nach oben

Erschienen in:

2015 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Seminar

verfasst von : Annett Hilger, Thorben Lübbert, Igor Pretzer, Jessica Reinartz, Julia Theißen, Michael Schneider

Erschienen in: Gute Hochschullehre: Eine evidenzbasierte Orientierungshilfe

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Zusammenfassung

In Seminaren steht im Gegensatz zu Vorlesungen das interaktive Lernen der Studierenden im Mittelpunkt. Kooperatives Lernen, also Gruppenarbeit, ist dabei eine besonders effektive Lernform. Kooperatives Lernen funktioniert gut, wenn gemeinsame Gruppenziele und individuelle Verantwortlichkeiten sichergestellt werden. Das Lesen anspruchsvoller Originaltexte, das Schreiben eigener Texte sowie das Halten von Referaten können effektive Lerntechniken darstellen, wenn sie gut vor- und nachbereitet werden, wobei einerseits die Inhalte und andererseits die Methode selbst, z. B. Lesestrategien oder Präsentationsfähigkeiten, thematisiert werden sollten. Für Referate gilt wie für Vorlesungen, dass eine hohe inhaltliche Klarheit, eine sorgfältige Strukturierung und interaktive Elemente, die zur Reflexion und zur Klärung von Fragen anregen, essenziell sind. Studierende arbeiten in Seminaren dann motiviert mit, wenn sie verstehen, wie sie durch konkretes eigenes Handeln ihre Kompetenz steigern und gute Bewertungen erzielen können.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Vorlesung

Nächstes Kapitel Projektseminar

Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148.CrossRef

Brown, G. T. L., & Marshall, J. C. (2012). The impact of training students how to write introductions for academic essays: An exploratory, longitudinal study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(6), 653–670. doi:10.1080m602938.20IJ.S632n.CrossRef

Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 113–143. doi:10.3102/003465430298563.CrossRef

De Grez, L., Valcke, M., & Roozen, I. (2009). The impact of an innovative instructional intervention on the acquisition of oral presentation skills in higher education. Computers & Education, 53, 112–120. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.005.CrossRef

Dinther, M. v., Dochy, F., & Segers, M. (2011). Factors affecting students’ self-efficacy in higher education. Educational Research Review, 6, 95–108. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.10.003.CrossRef

Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 239–264. doi:10.3102/00346543061002239.CrossRef

Donovan, J. J., & Radosevich, D. J. (1999). A meta-analytic review of the distribution of practice effect: Now you see it, now you don’t. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(5), 795–805.CrossRef

Dunning, D., Heath, C., & Suls, J. M. (2004). Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(3), 69–106. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00018.x.CrossRef

Epstein, W., Glenberg, A. M., & Bradley, M. M. (1984). Coactivation and comprehension: Contribution of text variables to the illusion of knowing. Memory & Cognition, 12(4), 355–360.CrossRef

Feldman, K. A. (2007). Identifying exemplary teachers and teaching: Evidence from student ratings. In R. P. Perry, & J. C. Smart (Hrsg.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective. New York: Springer.

Glenberg, A. M., Wilkinson, A. C., & Epstein, W. (1982). The illusion of knowing: Failure in the self-assessment of comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 10(6), 597–602.CrossRef

Hall, D., & Buzwell, S. (2012). The problem of free-riding in group projects: Looking beyond social loafing as reason for non-contribution. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(1), 37–49. doi:10.1177/1469787412467123.CrossRef

Hart, E. R., & Speece, D. L. (1998). Reciprocal teaching goes to college: Effects for postsecondary students at risk for academic failure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 670–681. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.670.CrossRef

Heiman, H. L., Uchida, T., Adams, C., Butter, J., Cohen, E., Persell, S. D., et al. (2012). E-learning and deliberate practice for oral case presentation skills: A randomized trial. Medical Teacher, 34(12), 820–826. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2012.714879.CrossRef

Hendry, G. D., & Anderson, J. (2013). Helping students understand the standards of work expected in an essay: Using exemplars in mathematics pre-service education classes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 754–768. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.703998.CrossRef

Hines, C. V., Cruickshank, D. R., & Kennedy, J. J. (1985). Teacher clarity and its relationship to student achievement and satisfaction. American Educational Research Journal, 22(1), 87–99. doi:10.3102/00028312022001087.CrossRef

Jang, H. (2008). Supporting students’ motivation, engagement, and learning during an uninteresting activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 798–811. doi:10.1037/a0012841.CrossRef

Kusurkar, R. A., Croiset, G., & Ten Cate, O. T. J. (2011). Twelve tips to stimulate intrinsic motivation in students through autonomy-supportive classroom teaching derived from self-determination theory. Medical Teacher, 33(12), 978–982. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2011.599896.PubMedCrossRef

