Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Mechanics of Composite Materials
Erschienen in: Mechanics of Composite Materials 2/2021

08.05.2021

Smart Composite Structures with Embedded Sensors for Load and Damage Monitoring – A Review

verfasst von: R. Janeliukstis, D. Mironovs

Erschienen in: Mechanics of Composite Materials | Ausgabe 2/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP) composite materials are widely used in different branches of industry, especially in aerospace, owing to their low mass, high strength and stiffness, and good fatigue and corrosion resistance. However, these materials are prone to the impact damage. Especially dangerous are barely visible impact faults, since it is difficult to detect them. If left unrepaired, they can lead to collapse of the whole structure. Hence, a continuous monitoring for loads and possible impact faults in these structures is crucial. Traditionally, this is realized via surface-mounted sensor technologies. However, smart structures with internally embedded sensors offer several advantages — sensor protection from the environment, better coupling to the structure, and no disruption of surface geometry, which is essential for aerodynamic elements, also allowing monitoring in the real time without stopping their operations. The most popular existing smart structural solutions — piezoelectric sensor networks and fibre optics, are reviewed along with other, less common sensor choices. This review also covers the limitations associated with sensor embedment, whose addressing would bring the society to a more reliable, cheaper, and efficient maintenance of transportation and infrastructure.
Nächster Artikel A Method for Predicting the Parameters of Plastic Deformation of Dispersedly Reinforced Materials by Using a Modified Mori–Tanaka Model

