Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
This paper introduces social identity theory and self-categorization theory to policy process research. Drawing from the prominent and widely acknowledged psychological social identity approach, it develops the theoretical concept of social identities in the policy process (SIPP) and advances the understanding of policy actors’ behavior. Compared to psychological foundations of existing theories of the policy process, the social identity approach emphasizes the importance of social group membership for forming common views on policy content and shaping policy actors’ behavior as beneficial to the in-group. Policy actors thus act in accordance with their salient social identity. This salience is dependent on the strength of a social identity, determined by the feeling of belonging, positive evaluation, and emotional bond to a group. Additionally, social identities are moderated by internal and external factors. SIPP distinguish three levels of analysis, ranging from the psychological microlevel concerned with individual behavior and preferences, over the socio-psychological mesolevel of intra- and intergroup dynamics toward a macroperspective of general types of social identities. In policy subsystems, five such types appear relevant: organizational identities, local identities, sectoral identities, demographic identities, and informal identities. By integrating SIPP into the analytical categories of theories of the policy process, this paper calls for a future research agenda establishing a further theoretical lens for a better understanding of policy processes.
Adams, B. G., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2015). The many faces of expatriate identity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 49, Supplement C, 322–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2015.05.009. CrossRef
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39. CrossRef
Ashforth, B. E., & Schinoff, B. S. (2016). Identity under construction: How individuals come to define themselves in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3(1), 111–137. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062322. CrossRef
Bandelow, N. C. (2006). Advocacy coalitions, policy-oriented learning and long-term change in genetic engineering policy: An interpretist view. German Policy Studies, 3(4), 743–795.
Bandelow, N. C., Vogeler, C. S., Hornung, J., Kuhlmann, J., & Heidrich, S. (2017). Learning as a necessary but not sufficient condition for major health policy change: A qualitative comparative analysis combining ACF and MSF. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2017.1393920. CrossRef
Bartle, J., & Bellucci, P. (2009). Political parties and partisanship: social identity and individual attitudes (Routledge/ECPR studies in European political science, Vol. 57). London: Routledge.
Béland, D. (2017). Identity, politics, and public policy. Critical Policy Studies, 11(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2016.1159140. CrossRef
Bonaiuto, M., Carrus, G., Martorella, H., & Bonnes, M. (2002). Local identity processes and environmental attitudes in land use changes: The case of natural protected areas. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23(5), 631–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00121-6. CrossRef
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cregan, C., Bartram, T., & Stanton, P. (2009). Union organizing as a mobilizing strategy: The impact of social identity and transformational leadership on the collectivism of union members. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 47(4), 701–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8543.2009.00733.x. CrossRef
Dancey, L., & Goren, P. (2010). Party identification, issue attitudes, and the dynamics of political debate. American Journal of Political Science, 54(3), 686–699. CrossRef
Detterbeck, K. (2011). Party careers in federal systems. Vertical linkages within Austrian, German, Canadian and Australian Parties. Regional & Federal Studies, 21(2), 245–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2011.530021. CrossRef
Ellemers, N., Kortekaas, P., & Ouwerkerk, J. W. (1999). Self-categorisation, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 371–389. CrossRef
Epitropaki, O., Kark, R., Mainemelis, C., & Lord, R. G. (2017). Leadership and followership identity processes: A multilevel review. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 104–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.10.003. CrossRef
Genieys, W. (2010). The new custodians of the state: Programmatic elites in french society. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Goren, P. (2005). Party identification and core political values. American Journal of Political Science, 49(4), 881–896. CrossRef
Greene, S. (2004). Social identity theory and party identification*. Social Science Quarterly, 85(1), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.08501010.x. CrossRef
Gupta, A., & Ferguson, J. (1992). Beyond “culture”: Space, identity, and the politics of difference. Cultural Anthropology, 7(1), 6–23. CrossRef
Haslam, C., Jetten, J., Haslam, S. A., Pugliese, C., & Tonks, J. (2011a). ‘I remember therefore I am, and I am therefore I remember’: Exploring the contributions of episodic and semantic self-knowledge to strength of identity. British Journal of Psychology, 102(2), 184–203. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712610X508091. CrossRef
Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S., & Platow, M. (2011b). The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence, and power. Hove, East Sussex; New York: Psychology Press.
Heikkila, T., & Cairney, P. (2017). Comparison of theories of the policy process. In C. M. Weible & P. A. Sabatier (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (4th ed., pp. 301–326). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Herweg, N., Zahariadis, N., & Zohlnhöfer, R. (2017). The multiple streams framework: Foundations, refinements, and empirical applications. In C. M. Weible & P. A. Sabatier (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (4th ed., pp. 17–53). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121–140. CrossRef
Hornsey, M. J. (2008). Social identity theory and self-categorization theory: A historical review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 204–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00066.x. CrossRef
Jenkins, R. (2014). Social identity (Fourth Edition. ed., Key Ideas). New York: Routledge
Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Nohrstedt, D., Weible, C. M., & Ingold, K. (2017). The advocacy coalition framework: An overview of the research program. In C. M. Weible & P. A. Sabatier (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 135–170). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Kakachia, K., & Minesashvili, S. (2015). Identity politics: Exploring Georgian foreign policy behavior. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 6(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2015.04.002. CrossRef
Kolata, A. L., Charnoz, O., & Diaz Pedregal, V. (Eds.). (2015). Local politics, global impacts: Steps to a multi-disciplinary analysis of scales (Global governance). Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
Leonardelli, G. J., Pickett, C. L., & Brewer, M. B. (2010). Chapter 2—Optimal distinctiveness theory: A framework for social identity, social cognition, and intergroup relations. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 43, pp. 63–113). New York: Academic Press.
