Skip to main content

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Short-Range Ensemble Forecast Post-processing

verfasst von : Marie-Amélie Boucher, Emmanuel Roulin, Vincent Fortin

Erschienen in: Handbook of Hydrometeorological Ensemble Forecasting

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Short-term hydrological ensemble forecasts do not usually account for the uncertainty in the initial conditions. Consequently, raw forecasts are often biased and under-dispersed and must be post-processed. Both precipitation and streamflow forecasts for short lead-time depart from the Gaussian distribution, and this important characteristic limits the choice of possible post-processing approaches. Post-processing is performed by calibrating a statistical model using a training dataset containing past forecasts and the corresponding observations. This chapter covers the most common post-processing approaches for short-term hydrological forecasts. They are divided into four categories: analog methods, regressions, kernel dressing, and Bayesian Model Averaging. The vast majority of post-processing methods can be categorized as regression-based. A selection of the most commonly encountered ones in hydrology is presented: quantile regression, nonhomogeneous regression, and logistic regression. Any post-processing approach brings benefits and drawbacks, which are discussed at the end of this chapter. However, according to the few existing comparative studies, no single method is appropriate for all forecasting situation. Therefore, the reader should make his or her own mind regarding which one to choose, according to his or her own specific needs and limitations.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat S. Applequist, G.E. Gahrs, R.L. Pfeffer, X.-F. Niu, Comparison of methodologies for probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasting. Weather Forecast. 17(4), 783–799 (2002)CrossRef S. Applequist, G.E. Gahrs, R.L. Pfeffer, X.-F. Niu, Comparison of methodologies for probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasting. Weather Forecast. 17(4), 783–799 (2002)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Z. Ben Bouallègue, Calibrated short-range ensemble precipitation forecasts using extended logistic regression with interaction terms. Weather Forecast. 28(2), 515–524 (2013)CrossRef Z. Ben Bouallègue, Calibrated short-range ensemble precipitation forecasts using extended logistic regression with interaction terms. Weather Forecast. 28(2), 515–524 (2013)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat M.-A. Boucher, L. Perreault, F. Anctil, A.-C. Favre, Exploratory analysis of statistical post-processing methods for hydrological ensemble forecasts, a comparative study. Hydrol. Process. 29, 1141–1155 (2015)CrossRef M.-A. Boucher, L. Perreault, F. Anctil, A.-C. Favre, Exploratory analysis of statistical post-processing methods for hydrological ensemble forecasts, a comparative study. Hydrol. Process. 29, 1141–1155 (2015)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat J.B. Bremnes, Probabilistic forecasts of precipitation in terms of quantiles using NWP model output. Mon. Weather Rev. 132, 338–347 (2004)CrossRef J.B. Bremnes, Probabilistic forecasts of precipitation in terms of quantiles using NWP model output. Mon. Weather Rev. 132, 338–347 (2004)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat J. Broecker, L.A. Smith, From ensemble forecasts to predictive distribution functions. Tellus Ser A 60(4), 663–678 (2008)CrossRef J. Broecker, L.A. Smith, From ensemble forecasts to predictive distribution functions. Tellus Ser A 60(4), 663–678 (2008)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat G.M. Carter, J.P. Dallavalle, H.R. Glahn, Statistical forecasts based on the National Meteorological Center’s numerical weather prediction system. Weather Forecast. 4, 401–412 (1989)CrossRef G.M. Carter, J.P. Dallavalle, H.R. Glahn, Statistical forecasts based on the National Meteorological Center’s numerical weather prediction system. Weather Forecast. 4, 401–412 (1989)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat M. Clark, S. Gangopadhyay, L. Hay, B. Rajagopalan, R. Wilby, The Schaake shuffle: a method for reconstructing space-time variability in forecasted precipitation and temperature fields. J. Hydrometeorol. 5(1), 243–262 (2004)CrossRef M. Clark, S. Gangopadhyay, L. Hay, B. Rajagopalan, R. Wilby, The Schaake shuffle: a method for reconstructing space-time variability in forecasted precipitation and temperature fields. J. Hydrometeorol. 5(1), 243–262 (2004)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat J. Demargne, L. Wu, S.K. Regonda, J.D. Brown, H. Lee, M.X. He, D.J. Seo, R. Hartman, H.D. Herr, M. Fresch, J. Schaake, Y.J. Zhu, The science of NOAA’s operational hydrologic ensemble forecast service. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 95(1), 79–98 (2014)CrossRef J. Demargne, L. Wu, S.K. Regonda, J.D. Brown, H. Lee, M.X. He, D.J. Seo, R. Hartman, H.D. Herr, M. Fresch, J. Schaake, Y.J. Zhu, The science of NOAA’s operational hydrologic ensemble forecast service. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 95(1), 79–98 (2014)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat V. Fortin, A.-C. Favre, M. Saïd, Probabilistic forecasting from ensemble prediction systems: improving upon the best-member method by using a different weight and dressing kernel for each member. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 132(617), 1349–1369 (2006)CrossRef V. Fortin, A.-C. Favre, M. Saïd, Probabilistic forecasting from ensemble prediction systems: improving upon the best-member method by using a different weight and dressing kernel for each member. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 132(617), 1349–1369 (2006)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat C. Fraley, A.E. Raftery, J.M. Sloughter, T. Gneiting, ensembleBMA: An R Package for Probabilistic Forecasting Using Ensembles and Bayesian Model Averaging. Technical Report 516 (Department of Statistics, University of Washington, 2007) C. Fraley, A.E. Raftery, J.M. Sloughter, T. Gneiting, ensembleBMA: An R Package for Probabilistic Forecasting Using Ensembles and Bayesian Model Averaging. Technical Report 516 (Department of Statistics, University of Washington, 2007)
Zurück zum Zitat C. Fraley, A.E. Raftery, T. Gneiting, Calibrating multi-model forecast ensembles with exchangeable and missing members using Bayesian Model Averaging. Mon. Weather Rev. 138, 190–202 (2010)CrossRef C. Fraley, A.E. Raftery, T. Gneiting, Calibrating multi-model forecast ensembles with exchangeable and missing members using Bayesian Model Averaging. Mon. Weather Rev. 138, 190–202 (2010)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat P. Friederichs, A. Hense, Statistical downscaling of extreme precipitation events using censored quantile regression. Mon. Weather Rev. 135(6), 2365–2378 (2007)CrossRef P. Friederichs, A. Hense, Statistical downscaling of extreme precipitation events using censored quantile regression. Mon. Weather Rev. 135(6), 2365–2378 (2007)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat F. Fundel, M. Zappa, Hydrological ensemble forecasting in mesoscale catchments: sensitivity to initial conditions and value of reforecasts. Water Resour. Res. 47(9), p 9520 (2011) F. Fundel, M. Zappa, Hydrological ensemble forecasting in mesoscale catchments: sensitivity to initial conditions and value of reforecasts. Water Resour. Res. 47(9), p 9520 (2011)
Zurück zum Zitat H.R. Glahn, D.A. Lowry, The use of model output statistics (MOS) in objective weather forecasting. J. Appl. Meteorol. 11, 1203–1211 (1972)CrossRef H.R. Glahn, D.A. Lowry, The use of model output statistics (MOS) in objective weather forecasting. J. Appl. Meteorol. 11, 1203–1211 (1972)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat T. Gneiting, A.-E. Raftery, A.-H. Westveld, T. Goldman, Calibrated probabilistic forecasting using ensemble model output statistics and minimum CRPS estimation. Mon. Weather Rev. 133(5), 1098–1118 (2005)CrossRef T. Gneiting, A.-E. Raftery, A.-H. Westveld, T. Goldman, Calibrated probabilistic forecasting using ensemble model output statistics and minimum CRPS estimation. Mon. Weather Rev. 133(5), 1098–1118 (2005)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat T.M. Hamill, Verification of TIGGE multimodel and ECMWF reforecast-calibrated probabilistic precipitation forecasts over the contiguous United States. Mon. Weather Rev. 140, 2232–2252 (2012)CrossRef T.M. Hamill, Verification of TIGGE multimodel and ECMWF reforecast-calibrated probabilistic precipitation forecasts over the contiguous United States. Mon. Weather Rev. 140, 2232–2252 (2012)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat T.M. Hamill, J.S. Whitaker, Probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasts based on reforecast analogs: theory and application. Mon. Weather Rev. 134(11), 3209–3229 (2006)CrossRef T.M. Hamill, J.S. Whitaker, Probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasts based on reforecast analogs: theory and application. Mon. Weather Rev. 134(11), 3209–3229 (2006)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat C. Johnson, N. Bowler, On the reliability and calibration of ensemble forecasts. Mon. Weather Rev. 137, 1717–1720 (2009)CrossRef C. Johnson, N. Bowler, On the reliability and calibration of ensemble forecasts. Mon. Weather Rev. 137, 1717–1720 (2009)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat T.H. Kang, Y.O. Kim, I.P. Hong, Comparison of pre- and post-processors for ensemble streamflow prediction. Atmos. Sci. Lett. 11(2), 153–159 (2010)CrossRef T.H. Kang, Y.O. Kim, I.P. Hong, Comparison of pre- and post-processors for ensemble streamflow prediction. Atmos. Sci. Lett. 11(2), 153–159 (2010)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat R. Koenker, G. Basset, Regression quantiles. Econometrica 46(1), 33–50 (1978)CrossRef R. Koenker, G. Basset, Regression quantiles. Econometrica 46(1), 33–50 (1978)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat E.N. Lorenz, Atmospheric predictability as revealed by naturally occurring analogues. J. Atmos. Sci. 26(4), 636–646 (1969)CrossRef E.N. Lorenz, Atmospheric predictability as revealed by naturally occurring analogues. J. Atmos. Sci. 26(4), 636–646 (1969)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat R. Marty, V. Fortin, H. Kuswanto, A.-C. Favre, E. Parent, Combining the Bayesian processor of output with Bayesian Model Averaging for reliable ensemble forecasting. J. R. Stat. Soc. C Appl. Stat. 64(1), 75–92 (2014)CrossRef R. Marty, V. Fortin, H. Kuswanto, A.-C. Favre, E. Parent, Combining the Bayesian processor of output with Bayesian Model Averaging for reliable ensemble forecasting. J. R. Stat. Soc. C Appl. Stat. 64(1), 75–92 (2014)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat J.W. Messner, A. Zeileis, crch: Censored Regression with Conditional Heteroscedasticity (2013). R package version 0.1-0 J.W. Messner, A. Zeileis, crch: Censored Regression with Conditional Heteroscedasticity (2013). R package version 0.1-0
Zurück zum Zitat J.W. Messner, G.J. Mayr, D.S. Wilks, A. Zeileis, Extending extended logistic regression: extended vs. separate vs. ordered vs. censored. Mon. Weather Rev. 142(8), 3003–3014 (2014a) J.W. Messner, G.J. Mayr, D.S. Wilks, A. Zeileis, Extending extended logistic regression: extended vs. separate vs. ordered vs. censored. Mon. Weather Rev. 142(8), 3003–3014 (2014a)
Zurück zum Zitat J.W. Messner, G.J. Mayr, A. Zeileis, D.S. Wilks, Heteroscedastic extended logistic regression for post-processing of ensemble guidance. Mon. Weather Rev. 142(1), 448–456 (2014b)CrossRef J.W. Messner, G.J. Mayr, A. Zeileis, D.S. Wilks, Heteroscedastic extended logistic regression for post-processing of ensemble guidance. Mon. Weather Rev. 142(1), 448–456 (2014b)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat J.A. Nelder, R.W.M. Wedderburn, Generalized linear models. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A Gen. 135(3), 370–384 (1972)CrossRef J.A. Nelder, R.W.M. Wedderburn, Generalized linear models. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A Gen. 135(3), 370–384 (1972)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat T.C. Pagano, D.L. Shrestha, Q.J. Wang, D. Robertson, P. Hapuarachchi, Ensemble dressing for hydrological applications. Hydrol. Process. 27(1), 106–116 (2013)CrossRef T.C. Pagano, D.L. Shrestha, Q.J. Wang, D. Robertson, P. Hapuarachchi, Ensemble dressing for hydrological applications. Hydrol. Process. 27(1), 106–116 (2013)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat A.E. Raftery, T. Gneiting, F. Balabdaoui, M. Polakowski, Using Bayesian Model Averaging to calibrate forecast ensembles. Mon. Weather Rev. 133, 1155–1174 (2005)CrossRef A.E. Raftery, T. Gneiting, F. Balabdaoui, M. Polakowski, Using Bayesian Model Averaging to calibrate forecast ensembles. Mon. Weather Rev. 133, 1155–1174 (2005)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat E. Roulin, S. Vannitsem, Post-processing of ensemble precipitation predictions with extended logistic regression based on hindcasts. Mon. Weather Rev. 140, 874–888 (2012)CrossRef E. Roulin, S. Vannitsem, Post-processing of ensemble precipitation predictions with extended logistic regression based on hindcasts. Mon. Weather Rev. 140, 874–888 (2012)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat E. Roulin, S. Vannitsem, Post-processing of medium range probabilistic hydrological forecasting: impact of forcing, initial conditions and model errors. Hydrol. Process. 