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
X. P. Qing, S. J. Beard, A. Kumar, T. K. Ooi, and F.-K. Chang, “Built-in sensor network for structural health monitoring of composite structure,” J. Intel. Mat. Syst. Str., 18, 39-49 (2017).CrossRef
2.
L. C. Heaton, M. Kranz, and J. Williams, “Embedded fiber optics for structural health monitoring of composite motor cases,” Proc. SPIE 5393, Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring of Aerospace Materials and Composites III, NDE for Health Monitoring and Diagnostics, San Diego, CA, USA (2004).
3.
4.
G. Marsh, “Airbus A350 XWB update,” Reinf. Plast., 54, No. 6, 20-24 (2010).CrossRef
5.
H. Zhang, E. Bilotti, and T. Peijs, “The use of carbon nanotubes for damage sensing and structural health monitoring in laminated composites: a review,” J. Nanocomposites, 1, No. 4, 167-184 (2015).CrossRef
6.
L. Qiu, X. Lin, Y. Wang, S. Yuan, and W. Shi, “A mechatronic smart skin of flight vehicle structures for impact monitoring of light weight and low-power consumption,” Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 144, 106829 (2020).CrossRef
7.
P. D. Foote, “Integration of structural health monitoring sensors with aerospace,” Adv. Mater. Res-Switz., 46, No. 2, 197-203 (2015).
8.
M. Lin and F.-K. Chang, “The manufacture of composite structures with a built-in network of piezoceramics,” Compos. Sci. Technol., 62, 919-939 (2002).CrossRef
9.
W. J. Staszewski, S. Mahzan, and R. Traynor, “Health monitoring of aerospace composite structures — Active and passive approach,” Compos. Sci. Technol., 69, 1678-1685 (2009).CrossRef
10.
F. J. Yang and W. J. Cantwell, “Impact damage initiation in composite materials,” Compos. Sci. Technol., 70, 336-342 (2010).CrossRef
11.
J. Sebastian, N. Schehl, M. Bouchard, M. Boehle, L. Li, A. Lagounov, and K. Lafdi, “Health monitoring of structural composites with embedded carbon nanotube coated glass fiber sensors,” Carbon, 66, 191-200 (2014).CrossRef
12.
Y. Lin, Le Tu, H. Liu, and Wei Li, “Fault analysis of wind turbines in China,” Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 55, 482-490 (2016).
13.
H. F. Zhou, H. Y. Dou, L. Z. Qin, Y. Chen, Y. Q. Ni, and J. M. Ko, “A review of full-scale structural testing of wind turbine blades,” Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 33, 177-187 (2014).CrossRef
14.
B. Chen, S. You, Y. Yu, and Y. Zhou, “Acoustical damage detection of wind turbine blade using the improved incremental support vector data description,” Renew. Energ., 156, 548-557 (2020).CrossRef
15.
R. Yang, Y. He, and H. Zhang, “Progress and trends in nondestructive testing and evaluation for wind turbine composite blade,” Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 60, 1225-1250 (2016).CrossRef
16.
A. Ghoshal, M. J. Sundaresan, M. J. Schulz, and P. F. Pai, “Structural health monitoring techniques for wind turbine blades,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 85, 309-324 (2000).CrossRef
17.
Z. Su, X. Wang, Z. Chen, L. Ye, and D. Wang, “A built-in active sensor network for health monitoring of composite structures,” Smart Mater. Struct., 15, 1939-1949 (2006).CrossRef
18.
V. K. Varadan and V. V. Varadan, “Conformal and embedded IDT microsensors for health monitoring of structures,” Proc. SPIE 3990, Smart Structures and Materials 2000: Smart Electronics and MEMS, SPIE’s 7th Annual International Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials, Newport Beach, CA, USA (2000).
19.
A. Tayebi and M. M. Ul Hoque, “Design of experiments optimization of embedded MEMS sensors in composites for structural health monitoring,” Proc. SPIE 5057, Smart Structures and Materials 2003: Smart Systems and Nondestructive Evaluation for Civil Infrastructures, Smart Structures and Materials, San Diego, California, USA (2003).
20.
L. Lampani, F. Sarasini, J. Tirillò, and P. Gaudenzi, “Analysis of damage in composite laminates with embedded piezoelectric patches subjected to bending action,” Compos. Struct., 202, 935-942 (2018).CrossRef
21.
P. Wierach, Nano-Micro-Macro. In: M. Wiedemann, M. Sinapius (eds). Adaptive, tolerant and efficient composite structures, research topics in aerospace. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; (2013).
22.
C. A. Paget, K. Levin, and C. Delebarre, “Actuation performance of embedded piezoceramic transducer in mechanically loaded composites,” Smart Mater. Struct., 11, No. 6, 2002.
23.
N. D. Alexopoulos, C. Bartholome, P. Poulin, and Z. Marioli-Riga, “Structural health monitoring of glass fiber reinforced composites using embedded carbon nanotube (CNT) fibers,” Compos. Sci. Technol., 70, 260-271 (2010).CrossRef
24.
