Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics 4/2017

26.04.2016

Sex Differences Through a Neuroscience Lens: Implications for Business Ethics

verfasst von: Lori Verstegen Ryan

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Recent, groundbreaking work in neuroscience has illuminated sex differences that could have a profound impact on business organizations. Distinctions between the sexes that may have previously been presumed to be due to “nurture” may now also be demonstrably related to “nature.” Here, we report recent neuroscience findings related to males’ and females’ brain structures and brain chemistry, along with the results of recent neuroeconomic studies. We learn not only that male and female brains are structured differently, but also that different portions of their brains are used for the same tasks, often leading to identical conclusions. Neuroeconomic studies also demonstrate that the effects of hormones—most notably, oxytocin and testosterone—urge males and females to both think and behave differently in ethical situations. We suggest that examination of these new results could benefit six areas of business ethics research: trust, moral decision-making, organizational justice, moral development, the ethic of care, and female management styles. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of these findings for business practice, suggesting that it may be ethical to allow men and women to be treated differently in the workplace: such treatment may be advantageous not only for the workers’ firms, but also for the workers themselves.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2002). Who trusts others? Journal of Public Economics, 65, 207–234.CrossRef Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2002). Who trusts others? Journal of Public Economics, 65, 207–234.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Andersena, M. L., Alvarenga, T. F., Mazaro-Costab, R., Hachula, H. C., & Tufika, S. (2011). The association of testosterone, sleep, and sexual function in men and women. Brain Research, 1416, 80–104.CrossRef Andersena, M. L., Alvarenga, T. F., Mazaro-Costab, R., Hachula, H. C., & Tufika, S. (2011). The association of testosterone, sleep, and sexual function in men and women. Brain Research, 1416, 80–104.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baumgartner, T., Heinrichs, M., Vontanthen, A., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2008). Oxytocin shapes the neural circuitry of trust and trust adaptation in humans. Neuron, 58, 639–650.CrossRef Baumgartner, T., Heinrichs, M., Vontanthen, A., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2008). Oxytocin shapes the neural circuitry of trust and trust adaptation in humans. Neuron, 58, 639–650.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Buchan, N. R., Croson, R. T. A., & Solnick, S. (2008). Trust and gender: An examination of behavior and beliefs in the investment game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 68, 466–476.CrossRef Buchan, N. R., Croson, R. T. A., & Solnick, S. (2008). Trust and gender: An examination of behavior and beliefs in the investment game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 68, 466–476.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Burton, B. K., & Dunn, C. P. (1996). Feminist ethics as moral grounding for stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 6(2), 133–147.CrossRef Burton, B. K., & Dunn, C. P. (1996). Feminist ethics as moral grounding for stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 6(2), 133–147.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Butler, J. K, Jr. (1991). Toward understanding and measuring conditions of trust: Evolution of a conditions of trust inventory. Journal of Management, 17, 643–663.CrossRef Butler, J. K, Jr. (1991). Toward understanding and measuring conditions of trust: Evolution of a conditions of trust inventory. Journal of Management, 17, 643–663.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cahill, L. (2006). Why sex matters for neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 477–485.CrossRef Cahill, L. (2006). Why sex matters for neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 477–485.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Castaldo, S., Premazzi, K., & Zerbini, F. (2010). The meaning(s) of trust: A content analysis on the diverse conceptualizations of trust in scholarly research on business relationships. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 657–668.CrossRef Castaldo, S., Premazzi, K., & Zerbini, F. (2010). The meaning(s) of trust: A content analysis on the diverse conceptualizations of trust in scholarly research on business relationships. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 657–668.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 909–927.CrossRef Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 909–927.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Conlisk, J. (2011). Professor Zak’s empirical studies on trust and oxytocin. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 78, 160–166.CrossRef Conlisk, J. (2011). Professor Zak’s empirical studies on trust and oxytocin. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 78, 160–166.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cosgrove, K. P., Mazure, C. M., & Staley, J. K. (2007). Evolving knowledge of sex differences in brain structure, function, and chemistry. Biological Psychiatry, 62, 847–855.CrossRef Cosgrove, K. P., Mazure, C. M., & Staley, J. K. (2007). Evolving knowledge of sex differences in brain structure, function, and chemistry. Biological Psychiatry, 62, 847–855.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Delgado, M. R., Frank, R. H., & Phelps, E. A. (2005). Perceptions of moral character modulate the neural systems of reward during the trust game. Nature Neuroscience, 8(11), 1611–1618.CrossRef Delgado, M. R., Frank, R. H., & Phelps, E. A. (2005). Perceptions of moral character modulate the neural systems of reward during the trust game. Nature Neuroscience, 8(11), 1611–1618.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dobson, J., & White, J. (1995). Toward the feminine firm. Business Ethics Quarterly, 5(3), 463–478.CrossRef Dobson, J., & White, J. (1995). Toward the feminine firm. Business Ethics Quarterly, 5(3), 463–478.