Light, R. (2015). Like strangers we trust: Identity and generic affiliation networks. Social Science Research, 51(Supplement C), 132–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.12.016. CrossRef
Lindenberg, S. (2001). Social rationality versus rational egoism. In J. H. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 635–668). New York: Kluwer Academic.
Lipset, S. M., & Rokkan, S. (1967). Cleavage structures, party systems, and voter alignment: An introduction. In S. M. Lipset & S. Rokkan (Eds.), Party systems and voter alignments: Cross-national perspectives (pp. 1–64). New York: Collier-Macmillan.
Mavor, K. I., Platow, M. J., & Bizumic, B. (2017). Self and social identity in educational contexts. New York: Routledge. CrossRef
Nadler, J. T., & Hannon, G. Y. (2013). Self-selected social identification measure (SSIM): A survey assessing identity based on group membership. North American Journal of Psychology, 15(3), 425–446.
Naples, N. A., & Bickham Mendez, J. (Eds.). (2015). Border politics: Social movements, collective identities, and globalization. New York: NYU Press.
Oakes, P. J., Turner, J. C., & Haslam, S. A. (1991). Perceiving people as group members: The role of fit in the salience of social categorizations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1991.tb00930.x. CrossRef
Peters, K., Haslam, S. A., Ryan, M. K., & Fonseca, M. (2013). Working with subgroup identities to build organizational identification and support for organizational strategy: A test of the ASPIRe model. Group and Organization Management, 38(1), 128–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601112472368. CrossRef
Polletta, F., & Jasper, J. M. (2001). Collective identity and social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 283–305. CrossRef
Posner, D. N. (2017). When and why do some social cleavages become politically salient rather than others? Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40(12), 2001–2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1277033. CrossRef
Roccas, S., & Brewer, M. B. (2002). Social identity complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(2), 88–106. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0602_01. CrossRef
Różycka-Tran, J. (2017). Love thy neighbor? The effects of religious in/out-group identity on social behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 115(Supplement C), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.009. CrossRef
Sabatier, P. A. (1999). Theories of the policy process (Theoretical lenses on public policy). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Sabatier, P. A. (2007). Theories of the policy process (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1999). The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (Theoretical lenses on public policy). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Sabatier, P. A., & Weible, C. M. (2014). Theories of the policy process (3rd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Schuh, S. C., Van Quaquebeke, N., Göritz, A. S., Xin, K. R., De Cremer, D., & van Dick, R. (2016). Mixed feelings, mixed blessing? How ambivalence in organizational identification relates to employees’ regulatory focus and citizenship behaviors. Human Relations, 69(12), 2224–2249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726716639117. CrossRef
Sherif, M. (1966). In Common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation (The international series in the behavioral sciences). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Simon, B., & Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56(4), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.56.4.319. CrossRef
Steffens, N. K., Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., Platow, M. J., Fransen, K., Yang, J., et al. (2014). Leadership as social identity management: Introducing the identity leadership inventory (ILI) to assess and validate a four-dimensional model. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(5), 1001–1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.05.002. CrossRef
Stubager, R. (2009). Education-based group identity and consciousness in the authoritarian-libertarian value conflict. European Journal of Political Research, 48(2), 204–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2008.00834.x. CrossRef
Tajfel, H. (Ed.). (1982a). Social identity and intergroup relations (European studies in social psychology). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tajfel, H. (1982b). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245. CrossRef
Transue, J. E. (2007). Identity salience, identity acceptance, and racial policy attitudes: American national identity as a uniting force. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00238.x. CrossRef
Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of a social group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: Self-categorization theory. New York, NY: B. Blackwell.
Ullrich, J., & Van Dick, R. (2007). The group psychology of mergers & acquisitions: Lessons from the social identity approach. In C. L. Cooper, & S. Finkelstein (Eds.), Advances in mergers & acquisitions (Vol. 6, pp. 1–15). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Unsworth, K. L., & Fielding, K. S. (2014). it’s political: How the salience of one’s political identity changes climate change beliefs and policy support. Global Environmental Change, 27(Supplement C), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.05.002. CrossRef
Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psycholgical Bulletin, 134(4), 504–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504. CrossRef
Walsh, K. C. (2004). Talking about politics: Informal groups and social identity in American life (Studies in communication, media, and public opinion). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Weible, C. M., & Sabatier, P. A. (Eds.). (2017). Theories of the policy process (4th ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Westfall, J., Van Boven, L., Chambers, J. R., & Judd, C. M. (2015). Perceiving political polarization in the United States: party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615569849. CrossRef
Wieseke, J., Ahearne, M., Lam, S. K., & van Dick, R. (2009). The role of leaders in internal marketing. Journal of Marketing, 73(2), 123–145. CrossRef
Winterich, K. P., Zhang, Y., & Mittal, V. (2012). How political identity and charity positioning increase donations: Insights from moral foundations theory. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(4), 346–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2012.05.002. CrossRef
Zahariadis, N. (2003). Ambiguity and choice in public policy: Political decision making in modern democracies (American governance and public policy series). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Zohlnhöfer, R., Herweg, N., & Rüb, F. W. (2015). Theoretically refining the multiple streams framework: An introduction. European Journal of Political Research, 54(3), 412–418. CrossRef
- Social identities in the policy process
Nils C. Bandelow
Colette S. Vogeler
- Springer US
Integrating Knowledge and Practice to Advance Human Dignity
Print ISSN: 0032-2687
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0891
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, digitale Transformation/© Maksym Yemelyanov | Fotolia