Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
Despite being one of the most urgent societal tasks of the twenty-first century, public engagement with climate change remains low. Mounting research illustrates, however, that there is a significant and growing number of local citizens who are informed about climate change, appraise it as a current, visible, local and personal threat, and express concern – but they fail to act. What prevents them from translating their concern into more widespread and proactive coping action? Structural barriers such as a lack of financial capital and outdated policies are a necessary but insufficient explanation. New perspectives are needed that integrate the role of mental barriers and insights from cognitive psychology and neuroscience into climate adaptation debates and nudge thinking in new directions. Against this background, the present chapter firstly seeks to advance the discourse on coping by discussing (Lazarus and Folkman’s, Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer, New York, 1984) prominent schematization of coping, appraisal and emotion from psychology. Key conceptual aspects are highlighted that help to explain the prevailing dissonance between concern and appropriate climate action. Secondly, based on these outlines and underpinned by my own empirical data on Arctic change in Norway, examples of coping in the broader field of mental barriers and their crucial relevance for practice are illustrated. The aim is to demonstrate the necessity and benefits for intellectual and policy systems of considering intrapsychic processes in climate adaptation. In this regard, selected policy considerations are discussed to indicate the possible scope of action and policy designs.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
ACIA. (2005). Arctic climate impact assessment – Scientific report. Cambridge.
Aldwin, C. M. (2007). Stress, coping, and development. An integrative perspective (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
APA (American Psychological Association). (2009). Psychology and global climate change: Addressing a multifaceted phenomenon and set of challenges. A report by the task force on the interface between psychology and global climate change. Washington, DC: APA.
Center for Research on Environmental Decisions. (2009). The psychology of climate change communication: A guide for scientists, journalists, educators, political aides, and interested public. New York: Center for Research on Environmental Decisions (CRED) at Columbia University.
Cooper, C. L., & Deve, P. (2005). Stress. A brief history. Oxford: Blackwell.
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error. New York: G.P. Putnam.
Directorate of Fisheries. (2015). Data from register of fishermen. http://www.fiskeridir.no/English/Fisheries/Statistics/Fishermen-fishing-vessels-and-licenses. Last access: 10 Dec 2015.
Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Thomas, E. T. (2013). Intergroup relations. In J. M. Levine (Ed.), Group processes (pp. 323–349). New York.
Eppel, H. (2007). Stress als Risiko und Chance. Grundlagen von Belastung, Bewältigung und Ressource. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709–724. CrossRef
Filipp, S.-H., & Aymanns, P. (2010). Kritische Lebensereignisse und Lebenskrisen. Vom Umgang mit den Schattenseiten des Lebens. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Fossheim, M., Primicerio, R., Johannesen, E., Ingvaldsen, R., Aschan, M., & Dolgov, A. (2015). Recent warming leads to a rapid borealization of fish communities in the Arctic. Nature Climate Change, 5, 673–678. CrossRef
Gallup. (2015). Environment. http://www.gallup.com/poll/1615/Environment.aspx. Last access: 14 Dec 2015.
Gifford, R. (2011). The dragons of inaction. Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychologist, 66(4), 290–302. CrossRef
Gifford, R. (2013). Dragons, mules, and honeybees: Barriers, carriers, and unwitting enablers of climate change action. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 69(4), 41–48. CrossRef
Helgeson, J., van der Linden, S., & Chabay, I. (2012). The role of knowledge, learning and mental models in perceptions of climate change related risks. In A. Wals & P. B. Corcoran (Eds.), Learning for sustainability in times of accelerating change (pp. 329–346). Wageningen: Academic Publishers. CrossRef
Jentoft, S. (2000). The community: A missing link of fisheries management. Marine Policy, 24, 53–59. CrossRef
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. London: Penguin Group.
