nach oben

Erschienen in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Situational Method Engineering for Constructing Internet of Things Development Methods

verfasst von : Görkem Giray, Bedir Tekinerdogan

Erschienen in: Business Modeling and Software Design

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Developing Internet of Things (IoT) systems is not trivial and needs to be performed systematically to derive an IoT system that meets the required functional and non-functional concerns. Since IoT is applied to different heterogeneous domains usually a one-size-fits-all method is less feasible. For some cases a lightweight method with a few method artefacts are sufficient while in other cases a detailed set of method artefacts over the whole lifecycle might be required. So far, a few IoT system development methods (SDM) have been provided that include the steps necessary for guiding the development of IoT systems but these do not explicitly consider the situational needs for the required IoT method. In this paper we propose a situational method engineering (SME) approach for developing a method base that includes a broad set of method fragments which can be reused to develop customized methods. We illustrate the development of the method base using the existing IoT methods that have been proposed in the literature so far. Further we show how the method base can be used to develop methods for two different cases.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Increasing the Visibility of Requirements Based on Combined Variability Management

Nächstes Kapitel Towards Blockchain Support for Business Processes

Jacobson, I., Spence, I., Ng, P.W.: Is there a single method for the Internet of Things? Queue 15(3), 20 (2017)

Henderson-Sellers, B., Ralyté, J.: Situational method engineering: state-of-the-art review. J. Univ. Comput. Sci. 16(3), 424–478 (2010)

Brinkkemper, S.: Method engineering: engineering of information systems development methods and tools. Inf. Softw. Technol. 38(4), 275–280 (1996)CrossRef

Henderson-Sellers, B., Ralyté, J., Ågerfalk, P., Rossi, M.: Situational Method Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41467-1CrossRef

Ralyté, J.: Towards situational methods for information systems development: engineering reusable method chunks. In: Vasilecas, O., Caplinskas, A., Wojtkowski, W., Wojtkowski, W.G., Zupancic, J., Wrycza, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Information Systems Development, pp. 271–282 (2004)

ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 27: ISO/IEC 24744:2014. Software engineering – metamodel for development methodologies, Geneva (CH) (2014)

Object Management Group: Software & systems process engineering meta-model specification, Version 2 (2008). http://www.omg.org/spec/SPEM/2.0

Firesmith, D., Henderson-Sellers, B.: The OPEN Process Framework: An Introduction. Pearson Education, London (2002)

Object Management Group: Essence - kernel and language for software engineering methods, Version 1.1 (2008). http://www.omg.org/spec/Essence

10.

Ralyté, J., Rolland, C.: An assembly process model for method engineering. In: Dittrich, K.R., Geppert, A., Norrie, M.C. (eds.) CAiSE 2001. LNCS, vol. 2068, pp. 267–283. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45341-5_18CrossRefMATH

11.

Rolland, C.: A user centric view of Lyee requirements. In: Fujita, H., Johannesson, P. (eds.) New Trends in Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques. IOS Press (2002)

12.

Ralyté, J., Rolland, C., Ben Ayed, M.: An approach for evolution-driven method engineering. In: Krogstie, J., Halpin, T., Siau, K. (eds.) Information Modeling Methods and Methodologies (Advanced Topics in Database Research), pp. 80–100. Idea Group, Hershey (2005)

13.

Deneckère, R., Souveyet, C.: Patterns for extending an OO model with temporal features. In: Rolland, C., Grosz, G. (eds.) OOIS 1998. Springer, London (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0895-5_14CrossRef

14.

Gupta, D., Prakash, N.: Engineering methods from method requirements specifications. Requir. Eng. 6, 135–160 (2001)CrossRef

15.

Rolland, C., Prakash, N.: A proposal for context-specific method engineering. In: Brinkkemper, S., Lyytinen, K., Welke, R.J. (eds.) Method Engineering. ITIFIP, pp. 191–208. Springer, Boston, MA (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35080-6_13CrossRef

16.

Brinkkemper, S., Saeki, M., Harmsen, F.: A method engineering language for the description of systems development methods. In: Dittrich, K.R., Geppert, A., Norrie, M.C. (eds.) CAiSE 2001. LNCS, vol. 2068, pp. 473–476. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45341-5_33CrossRefMATH

17.

Kalus, G., Kuhrmann, M.: Criteria for software process tailoring: a systematic review. In: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Software and System Process. ACM (2013)

18.

Clarke, P., O’Connor, R.V.: The situational factors that affect the software development process: towards a comprehensive reference framework. Inf. Softw. Technol. 54(5), 433–447 (2012)CrossRef

19.

Khan, H.H., bin Mahrin, M.N., Chuprat, bt, S.: Review of support to situational requirement engineering from standards and models. Int. J. Digit. Inf. Wirel. Commun. (IJDIWC), 4(1), 79–94 (2014)

20.

Kornyshova, E., Deneckère, R., Salinesi, C.: Method chunks selection by multicriteria techniques: an extension of the assembly-based approach. In: Ralyté, J., Brinkkemper, S., Henderson-Sellers, B. (eds.) Situational Method Engineering: Fundamentals and Experiences. ITIFIP, vol. 244, pp. 64–78. Springer, Boston, MA (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73947-2_7CrossRef

21.

Office of Government Commerce: Managing successful projects with PRINCE2. The Stationery Office (2009)

22.

Slama, D., Puhlmann, F., Morrish, J., Bhatnagar, R.M.: Enterprise IoT Strategies and Best Practices for Connected Products and Services. O’Reilly Media, Inc. (2016)

23.

Giray, G., Tekinerdogan, B., Tüzün, E.: IoT system development methods. In: Hassan, Q.F., Khan, A.R., Madani, S.A. (eds.) Internet of Things: Challenges, Advances and Applications, pp. 141–159. Chapman and Hall/CRC (2018)

24.

Collins, T.: A methodology for building the Internet of Things. http://www.iotmethodology.com/. Accessed 4 Oct 2017

25.

Patel, P., Cassou, D.: Enabling high-level application development for the Internet of Things. J. Syst. Softw. 103(C), 62–84 (2015)CrossRef

26.

Patel, P.: Enabling high-level application development for the Internet of Things, Ph.D. diss., Universite Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris VI (2014)

27.

Fortino, G., Russo, W.: ELDAMeth: an agent-oriented methodology for simulation-based prototyping of distributed agent aystems. Inf. Softw. Technol. 54(6), 608–624 (2012)CrossRef

28.

Fortino, G., Rango, F., Russo, W.: ELDAMeth design process. In: Cossentino, M., Hilaire, V., Molesini, A., Seidita, V. (eds.) Handbook on Agent-Oriented Design Processes, pp. 115–139. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39975-6_5CrossRef

29.

Fortino, G., Guerrieri, A., Russo, W., Savaglio, C.: Towards a development methodology for smart object-oriented IoT systems: a metamodel approach. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (2015)

30.

Ayala, I., Amor, M.: Self-configuring agents for ambient assisted living applications. Ubiquit. Comput. 17(6), 1159–1169 (2012)CrossRef

31.

Ayala, I., Amor, M., Fuentes, L.: An agent platform for self-configuring agents in the Internet of Things. In: 3rd International Workshop on Infrastructures and Tools for Multi-agent Systems, ITMAS, Valencia, Spain, pp. 65–78 (2012)

32.

Ayala, I., Amor, M., Fuentes, L.: Towards a CVL process to develop agents for the IoT. In: Hervás, R., Lee, S., Nugent, C., Bravo, J. (eds.) UCAmI 2014. LNCS, vol. 8867, pp. 304–311. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13102-3_51CrossRef

33.

Ayala, I., Amor, M., Fuentes, L.: A software product line process to develop agents for the IoT. Sensors 15(7), 15640–15660 (2015)CrossRef

34.

Zambonelli, F.: Towards a discipline of IoT-oriented software engineering. In: 17th Workshop “From Objects to Agents”, Catania, Italy, pp. 1–7 (2016)

35.

Zambonelli, F.: Key abstractions for IoT-oriented software engineering. IEEE Softw. 34(1), 38–45 (2017)CrossRef

36.

Bajec, M., Vavpotic, D., Krisper, M.: Practice-driven approach for creating project-specific software development methods. Inf. Softw. Technol. 49(4), 345–365 (2007)CrossRef

37.

Coulin, C., Zowghi, D., Sahraoui, A.-E.-K.: A situational method engineering approach to requirements elicitation workshops in the software development process. Softw. Process Improv. Pract. 11(5), 451–464 (2006)CrossRef

38.

Ruy, F.B., de Almeida Falbo, R., Barcellos, M.P., Guizzardi, G.: An ontological analysis of the ISO/IEC 24744 metamodel. In: FOIS, pp. 330–343 (2014)

39.

Henderson-Sellers, B., Gonzalez-Perez, C.: Granularity in conceptual modelling: application to metamodels. In: Parsons, J., Saeki, M., Shoval, P., Woo, C., Wand, Y. (eds.) ER 2010. LNCS, vol. 6412, pp. 275–288. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16373-9_16CrossRef

40.

Tran, Q.N.N., Henderson-Sellers, B., Hawryszkiewycz, I.: Agile method fragments and construction validation. In: Handbook of Research on Modern Systems Analysis and Design Technologies and Applications, pp. 243–270. IGI Global (2009)

41.

Kroll, P., Kruchten, P.: The Rational Unified Process Made Easy: A Practitioner’s Guide to the RUP. Addison Wesley, Boston (2003)

42.

Verdouw, C.N., Wolfert, S., Tekinerdogan, B.: Internet of Things in agriculture. CAB Rev.: Perspect. Agric. Vet. Sci. Nutr. Nat. Resour. 11 (2016)

43.

Beck, K., Beedle, M., van Bennekum, A., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W. et al.: Manifesto for agile software development (2001). http://agilemanifesto.org/. Accessed 5 Oct 2017

44.

Schwaber, K., Sutherland, J.: Scrum Guide (2016)

45.

Weyrich, M., Ebert, C.: Reference architectures for the Internet of Things. IEEE Softw. 33(1), 112–116 (2016)CrossRef

46.

Clements, P., Northrop, L.: Software product lines. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2002)

47.

Giray, G., Tekinerdogan, B., Tüzün, E.: Adopting the essence framework to derive a practice library for the development of iot systems. In: Mahmood, Z. (ed.) Connected Environments for the Internet of Things. CCN, pp. 151–168. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70102-8_8CrossRef

48.

Park, J.S., Mcmahon, P.E., Myburgh, B.: Scrum powered by Essence. ACM SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 41(1), 1–8 (2016)CrossRef

49.

Giray, G., Tüzün, E., Tekinerdogan, B., Macit, Y.: Systematic approach for mapping software development methods to the essence framework. In: 5th International Workshop on Theory-Oriented Software Engineering, pp. 26–32 (2016)

50.

Schwaber, K.: Nexus Guide (2015)

51.

Giray, G., Tekinerdogan, B., Tüzün, E.: Modeling synthesis-based software architecture design approach using essence framework (in Turkish). J. Sci. Eng. 19(55), 1 (2017)

52.

Tekinerdogan, B.: Synthesis-based software architecture design, Ph.D. diss., Twente University (2000)

53.

Tekinerdogan, B.: Engineering Connected Intelligence: A Socio-Technical Perspective. Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, p. 40 (2017). http://edepot.wur.nl/401115. ISBN 9789463430494

54.

Kaya, M.C., Saeedi Nikoo, M., Suloglu, S., Tekinerdogan, B., Dogru, A.H.: Managing heterogeneous communication challenges in the Internet of Things using connector variability. In: Mahmood, Z. (ed.) Connected Environments for the Internet of Things. CCN, pp. 127–149. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70102-8_7CrossRef

55.

Köksal, Ö., Tekinerdogan, B.: Feature-driven domain analysis of session layer protocols of Internet of Things. In: 2017 IEEE International Congress on Internet of Things (ICIOT), Honolulu, HI, pp. 105–112 (2017)

Titel: Situational Method Engineering for Constructing Internet of Things Development Methods
verfasst von: Görkem Giray
Bedir Tekinerdogan
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Business Modeling and Software Design
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94213-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-94214-8

Copyright-Jahr: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94214-8_14

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"