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Driscoll, J. W. (1978). Trust and participation in organizational decision making as predictors of satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 21(1), 44–56.CrossRef Driscoll, J. W. (1978). Trust and participation in organizational decision making as predictors of satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 21(1), 44–56.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dulebohn, J. H., Conlon, D. E., Sarinopoulos, I., Davison, R. B., & McNamara, G. (2009). The biological bases of unfairness: Neuroimaging evidence for the distinctiveness of procedural and distributive justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110, 140–151.CrossRef Dulebohn, J. H., Conlon, D. E., Sarinopoulos, I., Davison, R. B., & McNamara, G. (2009). The biological bases of unfairness: Neuroimaging evidence for the distinctiveness of procedural and distributive justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110, 140–151.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Durante, K. M., & Saad, G. (2010). Ovulatory shifts in women’s social motives and behaviors: Implications for corporate organizations. In A. A. Stanton, M. Day, & I. M. Welpe (Eds.), Neuroeconomics and the firm (pp. 116–130). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar. Durante, K. M., & Saad, G. (2010). Ovulatory shifts in women’s social motives and behaviors: Implications for corporate organizations. In A. A. Stanton, M. Day, & I. M. Welpe (Eds.), Neuroeconomics and the firm (pp. 116–130). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Zurück zum Zitat Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Women and the labyrinth of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 85, 2–11. Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Women and the labyrinth of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 85, 2–11.
Zurück zum Zitat Fehr, E., & Camerer, C. F. (2007). Social neuroeconomics: The neural circuitry of social preferences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(10), 419–427.CrossRef Fehr, E., & Camerer, C. F. (2007). Social neuroeconomics: The neural circuitry of social preferences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(10), 419–427.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429–456.CrossRef Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429–456.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Franke, G. R., Crown, D. F., & Spake, D. F. (1997). Gender differences in ethical perceptions of business practices: A social role theory perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 920–934.CrossRef Franke, G. R., Crown, D. F., & Spake, D. F. (1997). Gender differences in ethical perceptions of business practices: A social role theory perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 920–934.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Frantz, R. (2005). Two minds. New York: Springer. Frantz, R. (2005). Two minds. New York: Springer.
Zurück zum Zitat Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Gray, J. (2008). Why Mars and Venus collide. New York: Harper. Gray, J. (2008). Why Mars and Venus collide. New York: Harper.
Zurück zum Zitat Haederle, M. (2010). The best fiscal stimulus: Trust. Miller-McCune, 3, 42–49. Haederle, M. (2010). The best fiscal stimulus: Trust. Miller-McCune, 3, 42–49.
Zurück zum Zitat Haier, R. J., & Benbow, C. P. (1995). Sex differences and lateralization in temporal lobe glucose metabolism during mathematical reasoning. Developmental Neuropsychology, 11, 405–414.CrossRef Haier, R. J., & Benbow, C. P. (1995). Sex differences and lateralization in temporal lobe glucose metabolism during mathematical reasoning. Developmental Neuropsychology, 11, 405–414.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Haier, R. J., Jung, R. E., Yeo, R. A., Head, K., & Alkire, M. T. (2005). The neuroanatomy of general intelligence: Sex matters. NeuroImage, 25, 320–327.CrossRef Haier, R. J., Jung, R. E., Yeo, R. A., Head, K., & Alkire, M. T. (2005). The neuroanatomy of general intelligence: Sex matters. NeuroImage, 25, 320–327.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Harrison, G., & Ross, D. (2010). The methodologies of neuroeconomics. Journal of Economic Methodology, 17(2), 185–196.CrossRef Harrison, G., & Ross, D. (2010). The methodologies of neuroeconomics. Journal of Economic Methodology, 17(2), 185–196.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hill, C. A., & O’Hara, E. A. (2006). A cognitive theory of trust. Washington University Law Review, 84, 1717–1796. Hill, C. A., & O’Hara, E. A. (2006). A cognitive theory of trust. Washington University Law Review, 84, 1717–1796.
Zurück zum Zitat Ingalhalikar, M., Smith, A., Parker, D., Satterthwaite, T. D., Elliott, M. A., Ruparel, K., et al. (2014). Sex differences in the structural connectome of the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 111, 823–828.CrossRef Ingalhalikar, M., Smith, A., Parker, D., Satterthwaite, T. D., Elliott, M. A., Ruparel, K., et al. (2014). Sex differences in the structural connectome of the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 111, 823–828.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Irwin, K., Edwards, K., & Tamburello, J. A. (2015). Gender, trust and cooperation in environmental social dilemmas. Social Science Research, 50, 328–342.CrossRef Irwin, K., Edwards, K., & Tamburello, J. A. (2015). Gender, trust and cooperation in environmental social dilemmas. Social Science Research, 50, 328–342.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kenning, P., & Plassmann, H. (2005). Neuroeconomics: An overview from an economic perspective. Brain Research Bulletin, 67, 343–354.CrossRef Kenning, P., & Plassmann, H. (2005). Neuroeconomics: An overview from an economic perspective. Brain Research Bulletin, 67, 343–354.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1–31.CrossRef Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1–31.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–480). Chicago: Rand McNally. Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–480). Chicago: Rand McNally.
Zurück zum Zitat Konrad, C., Engelien, A., Schoning, S., Zwitserlood, P., Jansen, A., Pletziger, E., et al. (2008). The functional anatomy of semantic retrieval is influenced by gender, menstrual cycle, and sex hormones. Journal of Neural Transmission, 115, 1327–1337.CrossRef Konrad, C., Engelien, A., Schoning, S., Zwitserlood, P., Jansen, A., Pletziger, E., et al. (2008). The functional anatomy of semantic retrieval is influenced by gender, menstrual cycle, and sex hormones. Journal of Neural Transmission, 115, 1327–1337.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kosfeld, M., Heinrichs, M., Zak, P. J., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2005). Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature, 435(7042), 673–676.CrossRef Kosfeld, M., Heinrichs, M., Zak, P. J., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2005). Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature, 435(7042), 673–676.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.
Zurück zum Zitat McEwen, B. S. (2000). The neurobiology of stress: From serendipity to clinical relevance. Brain Research, 886, 172–189.CrossRef McEwen, B. S. (2000). The neurobiology of stress: From serendipity to clinical relevance. Brain Research, 886, 172–189.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Merolla, J., Burnett, G., Pyle, K., Ahmadi, S., & Zak, P. (2013). Oxytocin and the biological basis for interpersonal and political trust. Political Behavior, 35, 753–776.CrossRef Merolla, J., Burnett, G., Pyle, K., Ahmadi, S., & Zak, P. (2013). Oxytocin and the biological basis for interpersonal and political trust. Political Behavior, 35, 753–776.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Peper, J. S., & Koolschijn, P. C. (2012). Sex steroids and the organization of the human brain. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 6745–6746.CrossRef Peper, J. S., & Koolschijn, P. C. (2012). Sex steroids and the organization of the human brain. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 6745–6746.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ramamoorthy, N. (2004). Gender and employee attitudes: The role of organizational justice perceptions. British Journal of Management, 15, 247–258.CrossRef Ramamoorthy, N. (2004). Gender and employee attitudes: The role of organizational justice perceptions. British Journal of Management, 15, 247–258.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Reuter, M., Montag, C., Altmann, S., Bendlow, F., Elger, C., Kirsch, P., et al. (2009). Genetically determined differences in human trust behavior: The role of the oxytocin receptor gene. Paper presented at the NeuroPsychoEconomics conference, Bonn, Germany. Reuter, M., Montag, C., Altmann, S., Bendlow, F., Elger, C., Kirsch, P., et al. (2009). Genetically determined differences in human trust behavior: The role of the oxytocin receptor gene. Paper presented at the NeuroPsychoEconomics conference, Bonn, Germany.
Zurück zum Zitat Reynolds, S. J. (2006). A neurocognitive model of the ethical decision-making process: Implications for study and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 737–748. Reynolds, S. J. (2006). A neurocognitive model of the ethical decision-making process: Implications for study and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 737–748.
Zurück zum Zitat Riedl, R., Hubert, M., & Kenning, P. (2010). Are there neural gender differences in online trust? An fMRI study on the perceived trustworthiness of Ebay offers. MIS Quarterly, 34, 397–428. Riedl, R., Hubert, M., & Kenning, P. (2010). Are there neural gender differences in online trust? An fMRI study on the perceived trustworthiness of Ebay offers. MIS Quarterly, 34, 397–428.
Zurück zum Zitat Riedl, R., & Javor, A. (2012). The biology of trust: Integrating evidence from genetics, endocrinology and functional brain imaging. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 5, 63–91.CrossRef Riedl, R., & Javor, A. (2012). The biology of trust: Integrating evidence from genetics, endocrinology and functional brain imaging. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 5, 63–91.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Robertson, D., Snarey, J., Ousley, O., Harenski, K., Bowman, F. D., Gilkey, R., & Kilts, C. (2007). The neural processing of moral sensitivity to issues of justice and care. Neuropsychologia, 45, 755–766.CrossRef Robertson, D., Snarey, J., Ousley, O., Harenski, K., Bowman, F. D., Gilkey, R., & Kilts, C. (2007). The neural processing of moral sensitivity to issues of justice and care. Neuropsychologia, 45, 755–766.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ruigrok, A. N. V., Salimi-Khorshidi, G., Lai, M.-C., Baron-Cohen, S., Lombardo, M. V., Tait, R. J., & Suckling, J. (2014). A meta-analysis of sex differences in human brain structure. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 39, 34–50.CrossRef Ruigrok, A. N. V., Salimi-Khorshidi, G., Lai, M.-C., Baron-Cohen, S., Lombardo, M. V., Tait, R. J., & Suckling, J. (2014). A meta-analysis of sex differences in human brain structure. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 39, 34–50.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Salvador, R., & Folger, R. G. (2009). Business ethics and the brain. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19, 1–31.CrossRef Salvador, R., & Folger, R. G. (2009). Business ethics and the brain. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19, 1–31.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sanfrey, A. G. (2007). Social decision-making: Insights from game theory and neuroscience. Science, 318, 598–602.CrossRef Sanfrey, A. G. (2007). Social decision-making: Insights from game theory and neuroscience. Science, 318, 598–602.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sisk, C. L., & Foster, D. L. (2004). The neural basis of puberty and adolescence. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 1040–1047.CrossRef Sisk, C. L., & Foster, D. L. (2004). The neural basis of puberty and adolescence. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 1040–1047.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Smith, C. T., Sierra, Y., Oppler, S. H., & Boettiger, C. A. (2014). Ovarian cycle effects on immediate reward selection bias in humans: A role for estradiol. The Journal of Neuroscience, 34(16), 5468–5476.CrossRef Smith, C. T., Sierra, Y., Oppler, S. H., & Boettiger, C. A. (2014). Ovarian cycle effects on immediate reward selection bias in humans: A role for estradiol. The Journal of Neuroscience, 34(16), 5468–5476.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Stanton, A. A. (2010). Hormonal influence on male decision-making: Implications for organizational management. In A. A. Stanton, M. Day, & I. M. Welpe (Eds.), Neuroeconomics and the firm (pp. 131–150). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.CrossRef Stanton, A. A. (2010). Hormonal influence on male decision-making: Implications for organizational management. In A. A. Stanton, M. Day, & I. M. Welpe (Eds.), Neuroeconomics and the firm (pp. 131–150). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Steinborn, D., & Heuser, U. J. (2014). Gender über alles. World Policy Journal, 31, 17–23.CrossRef Steinborn, D., & Heuser, U. J. (2014). Gender über alles. World Policy Journal, 31, 17–23.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sweeney, P. D., & McFarlin, D. B. (1997). Process and outcome: Gender differences in the assessment of justice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(7), 83–98.CrossRef Sweeney, P. D., & McFarlin, D. B. (1997). Process and outcome: Gender differences in the assessment of justice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(7), 83–98.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tranel, D., Damasio, H., Denburg, N. L., & Bechara, A. (2005). Does gender play a role in functional asymmetry of ventromedial prefrontal cortex? Brain, 128, 2872–2881.CrossRef Tranel, D., Damasio, H., Denburg, N. L., & Bechara, A. (2005). Does gender play a role in functional asymmetry of ventromedial prefrontal cortex? Brain, 128, 2872–2881.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Weisberg, Y. J., DeYoung, C. G., & Hirsh, J. B. (2011). Gender differences in personality across the ten aspects of the big five. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 178. Weisberg, Y. J., DeYoung, C. G., & Hirsh, J. B. (2011). Gender differences in personality across the ten aspects of the big five. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 178.
Zurück zum Zitat White, T. I. (1992). Business, ethics, and Carol Gilligan’s ‘Two Voices’. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2(1), 51–61.CrossRef White, T. I. (1992). Business, ethics, and Carol Gilligan’s ‘Two Voices’. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2(1), 51–61.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wicks, A. C., Gilbert, J., Daniel, R., & Freeman, R. E. (1994). A feminist reinterpretation of the stakeholder concept. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 475–497.CrossRef Wicks, A. C., Gilbert, J., Daniel, R., & Freeman, R. E. (1994). A feminist reinterpretation of the stakeholder concept. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 475–497.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zak, P. J. (2008). The neurobiology of trust. Scientific American, 298, 88–95.CrossRef Zak, P. J. (2008). The neurobiology of trust. Scientific American, 298, 88–95.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zak, P. J., Boria, K., Matzner, W. T., & Kurzban, R. (2005). The neuroeconomics of distrust: Sex differences in behavior and physiology. American Economic Review, 95, 360–363.CrossRef Zak, P. J., Boria, K., Matzner, W. T., & Kurzban, R. (2005). The neuroeconomics of distrust: Sex differences in behavior and physiology. American Economic Review, 95, 360–363.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Sex Differences Through a Neuroscience Lens: Implications for Business Ethics
verfasst von
Lori Verstegen Ryan
Publikationsdatum
26.04.2016
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3110-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Journal of Business Ethics 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe