nach oben

Erschienen in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

SMERF: Social Media, Ethics and Risk Framework

verfasst von : Ian Mitchell, Tracey Cockerton, Sukhvinder Hara, Carl Evans

Erschienen in: Cyber Criminology

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

SMERF is a proposed framework to support researchers and investigators in risk assessment when working with Social Media (SM). The aim of SMERF is to mitigate risk, by identifying it a priori. Risk assessment is considered where there is a potential danger involved in undertaking SM-related projects, which may include Digital Investigations and undergraduate or postgraduate projects. The vulnerbilities of the researcher or investigator that conduct SM-related work is discussed and what types of threats they may be exposed to are described. These are related to current counter-terrorim laws, data protection regulations and acceptable use policies. SMERF is proposed to mitigate risks that the investigator or researcher and their associated organisations maybe exposed to. The development of SMERF is agile and therefore has the ability to adapt to different organisations’ requirements. Finally, a quality assurance and risk assessment life-cycle is proposed and recommendations are for SMERF to be reviewed annually and updated appropriately.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Crime Data Mining, Threat Analysis and Prediction

Nächstes Kapitel Understanding the Cyber-Victimisation of People with Long Term Conditions and the Need for Collaborative Forensics-Enabled Disease Management Programmes

Definition of trolling:“…intentionally posting provocative messages about sensitive subject to create conflict, upset people, and bait them…”(Zainudin et al. 2016). For further classifications on trolling, see Bishop (2012).

Natural Language Processing defines stemming as identifying the same words with different affixes, see Bird et al. (2009, Ch.3.), e.g. lie and lying.

ACM. (2017). ACM code of ethics and professional conduct. https://www.acm.org/about-acm/acm-code-of-ethics-and-professional-conduct. Accessed June 16, 2017.

Aragon, A., AlDoubi, S., Kaminski, K., Anderson, S.K., & Isaacs, N. (2014). Social networking: Boundaries and limits part 1: Ethics. TechTrends, 58(2), 25.CrossRef

Ashley, C., & Tuten, T. (2015). Creative strategies in social media marketing: An exploratory study of branded social content and consumer engagement. Psychology & Marketing, 32(1), 15–27.CrossRef

Backstrom, L., & Kleinberg, J. (2014). Romantic partnerships and the dispersion of social ties: A network analysis of relationship status on facebook. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 831–841). ACM.

Balduzzi, M., Platzer, C., Holz, T., Kirda, E., Balzarotti, D., & Kruegel, C. (2010). Abusing social networks for automated user profiling. In International Workshop on Recent Advances in Intrusion Detection (pp. 422–441). Springer

BCS: Code of conduct. (2017). http://www.bcs.org/category/6030. Accessed June 16, 2017.

Beninger, K., Fry, A., Jago, N., Lepps, H., Nass, L., & Silvester, H. (2014). Research using social media; users’ views. National Centre for Social Research.

Beurskens, M. (2014). Legal questions of twitter research. In K. Weller (Ed.), Twitter and society (p. 123). New York: Peter Lang.

Bird, S., Klein, E., & Loper, E. (2009). Natural language processing with Python: Analyzing text with the natural language toolkit. Beijing: O’Reilly Media, Inc.

Bishop, J. (2012). Tackling Internet abuse in Great Britain: Towards a framework for classifying severities of ‘flame trolling’. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Security and Management (SAM) (p. 1). The Steering Committee of The World Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering and Applied Computing (WorldComp).

Carter, C. (2014). Twitter troll jailed for ‘campaign of hatred’ against Stella Creasy. The Daily Telegraph.

Council of European Union. (2018). Council regulation (EU) no 2016/679. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/LSU/?uri=CELEX%3A32016R0679. Accessed on June 25, 2017.

CT&S. (2015). Counter Terrorism & Security Act. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/6/contents/enacted. Accessed on June 15, 2017.

Gerbaudo, P., & Treré, E. (2015). In search of the ‘we’ of social media activism: Introduction to the special issue on social media and protest identities. Information, Communication & Society, 18(8), 865–871.CrossRef

Granville, K. (2018). Facebook and cambridge analytica: What you need to know as fallout widens. The New York Times.

