Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
What does one wear to work in the life of the mind? The establishment of ‘seriousness’ as a cardinal academic virtue is reinforced via a series of distinctions between the high-minded concerns worthy of scholarly pursuit, and the materialistic, venal and/or frivolous concerns of secular life. The historical marginalisation of women in academia is also reinforced by these distinctions—despite the mass entry of women into academia over the past 40 years, a masculine hegemony continues to set the terms on which women can be accepted into and succeed within academia, and ‘feminine’ interests and concerns are treated with suspicion and/or contempt (Bagilhole 2002). Yet although the force of male hegemony in the academy is considerable, it is by no means uncontested; for many decades, women have fought against the assumption that academic recognition is contingent on eschewing femininity and have sought to find modes of embodiment that acknowledge the presence of women in academia as women (Showalter 1997). Women in academia thus face a dilemma in crafting and communicating what we might think of as (borrowing from Gill and Scharff 2011) ‘academic femininities’—modes of self-presentation that allow them to simultaneously address the requirement to demonstrate intellectual seriousness, while also refusing to accept the traditional exclusion of markers of femininity from the academy.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Bagilhole, B. (2002). Challenging Equal Opportunities: Changing and Adapting Male Hegemony in Academia. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(1), 19–33. CrossRef
Bartky, S. L. (1990). Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression. New York: Routledge.
Baumgardner, J., & Richards, A. (2000). Manifesta: Young Women, Feminism, and the Future. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Bourdieu, P. (1996). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.
Dworkin, A. (1974). Women Hating. New York: E. P. Dutton.
Entwistle, J., & Rocamora, A. (2006). The Field of Fashion Materialized: A Study of London Fashion Week. Sociology, 40(4), 735–751. CrossRef
Gill, R. (2007). Postfeminist Media Culture: Elements of a Sensibility. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 10(2), 147–166. CrossRef
Gill, R. (2008). Empowerment/Sexism: Figuring Female Sexual Agency in Contemporary Advertising. Feminism & Psychology, 18(1), 35–60. CrossRef
Gill, R., & Donaghue, N. (2013). As if Postfeminism Had Come True: The Turn to Agency in Cultural Studies of ‘Sexualisation’. In S. Madhok, A. Phillips & K. Wilson (Eds.), Gender, Agency, and Coercion (pp. 240–257). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gill, R., & Scharff, C. (Eds.). (2011). New Femininities: Postfeminism, Neoliberalism and Subjectivity. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Henry, A. (2012). Fashioning a Feminist Style, or, How I Learned to Dress from Reading Feminist Theory. In M. Jolles & S. Tarrant (Eds.), Fashion Talks: Undressing the Power of Style. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Jeffreys, S. (2005). Beauty and Misogyny: Harmful Cultural Practices in the West. New York: Routledge.
McRobbie, A. (2009). The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change. London: Sage.
Riley, S. C., & Scharff, C. (2013). Feminism Versus Femininity? Exploring Feminist Dilemmas Through Cooperative Inquiry Research. Feminism & Psychology, 23(2), 207–223. CrossRef
Roberts, M. (2007). The Fashion Police: Governing the Self in What Not to Wear. In Y. Tasker & D. Negra (Eds.), Interrogating Postfeminism. Gender and the Politics of Popular Culture. London: Duke University Press.
Rocamora, A. (2011). Personal Fashion Blogs: Screens and Mirrors in Digital Self-Portraits. Fashion Theory, 15(4), 407–424. CrossRef
Rose, N. (1996). Inventing Our Selves: Psychology, Power, and Personhood. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Sandberg, S. (2013). Lean in: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead. New York: Random House.
Scharff, C. (2010). Young Women’s Negotiations of Heterosexual Conventions: Theorizing Sexuality in Constructions of ‘the Feminist’. Sociology, 44(5), 827–842. CrossRef
Scharff, C. (2012). Repudiating Feminism: Young Women in a Neoliberal World. Ashgate.
Showalter, E. (1997). The Professor Wore Prada. Vogue, 187, 80.
Tasker, Y., & Negra, D. (Eds.). (2007). Interrogating Postfeminism: Gender and the Politics of Popular Culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Thompson, L., & Donaghue, N. (2014). The Confidence Trick: Competing Constructions of Confidence and Self-Esteem in Young Women’s Discussions of the Sexualisation of Culture. Women’s Studies International Forum, 47, 23–35. CrossRef
Wolf, N. (1990). The Beauty Myth. New York: Random House.
- Seriously Stylish: Academic Femininities and the Politics of Feminism and Fashion in Academia
- Palgrave Macmillan UK
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta