Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Lead Editor: P. C. Taylor.
Educating new generations of physicists is often seen as a matter of attracting good students, teaching them physics and making sure that they stay at the university. Sometimes, questions are also raised about what could be done to increase diversity in recruitment. Using a discursive perspective, in this study of three introductory quantum physics courses at two Swedish universities, we instead ask what it means to become a physicist, and whether certain ways of becoming a physicist and doing physics is privileged in this process. Asking the question of what discursive positions are made accessible to students, we use observations of lectures and problem solving sessions together with interviews with students to characterize the discourse in the courses. Many students seem to have high expectations for the quantum physics course and generally express that they appreciate the course more than other courses. Nevertheless, our analysis shows that the ways of being a “good quantum physics student” are limited by the dominating focus on calculating quantum physics in the courses. We argue that this could have negative consequences both for the education of future physicists and the discipline of physics itself, in that it may reproduce an instrumental “shut up and calculate”-culture of physics, as well as an elitist physics education. Additionally, many students who take the courses are not future physicists, and the limitation of discursive positions may also affect these students significantly.
Adams, W. K., Perkins, K. K., Podolefsky, N. S., Dubson, M., Finkelstein, N. D., & Wieman, C. E. (2006). New instrument for measuring student beliefs about physics and learning physics: The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research,2(1), 010101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.2.010101. CrossRef
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
Butler, J. (1997). The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press.
Byrne, R. (2006). The secret. London: Atria.
Chopra, D. (1989). Quantum healing: Exploring the frontiers of mind/body medicine. New York: New Age.
Commission, European. (2004). Report by the high level group on increasing human resources for science and technology in Europe. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Danielsson, A. T. (2009). Doing physics— doing gender: An exploration of physics students’ identity constitution in the context of laboratory work (Ph.D. thesis). Uppsala Universitet. Retrieved from http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-98907.
Due, K. (2012). Who is the competent physics student? A study of students’ positions and social interaction in small-group discussions. Cultural Studies of Science Education,. doi: 10.1007/s11422-012-9441-z.
Ferdinande, H. (2009). A European specification for physics bachelor studies. EPS Publications. Retrieved from http://www.eps.org/resource/resmgr/policy/eps_specification_bphys.pdf.
Gee, J. P. (2011). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Hasse, C., Sinding, A. B., Trentemøller, S., Velbaum, K., Lõhkivi, E., Tina, M.-L., et al. (2008). Draw the line! Universities as workplaces for male and female researchers in Europe. Tartu: UPGEM, Understanding Puzzles in the Gendered European Map. Retrieved from https://pure.au.dk/ws/files/177/Draw_the_Line_.
Jorgensen, M. W., & Phillips, L. J. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. CrossRef
Kaiser, D. (2007). Turning physicists into quantum mechanics. Physics World, (May), 28–33.
National Research Council. (2012). Discipline- based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13362.
OECD. (2008). Encouraging student interest in science and technology studies. Paris: Global Science Forum.
President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.
Redish, E. F. (2003). Teaching physics with the physics suite. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Rolin, K. (2008). Gender and physics: Feminist philosophy and science education. Science & Education,17(10), 1111–1125. CrossRef
Taylor, P. C. (2014). Contemporary qualitative research: Toward an integral research perspective. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II, pp. 38–54). New York: Routledge.
Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Tytler, R. (2014). Attitudes, identity, and aspirations toward science. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II, pp. 82–103). New York: Routledge.
Wertheim, M. (1995). Pythagoras’ trousers: God, physics, and the gender wars. New York: Times Books/Random House.
- “Shut up and calculate”: the available discursive positions in quantum physics courses
- Springer Netherlands
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, Neuer Inhalt/© julien tromeur | Fotolia