Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards MyNewsletter Firmensuche
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
Sustainability in Automotive

Gesamtlebenszyklus wird immer wichtiger

In der Digitalkonferenz am 5. Dezember 2024 geht es um die wachsende Bedeutung der Kreislaufwirtschaft in der Automobilindustrie und wie nachhaltige Werkstoffe sowie wiederverwendbare Komponenten dazu beitragen können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

So It’s Complex, Why Do I Care?

verfasst von : Steven Holt, Paul Collopy, Dianne DeTurris

Erschienen in: Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Systems engineering is especially difficult today because the systems that are being engineered are more complex than ever before. But why does it matter that systems are complex, and what should the engineering community do about complexity? Although there is a great deal of discussion about precisely what complexity is, and how complexity can be identified and measured, this chapter skirts those issues to focus on how engineers should cope with complexity. The critical aspect of complexity to the systems engineer is the way it interferes with prediction of design outcomes, a fundamental obstacle to the essentially deterministic methods of systems engineering. Transdisciplinary strategies are proposed for engineering complex systems, particularly a structured approach that encourages experimentation, at least on a small scale, to win some insight into the outcomes of complex behavior.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Mathematical Characterization of System-of-Systems Attributes
Nächstes Kapitel Designer Systems of Systems: A Rational Integrated Approach of System Engineering to Tailored Aerodynamics, Aeroelasticity, Aero-viscoelasticity, Stability, Control, Geometry, Materials, Structures, Propulsion, Performance, Sizing, Weight, Cost
Literatur
1.
Eremenko, P. (2010, October). Adaptive Vehicle Make (AVM). Proposers’ Day Briefing. Tactical Technology Office, DARPA.
2.
Augustine, N. R. (1983). Augustine’s laws (2nd ed.). New York: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
3.
Pernin, C., Axelband, E., Drezner, J., Dille, B., Gordon, J., Held, B., et al. (2012). Lessons from the army’s future combat systems program. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
4.
Maddox, I. D., Collopy, P. D., & Farrington, P. A. (2013). Value-based assessment of DoD acquisition programs. Procedia Computer Science, 16, 1161–1169.CrossRef
5.
Lloyd, S. (2001, August). Measures of complexity—A nonexhaustive list. IEEE Control Systems Magazine.
6.
Mitchell, M. (2009). Complexity: A guided tour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
Page, S. E. (2011). Diversity and complexity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8.
Boone, M., & Snowden, D. (2007, November). A leader’s framework for decision making. Harvard Business Review.
9.
Cilliers, P. (1998). Complexity and postmodernism: Understanding complex systems. London: Routledge.
10.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
11.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2003). Megaprojects and risk, an anatomy of ambition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
12.
Goldratt, E. (2008). The choice. Great Barrington, MA: North River Press.
13.
Ries, E. (2011). The lean startup: How today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. New York: Crown Business.
14.
Northrop, L., Feiler, P., Gabriel, R. P., Goodenough, J., Linger, R., Longstaff, T., et al. (2006). Ultra-large-scale systems: The software challenge of the future. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute.
15.
Felder, W. N., & Collopy, P. (2012). The elephant in the mist: What we don’t know about the design, development, test and management of complex systems. Journal of Aerospace Operations, 1, 317–327.
16.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
17.
Brooks, F. P., Jr. (1982). The mythical man-month, essays on software engineering. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley [Originally published in 1972].
18.
19.
Perrow, C. (1999). Normal accidents: Living with high-risk technologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
21.
March, J. G. (2010). The ambiguities of experience. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
22.
23.
24.
Hibbs, C., Jewett, S., & Sullivan, M. (2009). The art of lean software development. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
25.
Shalloway, A., Beaver, G., & Trott, J. R. (2010). Lean-agile software development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison-Wesley.
26.
Anderson, D. J. (2004). Agile management for software engineering: Applying the theory of constraints for business results. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
27.
Highsmith, J. (2004). Agile project management. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
28.
Reinertsen, D. G. (2009). The principles of product development flow: Second generation lean product development. Redondo Beach, CA: Celeritas Publishing.
29.
Collopy, P. D. (2015, March). Technical risk management. IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT.
30.
Griffin, M. D. (2010). How do we fix systems engineering? (IAC-10.D1.5.4). Prague: International Astronautical Congress.
31.
Brooks, F. (2010). The design of design: Essays from a computer scientist (1st ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Professional.
32.
Collopy, P., & Mesmer, B. (2014, November). Report on the science of systems engineering workshop. AIAA 2015-1865.
33.
34.
Christensen, C. M., Raynor, M., & Verlinden, M. (2001). Skate to where the money will be. Harvard Business Review, 79(10).
35.
Highsmith, J. (2002). Agile software development ecosystems. Boston: Addison Wesley.
36.
Metadaten
Titel
So It’s Complex, Why Do I Care?
verfasst von
Steven Holt
Paul Collopy
Dianne DeTurris
Copyright-Jahr
2017
Buch
Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-38754-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-38756-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38756-7_2

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise