nach oben

Educational Research for Policy and Practice

Erschienen in:

01.06.2015 | Original Paper

Setting formative assessments in real-world contexts to facilitate self-regulated learning

verfasst von: Hui Yong Tay

Erschienen in: Educational Research for Policy and Practice | Ausgabe 2/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Some writers (Black and Wiliam in Phi Delta Kappan 80(2):139–148, 1998; Clark 2012; Panadero and Jonsson in Educational Research Review 9:129–144, 2013) have hypothesized a link between formative assessments (FA) and self-regulated learning (SRL). FA give students an opportunity to play an active role in their learning exercise, in other words to exercise SRL, while SRL gives the learners the will and skill to take advantage of the feedback offered by FA to progress. This paper provides empirical evidence of this link through interviews of 13 students (aged 16–17) from an all-girls school who were assigned two tasks which tested the same cognitive skills but set in contrasting contexts: one was a paper-and-pen class assignment while the other, in a live online forum. Data were gathered through one-to-one interviews which probed students’ use of SRL in the 3 phases (Forethought, Performance, and Self-reflection) based on Zimmerman’s cyclical model of self-regulation (2000). The findings helped shed light on how different FA contexts can affect students’ use of SRL, specifically in terms of their motivation, metacognition, and behavior.

Vorheriger Artikel Parent involvement and student performance: the influence of school context

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2005). Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(3), 1–11.

Andrade, H., & Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 12–19.CrossRef

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. NY: Freeman.

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.CrossRef

Berg, B. L. (2007). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston: Pearson.

Berge, H., Ramaekers, S., Pilot, A. (2004). The design of authentic tasks that promote higher-order learning. Paper presented at the EARLI-SIG Higher Education/KIT conference. Retrieved February 15, 2009, from http://www.uu.nl/content/IVLOSpaperEARLI2004.pdf

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139–148.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31.CrossRef

Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers and students. Learning and Instruction, 7(2), 161–186.CrossRef

Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-Regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(2), 199–231.CrossRef

Borkowski, J. G., Weaver, C. M., Smith, L. E., & Akai, C. E. (2004). Metacognitive theory and classroom practices. In J. Ee, A. Chang, & O. Tan (Eds.), Thinking about thinking: What educators need to know (pp. 88–107). Singapore: McGraw Hill.

Boud, D. (1991). Implementing student self-assessment (2nd ed.). Sydney: HERDSA.

Boud, D. (2007). Reframing assessment as if learning was important. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment for higher education: Learning for the longer term (pp. 14–25). London: Routledge.

Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education, 24, 61–100.

Broadfoot, P. (2008). Assessment for learners: Assessment literacy and the development of learning power. In A. Havnes & L. McDowell (Eds.), Balancing dilemmas in assessment and learning in contemporary education (pp. 213–224). New York: Routledge.

Brookhart, S. (2003). Developing measurement theory for classroom assessment purposes and uses. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(4), 5–12.CrossRef

Clark, I. (2012). Formative assessment: Assessment is for self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24(2), 205–249.

Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Education Scotland. (n.d.) The Purpose of Education. Retrieved June 5, 2014, from http://www.educationscotland.gov.uk/thecurriculum/whatiscurriculumforexcellence/thepurposeofthecurriculum/

Fan, L. H. (2010). Integrating new assessment strategies into mathematics classrooms: An exploratory study in Singapore primary and secondary school [Electronic Version]. Retrieved November 1, 2010, from http://www.nie.edu.sg/files/oer/NIE_research_brief_10_003.pdf

Fullan, M., Rolheiser, C., Mascall, B., Edge, K. (2002, May). Accomplishing large scale reform: A tri-level proposition. Paper presented at the second annual conference on sustainability of systemic reform. [Internet conference]. Retrieved October 10, 2010, from http://www.michaelfullan.ca/

Goodrich-Andrade, H., & Boulay, B. A. (2003). Role of rubric-referenced self-assessment in learning to write. Journal of Educational Research, 97(1), 21–34.CrossRef

Havnes, A., & McDowell, L. (2008). Assessment, learners and teachers. In A. Havnes & L. McDowell (Eds.), Balancing dilemmas in assessment and learning in contemporary education (pp. 209–212). New York: Routledge.

Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 99–136.CrossRef

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Miller, W. L., & Crabtree, B. J. (1999). The dance of interpretation. In B. Crabtree & W. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 127–143). London: Sage.