Y. J. Yan and L. H. Yam, “Online detection of crack damage in composite plates using embedded piezoelectric actuators/ sensors and wavelet analysis,” Compos. Struct., 58, 29-38 (2002).CrossRef
25.
C. C. Bowland, Y. Wang, and A. K. Naskar, “Development of nanoparticle embedded sizing for enhanced structural health monitoring of carbon fiber composites,” Proc. SPIE 10169, Nondestructive Characterization and Monitoring of Advanced Materials, Aerospace, and Civil Infrastructure, Portland, Oregon, USA (2017).
26.
S. Bhalla and C. K. Soh, “Structural health monitoring by piezo-impedance transducers. I: Modeling,” J. Aerospace Eng., 17, No. 4, 154-165 (2004).CrossRef
27.
J. H. Nienwenhui, J. J. Neumann, D. W. Greve, and I. J. Oppenheim, “Generation and detection of guided waves using PZT wafer transducers,” IEEE T Ultrason. Ferr., 52, No. 11, 2103-2111 (2005).CrossRef
28.
L. Qiu, X. Deng, S. Yuan, Y. Huang, and Y. Ren, “Impact monitoring for aircraft smart composite skins based on a lightweight sensor network and characteristic digital sequences,” Sensors, 18, 2218 (2018).CrossRef
29.
B. Lin and V. Giurgiutiu, “Modeling and testing of PZT and PVDF piezoelectric wafer active sensors,” Smart Mater Struct., 15, 1085-109 (2006).CrossRef
30.
M. Lin, A. Kumar, S. Beard, and X. Qing, “Built-in structural diagnostic with the SMART layer and SMART suitcase,” Smart Materials Bulletin, 2001, No. 4, 7-11 (2001).
31.
A. Ghoshal, J. Ayers, M. Gurvich, M. Urban, and N. Bordick, “Experimental investigations in embedded sensing of composite components in aerospace vehicles,” Compos Part B-Eng., 71, 52-62 (2015).CrossRef
32.
M. B. Lemistre, Electric and Electromagnetic Properties Sensing, in: C. Boller, F.-K. Chang and Y. Fujino (eds.), Encyclopedia of Structural Health Monitoring, Wiley (2009).
33.
M. Melnykowycz and A. J. Brunner, “The performance of integrated active fiber composites in carbon fiber laminates,” Smart Mater. Struct., 20, No. 7, 075007 (2011).
34.
R. Paradies and B. Schlapfer, “Finite element modeling of piezoelectric elements with complex electrode configuration,” Smart Mater. Struct., 18, 025015 (2009).CrossRef
35.
D. N. Solovyev, S. S. Dadunashvili, A. Mironov, P. Doronkin, and D. Mironovs, “Mathematical modeling and experimental investigations of a main rotor made from layered composite materials,” Mech. Compos. Mater., 56, 103-110 (2020).CrossRef
36.
A. Mironov, A. Priklonskiy, D. Mironovs, and P. Doronkin, “Application of deformation sensors for structural health monitoring of transport vehicles,” Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 117 (2020).
37.
J. R. Zayas, D. P. Roach, M. A. Rumsey, W. R. Allan, and D. A. Horsley, “Low-cost fiber Bragg grating interrogation system for in situ assessment of structures,” SPIE, Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems, San Diego, CA, USA (2007).
38.
R. De Oliveira, C. A. Ramos, and A. T. Marques, “Health monitoring of composite structures by embedded FBG and interferometric Fabry–Perot sensors,” Comput Struct., 86, No. 3, 340–346 (2008).CrossRef
39.
M. Majumder, T. K. Gangopadhyay, A. K. Chakraborty, K. Dasgupta, and D. K. Bhattacharya, “Fibre Bragg gratings in structural health monitoring — present status and applications,” Sensor Actuat. A-Phys, 147, No. 1, 150–164 (2008).CrossRef
40.
M. Frövel, G. Carrión, J. M. Pintado, J. Cabezas, and F. Cabrerizo, “Health and usage monitoring of Spanish National Institute for Aerospace Technology unmanned air vehicles,” Struct. Health Monit., 16, No. 4, 486-493 (2016).CrossRef
41.
J. Alvarez-Montoya, A. Carvajal-Castrillón, and J. Sierra-Pérez, “In-flight and wireless damage detection in a UAV composite wing using fiber optic sensors and strain field pattern recognition,” Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 136, 106526 (2020).CrossRef
42.
T. J. Arsenault, A. Achuthan, P. Marzocca, C. Grappasonni, and G. Coppotelli, “Development of a FBG based distributed strain sensor system for wind turbine structural health monitoring,” Smart Mater. Struct., 22 075027 (2013).CrossRef
43.
H. Cheng-Yu, Z. Yi-Fan, Z. Meng-Xi, Leung Lai Ming Gordon, and L. Li-Qiang, “Application of FBG sensors for geotechnical health monitoring, a review of sensor design, implementation methods and packaging techniques,” Sensor Actuat A-Phus., 244, 184-197 (2016).
44.
M. Yeager, M. Todd, W. Gregory, and C. Key, “Assessment of embedded fiber Bragg gratings for structural health monitoring of composites,” Struct. Health Monit., 16, No. 3, 262-275 (2017).CrossRef
45.
H. V. Thakur, S. M. Nalawade, Y. Saxena, and K. T. V. Grattan, “All-fiber embedded PM-PCF vibration sensor for structural health monitoring of composite,” Sensor Actuat. A-Phys., 167, 204–212 (2011).CrossRef
46.
P. Antunes, H. Lima, N. Alberto et al., “Optical fiber accelerometer system for structural dynamic monitoring,” IEEE Sens. J., 9, No. 11, 1347-1354 (2009).CrossRef
47.
X. W. Ye, Y. H. Su, and J. P. Han, “Structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure using optical fiber sensing technology: A comprehensive review,” The Scientific World Journal, 2014, Article ID 652329 (2014).CrossRef
48.
I. Kressel, B. Dorfman, Y. Botsev, A. Handelman, J. Balter, A. C. R. Pillai, M. H. Prasad, N. Gupta, A. M. Joseph, R. Sundaram, and M. Tur, “Flight validation of an embedded structural health monitoring system for an unmanned aerial vehicle,” Smart Mater. Struct., 24, No. 7, 075022 (2015).
49.
N. Gutiérrez, R. Fernández, P. Galvín, and F. Lasagni, “Fiber Bragg grating application to study an unmanned aerial system composite wing,” J. Intel. Mater. Syst. Str., 30, No. 8, 1252–1262 (2019).CrossRef
50.
A. J. van Wyk and C. V. Robertson, “A systems engineering approach to structural health monitoring of composites using embedded optical fibre Bragg sensors for aeronautical applications,” Proc. SPIE 8066, Smart Sensors, Actuators, and MEMS V, 80660S (2011).
51.
D. A. Krohn, T. W. MacDougall, and A. Mendez, Fiber Optic Sensors: Fundamentals and Applications, SPIE Press monograph PM247, fourth ed., SPIE Press (2014).
52.
N. Gutiérrez, “Monitorización Estructural SHM Mediante Redes De Bragg,” Phd Thesis, University of Seville, Spain (2018).
53.
A. Carvajal-Castrillón, J. Alvarez-Montoya, J. Niño-Navia, L. Betancur-Agudelo, F. Amaya-Fernandez, and J. Sierra-Pérez, “Structural health monitoring on an unmanned aerial vehicle wing’s beam based on fiber Bragg gratings and pattern recognition techniques,” Procedia Structural Integrity, 5, 729-736 (2017).CrossRef
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
W. Baker, I. McKenzie, and R. Jones, “Development of life extension strategies for Australian military aircraft, using structural health monitoring of composite repairs and joints,” Compos. Struct., 66, 133–143 (2004).CrossRef
59.
S.-W. Kim, W.-R. Kang, M.-S. Jeong, I. Lee, and I.-B. Kwon, “Deflection estimation of a wind turbine blade using FBG sensors embedded in the blade bonding line,” Smart Mater. Struct., 22, 125004 (2013).CrossRef
60.
H.-I. Kim, J.-H. Han, and H.-J. Bang, “Real-time deformed shape estimation of a wind turbine blade using distributed fiber Bragg grating sensors,” Wind Energ., 17, 1455-1467 (2014).
61.
S. Park, T. Park and K. Han, “Real-time monitoring of composite wind turbine blades using fiber Bragg grating sensors,” Adv. Compos. Mater., 20, No. 1, 39-51 (2011).CrossRef
62.
A. Downey, F. Ubertini, and S. Laflamme, “Algorithm for damage detection in wind turbine blades using a hybrid dense sensor network with feature level data fusion,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 168, 288–296 (2017).CrossRef
63.
Z. Racz, E. M. Hackney, and D. Wood, “Soft elastomeric capacitive sensor for structural health monitoring,” Procedia Eng., 168, 721-724 (2016).CrossRef
64.
Y. Suzuki, T. Suzuki, A. Todoroki, and Y. Mizutani, “Smart lightning protection skin for real-time load monitoring of composite aircraft structures under multiple impacts,” Compos. Part A-Appl. S., 67, 44–54 (2014).CrossRef
65.
Dexmet Corporation. Lightning Strike Protection for Carbon Fiber Airplane. In: Advancement of Materials Process Engineering (SAMPE) Conference (2007).
66.
C. Cherif, E. Haentzsche, R. Mueller, A. Nocke, M. Huebner, and M. M. B. Hasan, in: V. Koncar (eds.), Carbon fibre sensors embedded in glass fibre-based composites for windmill blades, Ch. 15, Woodhead Publishing, pp. 329-352 (2016).
67.
S. Butler, M. Gurvich, A. Ghoshal, G. Welsh, P. Attridge, H. Winston, M. Urban, and N. Bordick, “Effect of embedded sensors on interlaminar damage in composite structures,” J. Intel. Mat. Syst. Str., 22, No. 16, 1857-1868 (2011).CrossRef
68.
K. Saton, K. Fukuchi, Y. Kurosawa, A. Hongo, and N. Takeda, “Polyimide-Coate Small-Diameter Optical Fiber Sensors for Embedding in Composite Laminate Structures,” SPIE: Newport Beach, CA, USA, 285-294 (2001).
69.
N. Takeda, Y. Okabe, J. Kuwahara, S. Kojima, and T. Ogisu, “Development of smart composite structures with smalldiameter fiber Bragg grating sensors for damage detection: Quantitative evaluation of delamination length in CFRP laminates using Lamb wave sensing,” Compos. Sci. Tech., 65, 2575-2587 (2005).CrossRef
70.
G. Luyckx, E. Voet, N. Lammens, and J. Degrieck, “strain measurements of composite laminates with embedded fiber Bragg gratings: Criticism and opportunities for research,” Sensors, 11, No. 1, 384-408 (2011).CrossRef
71.
G. Pereira, C. Frias, H. Faria, O. Frazão, and A. Marques, “Study of strain-transfer of FBG sensors embedded in unidirectional composites,” Polym Test., 32, No. 6, 1006–1010 (2013).CrossRef
72.
B. Torres, I. Paya-Zaforteza, P. A. Calderon, and J. M. Adam, “Analysis of the strain transfer in a new FBG sensor for structural health monitoring,” Eng. Struct., 33, No. 2, 539-548 (2011).CrossRef
73.
G. Pereira, C. Frias, H. Faria, O. Frazão, and A. T. Marques, “On the improvement of strain measurements with FBG sensors embedded in unidirectional composites,” Polym Test., 32, 99–105 (2013).CrossRef
74.
G. Luyckx, E. Voet, W. Waele, and J. Degrieck, “Multi-axial strain transfer from laminated CFRP composites to embedded Bragg sensor: I. Parametric study,” Smart Mater. Struct., 19, No. 10, 105017 (2010).
75.
A. Hehr, Y. Song, B. Suberu, J. Sullivan, V. Shanov and M. Schulz, in: M. J. Schulz, V. N. Shanov and Z. Yin (eds), Embedded Carbon Nanotube Sensor Thread for Structural Health Monitoring and Strain Sensing of Composite Materials, Ch. 24, Nanotube Superfiber Materials, Changing Engineering Design, Elsevier, pp. 671-712 (2014).
76.
H. Herranen, J. Majak, P. Tsukrejev, K. Karjust, and O. Märtens, “Design and manufacturing of composite laminates with structural health monitoring capabilities,” Procedia CIRP, 72, 647-652 (2018).CrossRef
77.
L. Qiu and S. Yuan, “On development of a multi-channel PZT array scanning system and it’s evaluating application on UAV wing box,” Sensor Actuat. A-Phys., 151, 220-230 (2009).CrossRef
78.
Q. Wang, M. Hong, and Z. Su, “An in situ structural health diagnosis technique and its realization via a modularized system,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 64, 873-887 (2015).CrossRef
79.
80.
B. A. Sjogren, “Static strength of CFRP laminates with embedded fiber-optic edge connectors,” Compos. Part A-Appl. S., 32, 189-196 (2001).CrossRef
81.
A. K. Green, M. Zaidman, E. Shafir, M. Tur, and S. Gali, “Infrastructure development for incorporating fiber-optic sensors in composite materials,” Smart Mater. Struct., 9, 316-321 (2000).CrossRef
82.
M. Ciccotti, M. George, V. Ranieri, L. Wondraczek, and C. Marlière, “Dynamic condensation of water at crack tips in fused silica glass,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 354, 564-568 (2008).CrossRef
83.
A. Saghafi A. R. Mirhabibi, and G. H. Yari, “Improved linear regression method for estimating Weibull parameters,” Theor. Appl. Fract. Mec., 52, 180-182 (2009).CrossRef
84.
M. Wang, N. Li, G. D. Wang, S. W. Lu, Q. D. Zhao, and X. L. Liu, “High-sensitive flexural sensors for health monitoring of composite materials using embedded carbon nanotube (CNT) buckypaper,” Compos. Struct., 113280 (2020).
85.
K. S. C. Kuang, R. Kenny, M. P. Whelan, W. J. Cantwell, and P. R. Chalker, “Embedded fiber Bragg grating sensors in advanced composite materials,” Compos. Sci. Technol., 61, 1379–1387 (2001).CrossRef
86.
G. C. Kahandawa, J. Epaarachchi, H. Wang, J. Canning, and K. T. Lau, “Extraction and processing of real time strain of embedded FBG sensors using a fixed filter FBG circuit and an artificial neural network,” Measurement, 46, 4045- 4051 (2013).CrossRef
87.
A. Vieira, R. de Oliveira, O. Frazão, J. M. Baptista, and A. T. Marques, “Effect of the recoating and the length on fiber Bragg grating sensors embedded in polymer composites,” Materials & Design, 30, 1818–1821 (2009).CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Smart Composite Structures with Embedded Sensors for Load and Damage Monitoring – A Review
verfasst von
R. Janeliukstis
D. Mironovs
Publikationsdatum
08.05.2021
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Mechanics of Composite Materials / Ausgabe 2/2021
Print ISSN: 0191-5665
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-8922
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11029-021-09941-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2021

Mechanics of Composite Materials 2/2021 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

A Method for Predicting the Parameters of Plastic Deformation of Dispersedly Reinforced Materials by Using a Modified Mori–Tanaka Model

Announcement

Some Conferences and Congresses

OriginalPaper

Extreme Values of the Strength of Single Filaments and Threads of a Paraaramide Fiber After Its Treatment by a Water Suspension of Carbon Nanoparticles

OriginalPaper

An Analysis of Sensitivity of the Monitoring System of Helicopters to Faults of their Blades

OriginalPaper

The Influence of γ-Radiation on the Structure and Mechanical Characteristics of a Polymer Composite Material Based on Low-Molecular Rubbers

OriginalPaper

Theoretical Estimation of the Shearing Strength of Polymer/Carbon Nanotube Contact: A Fractal Model

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise