J., Sides, & J. Citrin, J. (2018). The muted consequences of correct information about immigration. The Journal of Politics, forthcoming.
Zurück zum Zitat Jerit, J., & Barabas, J. (2012). Partisan perceptual bias and the information environment. The Journal of Politics, 74(3), 672–684. CrossRef Jerit, J., & Barabas, J. (2012). Partisan perceptual bias and the information environment. The Journal of Politics, 74(3), 672–684. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jessee, S. A. (2015). Don’t know responses, personality, and the measurement of political knowledge. Political Science Research and Methods, 5(4), 711–731. CrossRef Jessee, S. A. (2015). Don’t know responses, personality, and the measurement of political knowledge. Political Science Research and Methods, 5(4), 711–731. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kahan, D. M. (2016). The politically motivated reasoning paradigm, Part I. emerging. Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Kahan, D. M. (2016). The politically motivated reasoning paradigm, Part I. emerging. Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences.
Zurück zum Zitat Koriat, A., Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1980). Reasons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6(2), 107–118. Koriat, A., Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1980). Reasons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6(2), 107–118.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Jerit, J., Schwieder, D., & Rich, R. F. (2000). Misinformation and the currency of democratic citizenship. The Journal of Politics, 62(3), 790–816. CrossRef Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Jerit, J., Schwieder, D., & Rich, R. F. (2000). Misinformation and the currency of democratic citizenship. The Journal of Politics, 62(3), 790–816. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kull, S., Ramsay, C., & Lewis, E. (2003). Misperceptions, the media, and the Iraq War. Political Science Quarterly, 118(4), 569–598. CrossRef Kull, S., Ramsay, C., & Lewis, E. (2003). Misperceptions, the media, and the Iraq War. Political Science Quarterly, 118(4), 569–598. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. CrossRef Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Leeper, T. J., & Slothuus, R. (2014). Political parties, motivated reasoning, and public opinion formation. Political Psychology, 35(Suppl. 1), 129–156. CrossRef Leeper, T. J., & Slothuus, R. (2014). Political parties, motivated reasoning, and public opinion formation. Political Psychology, 35(Suppl. 1), 129–156. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1977). Do those who know more also know more about how much they know? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 20(2), 159–183. CrossRef Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1977). Do those who know more also know more about how much they know? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 20(2), 159–183. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Luna, K., & Martín-Luengo, B. (2012). Confidence accuracy calibration with general knowledge and eyewitness memory cued recall questions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 295, 289–295. CrossRef Luna, K., & Martín-Luengo, B. (2012). Confidence accuracy calibration with general knowledge and eyewitness memory cued recall questions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 295, 289–295. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Luskin, R. C., & Bullock, J. G. (2011). Don’t know” means don’t know”: DK responses and the public’s level of political knowledge. Journal of Politics, 73, 547–557. CrossRef Luskin, R. C., & Bullock, J. G. (2011). Don’t know” means don’t know”: DK responses and the public’s level of political knowledge. Journal of Politics, 73, 547–557. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nadeau, R., Niemi, R. G., & Levine, J. (1993). Innumeracy about minority populations. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 57(3), 332–347. CrossRef Nadeau, R., Niemi, R. G., & Levine, J. (1993). Innumeracy about minority populations. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 57(3), 332–347. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nyhan, B. (2010). Why the “death panel” myth wouldn’t die: Misinformation in the health care reform debate. The Forum, 8(1), Article 5. Nyhan, B. (2010). Why the “death panel” myth wouldn’t die: Misinformation in the health care reform debate. The Forum, 8(1), Article 5.
Zurück zum Zitat Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., & Ubel, P. A. (2013). The hazards of correcting myths about health care reform. Medical Care, 51(2), 127–132. CrossRef Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., & Ubel, P. A. (2013). The hazards of correcting myths about health care reform. Medical Care, 51(2), 127–132. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ortoleva, B. P., & Snowberg, E. (2015). Overconfidence in political behavior. American Economic Review, 105(2), 504–535. CrossRef Ortoleva, B. P., & Snowberg, E. (2015). Overconfidence in political behavior. American Economic Review, 105(2), 504–535. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Oskamp, S. (1962). The relationship of clinical experience and training methods to several criteria of clinical prediction. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 76(28), 1–27. CrossRef Oskamp, S. (1962). The relationship of clinical experience and training methods to several criteria of clinical prediction. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 76(28), 1–27. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pasek, J., Sood, G., & Krosnick, J. A. (2015). Misinformed about the affordable care act? Leveraging certainty to assess the prevalence of misperceptions. Journal of Communication, 65(4), 660–673. CrossRef Pasek, J., Sood, G., & Krosnick, J. A. (2015). Misinformed about the affordable care act? Leveraging certainty to assess the prevalence of misperceptions. Journal of Communication, 65(4), 660–673. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Petrocik, J. R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections. American Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 825–850. CrossRef Petrocik, J. R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections. American Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 825–850. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Prasad, M., Perrin, A. J., Bezila, K., Hoffman, S. G., Kindleberger, K., & Manturuk, K. (2009). ‘There must be a reason’: Osama, Saddam, and inferred justification. Sociological Inquiry, 79(2), 142–162. CrossRef Prasad, M., Perrin, A. J., Bezila, K., Hoffman, S. G., Kindleberger, K., & Manturuk, K. (2009). ‘There must be a reason’: Osama, Saddam, and inferred justification. Sociological Inquiry, 79(2), 142–162. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Prior, M., Sood, G., & Khanna, K. (2015). You cannot be serious. The impact of accuracy incentives on partisan bias in reports of economic perceptions. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 10(July), 489–518. CrossRef Prior, M., Sood, G., & Khanna, K. (2015). You cannot be serious. The impact of accuracy incentives on partisan bias in reports of economic perceptions. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 10(July), 489–518. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shapiro, R. Y., & Bloch-Elkon, Y. (2008). Do the facts speak for themselves? Critical Review, 20, 115–139. CrossRef Shapiro, R. Y., & Bloch-Elkon, Y. (2008). Do the facts speak for themselves? Critical Review, 20, 115–139. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Stalnaker, R. (1984). Inquiry. Cambridge: MIT Press. Stalnaker, R. (1984). Inquiry. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Stanig, P. (2013). Political polarization in retrospective economic evaluations during recessions and recoveries. Electoral Studies, 32(4), 729–745. CrossRef Stanig, P. (2013). Political polarization in retrospective economic evaluations during recessions and recoveries. Electoral Studies, 32(4), 729–745. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769. CrossRef Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Weatherson, B. (2005). Can we do without pragmatic encroachment? Philosophical Perspectives, 19(1), 417–443. Weatherson, B. (2005). Can we do without pragmatic encroachment? Philosophical Perspectives, 19(1), 417–443.
Zurück zum Zitat Weber, N., & Brewer, N. (2003). The effect of judgment type and confidence scale on confidence-accuracy calibration in face recognition. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 490–499. CrossRef Weber, N., & Brewer, N. (2003). The effect of judgment type and confidence scale on confidence-accuracy calibration in face recognition. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 490–499. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Self-Awareness of Political Knowledge
verfasst von
Matthew H. Graham
Publikationsdatum
08.09.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Political Behavior / Ausgabe 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0190-9320
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6687
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9499-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

Political Behavior 1/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Stellenausschreibungen

Anzeige

Premium Partner