Ministry of Education. (2009, September 17). Teachers—The Heart of Quality Education. Retrieved October 10, 2010, from http://www.moe.gov.sg/media/press/2009/09/teachers-the-heart-of-quality.php

Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2014) Desired outcomes of education. Retrieved June 5, 2014, from http://www.moe.gov.sg/education/desired-outcomes/

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.CrossRef

Panadero, E., & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2013). Self-assessment: theoretical and practical connotations. When it happens, how is it acquired and what to do to develop it in our students. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psycholog, 11(2), 551–576. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.14204/ejrep.30.12200.

Panadero, E., & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2014). How do students self-regulate? Review of Zimmerman’s cyclical model of self-regulated learning. Anales de Psicología, 30(2), 450–462.CrossRef

Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J., & Huertas, J. A. (2012). Rubrics and self-assessment scripts effects on self-regulation, learning and self-efficacy in secondary education. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 806–813.CrossRef

Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J., & Reche, E. (2013). Rubrics vs. self-assessment scripts effect on self-regulation, performance and self- efficacy in pre-service teachers. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39(3), 125–132.CrossRef

Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9, 129–144.CrossRef

Panadero, E., & Romero, M. (2014). To rubric or not to rubric? The effects of self-assessment on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(2), 133–148.CrossRef

Parkes, J. (2000). The interaction of assessment format and examinees’ perceptions of control. Educational Research, 42(2), 175–182.CrossRef

Partnership for \(21^{\rm st}\) Century Skills. (2002). Learning for the 21st century; A report and MILE guide for 21st century skills. Retrieved October 10, 2010, from http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/

Pintrich, P. R., & DeGroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.CrossRef

Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2002). Student motivation and self-regulated learning in the college classroom. In J. C. Smart & W. G. Tierney (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XVII). New York: Agathon Press.

Popham, W. J. (1997). What’s wrong and what’s right with rubrics. Educational Leadership, 55, 72–75.

Popham, W. J. (2009). Assessment literacy for teachers: Faddish or fundamental? Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 4–11.CrossRef

Puustinen, M., & Pulkkinen, L. (2001). Models of self-regulated learning: A review. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45(3), 269–286.CrossRef

Reitmeier, C. A., & Vrchota, D. A. (2009). Self-assessment of oral communication presentations in food science and nutrition. Journal of Food Science Education, 8(4), 88–92.CrossRef

Reynolds-Keefer, L. (2010). Rubric-referenced assessment in teacher preparation: An opportunity to learn by using. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 15(8). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=15&n=8

Rogoff, B., & Chavajay, P. (1995). What’s become of research on the cultural basis of cognitive development. American Psychologist, 50(10), 859–877.CrossRef

Sadler, D. R. (1983). Evaluation and the improvement of academic learning. Journal of Higher Education, 54(1), 60–79.CrossRef

Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144.CrossRef

Sadler, D. R. (1998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 77–85.CrossRef

Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535–550.CrossRef

Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications (3rd ed.). NJ: Pearson.

Stiggins, R. J., Arter, J. A., Chappuis, J., & Chappuis, S. (2004). Classroom assessment FOR student learning: Doing it right–using it well. Portland, OR: ETS Assessment Training Institute.

Stiggins, R. J., & Chappuis, J. (2011). An introduction to student-involved assessment for learning. \(6{\rm th}\) ed. Pearson.

Sungur, S., & Tekkaya, C. (2006). Effects of problem-based learning and traditional instruction on self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Research, 99(5), 307–317.CrossRef

Wiliam, D. (April 2014). Formative assessment and contingency in the regulation of learning processes. Paper presented in a Symposium entitled Toward a theory of classroom assessment as the regulation of learning at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, PA, April 2014.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRef

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.CrossRef

Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183.CrossRef

Titel: Setting formative assessments in real-world contexts to facilitate self-regulated learning
verfasst von: Hui Yong Tay
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2015
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Educational Research for Policy and Practice / Ausgabe 2/2015
Print ISSN: 1570-2081
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1723
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-015-9172-5

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2015

Governance challenges in the initiatives for out-of-school children in Tajikistan

Parent involvement and student performance: the influence of school context

Evaluating the Portuguese National Reading Plan: teachers’ perceptions on the impact in schools

Instructional expenditures and student achievement: a multiyear statewide analysis