Kyndt, E., Raes, E., Lismont, B., Timmers, F., Cascallar, E., & Dochy, F. (2013). A meta-analysis of the effects of face-to-face cooperative learning. Do recent studies falsify or verify earlier findings? Educational Research Review, 10, 133–149. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2013.02.002.CrossRef

Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., & d’Apollonia, S. (2001). Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 449–521. doi:10.3102/00346543071003449.CrossRef

Luiten, J., Ames, W., & Ackerson, G. (1980). A meta-analysis of the effects of advance organizers on learning and retention. American Educational Research Journal, 17(2), 211–218. doi:10.3102/00028312017002211.CrossRef

Martin, V. L., & Pressley, M. (1991). Elaborative-interrogation effects depend on the nature of the question. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 113–119. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.113.CrossRef

Mitchell, V.-W., & Bakewell, C. (1995). Learning without doing: Enhancing oral presentation skills through peer review. Management Learning, 26(3), 353–366. doi:10.1177/1350507695263005.

Norton, L. S. (1990). Essay-writing: What really counts? Higher Education, 20, 411–442.CrossRef

Nückles, M., Hübner, S., & Renkl, A. (2009). Enhancing self-regulated learning by writing learning protocols. Learning and Instruction, 19, 259–271. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.05.002.CrossRef

Ormrod, J. E. (2012). Human learning (6. Aufl.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Pekrun, R., Hall, N. C., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2014). Boredom and academic achievement: Testing a model of reciprocal causation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 696–710. doi:10.1037/a0036006.

Pressley, M., Ghatala, E. S., Woloshyn, V., & Pirie, J. (1990). Sometimes adults miss the main ideas in text and do not realize it: Confidence in responses to short-answer and multiple-choice comprehension items. In: Reading Research Quarterly, 25(3), 232–249. doi:10.2307/748004.CrossRef

Pressley, M., Wood, E., Woloshyn, V. E., Martin, V., King, A., & Menke, D. (1992). Encouraging mindful use of prior knowledge: Attempting to construct explanatory answers facilitates learning. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 91–109. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2701_7.CrossRef

Pressley, M., Yokoi, L., Meter, P. v., Etten, S. V., & Freebern, G. (1997). Some of the reasons why preparing for exams is so hard: What can be done to make it easier? Educational Psychology Review, 9(1), 1–38. doi:1040-726X/97/0300-0001$12.50/0.CrossRef

Radmacher, S. A., & Latosi-Sawin, E. (1995). Summary writing: A tool to improve student comprehension and writing in psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 22(2), 113–115. doi:10.1207/s15328023top2202_4.CrossRef

Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 38(2), 353–387. doi:10.1037/a0026838.CrossRef

Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Briggs, D., Iverson, H., Talbot, R., & Shepard, L. A. (2011). Impact of undergraduate science course innovations on learning. Science, 331(6022), 1269–1270. doi:10.1126/science.1198976.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.68.PubMedCrossRef

Schunk, D. H. (1990). Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 71–86. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2501_6.CrossRef

Slavin, R. E. (1983). When does cooperative learning increase student achievement? Psychological Bulletin, 94(3), 429–445.CrossRef

Slavin, R. E. (2010). Co-operative learning: What makes group-work work? In H. Dumont, D. Istance, & F. Benavides (Hrsg.), The Nature of Learning: Using Research to Inspire Practice (S. 161–178). Paris: OECD Publishing.

Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21–51. doi:10.3102/00346543069001021.CrossRef

Taylor, P. (1992). Improving graduate student seminar presentations through training. Teaching of Psychology, 19(4), 236. doi:10.1207/s15328023top1904_12.CrossRef

Wakefield, C., Adie, J., Pitt, E., & Owens, T. (2014). Feeding forward from summative assessment: The Essay Feedback Checklist as a learning tool. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(2), 253–262. doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.822845.CrossRef

Weinstein, N., Przybylski, A. K., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). The integrative process: New research and future directions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(1), 69–74. doi:10.1177/0963721412468001.CrossRef

Yang, Y.-F. (2010). Developing a reciprocal teaching/learning system for college remedial reading instruction. Computers & Education, 1193–1201. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.016.

Titel: Seminar
verfasst von: Annett Hilger
Thorben Lübbert
Igor Pretzer
Jessica Reinartz
Julia Theißen
Michael Schneider
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch: Gute Hochschullehre: Eine evidenzbasierte Orientierungshilfe
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-45061-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-662-45062-8

Copyright-Jahr: 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45062-8_3