Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction: The Shifting Global Economic Architecture Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

7. Shifting Authority of Actors in Global Economic Governance

verfasst von : Jonathan Luckhurst

Erschienen in: The Shifting Global Economic Architecture

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter demonstrates how the organizational and policymaking shifts influenced the authority of actors in global economic governance. This indicates that decentralizing strategic, political, and cognitive authority has significantly influenced actor hierarchies in the global economic architecture, especially since the GFC. This aspect of decentralizing authority leading to destabilizing actor hierarchies has been particularly significant for global development and financial governance, principally since the GFC. The chapter indicates how these effects were constituted through the strategic, political, and cognitive agency of actors. On the question of whether these shifts in the global economic architecture constituted a ‘post-Western’ world, while there has been what might be called a partial rebalancing due to decentralizing authority, nevertheless, the leading Western states, especially the G7, remain highly influential.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel The Growing Sustainable Development Consensus
Nächstes Kapitel Fragmentation or Integration of Global Economic Governance
Fußnoten
1
The May 2017 Taormina G7 Summit was widely considered damaging for American foreign relations and global authority. The Trump administration was isolated on climate change, and the president’s Twitter use exacerbated tensions with Chancellor Merkel (see Henley 2017; Irish and Balmer 2017; Osbourne 2017).
 
Literatur
Acharya, A. (2014). The end of American world order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bremmer, I. (2012). Every nation for itself: Winners and losers in a g-zero world. New York: Portfolio.
Buzdugan, S., & Payne, A. (2016). The long battle for global governance. London/New York: Routledge.
Conway, E. (2014). The summit: The biggest battle of the second world war—Fought behind closed doors. London: Little, Brown.
Cooper, A. F. (2008). Executive but expansive: The L20 as a project of ‘new’ multilateralism and ‘new’ regionalism. In A. F. Cooper, C. W. Hughes, & P. de Lombaerde (Eds.), Regionalisation and global governance: The taming of globalisation? (pp. 249–264). Abingdon: Routledge.
De Ville, F., & Siles-Brügge, G. (2015). The transatlantic trade and investment partnership and the role of computable general equilibrium modelling: An exercise in ‘managing fictional expectations’. New Political Economy, 20(5), 653–678.CrossRef
Eichengreen, B., Park, D., & Shin, K. (2013). Growth slowdowns redux: New evidence on the middle-income trap. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), working paper series (Working paper 18673). http://​www.​nber.​org/​papers/​w18673. Accessed 27 June 2017.
Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917.CrossRef
Garcia-Duran, P., & Eliasson, L. J. (2017). The public debate over transatlantic trade and investment partnership and its underlying assumptions. Journal of World Trade, 51(1), 23–42.
Giddens, A. (2002). Runaway world: How globalization is reshaping our lives. London: Profile Books.
Hall, P. A. (1989). The political power of economic ideas: Keynesianism across nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Helleiner, E. (2014). The forgotten foundations of Bretton Woods: International development and the making of the postwar order. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.
Helleiner, E. (2016a). Finance. In A. Acharya (Ed.), Why govern? Rethinking demand and progress in global governance (pp. 174–191). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Helleiner, E. (2016b). Legacies of the 2008 crisis for global financial governance. Global Summitry, 2(1), 1–12.CrossRef
Higgott, R. (2016). Regional worlds, regional institutions: Towards the regional economic institutionalisation of east Asia? CSGR (Working paper no. 280/16). Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, University of Warwick. www.​warwick.​ac.​uk/​csgr/​papers/​280-16.​pdf. Accessed 27 June 2017.
Hudson, V. M. (2005). Foreign policy analysis: Actor-specific theory and the ground of international relations. Foreign Policy Analysis, 1, 1–30.CrossRef
Ikenberry, G. J. (2008). The rise of China and the future of the west: Can the liberal system survive? Foreign Affairs, 87(1), 23–37.
Ikenberry, G. J. (2011). Liberal leviathan: The origins, crisis, and transformation of the American world order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Joffe, J. (2009). The default power: The false prophecy of America’s decline. Foreign Affairs, 88(5), 21–35.
Kiely, R. (2015). The BRICs, US ‘decline’ and global transformations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kotzian, P., & Kohler-Koch, B. (2015). Holding international governance to account: Do civil society organizations have a chance to exert accountability? Journal of International Organizations Studies, 6(2), 5–26.
Krauthammer, C. (1990). The unipolar moment. Foreign Affairs: America and the World, 70(1), 23–33.CrossRef
Krauthammer, C. (2002). The unipolar moment revisited. The National Interest, Winter 2002–03.
Krugman, P. (1995). Dutch tulips and emerging markets: Another bubble bursts. Foreign Affairs, 74(4), 28–44.CrossRef
Layne, C. (2012). This time it’s real: The end of unipolarity and the pax Americana. International Studies Quarterly, 56(1), 203–213.CrossRef
Leffler, M. P. (2005). 9/11 and American foreign policy. Diplomatic History, 29(3), 395–413.CrossRef
Lin, J. Y. (2010). New structural economics: A framework for rethinking development. World Bank policy research working paper 5197. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Luckhurst, J. (2016). The G20’s growing political and economic challenges. Global Summitry: Politics, Economics, and Law in International Governance, 2(2), 161–179.CrossRef
Mearsheimer, J. J. (1994). The false promise of international institutions. International Security, 19(3), 5–49.CrossRef
Naím, M. (2000). Fads and fashion in economic reforms: Washington consensus or Washington confusion? Third World Quarterly, 21(3), 505–528.CrossRef
Ohmae, K. (1990). The borderless world: Power and strategy in the interlinked economy. London/New York: Collins.
Ohmae, K. (1995). The end of the nation state. London: HarperCollins.
Rodrik, D. (2006). Goodbye Washington consensus, hello Washington confusion? Journal of Economic Literature, 44(4), 973–987.CrossRef
Ruggie, J. G. (1982). International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization, 36(2), 379–415.CrossRef
Schirm, S. A. (2013). Global politics are domestic politics: A societal approach to divergence in the G20. Review of International Studies, 39(3), 685–706.CrossRef
Shambaugh, D. (2016). China’s future. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Sohn, I. (2005). Asian financial cooperation: The problem of legitimacy in global financial governance. Global Governance, 11(4), 487–504.
Steil, B. (2013). The battle of Bretton Woods: John Maynard Keynes, Harry Dexter White, and the making of a new world order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRef
Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Participation and development: Perspectives from the comprehensive development paradigm. Review of Development Economics, 6(2), 163–182.CrossRef
Stuenkel, O. (2016). Post-Western world: How emerging powers are remaking global order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Suzuki, S. (2015). Will the AIIB trigger off a new round of rivalry in economic diplomacy between China and Japan? Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation (CSGR) (Working paper 279/15). Warwick: University of Warwick.
Walt, S. M. (2011, November/December). The end of the American era. The National Interest, 116, 6–17.
Waltz, K. N. (2000). Structural realism after the Cold War. International Security, 25(1), 5–41.CrossRef
Zakaria, F. (2008). The post-American world. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Metadaten
Titel
Shifting Authority of Actors in Global Economic Governance
verfasst von
Jonathan Luckhurst
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Buch
The Shifting Global Economic Architecture

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63156-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-63157-8

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63157-8_7