Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Responsible editor: Walter Klöpffer
The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11367-016-1094-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Life cycle assessment (LCA) results are often used to communicate the environmental impacts of products and measure environmental performance for comparison between different options on the market. Sensitivity analyses are a routine part of LCA but often used with a narrow focus. In a case study on foodstuff packaging, the environmental performance of two food cartons in comparison with competing packaging solutions, i.e. food cartons, glass jars, steel cans, plastic pots and retortable pouches, was examined. Furthermore, the benefits of additional sensitivity analyses as a tool to model country-specific conditions to extend the applicability of LCA findings across a number of systems were evaluated.
A cradle-to-grave LCA in compliance with ISO standards 14040 and 14044 for the European market (EU27 + 2) was performed. The study was accompanied by a critical review process. The choice of the analysed packaging systems was made according to the European market share. Relevant processes were modelled with primary input data wherever possible; otherwise, average data from public LCI databases were applied. A wide range of environmental impact categories were covered: Climate Change, Ozone Depletion Potential, Summer Smog, Acidification, Eutrophication, Human Toxicity: PM10 and Abiotic Resource Depletion. To comply with ISO standards, a sensitivity analysis on allocation was performed. In addition, sensitivity analyses on recycling rates were included.
The primary environmental impacts for both food cartons arose from base material production for primary packaging. The environmental performance of the food cartons compared favourably with all competing systems for virtually all examined impact categories, primarily due to the fact that primary packaging materials for food cartons are derived from renewable resources. The additional sensitivity analyses quantifying the influence of end-of-life management did not change overall results yet revealed trajectories that could be indicative of trends in a range of different settings from no to complete recycling. Thus, the additional sensitivity analyses revealed a robust result that may be informative in circumstances that depart from European settings.
Both food cartons show a superior performance in comparison with alternatives. The sensitivity analyses on recycling rates confirm this result even with very low or high quotas applied. These analyses provide valuable information on how different parameters depending on different geographic scopes may influence the overall results. Future LCA work would benefit from low-effort additional sensitivity analyses to broaden applicability of results and examine the robustness of findings.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
ESM 1 (PDF 83 kb)11367_2016_1094_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
ACE (2012) http://www.beveragecarton.eu/mediaroom/3/50/Beverage-Carton-Recycling-Rates-2011. Accessed July 2012
Boulay AM, Bouchard C, Bulle C, Deschenes L, Margni M (2011) Categorizing water for LCA inventory. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(7):639–651 CrossRef
Brandão M, Milà i Canals L (2013) Global characterisation factors to assess land use impacts on biotic production. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(6):1243–1252 CrossRef
CML (2002) Guinée. J.B. (Ed.) – Centre of Environmental Science – Leiden University (CML). de Bruijn. H.. van Duin. R.. Huijbregts. M.. Lindeijer. E.. Roorda. A.. van der Ven. B.. Weidema. B.: Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment. Operational Guide to the ISO Standards, Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science Vol. 7, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands
CML (2010) CML-IA database that contains characterisation factors for life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) for all baseline characterisation methods mentioned in [CML 2002]. Database CML-IA v3.7, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, November 2010; http://www.cml.leiden.edu/software/data-cmlia.html
De Baan L, Alkemade R, Koellner T (2013) Land use impacts on biodiversity in LCA: a global approach. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(6):1216–1230 CrossRef
Derwent RG, Jenkin ME, Saunders SM, Pilling MJ (1998) Photochemical ozone creation potentials for organic compounds in northwest Europe calculated with a master chemical mechanism. Atmos Environ 32:2429–2441 CrossRef
Euromonitor (2010) personal communication Euromonitor to SIG Combibloc, November 2010. http://www.euromonitor.com
Euromonitor (2012) personal communication Euromonitor to SIG Combibloc, April 2012. http://www.euromonitor.com
EUROSTAT (2013) http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=env_wasmun&lang=de. Accessed April 2013
Fehrenbach H, Grahl B, Giegrich J, Busch M (2015) Hemeroby as an impact category indicator for the integration of land use into life cycle (impact) assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20(11):1511–1527 CrossRef
FEVE (2013) http://www.feve.org/FEVE-STATIS-2013/Recycling-2011.html. Accessed April 2013
Heijungs R, Guinée J, Huppes G, Lankreijer RM, Udo de Haes HA, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Ansems AMM, Eggels PG, van Duin R, de Goede HP (1992) Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of products. Guide and Backgrounds, Centre of Environmental Science (CML). Leiden University, Leiden
Heldstab J, de Weg PHvd, Künzle T, Keller M, Zbinden R (2003) Modelling of PM10 and PM2.5 ambient concentrations in Switzerland 2000 and 2010, Environmental Documentation No.169. Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape SAEFL, Bern
Hoekstra AY, Chapagain AK, Aldaya MM, Mekonnen MM (2011) The water footprint assessment manual: setting the global standard. Water Footprint Network, Enschede, The Netherlands
IPCC (2007) Contribution of Working group 1 to IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, Technical Summary Report, May 2007. http://www.ipcc.ch.