29(6), 1434–1449 (2014)CrossRef E. Roulin, S. Vannitsem, Post-processing of medium range probabilistic hydrological forecasting: impact of forcing, initial conditions and model errors. Hydrol. Process. 29(6), 1434–1449 (2014)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat M.-S. Roulston, L.-A. Smith, Combining dynamical and statistical ensembles. Tellus 55A(1), 16–30 (2003)CrossRef M.-S. Roulston, L.-A. Smith, Combining dynamical and statistical ensembles. Tellus 55A(1), 16–30 (2003)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat R. Schefzik, T.L. Thorarinsdottir, T. Gneiting, Uncertainty quantification in complex simulation models using ensemble copula coupling. Stat. Sci. 28(4), 616–640 (2013)CrossRef R. Schefzik, T.L. Thorarinsdottir, T. Gneiting, Uncertainty quantification in complex simulation models using ensemble copula coupling. Stat. Sci. 28(4), 616–640 (2013)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat M. Scheuerer, Probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasting using ensemble model output statistics. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 140(680), 1086–1096 (2014)CrossRef M. Scheuerer, Probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasting using ensemble model output statistics. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 140(680), 1086–1096 (2014)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat M.J. Schmeits, K.J. Kok, A comparison between raw ensemble output, (modified) Bayesian Model Averaging, and extended logistic regression using ECMWF ensemble precipitation reforecasts. Mon. Weather Rev. 138, 4199–4211 (2010)CrossRef M.J. Schmeits, K.J. Kok, A comparison between raw ensemble output, (modified) Bayesian Model Averaging, and extended logistic regression using ECMWF ensemble precipitation reforecasts. Mon. Weather Rev. 138, 4199–4211 (2010)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat J.M. Sloughter, A.E. Raftery, T. Gneiting, Probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasting using Bayesian Model Averaging. Mon. Weather Rev. 135, 3209–3220 (2007)CrossRef J.M. Sloughter, A.E. Raftery, T. Gneiting, Probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasting using Bayesian Model Averaging. Mon. Weather Rev. 135, 3209–3220 (2007)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat S.J. van Andel, A.H. Weerts, J. Schaake, K. Bogner, Post-processing hydrological ensemble predictions intercomparison experiment. Hydrol. Process. 27(1), 158–161 (2012)CrossRef S.J. van Andel, A.H. Weerts, J. Schaake, K. Bogner, Post-processing hydrological ensemble predictions intercomparison experiment. Hydrol. Process. 27(1), 158–161 (2012)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat H.M. Van Den Dool, Searching for analogues, how long must we wait? Tellus A 46, 314–324 (1994)CrossRef H.M. Van Den Dool, Searching for analogues, how long must we wait? Tellus A 46, 314–324 (1994)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat B. Van Schaeybroeck, S. Vannitsem, Post-processing through linear regression. Nonlinear Process. Geophys. 18, 147–160 (2011)CrossRef B. Van Schaeybroeck, S. Vannitsem, Post-processing through linear regression. Nonlinear Process. Geophys. 18, 147–160 (2011)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat B. Van Schaeybroeck, S. Vannitsem, Ensemble post-processing using member-by-member approaches: theoretical aspects. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 141(688), 807–818 Part: A Published: APR 2015. Early View (2014) B. Van Schaeybroeck, S. Vannitsem, Ensemble post-processing using member-by-member approaches: theoretical aspects. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 141(688), 807–818 Part: A Published: APR 2015. Early View (2014)
Zurück zum Zitat S. Vannitsem, A unified linear model output statistics scheme for both deterministic and ensemble forecasts. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 135(644), 1801–1815 (2009)CrossRef S. Vannitsem, A unified linear model output statistics scheme for both deterministic and ensemble forecasts. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 135(644), 1801–1815 (2009)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat J.S. Verkade, J.D. Brown, P. Reggiani, A.H. Weerts, Post-processing ECMWF precipitation and temperature ensemble reforecasts for operational hydrologic forecasting at various spatial scales. Mon. Weather Rev. 135(6), 2379–2390 (2007)CrossRef J.S. Verkade, J.D. Brown, P. Reggiani, A.H. Weerts, Post-processing ECMWF precipitation and temperature ensemble reforecasts for operational hydrologic forecasting at various spatial scales. Mon. Weather Rev. 135(6), 2379–2390 (2007)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat M.