Groth, G. G., Longo, L. M., & Martin, J. L. (2017). Social media and college student risk behaviors: A mini-review. Addictive Behaviors, 65, 87–91.CrossRef

Gu, B., & Ye, Q. (2014). First step in social media: Measuring the influence of online management responses on customer satisfaction. Production and Operations Management, 23(4), 570–582.CrossRef

Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2010). Cyberbullying: Identification, prevention, and response. Cyberbullying Research Center.

Hoff, D. L., & Mitchell, S. N. (2009). Cyberbullying: Causes, effects, and remedies. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(5), 652–665.CrossRef

Home Office. (2015a). Prevent duty guidance: For higher education institutions in England and Wales. UK Govt.

Home Office. (2015b). Prevent duty guidance: For higher education institutions in Scotland. UK Govt.

Irvin, E., Taper, C., Igoe, L., & Pastore, R. S. (2015). Using Twitter in an undergraduate setting: Five recommendations from a foreign language class. eLearn 11.

Isaacs, N., Kaminski, K., Aragon, A., & Anderson, S. K. (2014). Social networking: Boundaries and limitations part 2: Policy. TechTrends 58(3), 10.CrossRef

Korda, H., & Itani, Z. (2013). Harnessing social media for health promotion and behavior change. Health Promotion Practice, 14(1), 15–23.CrossRef

Lewis, K., Kaufman, J., Gonzalez, M., Wimmer, A., & Christakis, N. (2008). Tastes, ties and time: A new social network dataset using Facebook. Social Networks, 30(4), 330–342.CrossRef

Lin, M. F. G., Hoffman, E. S., & Borengasser, C. (2013). Is social media too social for class? A case study of Twitter use. TechTrends, 57(2), 39.CrossRef

Markham, A. (2012). AOIR guidelines: Ethical decision making and Internet research ethics (Technical report). Association of Internet Research.

Markham, A., & Buchanan, E. (2012). Ethical decision-making and Internet research (Technical report). Association of Internet Research (AoIR).

Morgan, E. M., Snelson, C., & Elison-Bowers, P. (2010) Image and video disclosure of substance use on social media websites. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1405–1411.CrossRef

Munar, A. M., & Jacobsen, J. K. S. (2014). Motivations for sharing tourism experiences through social media. Tourism Management, 43, 46–54.CrossRef

Newman, M. (2010). Networks: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef

OfCom. (2016). Adults’ media use and attitudes. Office of Communications (April 2016).

Pyżalski, J. (2012). From cyberbullying to electronic aggression: Typology of the phenomenon. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 17(3–4), 305–317.CrossRef

Rivers, C. M., & Lewis, B. L. (2014). Ethical research standards in a world of big data. F1000Research, 3.

Sambrook, R. (2017). Taking the bait: The quest for instant gratification online is seriously compromising news reporting. Index on Censorship 46(1), 16–17.CrossRef

UKCCIS. (2010). Child safety online: A practical guide for parent and carers whose children are using social media. UK Govt.

Universities UK. (2012). Oversight of seucrity-sensitive research material in UK Universities (Technical report). UUK (October 2012).

Weale, S. (2018). Suicide is a sector-wide issue, says Bristol university vice-chancellor. The Guardian (Feb 2018).

Whittaker, E., & Kowalski, R. M. (2015). Cyberbullying via social media. Journal of School Violence 14(1), 11–29.CrossRef

Williams, M. L., Burnap, P., & Sloan, L. (2017). Towards an ethical framework for publishing twitter data in social research: Taking into account users’ views, online context and algorithmic estimation. Sociology, 51, 1–20.

Wondracek, G., Holz, T., Kirda, E., & Kruegel, C. (2010). A practical attack to de-anonymize social network users. In 2010 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) (pp. 223–238). IEEE.

Zainudin, N. M., Zainal, K. H., Hasbullah, N. A., Wahab, N. A., & Ramli, S. (2016). A review on cyberbullying in Malaysia from digital forensic perspective. In International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICICTM) (pp. 246–250). IEEE.

Zimmer, M. (2010). “But data is already public”: On the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics Information Technology, 12, 313–325.CrossRef

Titel: SMERF: Social Media, Ethics and Risk Framework
verfasst von: Ian Mitchell
Tracey Cockerton
Sukhvinder Hara
Carl Evans
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Cyber Criminology
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97180-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-97181-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97181-0_10

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"