ISO 14040: 2006 (2006) International standard - environmental management – life cycle assessment – principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization, Switzerland
ISO 14044: 2006 (2006) International standard - environmental management – life cycle assessment – requirements and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Switzerland
Jenkin ME, Hayman GD (1999) Photochemical ozone creation potentials for oxygenated volatile organic compounds: sensitivity to variations in kinetic and mechanistic parameters. Atmos Environ 33(8):1275–1293 CrossRef
Klöpffer W, Renner I (1995) Methodik der Wirkungsbilanz von Produkt-Ökobilanzen unter Berücksichtigung nicht oder nur schwer quantifizierbarer Umwelt-Kategorien. UBA-Texte 23/95; Berlin
Köllner T, Geyer R (2013) Global land use impact assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1185–1187 CrossRef
Leeuw FD (2002) A set of emission indicators for long-range transboundary air pollution. Bilthoven 2002
Markwardt S, Wellenreuther F (2012) Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of packaging systems for UHT milk on the European market. ifeu report to SIG Combibloc, Heidelberg
Markwardt S, Wellenreuther F (2013) Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of sterilised food packaging systems on the European market. ifeu report to SIG Combibloc. Heidelberg. http://www.sig.biz/fileadmin/content/7_Environment/4_LCAs/4_Food/LCA_Food.pdf
Markwardt S, Wellenreuther F, von Falkenstein E (2011) Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of beverage cartons cb5 and cb5 EcoPlus for UHT milk on the European market. ifeu report on behalf of SIG Combibloc. Heidelberg
Nielsen MAT (2011) personal communication Nielsen to SIG Combibloc. http://www.nielsen.com
Nielsen MAT (2012) personal communication Nielsen to SIG Combibloc. http://www.nielsen.com
Pfister S, Koehler A, Hellweg S (2009) Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. Environ Sci Technol 43:4098–4104 CrossRef
Pilz H, Brandt B (2010) Fehringer R (2010) The impact of plastics on life cycle energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in Europe. Summary Report, June
UBA (1998) Umweltbundesamt Berlin (publisher): Ökobilanz Graphischer Papiere. Berlin. 1998
UBA (2000) Umweltbundesamt. Berlin (publisher): Ökobilanz für Getränkeverpackungen II. Hauptteil, UBA-Texte 37/00, Berlin, 2000
Wellenreuther F, von Falkenstein E, Detzel A (2012) Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of beverage cartons combiblocSlimline and combiblocSlimline EcoPlus for UHT milk. ifeu report on behalf of SIG Combibloc. Heidelberg. http://www.sig.biz/fileadmin/content/7_Environment/4_LCAs/3_EcoPlus/LCA_combibloc_EcoPlus_en.pdf
WMO (2011) Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion 2010, Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Projekt Report No.52. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva
- Sensitivity analysis as a tool to extend the applicability of LCA findings
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Elektronische ISSN: 1614-7502
Fallstudie Überschwemmungskarten/© Thaut Images | Fotolia