Lazarus, R. S. (1998). Epilogue. In R. S. Lazarus (Ed.), Fifty years of research and theory of R. S. Lazarus. Analysis of historical and perennial issues (pp. 391–411). Mahwah: Lawerence Erlbaum Associates.
Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Springer.
Lazarus, R. S. (1999). Stress and emotion. A new synthesis. New York: Springer.
Lazarus, R. S. (2003). Does the positive psychology movement have legs? Psychological Inquiry, 14(2), 93–109. CrossRef
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.
LeDoux, J. E. (1996). The emotional brain. New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.
Lee, T. M., Markowitz, E. M., Howe, P. D., Ko, C.-Y., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2015). Predictors of public climate change awareness and risk perception around the world. Nature Climate Change, 5, 1014–1020. CrossRef
Lei, V. T., Hagoort, P., & Casasanto, D. (2012). Affective primacy vs. cognitive primacy: Dissolving the debate. Frontiers in Psychology, 17(3), 243.
Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Feinberg, G., & Rosenthal, S. (2015). Climate change in the American mind: October, 2015. New Haven: Yale University and George Mason University. Yale Program on Climate Change Communication.
Lertzman, R. (2015). Environmental melancholia. Psychoanalytic dimensions of engagement. New York: Routledge. CrossRef
Levine, J. M. (Ed.). (2013). Group processes. New York: Psychology Press.
Loewenstein, G. S., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, E. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267–286. CrossRef
Marshall, G. (2014). Don’t even think about it. Why our brains are wired to ignore climate change. New York: Bloomsbury.
Nisbet, M. C. (2009). Communication climate change. Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51(2), 12–23.
Norgaard, K. M. (2009). Cognitive and behavioral challenges in responding to climate change. Background paper to the 2010 world development report. Policy Research Working Paper 4940. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Norwegian Ministry of the Environment. (2012). First update of the integrated management plan for the marine environment of the Barents Sea-Lofoten Area. Meld. St. 10 (2010–2011) report to the storting (white paper). Oslo.
Øseth, E. (2011). Climate change in the Norwegian Arctic. Consequences for life in the north. Tromsø: Norwegian Polar Institute.
Pew Research Center. (2015, November). Global concern about climate change, broad support for limiting emissions. http://www.pewglobal.org/2015/11/05/global-concern-about-climate-change-broad-support-for-limiting-emissions/. Last access: 14 Dec 2015.
Scherer, K. R., Schoor, A., & Johnstone, T. (2001). Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, research, application. New York: Oxford University Press.
Siemer, M., Mauss, I., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Same situation – Different emotions: How appraisals shape our emotions. Emotion, 7(3), 592–600. CrossRef
Smith, E. R., & Mackie, D. M. (2007). Social psychology (3rd ed.). New York: Psychology Press.
Sommerkorn, M., & Hamilton, N. (Eds.). (2008). Arctic climate impact science. An update since ACIA. Olso: WWF International Arctic Programme.
Tennen, H., Affleck, G., Armeli, S., & Carney, M. A. (2000). A daily process approach to coping. American Psychologist, 55(6), 626–636. CrossRef
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
van der Linden, S. (2014). On the relationship between personal experience, affect and risk perception: The case of climate change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 430–440. CrossRef
van der Linden, S., Maibach, E., & Leiserowitz, A. (2015). Improving public engagement with climate change: Five “best practice” insights from psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(6), 758–763. CrossRef
West, J. J., & Hovelsrud, G. K. (2010). Cross-scale adaptation in the coastal fisheries: Findings from Lesesby, Northern Norway. Arctic, 63(3), 338–354. CrossRef
WWF Global (World Wide Fund for Nature Global). (2013). The arctic. http://wwf.panda.org/what_we_do/where_we_work/arctic/. Last access: 11 Dec 2015.
- Sleepwalking into Disaster? Understanding Coping in the Broader Field of Mental Barriers. Examples from the Norwegian Arctic in the Face of Climate Change
Anna Lena Bercht