Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
In this paper, we investigate the role of artifacts in a failed project that aimed at implementing a new culture of dealing with errors in a hospital by transferring safety standards from the aviation industry. We apply the interpretative method of objective hermeneutics to elucidate the role of artifacts as linking pins between diverging interpretive schemata and collective action during attempts to modify organizational routines. In particular, we show how the implementation of artifacts may serve as a means to satisfy a new espoused schema, while at the same time they are created and interpreted in ways that strengthen the old enacted schema. Although on the surface everyone would appreciate changes in treatment routines that help to avoid errors, the guiding norms of individual vigilance and self-centeredness, a culture that emphasizes hierarchy as a core value as well as the lack of sanctions for enacting the old schema led to a situation where the new espoused schema was never enacted. Instead, artifacts were used to stabilize a divergence between espoused and enacted schemata. Failure remained a cultural taboo.
Balogun, Julia, and Gerry Johnson. 2005. From intended strategies to unintended outcomes: The impact of change recipient sensemaking. Organization Studies 26:1573–1601. CrossRef
Bartunek, Jean M. 1984. Changing interpretive schemes and organizational restructuring: The example of a religious order. Administrative Science Quarterly 29:355–372. CrossRef
Bartunek, Jean M., Catherine A. Lacey, and Diane R. Wood. 1992. Social cognition in organizational change: An insider/outsider approach. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 28:204–223. CrossRef
Becker, Markus C. 2004. Organizational routines: A review of the literature. Industrial & Corporate Change 13:643–677. CrossRef
D’Adderio, Luciana. 2008. The performativity of routines: Theorising the influence of artifacts and distributed agencies on routines dynamics. Research Policy 37:769–789. CrossRef
D’Adderio, Luciana. 2011. Artifacts at the centre of routines: Performing the material turn in routines theory. Journal of Institutional Economics 7:197–230. CrossRef
Dutton, Jane E., and Janet M. Dukerich. 1991. Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal 34:517–554. CrossRef
Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review 14:532–550.
Eisenhardt, Kathleen M., and Melissa E. Graebner. 2007. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal 50:25–32. CrossRef
Elsbach, Kimberly D., Pamela S. Barr, and Andrew B. Hargadon. 2005. Identifying situated cognition in organizations. Organization Science 16:422–433. CrossRef
Feldman, Martha S. 2003. A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines. Industrial and Corporate Change 12:727–752. CrossRef
Feldman, Martha S. 2004. Resources in emerging structures and processes of change. Organization Science 15:295–309. CrossRef
Feldman, Martha S., and Brian T. Pentland. 2003. Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change. Administrative Science Quarterly 48:94–118. CrossRef
Flick, Uwe. 2002. Qualitative research – state of the art. Social Science Information 41:5–24. CrossRef
Friesl, Martin, and Joanne Larty. 2013. Replication of routines in organizations, existing literature and new perspectives. International Journal of Management Reviews 15:106–122. CrossRef
Gawande, Atul. 2011. The checklist manifesto: How to get things right. New York: MacMillan.
Geiger, Daniel, and Anja Schröder. 2014. Ever-changing routines? Toward a revised understanding of organizational routines between rule-following and rule-breaking. Schmalenbach Business Review 66:170–190.
Gilbert, Clark G. 2006. Change in the presence of residual fit: Can competing frames coexist? Organization Science 17:150–167. CrossRef
Gioia, Dennis A., and James B. Thomas. 1996. Identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sensemaking during strategic change in academia. Administrative Science Quarterly 41:370–403. CrossRef
Gioia, Dennis A., James B. Thomas, Shawn M. Clark, and Kumar Chittipeddi. 1994. Symbolism and strategic change in academia: The dynamics of sensemaking and influence. Organization Science 5:363–383. CrossRef
Güttel, Wolfgang H., Stefan W. Konlechner, Barbara Müller, Julia K. Trede, and Mark Lehrer. 2012. Facilitating ambidexterity in replicator organizations: Artifacts in their role as routine-recreators. Schmalenbach Business Review 74:187–203.
Hildebrand, Bruno. 2004. Gemeinsames Ziel, verschiedene Wege: Grounded Theory und Objektive Hermeneutik im Vergleich. Sozialer Sinn 4:177–194.
Hitzler, Ronald. 2005. The reconstruction of meaning: Notes on German interpretive sociology. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 6:1–10.
Howard-Grenville, Jennifer A. 2005. The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organization Science 16:618–636. CrossRef
Isabella, Lynn A. 1990. Evolving interpretations as a change unfolds: How managers construe key organizational events. Academy of Management Journal 33:7–41. CrossRef
Labianca, Giuseppe, Barbara Gray, and Daniel J. Brass. 2000. A grounded model of organizational schema change during empowerment. Organization Science 11:235–257. CrossRef
Leidner, Robin. 1993. Fast food, fast talk: Service work and the routinization of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lewis, Geraint A., Rhema Vaithianathan, Peter M. Hockey, Guy Hirst, and James P. Bagian. 2011. Counterheroism, common knowledge, and ergonomics: Concepts from aviation that could improve patient safety. The Milbank Quarterly 89:4–38. CrossRef
Lueger, Manfred, Karl Sandner, Renate Meyer, and Gerhard Hammerschmid. 2005. Contextualizing influence activities: An objective hermeneutical approach. Organization Studies 26:1145–1168. CrossRef
Miles, Matthew B., and Michael A. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, 2nd edn., Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Nag, Rajiv, Kevin G. Corley, and Dennis A. Gioia. 2007. The intersection of organizational identity, knowledge, and practice: Attempting strategic change via knowledge grafting. Academy of Management Journal 50:821–847. CrossRef
Nystrom, Paul C., and William H. Starbuck. 1984. To avoid organizational crises, unlearn. Organizational Dynamics 12:53–65. CrossRef
Oevermann, Ulrich, Tilman Allert, Elisabeth Konau, and Jürgen Krambeck. 1979. Die Methodologie einer “objektiven Hermeneutik” und ihre allgemeine forschungslogische Bedeutung in den Sozialwissenschaften. In Interpretative Verfahren in den Sozial- und Textwissenschaften, ed. Hans-Georg Soeffner, 352–434. Stuttgart: Metzler.
Parmigiani, Anne, and Jennifer Howard-Grenville. 2011. Routines revisited: Exploring the capabilities and practice perspectives. Academy of Management Annals 5:413–453. CrossRef
Pentland, Brian T., and Martha S. Feldman. 2008. Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action. Information and Organization 18:235–250. CrossRef
Petit, Sandra C., and Isabelle Huault. 2008. From practice-based knowledge to the practice of research: Revisiting constructivist research works on knowledge. Management Learning 39:73–91. CrossRef
Rafaeli, Anat, and Iris Vilnai-Yavetz. 2004. Emotion as a connection of physical artifacts and organizations. Organization Science 15:671–686. CrossRef
Reger, Rhonda K., Loren T. Gustafson, Samuel M. Demarie, and John V. Mullane. 1994. Reframing the organization: Why implementing total quality is easier said than done. Academy of Management Review 19:565–584.
Reger, Rhonda K., and Timothy B. Palmer. 1996. Managerial categorization of competitors: Using old maps to navigate new environments. Organization Science 7:22–39. CrossRef
Rerup, Claus, and Martha S. Feldman. 2011. Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: The role of trial-and-error learning. Academy of Management Journal 54:577–610. CrossRef
Salvato, Carlo, and Claus Rerup. 2011. Beyond collective entities: Multi-level research on organizational routines and capabilities. Journal of Management 37:468–490. CrossRef
Seidl, David, and Kai H. Becker. 2006. Organizations as distinction generating and processing systems: Niklas Luhmann’s contribution to organization studies. Organization 13:9–35. CrossRef
Siggelkow, Nicolaj. 2007. Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal 50:20–24. CrossRef
Tamuz, Michael, and Eric J. Thomas. 2006. Classifying and interpreting threats to patient safety in hospitals: Insights from aviation. Journal of Organizational Behavior 27:919–940. CrossRef
Tucker, Anita L., and Amy C. Edmondson. 2003. Why hospitals don’t learn from failures: Organizational and psychological dynamics that inhibit system change. California Management Review 45:55–72. CrossRef
Turner, Scott F., and Violina Rindova. 2012. A balancing act: How organizations pursue consistency in routine functioning in the face of ongoing change. Organization Science 23:24–46. CrossRef
Wagner, Stephan M., Peter Lukassen, and Matthias Mahlendorf. 2010. Misused and missed use – Grounded Theory and Objective Hermeneutics as methods for research in industrial marketing. Industrial Marketing Management 39:5–15. CrossRef
Weber, Reneé, and Jennifer Crocker. 1983. Cognitive processes in the revision of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45:961–977. CrossRef
Yin, Robert K. 2009. Case Study Research, Design and Methods, 4th edn., Thousand Oaks: Sage.
- Sheep in Wolf’s Clothing: The Role of Artifacts in Interpretive Schema Change
Stefan W. Konlechner
Wolfgang H. Güttel
- Springer International Publishing
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, Voraussetzungen für wirtschaftliche additive Fertigung/© Marco2811 | Fotolia