-P. Wand, M.-C. Jones, Kernel Smoothing (Chapman and Hall, London, 1995)CrossRef M.-P. Wand, M.-C. Jones, Kernel Smoothing (Chapman and Hall, London, 1995)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat A.H. Weerts, H.C. Winsemius, J.S. Verkade, Estimation of predictive hydrological uncertainty using quantile regression: example from the national flood forecasting system (England and Wales). Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 15, 255–265 (2011)CrossRef A.H. Weerts, H.C. Winsemius, J.S. Verkade, Estimation of predictive hydrological uncertainty using quantile regression: example from the national flood forecasting system (England and Wales). Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 15, 255–265 (2011)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat D.S. Wilks, Comparison of ensemble-MOS methods in the Lorenz ’96 setting. Meteorol. Appl. 13(3), 243–256 (2006)CrossRef D.S. Wilks, Comparison of ensemble-MOS methods in the Lorenz ’96 setting. Meteorol. Appl. 13(3), 243–256 (2006)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat D.S. Wilks, Extending logistic regression to provide full-probability-distribution MOS forecasts. Meteorol. Appl. 16(3), 361–368 (2009)CrossRef D.S. Wilks, Extending logistic regression to provide full-probability-distribution MOS forecasts. Meteorol. Appl. 16(3), 361–368 (2009)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat D.S. Wilks, Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences (Academic/Elsevier, 2011) D.S. Wilks, Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences (Academic/Elsevier, 2011)
Zurück zum Zitat D.S. Wilks, T.M. Hamill, Comparison of ensemble-MOS methods using GFS reforecasts. Mon. Weather Rev. 135(6), 2379–2390 (2007)CrossRef D.S. Wilks, T.M. Hamill, Comparison of ensemble-MOS methods using GFS reforecasts. Mon. Weather Rev. 135(6), 2379–2390 (2007)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat R.M. Williams, C.A.T. Ferro, F. Kwasniok, A comparison of ensemble post-processing methods for extreme events. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 140, 1112–1120 (2014)CrossRef R.M. Williams, C.A.T. Ferro, F. Kwasniok, A comparison of ensemble post-processing methods for extreme events. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 140, 1112–1120 (2014)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat L.J. Wilson, S. Beauregard, A.E. Raftery, R. Verret, Calibrated surface temperature forecasts from the Canadian ensemble prediction system using Bayesian Model Averaging (with discussion). Mon. Weather Rev. 135, 1364–1385 (2007). Discussion pages 4226–4236CrossRef L.J. Wilson, S. Beauregard, A.E. Raftery, R. Verret, Calibrated surface temperature forecasts from the Canadian ensemble prediction system using Bayesian Model Averaging (with discussion). Mon. Weather Rev. 135, 1364–1385 (2007). Discussion pages 4226–4236CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat A.W. Wood, Dynamical-statistical approaches for hydrological ensemble prediction, in Science Symposium Proceedings, Melbourne, Australia, 2012 (CSIRO: Water for a Healthy Country National Research Flagship, 2012) A.W. Wood, Dynamical-statistical approaches for hydrological ensemble prediction, in Science Symposium Proceedings, Melbourne, Australia, 2012 (CSIRO: Water for a Healthy Country National Research Flagship, 2012)
Zurück zum Zitat A.W. Wood, J.C. Schaake, Correcting errors in streamflow forecast ensemble mean and spread. J. Hydrometeorol. 9, 132–148 (2008)CrossRef A.W. Wood, J.C. Schaake, Correcting errors in streamflow forecast ensemble mean and spread. J. Hydrometeorol. 9, 132–148 (2008)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat L. Zhao, Q. Duan, J. Schaake, A. Ye, J. Xia, A hydrologic post-processor for ensemble streamflow predictions. Adv. Geosci. 29, 51–59 (2011)CrossRef L. Zhao, Q. Duan, J. Schaake, A. Ye, J. Xia, A hydrologic post-processor for ensemble streamflow predictions. Adv. Geosci. 29, 51–59 (2011)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Short-Range Ensemble Forecast Post-processing
verfasst von
Marie-Amélie Boucher
Emmanuel Roulin
Vincent Fortin
Copyright-Jahr
2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39925-1_71